Guidelines for effective integration of information technology in the care of HIV-infected populations

Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 39-48

  Magnus, Manya ^a,h   Herwehe, Jane ^b   Proescholdbell, Rae Jean ^c   Lombard, Frank ^c   Cajina, Adan ^d   Dastur, Zubin ^e   Millery, Mari ^f   Sabundayo, Beulah P ^g  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION   (United States)

^e WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^f Department of Medicine   (United States)

^g JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^h GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attitude to computers; Delivery of healthcare; Diffusion of information; HIV AIDS; Information management; Information services; Information technology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EVALUATION; EXPECTATION; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTED PATIENT; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MEDICAL INFORMATION; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THEORETICAL MODEL;

EID: 33845480780     PISSN: 10784659     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00124784-200701000-00008     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bates D, Cohen M, Leape L, Overhage J, Shabot M, Sheridan T. Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001;8:299-308.
2. Magruder C, Burke M, Hann N, Ludovic J. Using information technology to improve the public health system. J Pub Health Pract Manag. 2005;11:123-130.
3. Kukafka R. Public Health Informatics: the nature of the field and its relevance to health promotion practice. Health Promot Pract. 2005;6:23-28.
4. Detmer D. Building the National Health Information Infrastructure for personal health, health care services, public health, and research. BMC Med Inform Decis Making. 2003;3:1.
5. Institute of Medicine. Key capabilities of an electronic health system: letter report. 2003. Available at: http://www.nap. edu/catalog/10781.html. Accessed February 15, 2005.
6. Teich JM, Merchia PR, Schmiz JL, Kuperman GJ, Spurr CD, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry on prescribing practices. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2741-2747.
7. Kaushal R, Shojania KG, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1409-1416.
8. Hippisley-Cox J, Pringle M, Cater R, et al. The electronic patient record in primary care - regression or progression? A cross sectional study. BMJ. 2003;326:1439-1443.
9. Safran C, Rind DM, Davis RB, et al. Guidelines for management of HIV infection with computer-based patient's record. Lancet. 1995;346:341-346.
10. Jerant AF, Hill DB. Does the use of electronic medical records improve surrogate patient outcomes in outpatient settings? J Fam Pract. 2000;49:349-357.
11. ONCHIT, "Health IT Strategic Framework." Available at: www.hhs.gov/healthit/frameworkchapters.html. Accessed November 10, 2004.
12. Yasnoff WA, Humphreys BL, Overhage JM, et al.Aconsensus action agenda for achieving the national health information infrastructure. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11:332-338.
13. Health Resources and Services Administration. Special Projects of National Significance information technology initiative. Available at: http://hab.hrsa.gov/reports/ spnsreport_it.htm#SPNS. Accessed January 20, 2005.
14. Ash J. Organizational factors that influence information technology in academic health sciences centers. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997;4:102-109.
15. Howell JM, Higgins CA. Champions of change: identifying, understanding, and supporting champions of technological innovations. Organ Dyn. 1990;19:40-55.
16. Friedman CP, Wyatt JC. Evaluation Methods in Medical Informatics. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1997.
17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR. 1999;48(RR-11):1-40.
18. Rossi PH, Lipsey MW, Freeman HE. Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. 7th ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications Inc; 2004.
19. Wang SJ, Middleton B, Prosser LA, et al. A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. Am J Med. 2003;114:397-403.
20. Baker JL. Evaluating the Impact of Development Projects on Poverty: A Handbook for Practitioners. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2000.
21. Gold SR,Weinstein Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB,Weinstein MC, eds. Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1996.
22. Likourezos A, Chalfin DB, Murphy DG, Sommer B, Darcy K, Davidson SJ. Physician and nurse satisfaction with an electronic medical record system. J Emerg Med. 2004;27:419-424.
23. Garrison GM, Bernard ME, Rasmussen NH. 21st-century health care: the effect of computer use by physicians on patient satisfaction at a family medicine clinic. Fam Med. 2002;34:362-368.