Normal and abnormal imaging findings in lumbar total disk replacement: Devices and complications

Radiographics

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 105-118

  Murtagh, Ryan D ^a   Quencer, Robert M ^b   Cohen, Dan S ^c   Yue, James J ^d   Sklar, Evelyn L ^b  

^a University Diagnostic Institute   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FOREIGN BODY REACTION; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK HERNIA; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; RADIOGRAPHY; SPINE FRACTURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

FOREIGN-BODY REACTION; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISPLACEMENT; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; SPINAL FRACTURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 63049107290     PISSN: 02715333     EISSN: 15271323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/rg.291075740     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Errico TJ. Why a mechanical disc? Spine J 2004; 4(suppl 6):151S-157S.
2. Lemaire JP, Carrier H, Sariali el-H, Skalli W, Lavaste F. Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charité artificial disc: a 10-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005;18(4):353-359. [Published correction appears in J Spinal Disord Tech 2006;19(1):76.]
3. West JL III, Bradford DS, Ogilvie JW. Results of spinal arthrodesis with pedicle screw-plate fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991;73(8):1179-1184.
4. Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Hodges SD. Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar fusion. Am J Orthop 1999;28(6):336-340.
5. Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, Hoff JT, McGillicuddy JE. Adjacent segment disease of the lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine 2004;29(17):1938-1944.
6. Zigler JE. Lumbar spine arthroplasty using the ProDisc II. Spine J 2004;4(suppl 6):260S-267S.
7. Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration. New device approval: CHARITÉ Artificial Disc-P040006. Published October 26, 2004. Updated November 17, 2004. Accessed August 21, 2008.
8. Chin KR. Epidemiology of indications and contraindicatons to total disc replacement in an academic practice. Spine J 2007;7(4):392-398.
9. Errico TJ. Lumbar disc arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;435:106-117.
10. Stieber JR, Donald GD III. Early failure of lumbar disc replacement: case report and review of the literature. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006;19(1):55-60.
11. Marshman LA, Trewhella M, Friesem T, Rampersaud YR, Le Huec JC, Krishna M. The accuracy and validity of "routine" X-rays in estimating lumbar disc arthroplasty placement. Spine 2007; 32(23):E661-E666.
12. Guyer RD, Burd TA, Hochschuler SH, et al. Total disc replacement: implants and clinical results. In: Guyer RD, Zigler JE, eds. Spinal arthroplasty: a new era in spine care. St Louis, Mo: Quality Medi-cal Publishing, 2005; 180-222.
13. McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Holsapple G, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion. II. Evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. Spine 2005;30(14):1576-1583; discussion E388-E390.
14. Neal CJ, Rosner MK, Kuklo TR. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of adjacent segments after disc arthroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine 2005;3(5): 342-347.
15. Punt IM, Visser VM, van Rhijn LW, et al. Complications and reoperations of the SB Charité lumbar disc prosthesis: experience in 75 patients. Eur Spine J 2008;17(1):36-43.
16. Cinotti G, David T, Postacchini F. Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Spine 1996;21(8):995-1000.
17. van Ooij A, Oner FC, Verbout AJ. Complications of artificial disc replacement: a report of 27 patients with the SB Charité disc. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16(4):369-383.
18. Tropiano P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, Marnay T. Lumbar disc replacement: preliminary results with ProDisc II after a minimum follow-up period of 1 year. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16(4):362-368.
19. Mathew P, Blackman M, Redla S, Hussein AA. Bilateral pedicle fractures following anterior dislocation of the polyethylene inlay of a ProDisc artificial disc replacement: a case report of an unusual complication. Spine 2005;30(11):E311-E314.
20. Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Shah RV, et al. The treatment of disabling multilevel lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Spine 2005;30(19):2192-2199.
21. Shim CS, Lee S, Maeng DH, Lee SH. Vertical split fracture of the vertebral body following total disc replacement using ProDisc: report of two cases. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005;18(5):465-469.
22. Lemaire JP, Skalli W, Lavaste F, et al. Intervertebral disc prosthesis. Results and prospects for the year 2000. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997;337:64-76.
23. Caspi I, Levinkopf M, Nerubay J. Results of lumbar disc prosthesis after a follow-up period of 48 months. Isr Med Assoc J 2003;5(1):9-11.
24. Trouillier H, Kern P, Refior HJ, Müller-Gerbl M. A prospective morphological study of facet joint intergrity following intervertebral disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc. Eur Spine J 2006;15(2):174-182.
25. Dooris AP, Goel VK, Grosland NM, Gilberston LG, Wilder DG. Load-sharing between anterior and posterior elements in a lumbar motion segment implanted with an artificial disc. Spine 2001; 26(6):E122-E129.
26. Shim CS, Lee SH, Shin HD, et al. CHARITE versus ProDisc: a comparative study of a minimum 3-year follow-up. Spine 2007;32(9):1012-1018.
27. David T. Lumbar disc prosthesis: 5 years follow-up study on 147 patients with 163 SB Charité prostheses. Presented at the fourth annual meeting of the Spine Society of Europe, Nantes, France, September 11-14, 2002.
28. Mayer HM. Total lumbar disc replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87(8):1029-1037.
29. van Ooij A, Kurtz SM, Stessels F, Noten H, van Rhijn L. Polyethylene wear debris and long-term clinical failure of the Charité disc prosthesis. Spine 2007;32(2):223-229. [Published correction appears in Spine 2007;32(9):1052.]
30. Kurtz SM, van Ooij A, Ross R, et al. Polyethylene wear and rim fracture in total disc arthroplasty. Spine J 2007;7(1):12-21.
31. Tropiano P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP Jr, Marnay T. Lumbar total disc replacement. Seven to eleven-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87(3):490-496.
32. Petersilge CA. Lumbar disc replacement. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2006;10(1):22-29.
33. Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP Jr, Lim MR, Tropiano P, Marnay T. Correlation between range of motion and outcome after lumbar total disc replacement: 8.6-year follow-up. Spine 2005;30(12): 1407-1411.
34. Huang RC, Tropiano P, Marnay T, Girardi FP, Lim MR, Cammisa FP Jr. Range of motion and adjacent level degeneration after lumbar total disc replacement. Spine J 2006;6(3):242-247.
35. Marnay T. Lumbar disc replacement: 1-11 years results with ProDisc. Presented at the fourth annual meeting of the Spine Society of Europe, Nantes, France, 2002.
36. Bertagnoli R, Kumar S. Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications. Eur Spine J 2002;11(suppl 2):S131-S136.
37. McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Devine J, Williams E, Yu-Yahiro J. Classification of heterotopic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16(4):384-389.
38. Freeman BJ, Davenport J. Total disc replacement in the lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 2006;15(suppl 3):S439-S447.