A principled approach to biological motor control for generating humanoid robot reaching movements

Proceedings of the 2nd Biennial IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, BioRob 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 783-788

  Tuan, Tran Minh ^a   Souères, Philippe ^a   Taïx, Michel ^a   Guigon, Emmanuel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^b INSERM   (France)

Author keywords

Direct transcription; Human motor control; Humanoid robot; Neurobiological principles; Nonlinear programming; Reaching control

Indexed keywords

CONCURRENCY CONTROL; DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING; INTELLIGENT ROBOTS; LOW PASS FILTERS; MOTION CONTROL; MOTORS; NONLINEAR PROGRAMMING; OPTIMIZATION; ROBOTICS; TRANSCRIPTION;

DIRECT TRANSCRIPTION; HUMAN MOTOR CONTROL; HUMANOID ROBOT; NEUROBIOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES; REACHING CONTROL;

ROBOT PROGRAMMING;

EID: 63049114595     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/BIOROB.2008.4762783     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. K. Tahara, Z. Luo, and S. Arimoto. On control mechanism of human-like reaching movements with musculo-skeletal redundancy. In IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2006.
2. S. Northrup, N. Sarkar, and K. Kawamura. Biologically-inspired control architecture for a humanoid robot. In In: Proc IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Vol 2, pp 1100-1105, 2001.
3. G. Simmons and Y. Demiris. Optimal robot arm control using the minimum variance model. J Robot Syst, 22(11):677-690, 2005.
4. T. Matsui, M. Honda, and N. Nakazawa. A new optimal control model for reproducing human arm's two-point reaching movements: A modified minimum torque change model. In Proc IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, pp 1541-1546, 2006.
5. H. Seki and S. Tadakuma. Minimum jerk control of power assisting robot based on human arm behavior characteristics. In Proc IEEE Int.Conf. on Syst, Man and Cybernetics, Vol 1, pp 722-727, 2004.
6. M. Hersch and Billard A.G. A biologically-inspired controller for reaching movements. IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, 2006.
7. Mataric M. Getting humanoids to move and imitate. In IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2000.
8. Y. Fujita, Y. Nakamura, K. Yamane, and Suzuki I. Somatosensory computation for man-machine interface from motion-capture data and musculoskeletal human model. IEEE Trans. On Robotics 21(1):58-66, 2004.
9. E. Guigon, P. Baraduc, and M. Desmurget. Computational motor control: Redundancy and invariance. J Neurophysiol, 97(1):331-347, 2007.
10. E. Guigon, P. Baraduc, and M. Desmurget. Optimality, stochasticity, and variability in motor behavior. J Comput Neurosci, 24(1):57-68, 2008.
11. M.K. Rand, Y. Shimansky, G.E. Stelmach, and J.R. Bloedel. Adaptation of reach-to-grasp movement in response to force perturbations. Exp Brain Res, 154: 50-65, 2004.
12. T.G. Welter and M.F. Bobbert. Initial muscle activity in planar ballistic arm movements with varying external force directions. Motor Control, 6: 32-51, 2002.
13. J.F. Kalaska, Cohen D.A.D., M.L. Hyde, and M. Prud'homme. A comparison of movement direction-related versus load direction-related activity in primate motor cortex, using a two-dimensional reaching task. J Neurosci, 9: 2080-2102, 1989.
14. K.C. Nishikawa, S.T. Murray, and M. Flanders. Do arm postures vary with the speed of reaching. J Neurophysiol, 81: 2582-2586, 1999.
15. T. Flash and N. Hogan. The coordination of arm movements: An experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J Neurosci, 5: 1688-1703, 1985.
16. Y. Uno, M. Kawato, and R. Suzuki. Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement - minimum torque change model. Biol Cybern, 61(2):89-101, 1989.
17. C.M. Harris and D.M. Wolpert. Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature, 394(6695):780-784, 1998.
18. E. Todorov and M.I. Jordan. Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci, 5(11):1226-1235, 2002.
19. K.A. Thoroughman and K.J. Feller. Gravitational effects on torque change and variance optimization in reaching movements program no. 492.20. abstract viewer/itinerary planner. Washington, DC: Society for Neuroscience, Online, 2003.
20. R.M. Alexander. Optimization and gaits in the locomotion of vertebrates. Physiol Rev, 69(4):1199-1227, 1989.
21. F.C.T. Van der Helm and L.A. Rozendaal. Musculoskeletal systems with intrinsic and proprioceptive feedback. Neural control of posture and movement, 2000.
22. K. Kaneko, F. Kanehiro, S. Kajita, H. Hirukawa, T. Kawasaki, M. Hirata, K. Akachi, and T. Isozumi. Humanoid robot hrp-2. ICRA IEEE, 2004.
23. M.S. Spong and M. Vidyasagar. Robot Dynamics and Control. Wiley, 1989.
24. J.T. Betts. Practical Methods for Optimal Control Using Nonlinear Programming. Society for Industrial Mathematics, 2001.
25. A. Wächter and L.T. Biegler. On the implementation of a primaldual interior point filter line search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming. Mathematical Programming 106(1), pp. 25-57, 2006.
26. M. Flanders, J.J. Pellegrini, and S.D. Geisler. Basic features of phasic activation for reaching in vertical planes. Exp Brain Res, 1996.
27. S. Miossec, S. Yokoi, and K. Kheddar. Development of a software for motion optimization of robots - application to the kick motion of the hrp-2 robot. ICRA IEEE, 2006.