Evaluating health information technology: Provider satisfaction with an HIV-specific, electronic clinical management and reporting system

AIDS Patient Care and STDs

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 85-91

  Magnus, Manya ^a   Herwehe, Jane ^b   Andrews, Laura ^b   Gibson, Laura ^b   Daigrepont, Nathan ^b   De Leon, Jordana M ^a   Hyslop Jr , Newton E ^c   Stryon, Steven ^c   Wilcox, Ronald ^a   Kaiser, Michael ^a   Butler, Michael K ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c TULANE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIRETROVIRUS AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CD4 LYMPHOCYTE COUNT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DRUG USE; ELECTRONICS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH EDUCATION; HISTORY; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SAMPLE; SATISFACTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME; UNITED STATES; VIRUS LOAD;

ADULT; AMBULATORY CARE; ANTI-HIV AGENTS; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HIV INFECTIONS; HUMANS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; LOUISIANA; MALE; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; MIDDLE AGED; PROGRAM EVALUATION; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 60749113510     PISSN: 10872914     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/apc.2008.0053     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, et al. Systematic review: Impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med 2006;16;144:7427-7452.
2. Shekelle PG, Morton SC, Keeler FB. Costs and benefits of health information technology. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Report) 2006;132:171.
3. Bates D, Cohen M, Leape L, et al. T. Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 2001;8:299-308.
4. Fiks A, Grundmeier R, Biggs L, et al. Impact of clinical alerts within an electronic health record on routine childhood immunization in an urban pediatric population. Pediatrics 2007;120:707-714.
5. Garrett W and Yasnoff W. Disseminating public health practice guidelines in electronic medical record systems. J Public Health Manage Pract 2002;8:1-10.
6. Kukafka R, Johnson SB, Linfante A, Allegrante JP. Grounding a new information technology implementation framework in behavioral science: A systematic analysis of the lieterature on IT use. J Biomed Informatics 2003;36:218-227.
7. Hunt D, Haynes R, Hanna S, Smith K. Effects of a computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes JAMA 1998;28:1360-1361.
8. Institute of Medicine. Key Capabilities of an Electronic Health System: Letter Report. 2003. www.nap.edu/catalog/10781.html (Last accessed February 15, 2005).
9. Jerant AF, Hill DB. Does the use of electronic medical records improve surrogate patient outcomes in outpatient settings? J Fam Pract 2000;49:349-357.
10. Kaushal R, Shojania KG, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: A systematic review. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:1409-1416.
11. Kreuter MW, Wray RJ. Tailored and targeted health communication: strategies for enhancing information relevance. Am J Health Behav 2003;27(Suppl 3):S227-S232.
12. ONCHIT. Health IT Strategic Framework. www.hhs.gov/healthit/ frameworkchapters.html (26 May 2005). (Last accessed November 10, 2004).
13. Teich JM, Merchia PR, Schmiz JL, et al. Effects of computerized physician order entry on prescribing practices. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:2741-2747.
14. Wang SJ, Middleton B, Prosser LA, et al. A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. Am J Med 2003;114:397-403.
15. Yasnoff WA, Humphreys BL, Overhage JM, et al. A consensus action agenda for achieving the National Health Information Infrastructure. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 2004;11:332-338.
16. Garg AX, Adhikari NKJ, McDonald H, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes. JAMA 2005;293:1223-1238.
17. Eccles M, McColl E, Steen N, et al. Effect of a computerised evidence based guidelines on management of asthma and angina in adults in primary care: Cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2002;325:941.
18. Balas A, Weingarten S, Garb C, et al. Improving preventive care by prompting physicians. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:301-308.
19. Hippisley-Cox J, Pringle M, Cater R, et al. The electronic patient record in primary care - Regression or progression? A cross sectional study. BMJ 2003;326:1439-1443.
20. Saleem J, Patterson E, Militello L, et al. Exploring barriers and facilities to the use of computerized clinical reminders. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005;12:438-447.
21. Patterson E, Nguyen A, Halloran J, Asch S. Human factors barriers to the effective use of ten HIV clinical reminders. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004;11:50-59.
22. Simon SR, Kaushal R, Cleary PD, et al. Correlates of electronic health record adoption in office practices: A statewide survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14:110-117.
23. Weiner M, Gress TM, Tiemann DR, et al. contrasting views of physicians and nurses about an inpatient computer-based provider order-entry system. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1999;6:234-244.
24. Dagroso D, Williams PD, Chesney JD, et al. Implementation of an obstetrics EMR module: Overcoming user dissatisfaction. J Healthc Inf Manage 2007;21:87-94.
25. Adler KG, Edsall RL. Electronic Health Records: A User-Satisfaction Survey. Fam Pract Manage 2005;12:45-54.
26. Edsall RL, Adler KG. An EHR user-satisfaction survey: Advice from 408 family physicians. Fam Pract Manage 2005;47-51.
27. Joos D, Chen Q, Jirjis J, Johnson KB. An electronic medical record in primary care: impact on satisfaction, work efficiency and clinic processes. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;394-398.
28. Likourezos A, Chalfin DB, Murphy DG, Sommer B, Darcy K, Davidson SJ. Physician and nurse satisfaction with an electronic medical record system. J Emerg Med 2004;27:419-424.
29. O'Connell RT, Cho C, Shah N, et al. Take Note(s): Differential EHR satisfaction with two implementations under one roof. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004;11:43-49.
30. Whitten P, Buis L, Mackert M. Factors impacting providers' perceptions regarding a midwestern university-based EMR. Telemed J E Health 2007;13:391-397.
31. Safran C, Rind DM, Davis RB, et al. Guidelines for management of HIV infection with computer-based patient's record. Lancet 1995;346:341-346.
32. Magnus M, Herwehe J, Proescholdbell RJ, et al., for the SPNS IT Initiative. Guidelines for effective integration of information technology in the care of HIV-infected populations. J Public Health Manage Pract 2007;13:39-48.