The Morton-Massaro law of information integration: Implications for models of perception

Psychological Review

Volumn 108, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 113-148

  Movellan, Javier R ^a,b   McClelland, James L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COGNITION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STATISTICAL MODEL; VISION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0035220779     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.113     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. Allman, J., Miezin, F., & McGuiness, E. (1985). Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: Neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons. Annual Review Neuroscience, 8, 407-430.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Ashby, F. G. (1989). Stochastic general recognition theory. In D. Vickers & P. L. Smith (Eds.), Human information processing: Measures, mechanisms, and models (pp. 435-457). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
4. Ashby, F. G. (in press). A stochastic version of general recognition theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology.
5. Ashby, F. G., & Townsend, J. T. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence. Psychological Review, 93(2), 154-179.
6. Bülthoff, H. H., & Yuille, A. L. (1996). A Bayesian framework for the integration of visual modules. In T. Inui & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and performance XVI: Information integration in perception and communication (pp. 49-70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Clark, J. J., & Yuille, A. L. (1990). Data fusion for sensory information processing systems. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
8. Cover, T. M., & Thomas, J. A. (1991). Elements of information theory. New York: Wiley.
9. Crowther, C. S., Batchelder, W. H., & Hu, X. (1998). A measurement-theoretic analysis of the fuzzy logic model of perception. Psychological Review, 102, 396-408.
10. Dayan, P., & Sejnowski, T. (1996). Exploration bonuses and dual control. Machine Learning, 25, 5-22.
11. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93(3), 283-321.
12. Domingos, P., & Pazzani, M. (1997). On the optimality of the simple Bayesian classifier under zero-one loss. Journal of Machine Learning, 29, 103-130.
13. Duda, R. O., & Hart, P. E. (1973). Pattern classification and scene analysis. New York: Wiley.
14. Efron, B. (1982). The jacknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
15. Estes, W. K. (1975). The locus of inferential and perceptual processes in letter identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 122-145.
16. Felleman, D. J., & Essen, D. C. V. (1991). Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 1, 1-47.
17. Friedman, D., & Massaro, D. (1988). Understanding variability in binary and continuous choice. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5(3), 370-389.
18. Garner, W. R., & Morton, J. (1969). Perceptual independence: Definitions, models, and experimental paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 233-259.
19. Geman, S., Bienenstock, E., & Doursat, R. (1992). Neural networks and the bias/variance dilemma. Neural Computation, 4, 1-58.
20. Ghazanfar, A. A., & Nicolelis, A. L. (1997). Nonlinear processing of tactile information in the thalamocortical loop. Journal of Neurophysiology, 78, 506-510.
21. Gidas, B. (1986). Metropolis-type Monte Carlo simulation algorithms and simulated annealing. In J. L. Snell (Ed.), Topics in contemporary probability and its applications (pp. 159-232). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
22. Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1-67.
23. Golden, R. M. (1986). A developmental neural model of visual word recognition. Cognitive Science, 10, 241-276.
24. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1994). A dual read-out model of word context effects in letter perception: Further investigations of the word superiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(6), 1158-1176.
25. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
26. Gray, M. S., Movellan, J. R., & Sejnowski, T. (1997). Dynamic features for visual speechreading: A systematic comparison. In M. Mozer, M. Jordan, & T. Petsche (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 751-759). Vol. 9, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Green, D. M., Weber, D. L., & Duncan, J. E. (1977). Detection and recognition of pure tones in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62(4), 948-954.
28. Hennecke, M. E., Stork, D. G., & Ventakesh Prasad, K. (1996). Visionary speech: Looking ahead to practical speech reading systems. In D. G. Stork & M. E. Hennecke (Eds.), Speechreading by humans and machines: Models, systems, and applications (pp. 331-349). New York: NATO/Springer-Verlag.
29. Hinton, G. E., & Shallice, T. (1991). Lesioning an attractor network: Investigations of acquired dyslexia. Psychological Review 98(1), 74-95.
30. Hopfield, J. (1984). Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 81, 3088-3092.
31. Hornik, K., Stinchombe, M., & White, H. (1989). Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Networks, 2, 259-366.
32. Hubel, D. H., & Weisel, T. N. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular orientation and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology, 166, 106-154.
33. Hubel, D. H., & Weisel, T. N. (1968). Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. Journal of Physiology, 195, 215-243.
34. Inui, T., & McClelland, J. L. (Eds.). (1996). Attention and performance XVI: Information integration in perception and communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Jacobs, A. M., & Grainger, J. (1994). Models of visual word recognition -Sampling the state of the art. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1311-1334.
36. Karatzas, I., & Shreve, S. E. (1988). Brownian motion and stochastic calculus. New York: Springer-Verlag.
37. Keppel, G. (1993). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
38. Kloeden, P. E., & Platen, E. (1992). Numerical solutions to stochastic differential equations. Berlin: Springer.
39. Knill, D., & Richards, W. (1996). Perception as Bayesian inference. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Kruschke, J. K. (1996). Dimensional relevance shifts in category learning. Connection Science, 8, 201-223.
41. Kucera, H., & Francis, W. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
42. Kuhl, P. K., & Meltzoff, A. M. (1982). The bimodal perception of speech in infancy. Science, 218, 1138-1141.
43. Lamme, V. A. (1995). The neurophysiology of figure-ground segregation in primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 15(2), 1605-1615.
44. Lee, T., Mumford, D., Romero, R., & Lamme, V. (1998). The role of primary visual cortex in higher level vision. Vision Research, 38, 2429-2454.
45. Lorente De No, R. (1922). La corteza cerebral del raton (Primera contribucion. La corteza acustica) [The cerebral cortex of the mouse (A first contribution - The acoustic cortex)]. Trabajos del Laboratorio de Investigaciones Biologicas de la Universidad de Madrid, 20, 41-78.
46. Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior. New York: Wiley.
47. Luce, R. D., & Suppes, P. (1965). Preference, utility and subjective probability. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. 3. pp. 249-410). New York: Wiley.
48. Luettin, J., Thacker, N., & Beet, S. (1996). Statistical lip modelling for visual speech recognition. In Proceeding of the VIII European Signal Processing Conference: Vol. I (pp. 137-140). Trieste, Italy.
49. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. New York: Freeman.
50. Massaro, D. W. (1987a). Categorical partition: A fuzzy logical model of categorization behavior. In S. Harnad (Ed.), Categorical perception. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
51. Massaro, D. W. (1987b). Speech perception by ear and eye: A paradigm for psychological inquiry. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Massaro, D. W. (1989a). Experimental psychology: An information processing approach. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
53. Massaro, D. W. (1989b). Perceiving talking faces. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. Massaro, D. W. (1989c). Testing between the TRACE model and the fuzzy logical model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 398-421.
55. Massaro, D. W. (1996). Integration of multiple sources of information in language processing. In T. Inui & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and performance XVI: Information integration in perception and communication (pp. 397-432). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56. Massaro, D. W., & Cohen, M. M. (1983). Phonological constraints in speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 34, 338-348.
57. Massaro, D. W., & Cohen, M. M. (1991). Integration versus interactive activation: The joint influence of stimulus and context in perception. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 558-614.
58. Massaro, D. W., & Friedman, D. (1990). Models of integration given multiple sources of information. Psychological Review, 97, 225-252.
59. McClelland, J. L. (1981). Retrieving general and specific information from stored knowledge of specifics. In Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 170-172). Berkeley, CA: Cognitive Science Society.
60. McClelland, J. L. (1991). Stochastic interactive activation and the effect of context on perception. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 1-44.
61. McClelland, J. L. (1993). Toward a theory of information processing in graded, random, and interactive networks. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 655-688). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
62. McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
63. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
64. McFadden, D. (1978). Modeling the choice of residential location. In L. Lundqvist & J. Weibull (Eds.), Spatial interaction and residential location (pp. 75-96). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
65. Mineiro, P., Movellan, J. R., & Williams, R. J. (1998). Learning path distributions using nonequilibrium diffusion networks. In M. Kearns (Ed.), Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 597-599). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
66. Morton, J. (1969). The interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165-178.
67. Movellan, J. R. (1994). A reinforcement algorithm to learn trajectories with stochastic neural networks. In J. Cowan, G. Tesauro, & J. Alspector (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems: Vol. 6 (pp. 83-87). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
68. Movellan, J. R. (1998). A learning theorem for networks at detailed stochastic equilibrium. Neural Computation, 10(5), 1157-1178.
69. Movellan, J. R., & Chadderdon, G. (1996). Channel separability in the audio visual integration of speech: A Bayesian approach. In D. G. Stork & M. E. Hennecke (Eds.), Speechreading by humans and machines: Models, systems, and applications (pp. 473-487). New York: NATO/ Springer-Verlag.
70. Movellan, J. R., & McClelland, J. L. (1993). Learning continuous probability distributions with symmetric diffusion networks. Cognitive Science, 17, 463-496.
71. Movellan, J. R., & McClelland, J. L. (1995). Stochastic interactive processing, channel separability and optimal perceptual inference: An examination of Morton's law (Technical Report PDP.CNS.95.4) Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
72. Mumford, D. (1992). On the computational architecture of the neocortex. Biological Cybernetics, 66, 241-251.
73. Myers, R. H. (1990). Classical and modern regression with applications. Belmont, MA: Duxbury Press.
74. Newell, A. (1982). The knowledge level. Artificial Intelligence, 18, 87-127.
75. Oden, G. C., & Massaro, D. W. (1978). Integration of featural information in speech perception. Psychological Review, 85, 172-191.
76. Oksendal, B. (1992). Stochastic differential equations. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
77. Oliveira, J. T. (1961). La representation des distributions extremales bivariees [The representation of extreme bivariate distributions]. Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, 33, 477-480.
78. Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., McDonald, J. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1982). An activation-verification model of letter and word recognition: The word superiority effect. Psychological Review, 89, 573-594.
79. Partan, S., & Marler, P. (1999). Communication goes multimodal. Science, 283, 1272-1273.
80. Peon, R. H. (1961). Reticular mechanisms of sensory control. In W. Rosenblith (Ed.), Sensory communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
81. Phaf, R. H., van der Heijden, A. H. C., & Hudson, P. T. W. (1990). SLAM: A connectionist model for attention in visual selection tasks. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 273-341.
82. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
83. Prasad, K. V., Stork, D. G., & Wolff, G. J. (1993). Preprocessing video images for neural learning of lipreading (Technical Report No. TR93-26). Menlo Park, CA: Ricoh California Research Center.
84. Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teukolsky, S. A., & Vetterling, W. T. (1989). Numerical recipes in C: The art of scientific computing. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
85. Rabiner, L. R., & Juang, B.-H. (1993). Fundamentals of speech recognition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
86. Ramon y Cajal, S. (1892). Nuevo concepto de la histologia de los centros nerviosos [New concept for the histology of nervous centers]. Barcelona: Imprenta de Henrich y Ca.
87. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59-107.
88. Reif, F. (1967). Statistical physics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
89. Repp, B. H., Manuel, F. Y., Lieberman, A. M., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1983). Exploring the McGurk effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 21, 366.
90. Rumelhart, D. E., & Siple, P. (1974). Process of recognizing tachistoscopically presented words. Psychological Review, 81(2), 99-117.
91. Rumelhart, D. E., Smolensky, P., McClelland, J. L., & Hinton, G. E. (1986). Schemata and sequential thought processes in PDP models. In J. L. McClelland, D. E. Rumelhart, & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 7-57). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
92. Sam, N., Aulanko, R., Hari, M., Lounassmaa, O., Lu, S., & Simola, J. (1991). Seeing speech: Visual information from lip movements modifies activity in the human auditory cortex. Neuroscience Letters, 127, 141-145.
93. Samuel, A. G. (1981). Phonemic restoration: Insights from a new methodology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 474-494.
94. Samuel, A. G. (1996). Does lexical information influence the phonemic restoration of phonemes? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 28-51.
95. Shepard, R. N. (1964). Attention and the metric structure of the stimulus space. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 54-87.
96. Shiffrin, R. M., & Raaijmakers, J. (1992). The SAM retrieval model: A restrospective and prospective. In A. F. Healy, S. M. Kosslyn, & R. M. Shiffrin (Eds.), Essays in honor of William K. Estes (pp. 69-86). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
97. Sperry, R. W. (1969). A modified concept of conciousness. Psychological Review, 76, 532-536.
98. Stein, B. E., & Meredith, M. A. (1993). The merging of the senses. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
99. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donder's method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315.
100. Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1988). Reinforcement learning: An introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
101. Szentagothai, J., & Arbib, M. A. (1974). Conceptual models of neural organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
102. Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, G. (1983). Stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
103. Townsend, J. T., Hu, G. G., & Ashby, F. G. (1981). Perceptual sampling of orthogonal straight line features. Psychological Research, 43, 259-275.
104. Vapnik, V. N. (1995). The nature of statistical learning theory. New York: Springer-Verlag.
105. Yellot, J. I. (1977). The relationship between Luce's choice axiom, Thustone theory of comparative judgement, and the double exponential distribution. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 109-144.
106. Zadeh, L. A. (1988). Fuzzy logic (Technical Report CSLI-88-116). Stanford. CA: Stanford University, Center for the Study of Language and Information.