Relatively Fast! Efficiency Advantages of Comparative Thinking

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 138, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-21

  Mussweiler, Thomas ^a   Epstude, Kai ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

comparison; efficiency; procedural priming; thinking styles

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PRODUCTIVITY; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; THINKING;

ATTENTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONCEPT FORMATION; DECISION THEORY; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; EFFICIENCY; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; THINKING;

EID: 62949087128     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0014374     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Abelson R.P. Statistics as principled argument (1995), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
2. Andersen S.M., and Chen S. The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychological Review 109 (2002) 619-645
3. Baillargeon R. Reasoning about the height and location of a hidden object in 4.5- and 6.5-month-old infants. Cognition 38 (1991) 13-42
4. Bargh J.A. Attention and automaticity in the processing of self-relevant information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43 (1982) 425-436
5. Bargh J.A., and Chartrand T.L. The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In: Reis H.T., and Judd C. (Eds). Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2000), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA 253-285
6. Biernat M. Toward a broader view of social stereotyping. American Psychologist 58 (2003) 1019-1027
7. Biernat M., and Eidelman S. Standards. In: Kruglanski A.W., and Higgins E.T. (Eds). Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. 2nd ed. (2007), Guilford Press, New York 308-333
8. Bodenhausen G.V. Stereotypes as judgmental heuristics: Evidence of circadian variations in discrimination. Psychological Science 1 (1990) 319-322
9. Bodenhausen G.V., and Lichtenstein M. Social stereotypes and information-processing strategies: The impact of task complexity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52 (1987) 871-880
10. Brown D.R. Stimulus-similarity and the anchoring of subjective scales. American Journal of Psychology 66 (1953) 199-214
11. Bruner J. On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review 64 (1957) 123-152
12. Buunk A.P., and Gibbons F.X. Social comparison: The end of a theory and the emergence of a field. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 102 (2007) 3-21
13. Chapman G.B., and Johnson E.J. Incorporating the irrelevant: Anchors in judgments of belief and value. In: Gilovich T., Griffin D., and Kahneman D. (Eds). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (2002), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA 120-138
14. Choplin J.M., and Hummel J.E. Magnitude comparisons distort mental representations of magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 131 (2002) 270-286
15. Choplin J.M., and Hummel J.E. Comparison-induced decoy effects. Memory & Cognition 33 (2005) 332-343
16. Clement C.A., and Gentner D. Systematicity as a selection constraint in analogical mapping. Cognitive Science 15 (1991) 89-132
17. Coren S., and Enns J.T. Size contrast as a function of figural similarity. Perception and Psychophysics 54 (1993) 579-588
18. Dehaene S., Naccache L., Le Clec'H G., Koechlin E., Mueller M., Dehaene-Lambertz G., et al. Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature 395 (1998, October 8) 597-600
19. Dunning D., and Hayes A.F. Evidence of egocentric comparison in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 (1996) 213-229
20. Englich B., Mussweiler T., and Strack F. Playing dice with criminal sentences: The influence of irrelevant anchors on experts' judicial decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32 (2006) 188-200
21. Epstude K., and Roese N.J. The functional theory of counterfactual thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Review 12 (2008) 168-192
22. Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7 (1954) 117-140
23. Gentner D., and Markman A.B. Structural alignment in comparison: No difference without similarity. Psychological Science 5 (1994) 152-158
24. Gentner D., and Markman A.B. Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist 52 (1997) 45-56
25. Gentner D., and Medina J. Similarity and the development of rules. Cognition 65 (1998) 263-297
26. Gentner D., and Rattermann M.J. Language and the career of similarity. In: Gelman S.A., and Byrnes J.P. (Eds). Perspectives on thought and language: Interrelations in development (1991), Cambridge University Press, London 225-277
27. Gick M.L., and Holyoak K.J. Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology 12 (1980) 306-355
28. Gilbert D.T., Giesler R.B., and Morris K.A. When comparisons arise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69 (1995) 227-236
29. Goldstone R.L., and Medin D.L. Time course of comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20 (1994) 29-50
30. Helson H. Adaptation level theory: An experimental and systematic approach to behavior (1964), Harper, New York
31. Herr P.M. Consequences of priming: Judgment and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (1986) 1106-1115
32. Higgins E.T. Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review 94 (1987) 319-340
33. Higgins E.T., and Lurie L. Context, categorization, and recall: The "change-of-standard" effect. Cognitive Psychology 15 (1983) 525-547
34. Higgins E.T., and Stangor C. A "change-of-standard" perspective on the relations among context, judgment, and memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 (1988) 181-192
35. Higgins E.T., Strauman T., and Klein R. Standards and the process of self-evaluation: Multiple affects from multiple stages. In: Sorrentino R.M., and Higgins E.T. (Eds). Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (1986), Wiley, Chichester, United Kingdom 23-63
36. Hsee C.K. The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation of preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 67 (1996) 247-257
37. Iyengar S.S., and Lepper M. When choice is demotivating. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 (2000) 995-1006
38. Kahneman D., and Miller D.T. Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review 93 (1986) 136-153
39. Krueger J. On the perception of social consensus. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 30 (1998) 164-240
40. Krueger J.I. From social projection to social behavior. European Review of Social Psychology 18 (2007) 1-35
41. Kruglanski A.W. The psychology of being "right": The problem of accuracy in social perception and cognition. Psychological Bulletin 106 (1989) 395-409
42. Macrae C.N., and Bodenhausen G.V. Social cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Annual Review of Psychology 51 (2000) 93-120
43. Macrae C.N., Milne A.B., and Bodenhausen G.V. Stereotypes as energy-saving devices: A peek inside the cognitive toolbox. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66 (1994) 37-47
44. Markman A.D., and Gentner D. Structural alignment during similarity comparisons. Cognitive Psychology 25 (1993) 431-467
45. Markman A.D., and Gentner D. Commonalities and differences in similarity comparisons. Memory & Cognition 24 (1996) 235-249
46. Medin D.L., Goldstone R.L., and Gentner D. Respects for similarity. Psychological Review 100 (1993) 254-278
47. Miller D.T., and Prentice D.A. The construction of social norms and standards. In: Higgins E.T., and Kruglanski A.W. (Eds). Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (1996), Guilford Press, New York 799-829
48. Morse S., and Gergen K.J. Social comparison, self-consistency, and the concept of self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 16 (1970) 148-156
49. Mussweiler T. "Seek and ye shall find": Antecedents of assimilation and contrast in social comparison. European Journal of Social Psychology 31 (2001) 499-509
50. Mussweiler T. Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Psychological Review 110 (2003) 472-489
51. Mussweiler T., and Bodenhausen G.V. I know you are but what am I? Self-evaluative consequences of judging ingroup and outgroup members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82 (2002) 19-32
52. Mussweiler T., and Damisch L. Going back to Donald: How comparisons shape judgmental priming effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 95 (2008) 1295-1315
53. Mussweiler T., and Englich B. Subliminal anchoring: Judgmental consequences and underlying mechanisms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 98 (2005) 133-143
54. Mussweiler T., and Gentner D. On apples and oranges: Structural alignment in the selection of social comparison standards. Journal of Cognitive Science 8 (2007) 1-38
55. Mussweiler T., and Rüter K. What friends are for! The use of routine standards in social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 (2003) 467-481
56. Mussweiler T., Rüter K., and Epstude K. The man who wasn't there: Subliminal social comparison standards influence self-evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 40 (2004) 689-696
57. Mussweiler T., Rüter K., and Epstude K. The ups and downs of social comparison: Mechanisms of assimilation and contrast. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87 (2004) 832-844
58. Mussweiler T., and Strack F. Comparing is believing: A selective accessibility model of judgmental anchoring. In: Stroebe W., and Hewstone M. (Eds). European review of social psychology 10 (1999), Wiley, Chichester, United Kingdom 135-167
59. Mussweiler T., and Strack F. Hypothesis-consistent testing and semantic priming in the anchoring paradigm: A selective accessibility model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 35 (1999) 136-164
60. Navon D., and Gopher D. On the economy of the human processing system. Psychological Review 86 (1979) 214-255
61. Neely J.H. Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology 106 (1977) 226-254
62. Nosofsky R.M. Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115 (1986) 39-57
63. Nosofsky R.M., and Palmeri T.J. An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. Psychological Review 104 (1997) 266-300
64. Novick L.R. Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14 (1988) 510-520
65. Ross L., Green D., and House P. The false consensus phenomenon: An attributional bias in self-perception and social-perception processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13 (1977) 279-301
66. Rüter K., and Mussweiler T. Bonds of friendship: Comparative self-evaluations evoke the use of routine standards. Social Cognition 23 (2005) 137-160
67. Schwartz B., Ward A., Monterosso J., Lyubomirsky S., White K., and Lehman D.R. Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83 (2002) 1179-1197
68. Sherif M., and Hovland C.I. Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change (1961), Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
69. Sherman J.W., Klein S.B., Laskey A., and Wyer N.A. Intergroup bias in group judgment processes: The role of behavioral memories. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 34 (1998) 51-65
70. Sherman S.J., Ahlm D., Berman L., and Lynn S. Contrast effects and their relationship to subsequent behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 14 (1978) 340-350
71. Sherman S.J., Houston D.A., and Eddy D. Cancellation and focus: A feature-matching model of choice. In: Stroebe W., and Hewstone M. (Eds). European review of social psychology 10 (1999), Wiley, Chichester, United Kingdom 169-197
72. Smith E.R. Procedural knowledge and processing strategies in social cognition. In: Wyer R.S., and Srull T.K. (Eds). Handbook of social cognition. 2nd ed. 1 (1994), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 99-152
73. Smith E.R., and Zarate M.A. Exemplar-based model of social judgment. Psychological Review 99 (1992) 3-21
74. Swann W.B. Quest for accuracy in person perception: A matter of pragmatics. Psychological Review 91 (1984) 457-477
75. Taylor S.E. The interface of cognitive and social psychology. In: Harvey J. (Ed). Cognition, social behavior, and the environment (1981), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 182-211
76. Tversky A., and Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185 (1974, September 27) 1124-1130
77. Wickens C.D. The effects of divided attention in information processing in tracking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2 (1976) 1-13
78. Zeelenberg M., and Pieters R. A theory of regret regulation. Journal of Consumer Psychology 17 (2007) 3-18
79. Zhang S., and Markman A.B. Processing product unique features: Alignability and involvement in preference construction. Journal of Consumer Psychology 11 (2001) 13-27