The locus of temporal preparation effects: Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 536-542

  Bausenhart, Karin M ^a   Rolke, Bettina ^a   Hackley, Steven A ^b   Ulrich, Rolf ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847632809     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193882     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. BROWN, S. W. (1997). Attentional resources in timing: Interference effects in concurrent temporal and nontemporal working memory tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1118-1140.
2. GOTTSDANKER, R. (1975). The attaining and maintaining of preparation. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.), Attention and performance V (pp. 33-49). New York: Academic Press.
3. HACKLEY, S.A., & VALLE-INCLÁN, E (1998). Automatic alerting does not speed up late motoric processes in a reaction-time task. Nature, 391, 786-788.
4. HACKLEY, S. A., & VALLE-INCLÁN, R (1999). Accessory stimulus effects on response selection: Does arousal speed decision making? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 321-329.
5. HACKLEY, S. A., & VALLE-INCLÁN, E (2003). Which stages of processing are speeded by a warning signal? Biological Psychology, 64, 27-45.
6. LOFTUS, G. R. (2002). Analysis, interpretation, and visual presentation of experimental data. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Stevens 'handbook of experimental psychology: Vol. 4. Methodology in experimental psychology (3rd ed., pp. 339-390). New York: Wiley.
7. Lew, K. A., LARSON, S. L., BURKE, J., & HACKLEY, S. A. (1996). Alerting effects on choice reaction time and the photic blink reflex. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 98, 385-393.
8. MATTES, S., & ULRICH, R. (1997). Response force is sensitive to the temporal uncertainty of response stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1089-1097.
9. MEYER, D. E., & KIERAS, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: II. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review, 104, 749-791.
10. MILLER, J., & REYNOLDS, A. (2003). The locus of redundant-targets and nontargets effects: Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 1126-1142.
11. MORDKOFF, J. T., MILLER, J., & ROCH, A. C. (1996). Absence of coactivation in the motor component: Evidence from psychophysiological measures of target detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 25-41.
12. MÜLLER-GETHMANN, H., ULRICH, R., & RINKENAUER, G. (2003). Locus of the effect of temporal preparation: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology, 40, 597-611.
13. NAVON, D., & MILLER, J. (2002). Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 193-251.
14. NIEMI, P., & NÄÄTÄNEN, R. (1981). Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 133-162.
15. PASHLER, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244.
16. PASHLER, H., & JOHNSTON, J. C. (1998). Attentional limitations in dualtask performance. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 155-189). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
17. POSNER, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. REQUIN, J., BRENER, J., & RING, C. (1991). Preparation for action. In J. R. Jonnings & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive psychophysiology: Central and autonomic nervous system approaches (pp. 357-448). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
19. RUTHRUFF, E. D., JOHNSTON, J. C., & VAN SELST, M. (2001). Why practice reduces dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 3-21.
20. SANDERS, A. F. (1980). Some effects of instructed muscle tension on choice reaction time and movement time. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII (pp. 59-74). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. SANDERS, A. F. (1998). Elements of human performance: Reaction processes and attention in human skill. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. SIMON, R. J., & SLAVIERO, D. P. (1975). Differential effects of a foreperiod countdown procedure on simple and choice reaction time. Journal of Motor Behavior, 7, 9-14.
23. SMULDERS, F. T. Y. (1993). The selectivity of age effects on information processing: Response times and electrophysiology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
24. SOMMER, W., LEUTHOLD, H., & SCHUBERT, T. (2001). Multiple bottlenecks in information processing? An electrophysiological examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 81-88.
25. STERNBERG, S. (2001). Separate modifiability, mental modules, and the use of pure and composite measures to reveal them. Acta Psychologica, 106, 147-246.
26. TOMBU, M., & JOLICŒUR, P. (2003). A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 3-18.
27. WOODROW, H. (1914). The effect upon reaction time of variation in the preparatory interval. In J. Angell, H. Warren, J. Watson, & S. Franz (Eds.), The psychological monographs (pp. 16-65). Princeton, NJ: Psychological Review Company.