Parcel data for research and policy

Geography Compass

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 698-726

  Manson, Steven M ^a   Sander, Heather A ^a   Ghosh, Debarchana ^a   Oakes, J Michael ^a   Orfield Jr , Myron W ^a   Craig, William J ^a   Luce Jr , Thomas F ^a   Myott, Eric ^a   Sun, Shipeng ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AREAL INTERPOLATION; DATA SET; DIGITAL IMAGE; GIS; RESEARCH WORK; SPATIAL DATA; ZONATION;

EID: 63149139061     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17498198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00209.x     Document Type: Article

References (105)

1. Acharya, G., and Bennett, L. L. (2001). Valuing open space and land-use patterns in urban watersheds. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 22, p. 221.
2. AlGarni, A. M. (1996). Urban photogrammetric data base for multi-purpose cadastral-based information systems: The Riyadh city case. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 51, pp. 28-38.
3. Anselin, L., Florax, R. J. G. M., and Rey, S. J. (eds) (2004). Advances in spatial econometrics: Methodology, tools, and applications. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. p. 359.
4. Armstrong, M. P., Rushton, G., and Zimmerman, D. L. (1999). Geographically masking health data to preserve confidentiality. Statistics in Medicine 18, pp. 497-525.
5. Arthur-Hartranft, S. T., Carlson, T. N., and Clarke, K. C. (2003). Satellite and ground-based microclimate and hydrologic analyses coupled with a regional urban growth model. Remote Sensing of Environment 86, pp. 385-400.
6. Atasoy, M., Palmquist, R. B., and Phaneuf, D. J. (2006). Estimating the effects of urban residential development on water. Journal of Environmental Management 79, pp. 399-408.
7. Atkinson, P. M., and Tate, N. J. (2000). Spatial scale problems and geostatistical solutions: A review. Professional Geographer 54, pp. 607-623.
8. Bae, C. H. C., et al. (2007). The exposure of disadvantaged populations in freeway air-pollution sheds: A case study of the Seattle and Portland regions. Environment and Planning B - Planning & Design 34, p. 154.
9. Berke, E. M., et al. (2007a). Protective association between neighborhood Walkability and depression in older men. Journal of the American Geriatric Society 55, pp. 526-533.
10. Berke, E. M. (2007b). Association of the built environment with physical activity and obesity in older persons. American Journal of Public Health 97, pp. 486-492.
11. Bolitzer, B., and Netusil, N. R. (2000). The impact of open spaces on property values in Portland, Oregon. Journal of Environmental Management 59, p. 185.
12. Brown, D. G. (2003). Land use and forest cover on private parcels in the Upper Midwest USA, 1970 to 1990. Landscape Ecology 18, pp. 777-790.
13. Brown, P. (2004). Devil is in the detail as OS maps out the future. The Guardian March 8 2004 5.
14. Bullen, N., Jones, K., and Duncan, C. (1997). Modelling complexity: analysing between-individual and between-place variation - a multilevel tutorial. Environment and Planning A 29, pp. 585-609.
15. Burra, T., et al. (2002). Conceptual and practical issues in the detection of local disease clusters: A study of mortality in Hamilton, Ontario. Canadian Geographer 46, pp. 160-171.
16. Carrion-Flores, C., and Irwin, E. G. (2004). Determinants of residential land-use conversion and sprawl at the rural-urban fringe. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86, pp. 889-904.
17. Carruthers, J. I. (2002). The impacts of state growth management programmes: A comparative analysis. Urban Studies 39, pp. 1959-1982.
18. Cervero, R., and Duncan, M. (2007). Transit's value-added effects: Light and commuter rail services and commercial land values. Transportation Research Record 1805, pp. 8-15.
19. Cho, W. K. T. (1998). Iff the assumption fits: A comment on the king ecological inference solution. Political Analysis 7, pp. 143-163.
20. Conway, T. M. (2005). Current and future patterns of land-use change in the coastal zone of New Jersey. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design 32, p. 877.
21. Cowen, D. J., and Craig, W. J. (2003). A retrospective look at the need for a multipurpose cadastre. Surveying and Land Information Science 63, p. 205.
22. Craig, V. (1998). Kids mobility project. Minnesota, MN: Hennepin County Office of Planning and Development and Community Corrections.
23. Craig, W. J. (2005). White knights of spatial data infrastructure: The role and motivation of key individuals. URISA Journal 16, pp. 5-13.
24. Cunningham, C. R. (2006). House prices uncertainty, timing of development, and vacant land prices: Evidence for real options in Seattle. Journal of Urban Economics 59, pp. 1-31.
25. Curry, M. (1997). The digital individual and the private realm. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 87, pp. 681-699.
26. Dearwent, S. M., Jacobs, R. R., and Halbert, J. B. (2001). Locational uncertainty in georeferencing public health datasets. Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology 11, pp. 329-334.
27. Doss, C. R., and Taff, S. J. (1996). The influence of wetland type and wetland proximity on residential property values. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 21, p. 120.
28. Dungan, J. L., et al. (2002). A balanced view of scale in spatial statistical analysis. Ecography 25, pp. 626-640.
29. Ellis, C. D., Lee, S. W., and Kweon, B. S. (2006). Retail land use, neighborhood satisfaction and the urban forest: An investigation into the moderating and mediating effects of trees and shrubs. Landscape and Urban Planning 74, pp. 70-78.
30. Entwisle, B. (2007). Putting people into place. Demography 44, pp. 687-703.
31. FGDC (1998). Content standard for digital geospatial metadata. Washington, DC: Federal Geographic Data Committee.
32. FGDC (2003). Cadastral data content standard for the national spatial data infrastructure. Washington, DC: Federal Geographic Data Committee.
33. Fox, J., et al. (2003). People and the environment: Approaches for linking household and community surveys to remote sensing and GIS. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
34. Freeman, A. M. (2003). The measurement of environmental and resource values: Theory and methods. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
35. Geoghegan, J., Wainger, L. A., and Bockstael, N. E. (1997). Spatial landscape indices in a hedonic framework: An ecological economics analysis using GIS. Ecological Economics 23, pp. 251-264.
36. Georgiadou, Y., Rodriguez-Pabon, O., and Lance, K. T. (2006). Spatial data infrastructure (SDI) and E-governance: A quest for appropriate evaluation approaches URISA Journal 18, pp. 43-55.
37. Gewin, V. (2004). Mapping opportunities. Nature 427, pp. 376-377.
38. Haque, A. (2001). GIS, public service, and the issue of democratic governance. Public Administration Review 61, pp. 259-265.
39. Harvey, F., and Tulloch, D. L. (2006). Local government data sharing: evaluating the foundations of spatial data infrastructures. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 20, pp. 743-768.
40. Harvey, F., et al. (1999). Semantic interoperability: A central issue for sharing geographic information. Annals of Regional Science 33, pp. 213-232.
41. Haurin, D. R., and Brasington, D. (1996). School quality and real house prices: Inter- and intrametropolitan effects. Journal of Housing Economics 5, pp. 351-368.
42. Hayward, S., and Mondale, T. (2000). The brawl over sprawl: Is 'Smart Growth' really all that smart. American Experiment Quarterly 3, pp. 57-71.
43. Huxhold, W. E. (1991). An introduction to urban geographic information systems. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
44. Huxhold, W. E., Fowler, E. M., and Parr, B. (2004). ArcGIS and the digital city: A hands-on approach for local government. Redlands, CA, ESRI.
45. Irwin, E. (2002). The effects of open space on residential property values. Land Economics 78, pp. 465-481.
46. Irwin, E. G., and Bockstael, N. (2004). Endogenous spatial externalities: Empirical evidence and implications for the evolution of exurban residential land use patterns. In: Anselin, L., Florax, R. J. G. M. and Rey, S. J. (eds) Advances in spatial econometrics: Methodology, tools, and applications. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, p. 359.
47. Irwin, E. G., and Geoghegan, J. (2001). Theory, data, methods: developing spatially explicit economic models of land use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 85, pp. 7-23.
48. Johnson, J. P. (1995). Case studies of dissemination policy in local government GIS agencies. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 19, pp. 373-389.
49. Johnson, R. (2005). Minnesota Geospatial Data Collaborative, Minnesota-St. Paul Metropolitan Area. URISA Journal 17, pp. 41-45.
50. Kaufmann, J., and Steudler, D. (1998). Cadastre 2014: A vision for a future cadastral system. Copenhagen, Denmark: International Federation of Surveyors.
51. King, G. (1997). A solution to the ecological inference problem: reconstructing individual behavior from aggregate data. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52. Klinkenberg, B. (2003). The true cost of spatial data in Canada. The Canadian Geographer 47, pp. 37-49.
53. Landis, J. D., et al. (2006). The future of infill housing in California: Opportunities, potential, and feasibility. Housing Policy Debate 17, pp. 681-725.
54. Lee, C., Moudon, A. V., and Courbois, J. Y. P. (2006). Built environment and behavior: Spatial sampling using parcel data. Annals of Epidemiology 16, pp. 387-394.
55. Liverman, D., et al. (1998). People and pixels: Linking remote sensing and social science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
56. Lockyer, B. (2005). Opinions of the attorney general of California. 04-1105. Sacramento, CA: Matthew Bender.
57. Longley, P. (2000). Spatial analysis in the new millennium. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90, pp. 157-166.
58. Longley, P. A. (2003). Geographical information systems: Developments in socio-economic data infrastructures. Progress in Human Geography 27, p. 114.
59. Lutzenhiser, M., and Netusil, N. R. (2001). The effect of open spaces on a home's sale price. Contemporary Economic Policy 19, p. 291.
60. Mansfield, C., et al. (2005). Shades of Green: Measuring the value of urban forests in the housing market. Journal of Forest Economics 11, pp. 177-199.
61. Miranda, M. L., et al. (2007). Changes in blood lead levels associated with use of chloramines in water treatment systems. Environmental Health Perspectives 15, pp. 221-225.
62. Miranda, M. L., Dolinoy, D. C., and Overstreet, M. A. (2002). Mapping for prevention: GIS models for directing childhood lead poisoning prevention. Environmental Health Perspectives 110, pp. 947-953.
63. Moudon, A. V., et al. (2005). Cycling and the built environment, a US perspective. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment 10, pp. 245-261.
64. Moudon, A. V. (2007). Attributes of environments supporting walking. American Journal of Health Promotion 21, pp. 448-459.
65. Mugerauer, R. (2000). Qualitative GIS: To mediate, not dominate. In: Janelle, D. G. and Hodge, D. C. (eds) Information, Place, and Cyberspace Issues in Accessibility. Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag, pp. 317-338.
66. Newburn, D. A., and Berck, P. (2006). Modeling suburban and rural-residential development beyond the urban fringe. Land Economics 82, pp. 481-499.
67. NRC (1980). Need for a multipurpose cadastre. Washington, DC: National Research Council of the National Academies.
68. NRC (2003). GIS for housing and urban development. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
69. NRC (2007). National land parcel data: A vision for the future. Washington, DC: National Research Council of the National Academies.
70. Olivera, F., and DeFee, B. B. (2007). Urbanization and its effect on runoff in the Whiteoak Bayou watershed, Texas. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 43, pp. 170-182.
71. Orford, S. (2000). Modelling spatial structures in local housing market dynamics: A multilevel perspective. Urban Stud 37, pp. 1643-1671.
72. Peuquet, D. J. (1981a). An examination of techniques for reformatting digital cartographic data. Part I: The raster to vector process. Cartographica 18, pp. 34-48.
73. Peuquet, D. J. (1981b). An examination of techniques for reformatting digital cartographic data. Part II: The vector-to-raster process. Cartographica 18, pp. 21-33.
74. Polimeni, J. M. (2005). Simulating agricultural conversion to residential use in the Hudson River Valley: Scenario analyses and case studies. Agriculture and Human Values 22, pp. 377-393.
75. Rajabifard, A., et al. (2007). Assessing the worldwide comparison of cadastral systems. Land Use Policy 24, pp. 275-288.
76. Ready, R. C., and Abdalla, C. W. (2005). The amenity and disamenity impacts of agriculture: Estimates from a hedonic pricing model. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87, p. 314.
77. Rhind, D. (1996). Economic, legal and public policy issues influencing the creation, accessibility and use of GIS databases. Transactions in Geographical Information Systems 1, pp. 3-11.
78. Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociology Review 15, pp. 351-357.
79. Rodriguez, F., Morena, F., and Andrieu, H. (2005). Development of a distributed hydrological model based on urban databanks - production process of URBS. Water Science & Technology 52, pp. 241-248.
80. Roemmich, J. N., et al. (2006). Association of access to parks and recreational facilities with the physical activity of young children. Preventive Medicine 43, pp. 434-441.
81. Roemmich, J. N. (2007). The neighborhood and home environments: disparate relationship with physical activity and sedentary behaviors in youth. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 33, pp. 29-38.
82. Rogers, G. O., and DeFee, B. B., II (2005). Long-term impact of development on a watershed: Early indicators of future problems. Landscape and Urban Planning 73, pp. 215-233.
83. Rull, R. A., and Ritz, B. (2003). Historical pesticide exposure in California using pesticide use reports and land-use surveys: An assessment of misclassification error and bias. Environmental Health Perspectives 111, pp. 1582-1589.
84. Sengupta, S., and Osgood, D. E. (2003). The value of remoteness: A hedonic estimation of ranchette prices. Ecological Economics 44, p. 91.
85. Shilling, F., and Girvetz, E. (2007). Physical and financial barriers to implementing a nature reserve network in the Sierra Nevada, California, USA. Landscape and Urban Planning 80, pp. 165-172.
86. Stage, D., and von Meyer, N. (2006a). An assessment of best practices in seven state parcel management programs. Washington, DC: FGDC Cadastral Data Subcommittee.
87. Stage, D., and von Meyer, N. (2006b). An assessment of parcel data in the United States - 2005 survey results. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. [online]. Retrieved from http://www.nationalcad.org/ data/documents/Cadastral_Inv_2005_v2.pdf
88. Steudler, D., Rajabifard, A., and Williamson, I. P. (2004). Evaluation of land administration systems. Land Use Policy 21, pp. 371-380.
89. Stone, B. (2004). Paving over paradise: How land use regulations promote residential imperviousness. Landscape and Urban Planning 69, pp. 101-113.
90. Stone, B., and Bullen, J. L. (2006). Urban form and watershed management: How zoning influences residential stormwater volumes. Environment and Planning B - Planning & Design 33, p. 21.
91. Straeger, M. P., and Rosenberger, R. S. (2007). Aggregating high-priority landscape areas to the parcel level: An easement implementation tool. Journal of Environmental Management 82, pp. 290-298.
92. Tajima, K. (2003). New estimates of the demand for urban green space: Implications for valuing the environmental benefits of Boston's big dig project. Journal of Urban Affairs 25, p. 641.
93. Tate, N. J., and Atkinson, P. M. (2001). Modelling scale in geographical information science Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
94. Theobald, D. M. (2001). Land-use dynamics beyond the American urban fringe. Geographical Review 91, pp. 544-565.
95. Treuhaft, S., and Kingsley, G. T. (2008). Transforming community development with land information systems. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
96. Troy, A., and Wilson, M. A. (2006). Mapping ecosystem services: practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer. Ecological Economics 60, pp. 435-449.
97. Vance, C., and Iovanna, R. (2006). Analyzing spatial hierarchies in remotely sensed data: Insights from a multilevel model of tropical deforestation. Land Use Policy 23, p. 226.
98. VanWey, L. K., et al. (2005). Confidentiality and spatially explicit data: Concerns and challenges. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102, pp. 15337-15342.
99. Von Meyer, N. (2001). GIS and land records: The parcel data model. Redlands, CA: ESRI.
100. Waddell, P. (2000). A behavioral simulation model for metropolitan policy analysis and planning: Residential location and housing market components of UrbanSim. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design 27, pp. 247-263.
101. Waller, L. A., and Gotway, C. A. (2004). Applied spatial statistics for public health data. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
102. Williamson, I., Ting, L., and Grant, D. (1999). The evolving role of land administration in support of sustainable development. The Australian Surveyor 4, pp. 126-135.
103. Wong, D. (2004). The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP). In: Warf, B. and Hansen, K. (eds.) WorldMinds: Geographical perspectives on 100 Problems. Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 571-575.
104. Wu, J. J., Adams, R. M., and Plantinga, A. J. (2004). Amenities in an urban equilibrium model: Residential development in Portland, Oregon. Land Economics 80, p. 19.
105. Zandbergen, P. A. (2007). Influence of geocoding quality on environmental exposure assessment of children living near high traffic roads. BMC Public Health 7, p. 37.