Stroke motor recovery: Active neuromuscular stimulation and repetitive practice schedules

Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry

Volumn 74, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 1562-1566

  Cauraugh, J H ^a   Kim, S B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARM; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; ELBOW; ELECTROMYOGRAM; FEMALE; FINGER; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; JOINT FUNCTION; LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE TRAINING; NEUROMUSCULAR FUNCTION; NEUROMUSCULAR STIMULATION; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; REACTION TIME; REPETITIVE PRACTICE SCHEDULE; REPETITIVE STRAIN INJURY; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SHOULDER; STIMULATION; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT; WRIST;

EID: 0242556419     PISSN: 00223050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.74.11.1562     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Cauraugh JH, Kim SB. Two coupled motor recovery protocols are better than one: electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation and bilateral movements. Stroke 2002;33:1589-94.
2. Cramer SC, Bastings EP. Mapping clinically relevant plasticity after stroke. Neuropharmacology 2000;39:842-51.
3. Hallett M. Plasticity of the human motor cortex and recovery from stroke. Brain Res Rev 2001;36:169-74.
4. Hallett M. Recent advances in stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002;16:211-17.
5. Schmidt RA, Bjork RA. New conceptualizations of practice: common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychol Sci 1992;3:207-17.
6. Shumway-Cook A, Woollocott MH. Motor control: theory and practical applications, 2nd ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2001.
7. Shea JB, Morgan RL. Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. J Exp Psychol: Hum Learn Mem 1979;5:179-87.
8. Immink MA, Wright DL. Motor programming during practice conditions high and low in contextual interference. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 2001;27:423-37.
9. Cauraugh JH, Light K, Kim SB, et al. Chronic motor dysfunction after stroke: recovering wrist and finger extension by electromyography triggered neuromuscular stimulation. Stroke 2000;31:1360-4.
10. Burridge JH, Ladouceur M. Clinical and therapeutic applications of neuromuscular stimulation: A review of current use and speculation into future developments. Neuromodulation 2001;4:147-54.
11. Cauraugh JH, Kim SB. Progress toward motor recovery with active neuromuscular stimulation: Muscle activation pattern evidence after a stroke. J Neurol Sci 2003;207:25-9.
12. Chae J, Yu D. Neuromuscular stimulation for motor relearning in hemiplegia. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med 1999;11:279-97.
13. Muellbacher W, Richards C, Ziemann U, et al. Improving hand function in chronic stroke. Arch Neurol 2002;59:1278-82.
14. Saper CB, Iversen S, Frackowiak R. Integration of sensory and motor function: the association areas of the cerebral cortex and the cognitive capabilities of the brain. In: Kondel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM, eds. Principles of neural science, 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2000:349-80.
15. Pleger B, Schwenkris P, Dinse H, et al. Pharmacological suppression of plastic changes in human primary somatosensory cortex after motor learning. Exp Brain Res 2002; Online publication: DOI 10.1007/s00221-022-1324-1.
16. Bernstein NA. The co-ordination and regulation of movements. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1967.
17. Baratta RV, Solomonow M, Zhou BH, et al. Methods to reduce the variability of EMG power spectrum estimates. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 1998;8:279-85.
18. Macaluso A, De Vito G, Felici F, et al. Electromyogram changes during sustained contraction after resistance training in women in their 3rd and 8th decades. Eur J Appl Physiol 2000;82:418-24.
19. Mathiowetz V, Vollard G, Kashman N, et al. Adult norms for the Box and Block test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther 1985;39:386-91.
20. Ghez C, Krakauer J. The organization of movement. In: Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM, eds. Principles of neural science, 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2000:653-73.
21. Krakauer J, Ghez C. Voluntary movement. In: Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM, eds. Principles of neural science, 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2000:756-81.
22. Altman DG, Schulz KF. Concealing treatment allocation in randomized trials. BMJ 2001;323:446-7.
23. Weiss AD. The locus of reaction time change with set, motivation, and age. J Gerontol 1965;20:60-4.
24. Botwinick J, Thompson LW. Premotor and motor components of reaction time. J Exp Psychol 1966;71:9-15.
25. Altman DG. Statistics in medical journals: some recent trends. Stat Med 2000;19:3275-89.
26. Winer BJ, Brown DR, Michels KM. Statistical principles in experimental design, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991.
27. Cauraugh JH. Experimental design and statistical decisions tutorial: comments on longitudinal ideomotor apraxia recovery. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2002;12:75-83.
28. Basmajian JV. Biofeedback principles and practice for clinicians, 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1989.
29. Chae J, Yang G, Park B, et al. Delay in initiation and termination of muscle contraction, motor impairment, and physical disability in upper limb hemiparesis. Muscle Nerve 2002;25:568-75.
30. Christou EA, Shinohara M, Enoka RM. Fluctuations in acceleration during voluntary contractions lead to greater impairment of movement accuracy in old adults. J Appl Physiol 2003: online publication 10.1152.
31. Cohen LG, Hallett M. Neural plasticity and recovery of function. In: Greenwood RJ, Barnes MP, McMillan TM, et al, eds. Handbook of neurological rehabilitation, 2nd ed. Hove, England: Psychology Press, 2003:99-111.
32. Duncan PW, Lai SM. Stroke recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil 1997;4:51-8.