Interrelations between effective population size and other pedigree tools for the management of conserved populations

Genetical Research

Volumn 75, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 331-343

  Caballero, Armando ^a   Toro, Miguel A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIGO   (Spain)

^b INIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; GENETIC PARAMETERS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME; MATING; PARENT; PEDIGREE; POPULATION;

BREEDING; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; GENETICS, POPULATION; MODELS, GENETIC; PEDIGREE; POPULATION DENSITY; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 0034053623     PISSN: 00166723     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0016672399004449     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Alderson, G. H. L. (1991). A system to maximise the maintenance of genetic variability in small populations. In Conservation of Domestic Livestock (ed. L. Alderson & L. Bodo), pp. 18-19. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
2. Ballou, J. D. & Foose, T. J. (1995). Demographic and genetic management of captive populations. In Wild Mammals in Captivity (ed. D. G. Kleinman, S. Lumpkin, M. Allen, H. Harris & K. Thompson), pp. 263-283. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Ballou, J. D. & Lacy, R. C. (1995). Identifying genetically important individuals for management of genetic diversity in captive populations. In Population Management for Survival and Recovery (ed. J. D. Ballou, M. Gilpin & T. J. Foose), pp. 76-111. New York: Columbia University Press.
4. Boichard, D., Maignel, L. & Verrier, E. (1997). The value of using probabilities of gene origin to measure genetic variability in a population. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 29, 5-23.
5. Borlase, S. C., Loebel, D. A., Frankham, R., Nurthen, R. K., Briscoe, D. A. & Dagard, G. E. (1993). Modeling problems in conservation genetics using captive Drosophila populations: consequences of equalization of family sizes. Conservation Biology 7, 122-131.
6. Brisbane, J. R. & Gibson, J. P. (1995). Balancing selection response and rate of inbreeding by including genetic relationships in selection decisions. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 91, 421-431.
7. Caballero, A. (1994). Developments in the prediction of effective population size. Heredity 73, 657-679.
8. Caballero, A. & Hill, W. G. (1992). Effective size of non-random mating populations. Genetics 130, 909-916.
9. Caballero, A. & Santiago, E. (1995). Response to selection from new mutation and effective size of partially inbred populations. I. Theoretical results. Genetical Research 66, 213-225.
10. Caballero, A., Santiago, E. & Toro, M. A. (1996). Systems of mating to reduce inbreeding in selected populations. Animal Science 62, 431-442.
11. Cockerham, C. C. (1967). Group inbreeding and coancestry. Genetics 56, 89-104.
12. Cockerham, C. C. (1969). Variance of gene frequencies. Evolution 23, 72-84.
13. Crow, J. F. & Kimura, M. (1970). An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. New York: Harper & Row.
14. Food and Agricultural Organization (1998). Secondary Guidelines for Development of National Farm Animal Genetic Resources Management Plans. Management of Small Populations at Risk. Initiative for Domestic Animal Diversity (IDAD). Geneva: FAO.
15. Fernández, J. & Toro, M. A. (1999). The use of mathematical programming to control inbreeding in selection schemes. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, in press.
16. Folch, P. & Jordana, J. (1998). Demographic characterization, inbreeding and maintenance of genetic diversity in the endangered Catalonian donkey breed. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 30, 195-201.
17. Gilligan, D. M., Woodworth, L. M., Montgomery, M. E., Briscoe, D. A. & Frankham, R. (1997). Is mutation accumulation a threat to the survival of endangered populations? Conservation Biology 11, 1235-1241.
18. Gowe, R. S., Robertson, A. & Latter, B. D. H. (1959). Environment and poultry breeding problems. 5. The design of poultry control strains. Poultry Science 38, 462-471.
19. Grundy, B., Caballero, A., Santiago, E. & Hill, W. G. H. (1994). A note on using biased parameter values and nonrandom mating to reduce rates of inbreeding in selection programmes. Animal Production 59, 465-468.
20. Grundy, B., Villanueva, B. & Woolliams, J. (1998). Dynamic selection procedures for constrained inbreeding and their consequences for pedigree development. Genetical Research 72, 159-168.
21. Henderson, C. R. (1976). A simple method for computing the inverse of a numerator relationship matrix used in prediction of breeding values. Biometrics 32, 69-83.
22. James, J. W. (1962). The spread of genes in random mating control populations. Genetical Research 3, 1-19.
23. Keightley, P. D., Caballero, A. & García-Dorado, A. (1998). Surviving under mutation pressure. Current Biology, 8, R235-R237.
24. Kimura, M. & Crow, J. F. (1963a). The measurement of effective population number. Evolution, 17, 279-288.
25. Kimura, M. & Crow, J. F. (1963b). On the maximum avoidance of inbreeding. Genetical Research 4, 399-415.
26. Lacy, R. C. (1989). Analysis of founder representation in pedigrees: founder equivalents and founder genome equivalence. Zoo Biology 8, 111-124.
27. Lacy, R. C. (1994). Managing genetic diversity in captive populations of animals. In Restoration of Endangered Species (ed. M. L. Bowles & C. J. Whelan), pp. 63-89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Lacy, R. (1995). Clarification of genetic terms and their use in the management of captive populations. Zoo Biology 14, 565-578.
29. Lindgren, D. & Mullin, T. J. (1998). Relatedness and status number in seed orchard crops. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 28, 276-283.
30. Lindgren, D., Gea, L. D. & Jefferson, P. A. (1996). Status number for measuring genetic diversity. Forest Research 4, 69-76.
31. Loebel, D. A., Nurthen, R. K., Frankham, R., Briscoe, D. A. & Craven, D. (1992). Modeling problems in conservation genetics using captive Drosophila populations: consequences of equalizing founder representation. Zoo Biology 11, 319-332.
32. MacCluer, J. W., VandeBerg, J. L., Read, B. & Ryder, O. A. (1986). Pedigree analysis by computer simulation. Zoo Biology 5, 147-160.
33. Malécot, G. (1948). Les Mathématiques de l' Hérédité. Paris: Masson et Cie.
34. Meuwissen, T. H. E. (1997). Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. Journal of Animal Science 75, 934-940.
35. Montgomery, M., Ballou, J. D., Nurthen, R. K., England, P., Briscoe, D. & Frankham, R. (1997). Minimizing kinship in captive breeding programs. Zoo Biology 16, 377-389.
36. Nei, M. (1973). Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 70, 3321-3323.
37. Nieto, B., Salgado, C. & Toro, M. A. (1986). Optimization of artificial selection response. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 103, 199-204.
38. Oldenbroek, J. K. (1999). Genebanks and the conservation of farm animal genetic resources. Lalystad, The Netherlands: DLO Institute for Animal Sciences and Health.
39. Pérez-Enciso, M. (1990). Use of the uncertain relationship matrix to compute effective population size. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 112, 327-332.
40. Robertson, A. (1964). The effect of nonrandom mating within inbred lines on the rate of inbreeding. Genetical Research 5, 164-167.
41. Rochambeau, H. de, La Fuente, L. F. de, Rouvier, R. & Ouhayoun, J. (1989). Sélection sur la vitesse de croissance post-sevrage chez le lapin. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 21, 527-546.
42. Rodrigañez, Toro, M. A., Rodríguez, C. & Silió, L. (1998). Effect of founder allele survival and inbreeding depression on litter size in a closed line of Large White pigs. Animal Science, 67, 573-582.
43. Sánchez, L., Toro, M. A. & García, C. (1999). Improving the efficiency of artificial selection : more selection pressure with less inbreeding. Genetics 151, 1103-1114.
44. Santiago, E. & Caballero, A. (1995). Effective size of populations under selection. Genetics 139, 1013-1030.
45. Schoen, D. J., David, J. L. & Bataillon, T. M. (1998). Deleterious mutation accumulation and the regeneration of genetic resources. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 95, 394-399.
46. Shabalina, S. A., Yampolsky, L. Y. & Kondrashov, A. S. (1997). Rapid decline of fitness in panmictic populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA 94, 13034-13039.
47. Sölkner, J., Filipcic, L. & Hampshire, N. (1998). Genetic variability of populations and similarity of subpopulations in Austrian cattle breeds determined by analysis of pedigrees. Animal Science 67, 249-256.
48. Thomas, A. & Thompson, E. A. (1984). Gene survival in an isolated population: the number of distinct genes on Tristan da Cunha. Annals of Human Biology 11, 101-112.
49. Thompson, E. A. (1986). Ancestry of alleles and extinction of genes in populations with defined pedigrees. Zoo Biology 9, 259-274.
50. Thompson, R. (1977). The estimation of heritability with unbalanced data. II. Data available on more than two generations. Biometrics 33, 497-504.
51. Toro, M. A. & Nieto, B. M. (1984). A simple method for increasing the response to artificial selection. Genetical Research 44, 347-349.
52. Toro, M. A., Nieto, B. M. & Salgado, C. (1988). A note on minimisation of inbreeding in small scale breeding programmes. Livestock Production Science 20, 317-323.
53. Toro, M. A., Silió, L., Rodrigañez, J., Rodríguez, C. & Fernández, J. (1999). Optimal use of genetic markers in conservation programmes. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 31, 255-261.
54. Villanueva, B., Woolliams, J. A. & Simm, G. (1994). Strategies for controlling rates of inbreeding in MOET nucleous schemes for beef cattle. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 26, 517-535.
55. Wang, J. (1997a). Effect of excluding sib matings on inbreeding coefficient and effective size of finite diploid populations. Biometrics 53, 1354-1365.
56. Wang, J. (1997b). More efficient breeding systems for controlling inbreeding and effective size in animal populations. Heredity 79, 591-599.
57. Wang, J. & Caballero, A. (1999). Developments in predicting the effective size of subdivided populations. Heredity 82, 212-226.
58. Wang, J. & Hill, W. G. (2000). Marker assisted selection to increase effective population size by reducing Mendelian segregation variance. Genetics 154, 475-489.
59. Wang, J., Xu, J. C., Song, J. Z. & Tang, W. S. (1994). Study of mating systems for controlling inbreeding levels in domestic animal populations with overlapping generations. Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 21, 536-539.
60. Woolliams, J. A. (1989). Modifications to MOET nucleus breeding schemes to improve rates of genetic progress and decrease rates of inbreeding in dairy cattle. Animal Production 49, 1-14.
61. Woolliams, J. A. & Mäntysaari, E. A. (1995). Genetic contributions of Finnish Ayrshire bulls over four generations. Animal Science 61, 177-187.
62. Woolliams, J. A. & Thompson, R. (1994). A theory of genetic contributions. Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 19, 127-134.
63. Wray, N. R. (1990). Accounting for mutation effects in the additive genetic variance-covariance matrix and its inverse. Biometrics 46, 177-186.
64. Wray, N. R. & Goddard, M. E. (1994). Increasing long-term response to selection. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 26, 431-451.
65. Wray, N. R. & Thompson, R. (1990). Predictions of rates of inbreeding in selected populations. Genetical Research 55, 41-54.
66. Wray, N. R., Woolliams, J. A. & Thompson, R. (1990). Methods for predicting rates of inbreeding in selected populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 80, 503-512.
67. Wright, S. (1921). Systems of mating. Genetics 6, 111-178.
68. Wright, S. (1931). Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16, 97-159.
69. Wright, S. (1969). Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, vol. 2, The Theory of Gene Frequencies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.