Pseudocontingencies: An Integrative Account of an Intriguing Cognitive Illusion

Psychological Review

Volumn 116, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 187-206

  Fiedler, Klaus ^a   Freytag, Peter ^a   Meiser, Thorsten ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

adaptive cognition; aggregation; base rate; contingency; illusory correlations

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; ILLUSION; LEARNING; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; BAYES THEOREM; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; JUDGMENT; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; STEREOTYPING;

EID: 60749124213     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0014480     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Allan L.G. Human contingency judgments: Rule based or associative?. Psychological Bulletin 114 (1993) 435-448
2. Allan L.G., Hannah S.D., Crump M.J.C., and Siegel S. The psychophysics of contingency assessment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 137 (2008) 226-243
3. Alloy L.B., and Tabachnik N. Assessment of covariation by humans and animals: The joint influence of prior expectations and current situational information. Psychological Review 91 (1984) 112-149
4. Arieh Y., and Algom D. Processing picture-word stimuli: The contingent nature of picture and of word superiority. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28 (2002) 221-232
5. Batchelder W.H., and Riefer D.M. Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. Psychological Review 97 (1990) 548-564
6. Batchelder W.H., and Riefer D.M. Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 6 (1999) 57-86
7. Bluemke, M., & Fiedler, K. (2008). Base rate effects on the IAT. Manuscript submitted for publication.
8. Bousfield W.A., and Puff C.R. Determinants of the clustering of taxonomically and associatively related word pairs. Journal of General Psychology 73 (1965) 211-221
9. Chater N., and Oaksford M. The probabilistic mind: Prospects for Bayesian cognitive science (2008), Oxford University Press, London
10. Chater N., Vlaev I., and Grinberg M. A new consequence of Simpson's paradox: Stable cooperation in one-shot prisoner's dilemma from populations of individualistic learners. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 137 (2008) 403-421
11. Cohen B.H. Some-or-none characteristics of coding behavior. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 5 (1966) 182-187
12. Conger A.J., and Jackson D.N. Suppressor variables, prediction, and the interpretation of psychological relationships. Educational and Psychological Measurement 32 (1972) 579-599
13. Crocker J. Judgment of covariation by social perceivers. Psychological Bulletin 90 (1981) 272-292
14. Dawes R.M. Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology 31 (1980) 169-193
15. DeHouwer J., and Beckers T. A review of recent developments in research and theories on human contingency learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology 55 B (2002) 289-310
16. Dougherty M.R.P., Gettys C.F., and Ogden E.E. MINERVA-DM: A memory processes model for judgments of likelihood. Psychological Review 106 (1999) 180-209
17. Eder, A. B., Fiedler, K., & Hamm-Eder, S. (2008). Illusory correlations revisited: The role of pseudocontingencies and working-memory capacity. Manuscript submitted for publication.
18. Erev I., and Barron G. On adaptation, maximization, and reinforcement learning among cognitive strategies. Psychological Review 112 (2005) 912-932
19. Fairchild H.H. Scientific racism: The cloak of objectivity. Journal of Social Issues 47 (1991) 101-115
20. Fiedler K. Person memory and person judgments based on categorically organized information. Acta Psychologica 61 (1986) 117-135
21. Fiedler K. Explaining and simulating judgment biases as an aggregation phenomenon in probabilistic, multiple-cue environments. Psychological Review 103 (1996) 193-214
22. Fiedler K. Illusory correlations: A simple associative algorithm provides a convergent account of seemingly divergent paradigms. Review of General Psychology 4 (2000) 25-58
23. Fiedler K. Pseudocontingencies: A key paradigm for understanding adaptive cognition. In: Chater N., and Oaksford M. (Eds). The probabilistic mind: Prospects for Bayesian cognitive science (2008), Oxford University Press, London 165-186
24. Fiedler, K., & Freytag, P. (1999). [Pseudocontingencies inferred from propositional information]. Unpublished raw data.
25. Fiedler K., and Freytag P. Pseudocontingencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87 (2004) 453-467
26. Fiedler K., Freytag P., and Unkelbach C. Pseudocontingencies in a simulated classroom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92 (2007) 665-677
27. Fiedler K., and Graf R. Grouping and categorization in judgment of contingency. In: Caverni J.P., Fabre J.M., and Gonzalez M. (Eds). Cognitive biases (1990), North-Holland, Oxford, England 47-57
28. Fiedler K., Russer S., and Gramm K. Illusory correlations and memory performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 29 (1993) 111-136
29. Fiedler K., and Stroehm W. The use of statistical, spatial-temporal, and intensional information in judgments of contingency. European Journal of Social Psychology 16 (1986) 385-398
30. Fiedler K., Walther E., Freytag P., and Plessner H. Judgment biases in a simulated classroom: A cognitive-environmental approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 88 (2002) 527-561
31. Fiedler K., Walther E., and Nickel S. Covariation-based attribution: On the ability to assess multiple covariates of an effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25 (1999) 607-622
32. Freytag P. Contextually determined typicality (2003), Logos, Berlin, Germany
33. Freytag, P., Kutzner, F., Vogel, T., & Fiedler, K. (2008). [On the adaptive value of pseudocontingencies]. Unpublished raw data.
34. Freytag, P., Vogel, T., Kutzner, F., & Fiedler, K. (2008). [Pseudocontingencies due to base-rate reproduction]. Unpublished raw data.
35. Gaissmaier W., Schooler L.J., and Rieskamp J. Simple predictions fueled by capacity limitations: When are they successful?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 32 (2006) 966-982
36. Garner W.R. The stimulus in information processing. American Psychologist 25 (1970) 350-358
37. Goodie A.S., and Fantino E. Learning to commit or avoid the base-rate error. Nature 380 (1996, March 21) 247-249
38. Goodie A.S., and Fantino E. What does and does not alleviate base-rate neglect under direct experience. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 12 (1999) 307-335
39. Greenwald A.G., Nosek B.A., and Banaji M.R. Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 (2003) 197-216
40. Hamilton D.L. Illusory correlations as a basis for stereotyping. In: Hamilton D.L. (Ed). Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior (1981), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 115-144
41. Hamilton D.L., and Gifford R.K. Illusory correlation in interpersonal perception: A cognitive basis of stereotypic judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 12 (1976) 392-407
42. Hammond J.L. Two sources of error in ecological correlations. American Sociological Review 38 (1973) 764-777
43. Hermans D., DeHouwer J., and Eelen P. The affective priming effect: Automatic activation of evaluative information in memory. Cognition & Emotion 8 (1994) 515-533
44. Hoffman C., and Hurst N. Gender stereotypes: Perception or rationalization?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58 (1990) 197-208
45. Huttenlocher J., Hedges L., and Vevea J.L. Why do categories affect stimulus judgment?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129 (2000) 220-241
46. Juslin P., and Persson M. PROBabilities from EXemplars (PROBEX): A "lazy" algorithm for probabilistic inference from generic knowledge. Cognitive Science 26 (2002) 563-607
47. Kahneman D., and Knetsch J.L. Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22 (1992) 57-70
48. Kareev Y. Seven (indeed, plus or minus two) and the detection of correlations. Psychological Review 107 (2000) 397-402
49. Kareev, Y., Fiedler, K. & Avrahami, J. (in press). Base rates, contingencies, and prediction behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
50. Kelley H.H. The process of causal attribution. American Psychologist 28 (1973) 107-128
51. Klauer K.C., and Meiser T. A source-monitoring analysis of illusory correlations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26 (2000) 1074-1093
52. Klauer K.C., Musch J., and Naumer B. On belief bias in syllogistic reasoning. Psychological Review 107 (2000) 852-884
53. Kutzner F., Freytag P., Vogel T., and Fiedler K. Base-rate neglect as a function of base rates in probabilistic contingency learning. Journal for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 90 (2008) 23-32
54. Lambert A.J., and Wyer R.S. Stereotypes and social judgment: The effects of typicality and group heterogeneity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59 (1990) 676-691
55. Maddox W.T. Perceptual and decisional separability. In: Ashby F.G. (Ed). Probabilistic multidimensional models of perception and cognition (1992), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 147-180
56. Marsh H.W., and Hau K.T. Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: A cross-cultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist 58 (2003) 364-376
57. McClure J. Discounting of causes of behavior: Are two reasons better than one?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 (1998) 7-20
58. McGarty C., Haslam S.A., Turner J.C., and Oakes P.J. Illusory correlation as accentuation of actual intercategory difference: Evidence for the effect with minimal stimulus information. European Journal of Social Psychology 23 (1993) 391-410
59. Meiser T. Effects of processing strategy on episodic memory and contingency learning in group stereotype formation. Social Cognition 21 (2003) 121-156
60. Meiser T. Contingency learning and biased group impressions. In: Fiedler K., and Juslin P. (Eds). Information sampling and adaptive cognition (2006), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England 183-209
61. Meiser T., and Bröder A. Memory for multidimensional source information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28 (2002) 116-137
62. Meiser T., and Hewstone M. Crossed categorization effects on the formation of illusory correlations. European Journal of Social Psychology 31 (2001) 443-466
63. Meiser T., and Hewstone M. Cognitive processes in stereotype formation: The role of correct contingency learning for biased group judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87 (2004) 599-614
64. Meiser T., and Hewstone M. Illusory and spurious correlations: Distinct phenomena or joint outcomes of exemplar-based category learning?. European Journal of Social Psychology 36 (2006) 315-336
65. Metcalfe J., and Mischel W. A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review 106 (1999) 3-19
66. Mojzisch A., and Schulz-Hardt S. Information sampling in group decision making. In: Fiedler K., and Juslin P. (Eds). Sampling and adaptive cognition (2006), Cambridge University Press, New York 299-326
67. Morris M.W., and Larrick R.P. When one cause casts doubt on another: A normative analysis of discounting in causal attribution. Psychological Review 102 (1995) 331-355
68. Nickerson C.E. Does willingness to pay reflect the purchase of moral satisfaction? A reconsideration of Kahneman and Knetsch. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 28 (1995) 126-133
69. Nosofsky R.M., and Johansen M.K. Exemplar-based accounts of "multiple-system" phenomena in perceptual categorization. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 7 (2000) 375-402
70. Öhman A. Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved model of fear and fear conditioning. Psychological Review 108 (2001) 483-522
71. Pedhazur E.J. Multiple regression in behavioral research. 2nd ed. (1982), Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York
72. Reips U.-D., and Waldmann M.R. When learning order affects sensitivity to base rates: Challenges for theories of causal learning. Experimental Psychology 55 (2008) 9-22
73. Robinson W.S. Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review 15 (1950) 351-357
74. Schaller M., Asp C.H., Rosell M.C., and Heim S.J. Training in statistical reasoning inhibits the formation of erroneous group stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22 (1996) 829-844
75. Schaller M., and O'Brien M. "Intuitive analysis of covariance" and group stereotype formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 18 (1992) 776-785
76. Shanks D.R., Tunney R.J., and McCarthy J.D. A re-examination of probability matching and rational choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 15 (2002) 233-250
77. Simon H.A. Models of bounded similarity (1982), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
78. Simpson E.H. The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 13 B (1951) 238-241
79. Stasser G., and Titus W. Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling in group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48 (1985) 1467-1478
80. Stroessner S.J., Hamilton D.L., and Mackie D.M. Affect and stereotyping: The effect of induced mood on distinctiveness-based illusory correlations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62 (1992) 564-576
81. Trope Y. Identification and inference processes in dispositional attribution. Psychological Review 93 (1986) 239-257
82. Tulving E., and Donaldson W. Organization of memory (1972), Academic Press, Oxford, England
83. Vlaev I., and Chater N. Game relativity: How context influences strategic decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 32 (2006) 131-149
84. Waldmann M., and Hagmayer Y. Causal paradox: When a cause simultaneously produces and prevents an effect. In: Moore J., and Lehmann F. (Eds). Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (1995), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 425-430
85. White P.A. Use of prior beliefs in the assignment of causal roles: Causal powers versus regularity-based accounts. Memory & Cognition 23 (1995) 243-254
86. White P.A. Causal judgment from contingency information: Relation between subjective reports and individual tendencies in judgment. Memory & Cognition 28 (2001) 415-426
87. Woodworth R.S., and Sells S.B. An atmosphere effect in formal syllogistic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 18 (1935) 451-460
88. Zuckerman M., Knee C.R., Hodgins H.S., and Miyake K. Hypothesis confirmation: The joint effect of positive test strategy and acquiescence response set. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68 (1995) 52-60