Distances and directions in multidimensional shape spaces: Implications for morphometric applications

Systematic Biology

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 678-688

  Klingenberg, Christian Peter ^a   Montero, Leonardo R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b Centro de Biociencias e Biotecnologia   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; BIOMETRY; GENETIC SELECTION; METHODOLOGY; MORPHOMETRICS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; REVIEW;

ANATOMY; BIOMETRY; BODY WEIGHTS AND MEASURES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MODELS, GENETIC; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; SELECTION (GENETICS);

EID: 15244360917     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150590947258     Document Type: Review

References (72)

1. Albertson, R. C., J. T. Streelman, and T. D. Kocher. 2003a. Directional selection has shaped the oral jaws of Lake Malawi cichlid fishes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:5252-5257.
2. Albertson, R. C., J. T. Streelman, and T. D. Kocher. 2003b. Genetic basis of adaptive shape differences in the cichlid head. J. Hered. 94:291-301.
3. Albrecht, G. H. 1980. Multivariate analysis and the study of form, with special reference to canonical variate analysis. Am. Zool. 20:679-693.
4. Arnqvist, G., and R. Thornhill. 1998. Evolution of animal genitalia: Patterns of phenotypic and genotypic variation and condition dependence of genital and non-genital morphology in water strider (Heteroptera: Gerridae: Insecta). Genet. Res. 71:193-212.
5. Auffray, J.-C., V. Debat, and P. Alibert. 1999. Shape asymmetry and developmental stability. Pages 309-324 in On growth and form: Spatiotemporal pattern formation in biology (M. A. J. Chaplain, G. D. Singh, and J. C. McLachlan, eds.). Wiley, Chichester.
6. Badyaev, A. V., and K. R. Foresman. 2000. Extreme environmental change and evolution: Stress-induced morphological variation is strongly concordant with patterns of evolutionary divergence in shrew mandibles. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 267:371-377.
7. Bookstein, F. L. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data: Geometry and biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. Bookstein, F. L. 1996. Biometrics, biomathematics and the morphometric synthesis. Bull. Math. Biol. 58:313-365.
9. Bookstein, F. L. 1998. A hundred years of morphometrics. Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. Hung. 44:7-59.
10. Bookstein, F. L., P. Gunz, P. Mitteroecker, H. Prossinger, K. Schaefer, and H. Seidler. 2003. Cranial integration in Homo: Singular warps analysis of the midsagittal plane in ontogeny and evolution. J. Hum. Evol. 44:167-187.
11. Campbell, N. A., and W. R. Atchley. 1981. The geometry of canonical variate analysis. Syst. Zool. 30:268-280.
12. Cardini, A. 2003. The geometry of the marmot (Rodentia: Sciuridae) mandible: Phylogeny and patterns of morphological evolution. Syst. Biol. 52:186-205.
13. Carroll, J. D., P. E. Green, and A. Chaturvedi. 1997. Mathematical tools for applied multivariate analysis. Academic Press, San Diego.
14. Cheverud, J. M. 1984. Quantitative genetics and developmental constraints on evolution by selection. J. Theoret. Biol. 110:155-171.
15. Cheverud, J. M., G. P. Wagner, and M. M. Dow. 1989. Methods for the comparative analysis of variation patterns. Syst. Zool. 38:201-213.
16. Corti, M., and F. J. Rohlf. 2001. Chromosomal speciation and phenoty pic evolution in the house mouse. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 73:99-112.
17. Currie, A. J., S. Ganeshanandam, D. A. Noiton, D. Garrick, C. J. A. Shelbourne, and N. Oraguzie. 2000. Quantitative evaluation of apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.) fruit shape by principal component analysis of Fourier descriptors. Euphytica 111:219-227.
18. Debat, V., P. Alibert, P. David, E. Paradis, and J.-C. Auffray. 2000. Independence between developmental stability and canalization in the skull of the house mouse. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 267:423-430.
19. Debat, V., M. Bégin, H. Legout, and J. R. David. 2003. Allometric and nonallometric components of Drosophila wing shape respond differently to developmental temperature. Evolution 57:2773-2784.
20. Dobigny, G., M. Baylac, and C. Denys. 2002. Geometric morphometrics, neural networks and diagnosis of sibling Taterillus species (Rodentia, Gerbillinae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 77:319-327.
21. Douglas, M. E., M. R. Douglas, J. M. Lynch, and D. M. McElroy. 2001. Use of geometric morphometrics to differentiate Gila (Cyprinidae) within the upper Colorado River basin. Copeia 2001:389-400.
22. Dryden, I. L., and K. V. Mardia. 1998. Statistical shape analysis. Wiley, Chichester.
23. Duarte, L. C., L. R. Monteiro, F. J. Von Zuben, and S. F. Dos Reis. 2000. Variation in mandible shape in Trichomys apereoides (Mammalia: Rodentia): Geometric analysis of a complex morphological structure. Syst. Biol. 49:563-578.
24. Falconer, D. S., and T. F. C. Mackay. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edition. Longman, Essex.
25. Felsenstein, J. 1988. Phylogenies and quantitative characters. Annu. Revi. Ecol. Syst. 19:455-471.
26. Felsenstein, J. 2002. Quantitative characters, phylogenies, and morphometrics. Pages 27-44 in Morphology, shape and phylogeny (N. MacLeod, and P. L. Forey, eds.). Taylor & Francis, London.
27. Fernández Iriarte, P., W. Céspedes, and M. Santos. 2003. Quantitative-genetic analysis of wing form and bilateral asymmetry in isochromosomal lines of Drosophila subobscura using Procrustes methods. J. Genet. 82:95-113.
28. Fisher, R. A. 1918. The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Trans. R. Soci. Edinburgh 52:399-433.
29. Flury, B. 1997. A first course in multivariate statistics. Springer, New York.
30. Flury, B., and H. Riedwyl. 1986. Standard distance in univariate and multivariate analysis. Am. Stat. 40:249-251.
31. Goodall, C. R. 1991. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 53:285-339.
32. Harvati, K. 2003. Quantitative analysis of Neanderthal temporal bone morphology using three-dimensional geometric morphometrics. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 120:323-338.
33. Kent, J. T., and K. V. Mardia. 1997. Consistency of Procrustes estimators. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 59:281-290.
34. Klingenberg, C. P. 2003a. A developmental perspective on developmental instability: Theory, models and mechanisms. Pages 14-34 in Developmental instability: Causes and consequences (M. Polak, ed.) Oxford University Press, New York.
35. Klingenberg, C. P. 2003b. Quantitative genetics of geometric shape: Heritability and the pitfalls of the univariate approach. Evolution 57:191-195.
36. Klingenberg, C. P., A. V. Badyaev, S. M. Sowry, and N. J. Beckwith. 2001a. Inferring developmental modularity from morphological integration: Analysis of individual variation and asymmetry in bumblebee wings. Am. Nat. 157:11-23.
37. Klingenberg, C. P., M. Barluenga, and A. Meyer. 2002. Shape analysis of symmetric structures: Quantifying variation among individuals and asymmetry. Evolution 56:1909-1920.
38. Klingenberg, C. P., M. Barluenga, and A. Meyer. 2003a. Body shape variation in cichlid fishes of the Amphilophus citrinellus species complex. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 80:397-408.
39. Klingenberg, C. P., and L. J. Leamy. 2001. Quantitative genetics of geometric shape in the mouse mandible. Evolution 55:2342-2352.
40. Klingenberg, C. P., L. J. Leamy, and J. M. Cheverud. 2004. Integration and modularity of quantitative trait locus effects on geometric shape in the mouse mandible. Genetics 166:1909-1921.
41. Klingenberg, C. P., L. J. Leamy, E. J. Routman, and J. M. Cheverud. 2001b. Genetic architecture of mandible shape in mice: Effects of quantitative trait loci analyzed by geometric morphometrics. Genetics 157:785-802.
42. Klingenberg, C. P., and G. S. McIntyre. 1998. Geometric morphometrics of developmental instability: Analyzing patterns of fluctuating asymmetry with Procrustes methods. Evolution 52:1363-1375.
43. Klingenberg, C. P., G. S. McIntyre, and S. D. Zaklan. 1998. Left-right asymmetry of fly wings and the evolution of body axes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 265:1255-1259.
44. Klingenberg, C. P., K. Mebus, and J.-C. Auffray. 2003b. Developmental integration in a complex morphological structure: How distinct are the modules in the mouse mandible? Evol. Dev. 5:522-531.
45. Klingenberg, C. P., and H. F. Nijhout. 1999. Genetics of fluctuating asymmetry: A developmental model of developmental instability. Evolution 53:358-375.
46. Klingenberg, C. P., and S. D. Zaklan. 2000. Morphological integration between developmental compartments in the Drosophila wing. Evolution 54:1273-1285.
47. Lande, R. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain: Body size allometry. Evolution 33:402-416.
48. Lande, R., and S. J. Arnold. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210-1226.
49. Leamy, L. J., M. S. Workman, E. J. Routman, and J. M. Cheverud. 2005. An epistatic genetic basis for fluctuating asymmetry of tooth size and shape in mice. Heredity 94:316-325.
50. Lele, S. R. 1993. Euclidean distance matrix analysis (EDMA): Estimation of mean form and mean form difference. Math. Geol. 25:573-602.
51. Lele, S. R., and J. T. Richtsmeier. 2001. An invariant approach to statistical analysis of shapes. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton.
52. Liu, J., J. M. Mercer, L. F. Stam, G. C. Gibson, Z.-B. Zeng, and C. C. Laurie. 1996. Genetic analysis of a morphological shape difference in the male genitalia of Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. Genetics 142:1129-1145.
53. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
54. Mantel, N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 27:209-220.
55. Mardia, K. V., J. T. Kent, and J. M. Bibby. 1979. Multivariate analysis. Academic Press, London.
56. Møller, A. P., and J. P. Swaddle. 1997. Asymmetry, developmental stability, and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
57. Monteiro, L. R., J. A. F. Diniz-Filho, S. F. Dos Reis, and E. D. Araújo. 2002. Geometric estimates of heritability in biological shape. Evolution 56:563-572.
58. Monteiro, L. R., J. A. F. Diniz-Filho, S. F. Dos Reis, and E. D. Araújo. 2003. Shape distances in general linear models: Are they really at odds with the goals of morphometrics? A reply to Klingenberg. Evolution 57:196-199.
59. Palmer, A. R., and C. Strobeck. 1986. Fluctuating asymmetry: Measurement, analysis, patterns. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17:391-421.
60. Palmer, A. R., and C. Strobeck. 2003. Fluctuating asymmetry analyses revisited. Pages 279-319 in Developmental instability: Causes and consequences (M. Polak, ed.). Oxford University Press, New York.
61. Phillips, P. C., and S. J. Arnold. 1989. Visualizing multivariate selection. Evolution 43:1209-1222.
62. Roff, D. A. 1997. Evolutionary quantitative genetics. Chapman & Hall, New York.
63. Rohlf, F. J. 1999. Shape statistics: Procrustes superimpositions and tangent spaces. J. Classif. 16:197-223.
64. Rohlf, F. J. 2001. Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: Geometric interpretations. Evolution 55:2143-2160.
65. Rohlf, F. J. 2002. Geometric morphometrics and phylogeny. Pages 175-193 in Morphology, shape, and phylogeny (N. MacLeod, and P. L. Forey, eds.). Taylor & Francis, London.
66. Rohlf, F. J., and M. Corti. 2000. The use of two-block partial least-squares to study covariation in shape. Syst. Biol. 49:740-753.
67. Rohlf, F. J., A. Loy, and M. Corti. 1996. Morphometric analysis of Old World Talpidae (Mammalia, Insectivora) unsing partial-warp scores. Syst. Biol. 45:344-362.
68. Rüber, L., and D. C. Adams. 2001. Evolutionary convergence of body shape and trophic morphology in cichlids from Lake Tanganyika. J. Evol. Biol. 14:325-332.
69. Smith, D. R., B. J. Crespi, and F. L. Bookstein. 1997. Fluctuating asymmetry in the honey bee, Apis mellifera: Effects of ploidy and hybridization. J. Evol. Biol. 10:551-574.
70. Steppan, S. J., P. C. Phillips, and D. Houle. 2002. Comparative quantitative genetics: Evolution of the G matrix. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:320-327.
71. Workman, M. S., L. J. Leamy, E. J. Routman, and J. M. Cheverud. 2002. Analysis of quantitative trait locus effects on the size and shape of mandibular molars in mice. Genetics 160:1573-1586.
72. Zimmerman, E., A. Palsson, and G. Gibson. 2000. Quantitative trait loci affecting components of wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 155:671-683.