Theory, data, methods: Developing spatially explicit economic models of land use change

Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

Volumn 85, Issue 1-3, 2001, Pages 7-24

  Irwin, Elena G ^a   Geoghegan, Jacqueline ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CLARK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Land use change; Spatial economic models

Indexed keywords

LAND COVER; LAND USE CHANGE; MODELING; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

MARYLAND; PATUXENT WATERSHED; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0035020028     PISSN: 01678809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00200-6     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Alonso, W., 1964. Location and Land Use. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
2. Anas A., Kim I. General equilibrium models of polycentric urban land use with endogenous congestion and job agglomeration. J. Urban Econ. 40:1996;232-256.
3. Anas A., Arnott R., Small K. Urban spatial structure. J. Econ. Lit. 36:1998;1426-1464.
4. Andersen L.E. The causes of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. J. Environ. Dev. 5:1996;309-328.
5. Anselin, L., 1988. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
6. Anselin, L., Florax, R. (Eds.), 1995. New Directions in Spatial Econometrics. Springer, Berlin.
7. Arthur, W.B., 1988. Urban systems and historical path dependence. In: Ausubel, J., Herman, R. (Eds.), Cities and Their Vital Systems. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 85-97.
8. Baker W. A review of models of landscape change. Landscape Ecol. 2:1989;111-133.
9. Batty M., Longley P., Fotheringham S. Urban growth and form: scaling, fractal geometry, and diffusion-limited aggregation. Environ. Plann. A. 21:1989;1447-1472.
10. Bell K.P., Bockstael N.E. Applying the generalized moments estimation approach to spatial problems involving micro-level data. Rev. Econ. Statist. 82:2000;72-82.
11. Berry M., Hazen B., MacIntyre R.L., Flamm R. LUCAS: a system for modeling land-use change. IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng. 3:1996;24-35.
12. Bockstael N.E. Modeling economics and ecology: the importance of a spatial perspective. Am. J. Agr. Econ. 78:1996;1168-1180.
13. Bockstael, N.E., Bell, K.P., 1998. Land use patterns and water quality: the effect of differential land management controls. In: Just, R., Netanyahu, S. (Eds.), International Water and Resource Economics Consortium, Conflict and Cooperation on Trans-boundary Water Resources. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, pp. 169-191.
14. Bockstael, N.E., Irwin, E.G., 2000. Economics and the land use-environment link. In: Folmer, H., Tietenberg, T. (Eds.), The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 1999/2000. Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA, pp. 1-54.
15. Chomitz K., Gray D. Roads, land use and deforestation: a spatial model applied to Belize. World Bank Econ. Rev. 10:1996;487-512.
16. Clarke K.C., Hoppen S., Gaydos L. A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environ. Plann. B. 24:1997;247-261.
17. Deacon R., Brookshire D., Fisher A., Kneese A., Kolstad C., Scrogin D., Smith V.K., Ward M., Wilen J. Research trends and opportunities in environmental and natural resource economics. Environ. Resour. Econ. 11:1998;383-397.
18. Flamm R., Turner M. Alternative model formulations for a stochastic simulation of landscape change. Landscape Ecol. 9:1994;37-46.
19. Freeman, M., 1993. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
20. Fujita, M., Krugman, P., Venables, A.J., 1999. The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions and International Trade. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
21. Geoghegan, J., Bockstael, N.E., 2000. Smart growth and the supply of sprawl. Paper presented at the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Workshop, La Jolla, CA.
22. Geoghegan J., Wainger L., Bockstael N. Spatial landscape indices in a hedonic framework: an ecological economics analysis using GIS. Ecol. Econ. 23:1997;251-264.
23. Geoghegan, J., Pritchard Jr., L., Ogneva-Himmelberger, Y., Roy Chowdhury, R., Sanderson, S., Turner II, B.L., 1998. Socializing the pixel and pixelizing the social in land-use and land-cover change. In: Liverman, D., Moran, E., Rindfuss, R., Stern, P. (Eds.), Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change. National Research Council. People and Pixels: Linking Remote Sensing and Social Science. National Academy of Science Press, Washington, DC, pp. 51-69.
24. Greene, W., 2000. Econometric Analysis, 4th Edition. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
25. Hazen B.C., Berry M.W. The simulation of land-cover change using a distributed computing environment. Simulat. Pract. Theory. 5:1997;489-514.
26. Irwin, E.G., Bockstael, N.E., 2001. Interacting agents, spatial externalities, and the endogenous evolution of residential land use patterns, Department of Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics Working Paper AEDE-WP-0010-01, The Ohio State University.
27. Ives A.R., Turner M.G., Pearson S.M. Local explanations of landscape patterns: can analytical approaches approximate simulation models of spatial processes? Ecosystems. 1:1998;35-51.
28. Krugman P. Increasing returns and economic geography. J. Polit. Econ. 99:1991;438-499.
29. Krugman, P., 1996. The Self-organizing Economy. Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MA.
30. LaGro J.A., DeGloria S.D. Land use dynamics within an urbanizing non-metropolitan county in New York state (USA). Landscape Ecol. 7:1992;275-289.
31. Landis J. Imagining land use futures: applying the California urban futures model. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 61:1995;438-457.
32. Landis J., Zhang M. The second generation of the California urban futures model. Part 1: model logic and theory. Environ. Plann. A. 25:1998;657-666.
33. Landis J., Zhang M. The second generation of the California urban futures model. Part 2: specification and calibration results of the land-use change submodel. Environ. Plann. A. 25:1998;795-824.
34. Ludeke A.K., Maggio R.C., Reid L.M. An analysis of anthropogenic deforestation using logistic regression and GIS. J. Environ. Manage. 32:1990;247-259.
35. Mertens B., Lambin E. Spatial modeling of deforestation in southern Cameroon. Appl. Geogr. 17:1997;143-162.
36. Mills E.S. An aggregative model of resource allocation in a metropolitan area. Am. Econ. Rev. 57:1967;197-210.
37. Muth, R., 1969. Cities and Housing. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
38. Nelson G., Hellerstein D. Do roads cause deforestation? Using satellite images in econometric analysis of land use. Am. J. Agr. Econ. 79:1997;80-88.
39. Pfaff A. What drives deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon? J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 37:1999;26-43.
40. Veldkamp A., Fresco L. CLUE-CR: an integrated multi-scale model to simulate land use change scenarios in Costa Rica. Ecol. Model. 91:1996;231-248.
41. Veldkamp A., Fresco L. Exploring land use scenarios: an alternative approach based on actual land use. Agric. Syst. 55:1997;1-17.
42. Veldkamp A., Fresco L. Reconstructing land use drivers and their spatial scale dependence for Costa Rica (1973 and 1984). Agric. Syst. 55:1997;19-43.
43. Wegener M. Operational urban models: state of the art. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 60:1994;17-29.
44. White R., Engelen G. Cellular automata and fractal urban form: a cellular modelling approach to the evolution of urban land use patterns. Environ. Plann. A. 25:1993;1175-1199.
45. White R., Engelen G., Uljee I. The use of constrained cellular automata for high-resolution modelling of urban land-use dynamics. Environ. Plann. B. 24:1997;323-343.
46. Wolfram, S., 1986. Theory and Applications of Cellular Automata. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore.
47. Wu F., Webster C.J. Simulation of land development through the integration of cellular automata and multicriteria evaluation. Environ. Plann. B. 25:1998;103-126.
48. Zhang W. Location choice and land use in an isolated state: endogenous capital and knowledge accumulation. Ann. Reg. Sci. 27:1993;23-39.