Hypothesis generation in signaling networks

Journal of Computational Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1546-1557

  Ruths, Derek A ^a   Nakhleh, Luay ^a   Iyengar, M Sriram ^b   Reddy, Shrikanth A G ^c   Ram, Prahlad T ^c  

^a Rice University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Algorithms; Biology; Computational molecular biology; Evolution; Genomics; Phylogenetic trees

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; CELL ACTIVITY; CELL DEATH; CELL MOTILITY; CHEMICAL REACTION; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CONSTRAINED DOWNSTREAM PROBLEM; GENOMICS; HYPOTHESIS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LABORATORY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; MINIMUM KNOCKOUT PROBLEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SIGNALING NETWORK; TECHNOLOGY;

ALGORITHMS; BIOMETRY; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; RECEPTOR, EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 33845355240     PISSN: 10665277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2006.13.1546     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Aladjem, M.I., Pasa, S., Parodi, S., et al. 2004. Molecular interaction maps-a diagrammatic graphical language for bioregulatory networks. Sci. STKE pe8.
2. Barabasi, A.L., and Oltvai, Z.N. 2004. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5, 101-113.
3. Bhalla, U.S., and Iyengar, R. 1999. Emergent properties of networks of biological signaling pathways. Science 283, 381-387.
4. Bhalla, U.S., Ram, P.T., and Iyengar, R. 2002. MAP kinase phosphatase as a locus of flexibility in a mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling network. Science 297, 1018-1023.
5. Chabrier-Rivier, N., and Fages, F. 2003. Symbolic model checking of biochemical networks. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2602, 149-162.
6. Chabrier-Rivier, N., Chiaverini, M., Danos, V., et al. 2004. Modeling and querying biomolecular interaction networks. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 325, 25-44.
7. Chabrier-Rivier, N., Fages, F., and Soliman, S. 2005. The biochemical abstract machine (BIOCHAM). Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 3082, 172-191.
8. Eker, S., Knapp, M., Laderoute, K., et al. 2002. Pathway logic: executable models of biological networks. Electronic Notes in Theoret. Comput. Sci. 71, eker-etal-02wrla.
9. Belloni, E., et al. 1996. Identification of Sonic hedgehog as a candidate gene responsible for holopro-sencephaly. Nat. Genet. 14, 353-356.
10. Feldman, D.S., Carnes, C.A., Abraham, W.T., et al. 2005. Mechanisms of disease: β-adrenergic receptors alterations in signal transduction and pharmacogenomics in heart failure. Nat. Clin. Pract. Cardiovasc. Med. 2, 475-483.
11. Fu, C., Qi, Z., and You, J. 2004. A BioAmbients based framework for chain-structured biomolecules modelling. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 3314, 455-459.
12. Funahashi, A., Morohashi, M., Kitano, H., et al. 2003. CellDesigner: a process diagram editor for gene-regulatory and biochemical networks. BIOSILICO 1, 159-162.
13. Hoffmann, A., Levchenko, A., Scott, M.L., et al. 2002. The IKappaB-NF-kappaB signaling module: temporal control and selective gene activation. Science 298, 1241-1245.
14. Hunter, T. 2000. Signaling-2000 and beyond. Cell 100, 113-127.
15. Karp, R.M. 1972. Reducibility among combinatorial problems. In: Miller, R.E., and Thatcher, J.W., eds., Complexity of Computer Computations, 85-103. Plenum Press, New York.
16. Kitano, H., Funahashi, A., Matsuoka, Y., et al. 2005. Using process diagrams for the graphical representation of biological networks. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 961-966.
17. Ma'ayan, A., Jenkins, S.L, Neves, S., et al. 2005. Formation of regulatory patterns during signal propagation in a mammalian cellular network. Science 309, 1078-1083.
18. Meng, T.C., Somani, S., and Dhar, P. 2004. Modeling and simulation of biological systems with stochasticity. Silica Biol. 4, 293-309.
19. Menger, K. 1927. Zur allgemeinen Kurventheorie. Fundament. Math. 10, 96-115.
20. Nagasaki, M., Doi, A., Matsuno, H., et al. 2004. A versatile Petri Net based architecture for modeling and simulation of complex biological processes. Genome Inform. 15, 180-197.
21. Oda, K., Matsuoka, Y., Funahashi, A., et al. 2005. A comprehensive pathway map of epidermal growth factor signaling. Mol. Syst. Biol. msb41000014, E1-E17.
22. Peterson, J.L. 1981. Petri Net Theory and the Modelling of Systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
23. Phillips, A., and Cardelli, L. 2005. A correct abstract machine for the stochastic pi-calculus. Electronic Notes in Trans. Comput. Syst. Biol.
24. SBML. 2005: Systems biology markup language webpage. Available at: http://www.sbml.org. Accessed September 13, 2006.
25. Smith, A.E., Slepchenko, B.M., Schaff, J.C., et al. 2002. Systems analysis of Ran transport. Science 295, 488-491.
26. Sriram, M. 2003. Modelling protein functional domains in signal transduction using Maude. Briefings Bioinform. 4, 236-245.
27. Tran, N., Baral, C., Nagaraj, V., et al. 2005. Knowledge-based interacative framework for hypothesis formation in biochemical networks. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3615, 121-136.
28. Tsavachidou, D., and Liebman, M. 2002: Modeling and simulation of pathways in menopause. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 9, 461-471.
29. Wuchty, S., Oltvai, Z.N., and Barabasi, A.L. 2003. Evolutionary conservations of motif constituents in the yeast protein interaction network. Nat. Genet. 35, 176-179.