Erratum to "Mapping ecosystem services: Practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer" [Ecological Economics 60 (2006) 435-449] (DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.04.007);Mapping ecosystem services: Practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer

Ecological Economics

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 435-449

  Troy, Austin ^a,b   Wilson, Matthew A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

^b Spatial Informatics Group LLC ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Benefits transfer; Ecosystem service valuation; Geographic information systems; Spatial analysis; Valuation transfer

Indexed keywords

AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES; GIS; LAND COVER; MAPPING; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; VALUATION;

CALIFORNIA; MASSACHUSETTS; MAURY ISLAND; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [UNITED STATES];

EID: 33750167335     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.11.004     Document Type: Erratum

References (37)

1. Bateman I.J., Ennew C., Lovett A.A., and Rayner A.J. Modelling and mapping agricultural output values using farm specific details and environmental databases. Journal of Agricultural Economics 50 (1999) 488-511
2. Bateman I.J., Jones A.P., Lovett A.A., Lake I.R., and Day B.H. Applying Geographical Information Systems (GIS) to environmental and resource economics. Environmental and Resource Economics 22 (2002) 219-269
3. Costanza R., d'Arge R., deGroot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., Limburg K., Naeem S., O'Neill R.V., Paruelo J., Raskin R.G., Sutton P., and van den Belt M. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387 (1997) 253-260
4. Daily G.C. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems (1997), Island Press, Washington, DC
5. Desvousges W.H., Johnson F.R., and Spencer Banzhaf H.S. Environmental Policy Analysis with Limited Information: Principles and Application of the Transfer Method (1998), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK
6. Drake J., Knox R., Dubayah R., Clark D., Condit R., Blair J., and Hofton M. Above-ground biomass estimation in closed canopy neotropical forests using lidar remote sensing: factors affecting the generality of relationships. Global Ecology and Biogeography 12 (2003) 147-159
7. Dubayah R., and Drake J. Lidar remote sensing for forestry. Journal of Forestry 98 (2000) 44-46
8. Eade J.D.O., and Moran D. Spatial economic valuation: benefits transfer using geographical information systems. Journal of Environmental Management 48 (1996) 97-110
9. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses. EPA 240-R-00-003 (2000), US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
10. Fausold C.J., and Lilieholm R.J. The economic value of open space: a review and synthesis. Environmental Management 23 (1999) 307-320
11. Fotheringham A.S., Brunsdon C., and Charlton M. Quantitative Geography: Perspectives on Spatial Data Analysis (2000), Publication Sage, London
12. French J. Airborne LiDAR in support of geomorphological and hydraulic modelling. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 28 (2003) 321-335
13. Heal G.M., Barbier E.B., Boyle K.J., Covich A.P., Gloss S.P., Hershner C.H., Hoehn J.P., Pringle C.M., Polasky S., Segerson K., and Schrader-Frechette K. Valuing Ecosystem Services: Toward Better Environmental Decision-Making (2005), The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
14. Herrera Environmental Consultants, Northern Economics Inc., and Spatial Informatics Group LLC. Ecological Economic Evaluation: Maury Island, King County Washington, King County, WA (2004), Water and Land Resources Division 55 pp.
15. Iovanna R., and Griffiths C. Clean water, ecological benefits and benefits transfer: a work in progress at the U.S. EPA. Ecological Economics 60 (2006) 473-482 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.06.012 (this issue)
16. Kreuter U.P., Harris H.G., Matlock M.D., and Lacey R.E. Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area, Texas. Ecological Economics 39 (2001) 333-346
17. Ligon, F., Rich, A., Rynearson, R., Thronburgh, D., Trush, W., 1999. Report of the Scientific Review Panel on California Forest Practice Rules and Salmonid Habitat. The Resources Agency of California and the National Marine Fisheries Service.
18. Lohani B., and Mason D. Application of airborne scanning laser altimetry to the study of tidal channel geomorphology. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 56 (2001) 100-120
19. Loomis J.B. The evolution of a more rigorous approach to benefit transfer-benefit function transfer. Water Resources Research 28 (1992) 701-705
20. Lovett A.A., Brainard J.S., and Bateman I.J. Improving benefit transfer demand functions: a GIS approach. Journal of Environmental Management 51 (1997) 373-389
21. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment (2003), Island Press, Washington, DC
22. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Business and Industry Synthesis Report (2005), Island Press, Washington, DC
23. Openshaw S., Charlton M.E., Wymer C., and Craft A.W. A Mark I geographical analysis machine for the automated analysis of point data sets. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 1 (1987) 359-377
24. Palmquist R. Valuing localized externalities. Journal of Urban Economics 31 (1992) 59-68
25. Patenaude G., Hill R., Milne R., Gaveau D., Briggs B., and Dawson T. Quantifying forest above ground carbon content using LiDAR remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment 93 (2004) 368-380a
26. Pearce D. Auditing the Earth. Environment 40 (1998) 23-28
27. Rosenberger R., and Stanley R. Measurement, generalization and publication: sources of error in benefit transfers and their management. Ecological Economics 60 (2006) 372-378 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.03.018 (this issue)
28. Ruijgrok E.C.M. Transferring economic values on the basis of an ecological classification of nature. Ecological Economics 39 (2001) 399-408
29. Southwick E.E., and Southwick L. Estimating the economic value of honey-bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae) as agricultural pollinators in the United-States. Journal of Economic Entomology 85 (1992) 621-633
30. Tsihrintzis V., Vasarhelyi G., and Lipa J. Ballona wetland: a multi-objective salt marsh restoration plan. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Water, Maritime and Energy 118 (1996) 131-144
31. TSS Consultants, and Spatial Informatics Group LLC. Assessment of the efficacy of the California Bureau of Land Management Community Assistance and Hazardous Fuels Programs (2005), U.S. Bureau of Land Management 1-81
32. Van den Bergh J., and Button K. Meta-analysis of environmental issues in regional, urban and transport economics. Urban Studies 34 (1997) 927-944
33. Wilson M., and Hoehn J. Introduction to the special issue on environmental benefits transfer: methods, applications and new directions. Ecological Economics 60 (2006) 389-398 (this issue)
34. Wilson M.A., and Troy A. Accounting for the economic value of ecosystem services in Massachusetts. In: Breunig K. (Ed). Losing Ground: At What Cost (2003), Massachusetts Audubon Society, Boston 19-22
35. Wilson M., and Troy A. Accounting for ecosystem services in a spatially explicit format: value transfer and Geographic Information Systems. Proceedings of an International Workshop on Benefits Transfer and Valuation Databases: Are We Heading in the Right Direction? Sponsored by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's National Center for Environmental Economics and Environment Canada: March 21-22, Washington DC (2005)
36. Wilson M., Troy A., and Costanza R. The economic geography of ecosystem goods and services: revealing the monetary value of landscapes through transfer methods and Geographic Information Systems. In: Dietrich M., and Straaten V.D. (Eds). Cultural Landscapes and Land Use (2004), Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands 69-94
37. Woodward R., and Wui Y. The economic value of wetland services: a meta-analysis. Ecological Economics 37 (2001) 257-270