Pedagogically founded courseware generation based on HTN-planning

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 9319-9332

  Ullrich, Carsten ^a   Melis, Erica ^b  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b GERMAN RESEARCH CENTER FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DFKI   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adaptivity; Courseware generation; Pedagogical knowledge; Technology supported learning

Indexed keywords

EXPERT SYSTEMS; ROBOTIC ASSEMBLY;

ADAPTIVITY; AUTOMATIC ASSEMBLIES; COURSEWARE GENERATION; EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES; LEARNING GOALS; LEARNING TIME; PEDAGOGICAL KNOWLEDGE; PLANNING OPERATORS; TECHNICAL EVALUATIONS;

EDUCATION;

EID: 60849109483     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.12.043     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bhatti, N., Bouch, A., & Kuchinsky, A. (2000). Integrating user-perceived quality into web server design. In Proceedings of the 9th international World Wide Web conference on computer networks: the International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Netowrking (pp. 1-16). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland Publishing Co. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1286(00)00087-6.
2. Brusilovsky, P., & Millán, E. (2007). User models for adaptive hypermedia and adaptive educational systems. In P. Brusilovsky, A. Kobsa & W. Nejdl (Eds.), The adaptive web. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 4321, pp. 3-53). Springer.
3. Brusilovsky P., and Vassileva J. Course sequencing techniques for large-scale webbased education. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning 13 1/2 (2003) 75-94
4. Conlan, O., Lewis, D. Higel, S., O'Sullivan, D., & Wade, V. (2003). Applying adaptive hypermedia techniques to semantic web service composition. In P. de Bra (Ed.), Proceedings of AH2003: Workshop on adaptive hypermedia and adaptive web-based systems, Budapest, Hungary, May 20-24 (pp. 53-62).
5. De Bra P. Pros and cons of adaptive hypermedia in web-based education. Journal on CyberPsychology and Behavior 3 1 (2000) 71-77
6. Dimitrova V. STyLE-OLM: Interactive open learner modelling. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 13 (2002) 35-78
7. Etzioni, O., Hanks, S., Weld, D., Draper, D., Lesh, N., & Williamson, M. (1992). An approach to planning with incomplete information. In B. Nebel, C. Rich, & W. R. Swartout (Eds.), Proceedings of the third international conference on principles of knowledge representation and reasoning, Cambridge, MA, USA (pp. 115-125). San Mateo, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann publishers Inc. ISBN: 1-55860-262-3. .
8. Ilghami, O., & Nau, D. S. (2003). A general approach to synthesize problem-specific planners. Technical Report CS-TR-4597, Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland.
9. IMS global learning consortium. IMS content packaging information model, June 2003.
10. Karampiperis P., and Sampson D. Automatic learning object selection and sequencing in web-based intelligent learning systems. In: Zongmin M. (Ed). Web-based intelligent e-learning systems: technologies and applications (2005), Information Science Publishing 56-71 (chapter III)
11. Kärger, P., Ullrich, C., & Melis, E. (2006). Integrating learning object repositories using a mediator architecture. In W. Nejdl & K. Tochtermann (Eds.), Innovative approaches for learning and knowledge sharing. Proceedings of the first European conference on technology enhanced learning, Heraklion, Greece (Vol. 4227, pp. 185-197). Springer-Verlag. ISBN: 9783540457770. .
12. Keenoy, K., Levene, M., & Peterson, D. (2003). Personalisation and trails in self e-learning networks. WP4 Deliverable 4.2, IST Self E-Learning Networks.
13. Kohlhase M. OMDoc - An open markup format for mathematical documents (2006), Springer-Verlag ISBN: 3540378979
14. Mayes J.T. Cognitive tools: A suitable case for learning. In: Kommers P.A.M., Jonassen D.H., and Mayes J.T. (Eds). Cognitive Tools for Learning, volume 81 of NATO ASI Series, Series F: Computer and Systems Science (1992), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heriot-Watt University, UK 7-18
15. Melis E., Goguadze G., Homik M., Libbrecht P., Ullrich C., and Winterstein S. Semantic-aware components and services of ActiveMath. British Journal of Educational Technology 37 3 (2006) 405-423
16. Méndez N.D.D., Ramírez C.J., and Luna J.A.G. IA planning for automatic generation of customized virtual courses. Frontiers In Artificial Intelligence And Applications. Proceedings of ECAI 2004 Vol. 117 (2004), IOS Press, Valencia, Spain 138-147
17. Merrill M.D. First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research & Development 50 3 (2002) 43-59
18. Nau, D., Au, T.-C., Ilghami, O., Kuter, U., Munoz-Avila, H., Murdock, J. W., et al. (2005). Applications of shop and shop2. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 20(2), 34-41. ISSN: 1541-1672. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2005.20.
19. Nau D.S., Muñoz-Avila H., Cao Y., Lotem A., and Mitchell S. Total-order planning with partially ordered subtasks. In: Nebel B. (Ed). Proceedings of the 17th international joint conference on artificial intelligence, IJCAI 2001 (2001), Morgan Kaufmann, Seattle, Washington, USA 425-430
20. Niss, M. (2002). Mathematical competencies and the learning of mathematics: the danish KOM project. Technical report, IMFUFA, Roskilde University.
21. Novak J.D., and Gowin D.B. Learning how to learn (1984), Cambridge University Press, New York
22. OECD (Ed.) (2004). Learning for tomorrows world - First results from PISA 2003. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Publishing.
23. Peachy D.R., and McCalla G.I. Using planning techniques in intelligent tutoring systems. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 24 1 (1986) 77-98
24. Pintrich P.R. The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research 31 (1999) 459-470
25. Prenzel M., Carstensen C.H., and Ramm G. PISA 2003 - Eine Einführung. In: PISA-Konsortium Deutschland (Ed). PISA 2003 - Der Bildungsstand der Jugendlichen in Deutschland - Ergebnisse des zweiten internationalen Vergleichs (2004), Waxmann Verlag, Münster, Germany 13-46
26. Russell, S. J. & Norvig, P. (2003). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. Pearson Education. ISBN: 137903952.
27. Sacerdoti, E. (1975). The nonlinear nature of plans. In The proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on artificial intelligence, Tiblisi, USSR (pp. 206-214). Morgan Kaufmann.
28. Sicilia, M.-A., Sánchez-Alonso, S., & García-Barriocanal, E. (2006). On supporting the process of learning design through planners. In Virtual campus 2006 post-proceedings. Selected and extended papers (pp. 81-89).
29. Specht, M., Kravcik, M., Pesin, L., & Klemke, R. (2001). Authoring adaptive educational hypermedia in WINDS. In N. Henze (Ed.), Proceedings of the ABIS 2001 workshop.
30. Specht M., and Oppermann R. ACE - adaptive courseware environment. The New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 4 (1998) 141-162
31. Tate A. Generating project networks. Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on artificial intelligence (1977), Morgan Kaufmann 888-893
32. Ullrich C. The learning-resource-type is dead, long live the learning- resource-type!. Learning Objects and Learning Designs 1 1 (2005) 7-15.
33. Van Marcke K. Instructional expertise. In: Frasson C., Gauthier G., and McCalla G.I. (Eds). Proceedings of the second international conference on intelligent tutoring systems, Montréal, Canada. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 608 (1992), Springer, Heidelberg 234-243 ISBN: 3-540-55606-0
34. Vassileva J., and Deters R. Dynamic courseware generation on the www. British Journal of Educational Technology 29 1 (1998) 5-14
35. Wiley, D. A. 2000. Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In D. A. Wiley (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects: Online version. published online.
36. Zech F. Grundkurs mathematikdidaktik (2002), Beltz Verlag, Weinheim