BidAnalyzer: A method for estimation and selection of dynamic bidding models

Marketing Science

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 949-960

  Jap, Sandy D ^a   Naik, Prasad A ^b  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Competitive bidding; E procurement; Electronic commerce; Internet auctions; Kalman filtering; Reverse auctions; Supplier sourcing

Indexed keywords

EID: 60849100529     PISSN: 07322399     EISSN: 1526548X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/mksc.1080.0363     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ariely, D., I. Simonson. 2003. Buying, bidding, playing or competing? Value assessment and decision dynamics in online auctions. J. Consumer Psych. 13(1-2) 113-123.
2. Bapna, R., W. Jank, G. Shmueli. 2004. Price formation and its dynamics in online auctions. Working paper, University of Maryland, College Park.
3. Bass, F. M., N. Bruce, S. Majumdar, B. P. S. Murthi. 2007. Wearout effects of different advertising themes: A dynamic Bayesian model of the advertising-sales relationship. Marketing Sci. 26(2) 179-195.
4. Beall, S., C. Carter, P. L. Carter, T. Germer, T. Hendrick, S. Jap, L. Kaufmann, D. Madejewski, R. Monczka, K. Petersen. 2003. The role of reverse auctions in strategic sourcing. Research paper, Center for Advanced Purchasing Studies (CAPS), Tempe, AZ.
5. Bikhchandani, S., D. Hirshleifer, I. Welch. 1992. A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. J. Political Econom. 100(5) 992-1026.
6. Bradlow, E. T., Y.-H. Park. 2007. Bayesian estimation of bid sequences in Internet auctions using a generalized record-breaking model. Marketing Sci. 26(2) 218-229.
7. Burnham, K. P., D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag, New York.
8. Dekimpe, M. G., P. H. Franses, D. M. Hanssens, P. A. Naik. 2008. Time series models in marketing. B. Wierenga, ed. Handbook of Marketing Decisions-Making Models. Springer, New York, 373-398.
9. Durbin, J., S. J. Koopman. 2001. Time Series Analysis by State Space Methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
10. Emiliani, M. L. 2000. Business-to-business online auctions: Key issues for purchasing process improvement. Supply Chain Management 5(4) 176-186.
11. Frühwirth-Schnatter, S. 2006. Finite Mixture and Markov Switching Models. Springer, New York.
12. Häubl, G., P. T. L. Popkowski-Leszczyc. 2006. Bidding frenzy: How the speed of competitor reaction influences product valuations in auctions. Working paper, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
13. Heyman, J., Y. Orhun, D. Ariely. 2004. Auction fever: The effect of opponents and quasi endowment on product valuations. J. Interactive Marketing 18(4) 7-21.
14. Hohner, G., J. Rich, E. Ng, G. Reid, A. J. Davenport, J. R. Kalagnanam, H. S. Lee, C. An. 2003. Combinatorial and quantity-discount procurement auctions benefit Mars, Incorporated and its suppliers. Interfaces 33(1) 23-35.
15. Hurvich, C. M., C.-L. Tsai. 1989. Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 76(2) 297-307.
16. Jap, S. D. 2002. Online reverse auctions: Issues, themes, and prospects for the future. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 30(4) 506-525.
17. Katok, E., A. M. Kwasnica. 2002. Time is money: The effect of clock speed on seller's revenue in Dutch auctions. ISBM Report 11-2002, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
18. Klemperer, P. 1999. Auction theory: A guide to the literature. J. Econom. Surveys 13(3) 227-286.
19. Ku, G., D. Malhotra, J. K. Murnighan. 2005. Towards a competitive arousal model of decision making: A study of auction fever in live and Internet auctions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 96 89-103.
20. Mabert, V. A., J. A. Skeels. 2002. Internet reverse auctions: Valuable tools in experienced hands. Business Horizons 70-76.
21. McAfee, R. P., J. McMillan. 1987. Auctions and bidding. J. Econom. Literature 25(2) 699-738.
22. Metty, T., R. Harlan, Q. Samelson, T. Moore, T. Morris, R. Sorenson, A. Schneur, O. R. R. Schneur, J. Kanner, K. Potts, J. Robbins. 2005. Reinventing the supplier negotiation process at Motorola. Interfaces 35(1) 7-23.
23. Naik, P. A., K. Raman. 2003. Understanding the impact of synergy in multimedia communications. J. Marketing Res. 40(4) 375-388.
24. Naik, P. A., M. Mantrala, A. Sawyer. 1998. Planning media schedules in the presence of dynamic advertising quality. Marketing Sci. 17(3) 214-235.
25. Naik, P. A., K. Raman, R. Winer. 2005. Planning marketing-mix strategies in the presence of interactions. Marketing Sci. 24(1) 25-34.
26. Naik, P. A., P. Shi, C.-L. Tsai. 2007. Extending the Akaike information criterion to mixture regression models. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 102(477) 244-254.
27. Oren, S. S., M. H. Rothkopf. 1975. Optimal bidding in sequential auctions. Oper. Res. 23 1080-1090.
28. Park, Y.-H., S. B. Rhee, E. Bradlow. 2003. An integrated model for who, when and how much in Internet auctions. Working paper, Wharton Business School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
29. Pinker, E., A. Seidmann, Y. Vakrat. 2003. Managing online auctions: Current business and research issues. Management Sci. 49(11) 1457-1484.
30. Sandholm, T., D. Levine, M. Concordia, P. Martyn, R. Hughes, J. Jacobs, D. Begg. 2006. Changing the game in strategic sourcing at Procter & Gamble: Expressive competition enabled by optimization. Interfaces 36(1) 55-72.
31. Seshadri, S., K. Chatterjee, G. L. Lilien. 1991. Multiple source procurement competitions. Marketing Sci. 10(3) 246-263.
32. Sheffi, Y. 2004. Combinatorial auctions in the procurement of transportation services. Interfaces 34(4) 245-252.
33. Shugan, S. M. 2005. Marketing and designing transaction games. Marketing Sci. 24(4) 525-530.
34. Shumway, R. H., D. S. Stoffer. 1982. An approach to time series smoothing and forecasting using the EM algorithm. J. Time Ser. Anal. 3 253-264.
35. Stein, A., P. Hawking, D. C. Wyld. 2003. The 20% solution?: A case study on the efficacy of reverse auctions. Management Res. News 26(5) 1-20.
36. Tuunainen, V. K., E. van Heck, O. Koppius. 2001. Auction speed as a design variable for Internet auctions. Working paper, Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
37. Wilcox, R. T. 2000. Experts and amateurs: The role of experience in Internet auctions. Marketing Lett. 11(4) 363-374.
38. Zeithammer, R. 2006. Forward-looking bidding in online auctions. J. Marketing Res. 43(3) 462-176.