Global robustness and identifiability of random, scale-free, and small-world networks

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 1158, Issue , 2009, Pages 82-92

  Gong, Yunchen ^a   Zhang, Zhaolei ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biochemical simulation; Network identifiability; Network robustness; Pathnet; Pathways; Reverse engineering

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE LIBRARY; GENE STRUCTURE; GENETIC ALGORITHM; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HELPER CELL; NETWORK LEARNING; PROCESS MODEL;

EID: 63849171480     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: 17496632     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2008.03752.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ivanov, S.S. et al. 2004. Antibodies immobilized as arrays to profile protein post-translational modifications in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell Proteomics 3 : 788 795.
2. Kricka, L.J. et al. 2006. Current perspectives in protein array technology. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 43 : 457 467.
3. Moffat, J. D.M. Sabatini. 2006. Building mammalian signalling pathways with RNAi screens. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7 : 177 187.
4. Wildenhain, J. E.J. Crampin. 2006. Reconstructing gene regulatory networks: from random to scale-free connectivity. IEE Proc. Syst. Biol. 153 : 247 256.
5. Bilke, S. C. Peterson. 2001. Topological properties of citation and metabolic networks. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft. Matter Phys. 64 : 036106.
6. Diao, Y. et al. 2007. The community structure of human cellular signaling network. J. Theor. Biol. 247 : 608 615.
7. Potapov, A.P. et al. 2005. Topology of mammalian transcription networks. Genome Inform. 16 : 270 278.
8. Siegal, M.L., D.E. Promislow A. Bergman. 2007. Functional and evolutionary inference in gene networks: does topology matter? Genetica 129 : 83 103.
9. Friedel, C.C. R. Zimmer. 2006. Inferring topology from clustering coefficients in protein-protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinformatics 7 : 519.
10. Przulj, N., D.G. Corneil I. Jurisica. 2004. Modeling interactome: scale-free or geometric? Bioinformatics 20 : 3508 3515.
11. Tanaka, R., T.M. Yi J. Doyle. 2005. Some protein interaction data do not exhibit power law statistics. FEBS Lett. 579 : 5140 5144.
12. Middendorf, M., E. Ziv C.H. Wiggins. 2005. Inferring network mechanisms: the Drosophila melanogaster protein interaction network. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 : 3192 3197.
13. Dwight Kuo, P., W. Banzhaf A. Leier. 2006. Network topology and the evolution of dynamics in an artificial genetic regulatory network model created by whole genome duplication and divergence. Biosystems 85 : 177 200.
14. Li, D. et al. 2006. Protein interaction networks of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster: large-scale organization and robustness. Proteomics 6 : 456 461.
15. Ma'ayan, A., A. Lipshtat R. Iyengar. 2006. Topology of resultant networks shaped by evolutionary pressure. Phys. Rev. E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 73 : 061912.
16. Rodriguez-Caso, C., M.A. Medina R.V. Sole. 2005. Topology, tinkering and evolution of the human transcription factor network. Febs J. 272 : 6423 6434.
17. Albert, R., H. Jeong A.L. Barabasi. 2000. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature 406 : 378 382.
18. Balaji, S. et al. 2006. Uncovering a hidden distributed architecture behind scale-free transcriptional regulatory networks. J. Mol. Biol. 360 : 204 212.
19. Bar-Yam, Y. I.R. Epstein. 2004. Response of complex networks to stimuli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101 : 4341 4345.
20. Pinheiro, C.F. A.T. Bernardes. 2005. Scale-free fuse network and its robustness. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft. Matter Phys. 72 : 046709.
21. Shargel, B. et al. 2003. Optimization of robustness and connectivity in complex networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 : 068701.
22. Gong, Y. Z. Zhang. 2007. CellFrame: a data structure for cell biology and construction of cell perturbation networks. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1115 : 249 266.
23. Gong, Y. Z. Zhang. 2007. Alternative pathway approach for automating analysis and validation of cell perturbation networks and design of perturbation experiments. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1115 : 267 285.
24. Gong, Y. Z. Zhang. 2005. Alternative signaling pathways: when, where and why? FEBS Lett. 579 : 5265 5274.
25. Gong, Y. X. Zhao. 2003. Shc-dependent pathway is redundant but dominant in MAPK cascade activation by EGF receptors: a modeling inference. FEBS Lett. 554 : 467 472.
26. Mendes, P., W. Sha K. Ye. 2003. Artificial gene networks for objective comparison of analysis algorithms. Bioinformatics 19 (Suppl 2 II122 II129.
27. Mendoza, L. I. Xenarios. 2006. A method for the generation of standardized qualitative dynamical systems of regulatory networks. Theor. Biol. Med. Model. 3 : 13.
28. Machne, R. et al. 2006. The SBML ODE Solver Library: a native API for symbolic and fast numerical analysis of reaction networks. Bioinformatics 22 : 1406 1407.
29. Ruths, D.A. et al. 2006. Hypothesis generation in signaling networks. J. Comput. Biol. 13 : 1546 1557.
30. Tompa, M. et al. 2005. Assessing computational tools for the discovery of transcription factor binding sites. Nat. Biotechnol. 23 : 137 144.
31. Vinayagam, A. et al. 2004. Applying support vector machines for gene ontology based gene function prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 5 : 116.
32. Violin, J.D. et al. 2008. beta 2-adrenergic receptor signaling and desensitization elucidated by quantitative modeling of real-time camp dynamics. J. Biol. Chem. 283 : 2949 2961.
33. Espenshade, P.J. A.L. Hughes. 2007. Regulation of sterol synthesis in eukaryotes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 41 : 401 427.
34. Wagner, A. J. Wright. 2007. Alternative routes and mutational robustness in complex regulatory networks. Biosystems 88 : 163 172.
35. Measday, V. et al. 2005. Systematic yeast synthetic lethal and synthetic dosage lethal screens identify genes required for chromosome segregation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 : 13956 13961.
36. Tong, A.H. C. Boone. 2006. Synthetic genetic array analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Mol. Biol. 313 : 171 192.
37. Zak, D.E. et al. 2003. Importance of input perturbations and stochastic gene expression in the reverse engineering of genetic regulatory networks: insights from an identifiability analysis of an in silico network. Genome Res. 13 : 2396 2405.
38. Hohler, T. et al. 2005. A genetic basis for IFN-gamma production and T-bet expression in humans. J. Immunol. 175 : 5457 5462.
39. Peng, S.L. 2006. The T-box transcription factor T-bet in immunity and autoimmunity. Cell Mol. Immunol. 3 : 87 95.
40. Szabo, S.J. et al. 2000. A novel transcription factor, T-bet, directs Th1 lineage commitment. Cell 100 : 655 669.
41. Yosef, N., A. Kaufman E. Ruppin. 2006. Inferring functional pathways from multi-perturbation data. Bioinformatics 22 : e539 e546.