Transit's value-added effects: Light and commuter rail services and commercial land values

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1805, 2002, Pages 8-15

  Cervero, Robert ^a   Duncan, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC NOISE; AUTOMOBILES; INVESTMENTS; TRAFFIC CONTROL; VIBRATIONS (MECHANICAL);

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD);

RAILROAD STATIONS;

EID: 0036943194     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1805-02     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Bernick, M., and R. Cervero. Transit Villages for the 21st Century. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1997.
2. Calthorpe, P., and W. Fulton. Regional City: Planning for the End of Sprawl. Island Press, Washington, D.C., 2001.
3. Cervero, R. Light Rail Transit and Urban Development. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 50, No. 2, 1984, pp. 133-147.
4. Cervero, R. Rail Transit and Joint Development: Land Market Impacts in Washington, D.C., and Atlanta. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 60, No. 1, 1994, pp. 83-94.
5. Landis, J., R. Cervero, and P. Hall. Transit Joint Development in the USA: An Inventory and Policy Assessment. Environment and Planning C, Vol. 9, No. 4, 1991, pp. 431-452.
6. McNeal, A., and R. Doggett. Metro Makes Its Mark. Urban Land, Vol. 58, No. 9, 1999, pp. 78-81, 118.
7. Falcke, C. Study of BART's Effects on Property Prices and Rents. Urban Mass Transportation Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1978.
8. Landis, J., S. Guathakurta, and M. Zhang. Capitalization of Transportation Investments into Single-Family Home Prices. Working Paper 619. Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley, 1994.
9. Dunphy, R. Transit Trends. Urban Land, Vol. 60, No. 5, 2001, pp. 79-83.
10. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., R. Cervero, and D. Aschuer. TCRP Report 35: Economic Impact Analysis of Transit Investments: Guidebook for Practitioners. National Academy Press, Transit Cooperative Research Program, Washington, D.C., 1998.
11. Damm, D., S. Lerman, E. Lerner-Lam, and J. Young. Response of Urban Real Estate Values in Anticipation of the Washington Metro. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 14, No. 3, 1980, pp. 20-30.
12. Bollinger, C., K. Ihlanfeldt, and D. Bowes. Spatial Variation in Office Rents Within the Atlanta Region. Urban Studies, Vol. 35, No. 7, 1998, pp. 1097-1117.
13. Nelson, A. Transit Stations and Commercial Property Values: A Case Study with Policy and Land Use Implications. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1999, pp. 77-93.
14. Weinstein, B., and T. Clower. The Initial Economic Impacts of the DART LRT System. Center for Economic Development and Research, University of North Texas, Denton.
15. Landis, J., and D. Loutzenheiser. BART at 20: BART Access and Office Building Performance. Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley, 1995.
16. Weinberger, R. R. Commercial Property Values and Proximity to Light Rail: Calculating Benefits with a Hedonic Price Model. Presented at the 79th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2000.
17. Weinberger, R. R. Light Rail Proximity: Benefit or Detriment?-The Case of Santa Clara County, California. Presented at the 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2001.