Take Note(s): Differential EHR Satisfaction with Two Implementations under One Roof

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 43-49

  O'Connell, Ryan T ^a   Cho, Christine ^a   Shah, Nidshi ^a   Brown, Karen ^a   Shiffman, Richard N ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ATTITUDE; COMPUTER; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HOSPITAL BILLING; HUMAN; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PATIENT CARE; PERCEPTION; PREDICTION; PRODUCTIVITY; RESIDENT; REVIEW; SATISFACTION;

EID: 0347052857     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M1409     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. McDonald CJ, Overhage JM, Tierney WM, Dexter PR, Martin DK, Suico JG, et al. The Regenstrief Medical Record System: a quarter century experience. Int J Med Inform. 1999;54(3): 225-53.
2. Lawler F, Cacy JR, Viviani N, Hamm RM, Cobb SW. Implementation and termination of a computerized medical information system. J Fam Pract. 1996;42(3):233-6.
3. Wager K, Lee FW, White AW. Life After a Disastrous Electronic Medical Record Implementation: One Clinic's Experience. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing, 2002.
4. Bates DW, Ebell M, Gotlieb E, Zapp J, Mullins H. A proposal for electronic medical records in U.S. primary care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10(1):1-10.
5. Rollins G. Turning a physician practice on its head: Kaiser leader reveals the challenges, benefits of the EHR. Journal of AHIMA. 2003;74(3):32-3.
6. Nelson R. Computerized patient records improve practice efficiency and patient care. Healthc Financ Manage. 1998;52(4):86, 88.
7. Anderson JD. Increasing the acceptance of clinical information systems. MD Comput. 1999;16(1):62-5.
8. Renner K. Electronic medical records in the outpatient setting (Part 1). Med Group Manage J. 1996;43(3):52-7.
9. Van der Meijden MJ, Tange HJ, Troost J, Hasman A. Determinants of Success of Inpatient Clinical Information Systems: A Literature Review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10(3):235-43.
10. Murff HJ, Kannry J. Physician satisfaction with two order entry systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001;8(5):499-509.
11. Mazzoleni MC, Baiardi P, Giorgi I, Franchi G, Marconi R, Cortesi M. Assessing users' satisfaction through perception of usefulness and ease of use in the daily interaction with a hospital information system. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1996:752-6.
12. Massaro TA. Introducing physician order entry at a major academic medical center: II. Impact on medical education. Acad Med. 1993;68(1):25-30.
13. Penrod LE, Gadd CS. Attitudes of academic-based and community-based physicians regarding EMR use during outpatient encounters. Proc AMIA Symp. 2001:528-32.
14. Folz-Murphy N, Partin M, Williams L, Harris CM, Lauer MS. Physician use of an ambulatory medical record system: matching form and function. Proc AMIA Symp. 1998:260-4.
15. Travers DA, Downs SM. Comparing user acceptance of a computer system in two pediatric offices: a qualitative study. Proc AMIA Symp. 2000:853-7.
16. Gamm LD, Barsukiewicz CK, Dansky KH, Vasey JJ. Investigating changes in end-user satisfaction with installation of an electronic medical record in ambulatory care settings. J Healthc Inf Manag. 1998;12(4):53-65.
17. Czaja SJ, Sharit J. Age differences in attitudes toward computers. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1998;53(5):329-40.
18. Brown SH, Coney RD. Changes in physicians' computer anxiety and attitudes related to clinical information system use. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994;1(5):381-94.
19. Gouveia-Oliveira A, Rodrigues T, de Melo FG. Computer education: attitudes and opinions of first-year medical students. Med Educ. 1994;28:501-7.
20. Holbrook A, Keshavjee K, Langton K, Troyan S, Millar S, Olantunji S, et al. A critical pathway for electronic medical record selection. Proc AMIA Symp. 2001:264-8.
21. Gamm LD, Barsukiewicz CK, Dansky KH, Vasey JJ, Bisordi JE, Thompson PC. Pre- and post-control model research on end-users' satisfaction with an electronic medical record: preliminary results. Proc AMIA Symp. 1998:225-9.
22. Aaronson JW, Murphy-Cullen CL, Chop WM, Frey RD. Electronic medical records: the family practice resident perspective. Fam Med. 2001;33(2):128-32.
23. Sittig DF, Kuperman GJ, Fiskio J. Evaluating physician satisfaction regarding user interactions with an electronic medical record system. Proc AMIA Symp. 1999:400-4.
24. Ash JS, Stavri PZ, Kuperman GJ. A consensus statement on considerations for a successful CPOE implementation. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10(3):229-34.
25. Swanson T. Recent implementations of electronic medical records in four family practice residency programs. Acad Med. 1997;72(7):607-12.
26. Treister NW. Physician acceptance of new medical information systems: the field of dreams. Physician Exec. 1998;24(3):20-4.
27. Massaro TA. Introducing physician order entry at a major academic medical center: I. Impact on organizational culture and behavior. Acad Med. 1993;68(1):20-5.
28. McDonald CJ. The barriers to electronic medical record systems and how to overcome them. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997;4(3):213-21.
29. Lee FW. Adoption of electronic medical records as a technology innovation for ambulatory care at the Medical University of South Carolina. Top Health Inf Manage. 2000;21(1):1-20.
30. Aydin CE, Forsythe DE. Implementing computers in ambulatory care: implications of physician practice patterns for system design. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1997:677-81.
31. Tang PH, (ed). Key Capabilities of an Electronic Health Record System. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2003.
32. Shiffman RN, Brandt CA, Freeman BG. Transition to a computer-based record using scannable, structured encounter forms. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151(12):1247-53.
33. Cork RD, Detmer WM, Friedman CP. Development and initial validation of an instrument to measure physicians' use of, knowledge about, and attitudes toward computers. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998;5(2):164-76.
34. Fries JF. Alternatives in medical record formats. Med Care. 1974;12(10):871-81.
35. Bell DS, Greenes RA. Evaluation of UltraSTAR: performance of a collaborative structured data entry system. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994:216-22.
36. Rodriguez NJ, Murillo V, Borges JA, Ortiz J, Sands DZ. A usability study of physicians' interaction with a paper-based patient record system and a graphical-based electronic patient record system. Proc AMIA Symp. 2002:667-71.