The future of infill housing in California: Opportunities, potential, and feasibility

Housing Policy Debate

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 681-725

  Landis, John D ^a   Hood, Heather ^a   Li, Guangyu ^a   Rogers, Thomas ^a   Warren, Charles ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Community development and revitalization; Infill; Urban policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248206678     PISSN: 10511482     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2006.9521587     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Abbott, Carl. 1996. Five Strategies for Downtown: Policy Discourse and Planning since 1943. In Planning the 20th-Century City, ed. Mary Corbin Sies and Christopher Silver, 404-27. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
2. Association of Bay Area Governments. 2002. Smart Growth/Regional Livability Footprint Project. World Wide Web page (accessed October 2005).
3. Boyd, James, Winston Harrington, and Molly McCauley. 1996. The Effects of Environmental Liability on Industrial Development. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 12:37-58.
4. Broder, John M. 2006. States Curbing Right to Seize Private Homes. New York Times, February 21.
5. California State University, Fullerton, Center for Demographic Research. 2004. Infill Capacity Analysis of Orange County and Western Riverside Gateway. Fullerton, CA.
6. Cervero, Robert, and Roger Gorham. 1995. Commuting in Transit vs. Automobile Neighborhoods. Journal of the American Planning Association 61(Spring):210-25.
7. Cervero, Robert, and Kara Kockelman. 1997. Travel Demand and the 3Ds: Density, Diversity, and Design. Transportation Research D 2(3):199-219.
8. Cervero, Robert, and Carolyn Radisch. 1996. Travel Choices in Pedestrian versus Automobile-Oriented Neighborhoods. Transportation Policy 3:127-41.
9. Danielson, Karen A., Robert E. Lang, and William Fulton. 1999. Retracting Suburbia: Smart Growth and the Future of Housing. Housing Policy Debate 10(3):513-40.
10. Farris, J. Terrence. 2001. The Barriers to Using Urban Infill Development to Achieve Smart Growth. Housing Policy Debate 12(1):1-30.
11. First American Real Estate Solutions. 2004. World Wide Web page (accessed January 2005).
12. Frieden, Bernard, and Lynne B. Sagalyn. 1989. Downtown, Inc.: How America Rebuilds Cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Fulton, William. 2001. Comment on J. Terrence Farris's "The Barriers to Using Urban Infill Development to Achieve Smart Growth." Housing Policy Debate 12(1):41-45.
14. GDT Corporation. 2004. 2004 California Dynamaps. World Wide Web page (accessed January 2005).
15. Johnson, Hans P., and Joseph M. Hayes. 2003. California's Newest Neighbors. California Counts (5)1. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
16. Landis, John D., Heather Hood, Guangyu Li, Michael Reilly, Thomas Rogers, and Charles Warren. 2006. The Future of Infill Housing in California: Opportunities, Potential, Feasibility, and Demand. Vols. I and II. Sacramento, CA: California Business, Transportation, and Housing Agency.
17. Landis, John D., Michael Smith-Heimer, Michael Larice, Michael Reilly, Mary Corley, and Oliver Jerchow. 2000. Raising the Roof: California Housing Development Projections and Constraints, 1997-2020. Statewide Housing Plan Update. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Housing and Community Development.
18. Myers, Dowell, and John Pitkin. 2001. Demographic Futures for California. Unpublished paper. University of Southern California, School of Policy, Planning, and Development, Population Dynamics Group.
19. Northeast-Midwest Institute and Congress for the New Urbanism. 2001. Strategies for Successful Infill Development. Washington, DC.
20. RealtyRates.com. 2005. World Wide Web page (accessed April).
21. Reconnecting America: Center for Transit-Oriented Development. 2004. Hidden in Plain Sight. Capturing the Demand for Housing near Transit. Oakland, CA.
22. Robertson, Kent A. 1995. Downtown Redevelopment Strategies in the United States. Journal of the American Planning Association 61(4):429-43.
23. RS Means. 2005. Construction Cost Estimating Guide, 2005. Kingston, MA.
24. Sacramento Area Council of Governments. 2005. Blueprint Project. World Wide Web page (accessed October).
25. San Diego Association of Governments, 2004. Regional Comprehensive Plan. World Wide Web page (accessed October 2005).
26. Sandoval, Juan Ness, and John Landis. 2000. Estimating the Infill Housing Capacity of the Bay Area. Working Paper No. 2000-06. University of California-Berkeley, Institute of Urban and Regional Development.
27. Southern California Association of Governments. 2005. Compass 2% Strategy - Phase 1. World Wide Web page (accessed October).
28. State of California, Department of Finance. 2004. Population Projections by Race/Ethnicity, Gender, and Age for California and Its Counties, 2000-2050. Sacramento, CA.
29. Suchman, Diane. 1997. Developing Infill Housing in Inner-City Neighborhoods. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
30. Transit Cooperative Research Project. 2004. Transit-Oriented Development in the United States: Experiences, Challenges, and Projects. Report No. 102. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
31. Urban Land Institute. 2001. Urban Infill Housing. Myth and Fact. Washington, DC.
32. U.S. Bureau of the Census. n.d. 2000 Census of Population and Housing. World Wide Web page (accessed January 2005).
33. U.S. Bureau of the Census. 2004. Geography Division: TIGER Line Files. World Wide Web page (accessed January 2005).
34. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. n.d. Superfund Information System: CERCLIS Database. World Wide Web page (accessed January 2005).
35. University of California-Davis, Information Center for the Environment. 2005. State of California General Plan Basemap. World Wide Web page (accessed January).
36. Wolman, Harold L., Coit Cook Ford III, and Edward Hill. 1994. Evaluating the Success of Urban Success Stories. Urban Studies 31(6):835-50.