Using online annotations to support error correction and corrective feedback

Computers and Education

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 882-892

  Yeh, Shiou Wen ^a   Lo, Jia Jiunn ^b  

^a CHUNG YUAN CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b CHUNG HUA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Applications in subject areas; Distance education and telelearning; Human computer interface

Indexed keywords

BREATH CONTROLLED DEVICES; CONTROL SYSTEMS; DISTANCE EDUCATION; ERROR ANALYSIS; ERRORS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); LINGUISTICS; STUDENTS;

ANALYSIS SYSTEMS; APPLICATIONS IN SUBJECT AREAS; CONTROL GROUPS; CORRECTION METHODS; DISTANCE EDUCATION AND TELELEARNING; ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGES; ERROR TYPES; EXPERIMENTAL GROUPS; HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERFACE; INTERACTIVE ENVIRONMENTS; ON-LINE DOCUMENTS; ONLINE ANNOTATIONS; SECOND LANGUAGES; USER QUERIES;

ERROR CORRECTION;

EID: 60449106143     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.014     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bargeron, D., Gupta, A., Sanocki, E., & Grudin, J. (1999). Annotations for streaming video on the web: System design and usage studies. Microsoft Research Report. Retrieved 19.01.02.
2. Berry, R. (1995). Language teachers and metalinguistics terminology. Paper presented at the Third international conference on teacher education in second language teaching, Hong Kong, City University of Hong Kong, March 14-16, 1995.
3. Brinko K.T. The practice of giving feedback to improve teaching. Journal of Higher Education 64 5 (1993) 574-593
4. Dagneaux E., Denness S., and Granger S. Computer-aided error analysis. System 26 1998 (1998) 163-174
5. Du, M. C. (2004). Personalized annotation management for web based learning service. Master thesis. Chungli, Taiwan: National Central University.
6. Enginarlar H. Student response to teacher feedback in EFL writing. System 21 2 (1993) 193-204
7. Ellis, R. (2007). Corrective Feedback in Theory, Research and Practice [Abstract]. Presented at the 5th international conference on ELT in China & the 1st congress of chinese applied linguistics. Beijing, China: Beijing Foreign Language Studies University, May 17-20, 2007. Retrieved 23.10.07.
8. Felix U. Analysing recent CALL effectiveness research-toward a common agenda. Computer Assisted Language Learning 18 2 (2005) 1-32
9. Ferris D. Teaching ESL composition students to become independent self-editors. TESOL Journal 4 4 (1995) 18-22
10. Ferris D. Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In: Hyland K., and Hyland F. (Eds). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (2006), Cambridge University Press, New York 81-104
11. Golovchinsky, G., & Marshall, C. (2000). Hypertext interaction revisited. Hypertext 2000. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
12. Hedgcock J., and Lefkowitz N. Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing. Journal of Second Language Writing 3 (1994) 141-163
13. Hyland K., and Hyland F. Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (2006), Cambridge University Press, New York
14. Jones L.C., and Plass J.L. Supporting listening comprehension and vocabulary acquisition in French with multimedia annotations. The Modern Language Journal 86 4 (2002) 546-561
15. Koch, S., & Schneider, G. (2000). Implementation of an annotation service on the WWW - virtual Notes. In: Proceedings of PDP'2000 - 8th euromicro workshop on parallel and distributed processing. Rhodos, Greece, January 19-21, 2000. IEEE Computer Society Press.
16. Krashen S. Principles and practices in second language acquisition (1982), Pergamon, New York, NY
17. Krashen S. The input hypothesis: Issues and implications (1985), Longman Publisher, London
18. Kubota M. Error correction strategies used by learners of Japanese when revising a writing task. System 29 2001 (2001) 467-480
19. Lee I. ESL learners' performance in error correction in writing: Some implications for teaching. System 25 4 (1997) 465-477
20. Lee I. L2 writing teachers' perspectives, practices and problems regarding error feedback. Assessing Writing 8 2003 (2003) 216-237
21. Leki I. Twenty-five years of contrastive rhetoric: Text analysis and writing pedagogies. TESOL Quarterly 25 (1991) 123-143
22. Magilow D.H. Case study #2: Error correction and classroom affect. Teaching German 32 2 (1999) 125-129
23. Miller S.K. A review of research on distance education in computers and composition. Computers and Composition 18 (2001) 423-430
24. Nagata N. Intelligent computer feedback for second language instruction. The Modern Language Journal 77 3 (1993) 330-339
25. Nagata N. The effectiveness of computer-assisted metalinguistic instruction: A case study in Japanese. Foreign Language Annals 30 2 (1997) 187-200
26. Ogata H., Feng C., Hada Y., and Yano Y. Online markup based language learning environment. Computers and Education: An International Journal 34 1 (2000) 51-66
27. Ovsiannikov I.A., Arbib M.A., and Mcneill T.H. Annotation technology. International Journal Human-Computer Studies 50 (1999) 329-362
28. Pederson K.M. Research on CALL. In: Flint S. (Ed). Modern media in foreign language education: Theory and implementation (1987), Cambridge University Press, New York 99-131
29. Peterson P.W. The debate about online learning: Key issues for writing teachers. Computers and Composition 18 (2001) 359-370
30. Rice G.E. Examining constructs in reading comprehension using two presentation modes: Paper vs. computer. Journal of Educational Computing Research 11 1994 (1994) 153-178
31. Schulz R.A. Focus on form in the foreign language classroom: Students' and teachers' views on error correction and the role of grammar. Foreign Language Annals 29 3 (1996) 343-364
32. Skehan P. A cognitive approach to language learning (1998), Oxford University Press, Oxford
33. Truscott J. The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning 46 (1996) 327-369
34. Truscott J. The case for the case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing 8 (1999) 111-122
35. van Els E., et al. Applied linguistics and the learning and teaching of foreign language (1984), Edward Arnold, London
36. Vygotsky L.S. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (1978), Harvard University, Cambridge
37. Ware P.D., and Warschauer M. Electronic feedback and second language writing. In: Hyland K., and Hyland F. (Eds). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (2006), Cambridge University Press, New York 118-122
38. Wible D., Kuo C.H., Chien F.Y., Liu A., and Tsao N.L. A Web-based EFL writing environment: Integrating information for learners, teachers, and researchers. Computers and Education: An International Journal 37 2001 (2001) 297-315
39. Wolfe J., and Neuwirth C.M. From the margins to the center: The future of annotation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 15 3 (2001) 333-371
40. Wolfe J. Annotation technologies: A software and research review. Computers and Composition 19 (2002) 471-497
41. Yates R., and Kenkel J. Responding to sentence-level errors in writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 11 2002 (2002) 29-47
42. Zamel V. The composing process of advanced ESL students: Six case studies. TESOL Quarterly 17 (1983) 165-187