Grounding a new information technology implementation framework in behavioral science: A systematic analysis of the literature on IT use

Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 218-227

  Kukafka, Rita ^a,b   Johnson, Stephen B ^b   Linfante, Allison ^c,d   Allegrante, John P ^c  

^a University of Columbia   (United States)

^b New York Presbyterian Hospital ^*  (United States)

^c Teachers College   (United States)

^d NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Attitude of health personnel; Attitudes to computers; Diffusion of innovation; End users; Information technology acceptance; Information technology usage; Knowledge attitudes practice; Models theoretical; Technology planning; Technology transfer

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; BIOINFORMATICS; COGNITION; DATA ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SOCIOLOGY; THEORETICAL MODEL;

EID: 0242521674     PISSN: 15320464     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2003.09.002     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Johansen R., Swigar T. Upsizing the individual in the downsized organization: managing in the wake of reengineering, globalization, and overwhelming technological change. 1996;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
2. Moore G.A. Crossing the chasm: marketing and selling high tech products to mainstream customers. 1991;Harper Collins, New York.
3. Norman D.A. Things that make us smart: defending human attributes in the age of the machine. 1993;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
4. Weiner L.R. Digital woes: why we should not depend on software. 1993;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
5. Davis S.A., Bostrom R.P. Training end users: an experimental investigation of the roles of the computer interface and training methods. MIS Q. 17:1963;61-85.
6. Gery G. Granting three wishes through performance-centered design. Commun. ACE. 40(7):1997;54-59.
7. Lorenzi N.M., Riley R.T., Blyth A.J., Southon G., Dixon B.J. Antecedents of the people and organizational aspects of medical informatics: review of the literature. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 4:1997;79-93.
8. Curtis B., Krasner H., Iscoe N. A field study of the software design process for large systems. Commun. ACM. 31:1988;1268-1286.
9. Palva P. Global information technology research: past, present and future. J. Global Inf. Technol. Manage. 1:1988;3-14.
10. Enns HG, Huff, SL. Implementation of information technology in developing countries: experience of a Mongolian internet service provider. In: Proceeding of the 32nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences, IEEE Comput Soc, Los Alamitos, CA, 1999.
11. Green L.W., Kreuter M.W. Health promotion planning: an educational and ecological approach. 1999;Mayfield, Mountain View, CA.
12. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13:1989;318-340.
13. Ajzen I., Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. 1980;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
14. Ajzen I., Madden T.J. Prediction of goal-directed behavior: attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 22:1986;453-474.
15. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50:1991;179-211.
16. Davis F.D. User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioural impacts. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 38:1993;475-487.
17. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of innovation. 4th ed. 1995;Free Press, New York.
18. Regan B, Java: one year out. Sun Microsystems 1996. Available from: http://www.webreference.com.
19. Bandura A. Social learning theory. 1977;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
20. Dishaw M.T., Strong D.M. Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs. Inf. Manage. 36:1999;9-21.
21. Williamson J.W., Weir C.R., Turner C.W., Lincoln M.J., Cofrin K.M.W. Healthcare informatics and information synthesis. 2002;Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
22. Prochaska J.O., DiClemente C.C., Norcross J.C. In search of how people change: applications to addictive behaviors. Am. Psychol. 47:1992;1102-1114.
23. Becker M.H. The Health Belief Model and personal health behavior. Health Educ. Monogr. 2:1974.
24. Engestrom Y. Perspectives on activity theory. 1999;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
25. Bartholomew L.K., Parcel G.S., Kok, Gottlieb G. Intervention mapping: designing theory- and evidence-based health promotion programs. 2001;Mayfield, Mountain View, CA.