L2 writing teachers' perspectives, practices and problems regarding error feedback

Assessing Writing

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 216-237

  Lee, Icy ^a  

^a HONG KONG BAPTIST UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Error feedback in L2 writing classrooms

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141532916     PISSN: 10752935     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2003.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Cohen A. (1987). Student processing of feedback on their compositions. In: A. L. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 57-69). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2. Curriculum Development Council. (1999). Syllabuses for secondary schools: English language Secondary 1-5. Hong Kong: Education Department.
3. Enginarlar H. Student response to teacher feedback in EFL writing System 21 (2) 1993 193-204
4. Fathman A. & Whalley E. (1990). Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content. In: B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 178-190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Ferris D.R. Can advanced ESL students be taught to correct their most serious and frequent errors? CATESOL Journal 8 (1) 1995 41-62
6. Ferris D.R. The influence of teacher commentary on student revision TESOL Quarterly 31 1997 315-339
7. Ferris D.R. (2002). Treatment of error in second language student writing. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
8. Ferris D.R. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Ferris D.R., & Helt M. (2000). Was Truscott right? New evidence on the effects of error correction in L2 writing classes. Paper presented at the American Association of Applied Linguistics Conference, March 11-14, 2000, Vancouver, BC.
10. Ferris D.R. Roberts B. Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing 10 2001 161-184
11. Frantzen D. The effects of grammar supplementation on written accuracy in an intermediate Spanish content course Modern Language Journal 79 1995 244-329
12. Glenwright P. Language proficiency assessment for teachers: The effects of benchmarking on writing assessment in Hong Kong schools Assessing Writing 8 (2) 2002 84-109
13. Lalande J.F.Jr. Reducing composition errors: An experiment Modern Language Journal 66 1982 140-149
14. Lee I. ESL learners' performance in error correction in writing System 25 (4) 1997 465-477
15. Leki I. The preference of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes Foreign Language Annals 24 1991 203-218
16. Mantello M. Error correction in the L2 classroom Canadian Modern Language Review 54 1997 127-131
17. UPolio C. Fleck C. Leder N. & "If only I had more time": ESL learners' changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions Journal of Second Language Writing 7 1998 43-68
18. Raimes A. Errors: Windows into the mind College ESL 1 (2) 1991 55-64
19. Reid J. (1998). "Eye" learners and "ear" learners: Identifying the language needs of international students and U.S. resident writers. In: P. Byrd & J. M. Reid (Eds.), Grammar in the composition classroom: Essays on teaching ESL for college-bound students (pp. 3-17). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
20. Robb T. Ross S. Shortreed I.Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality TESOL Quarterly 20 1986 83-93
21. Truscott J. The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes Language Learning 46 1996 327-369
22. Truscott J. The case for "The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes": A response to Ferris Journal of Second Language Writing 8 (2) 1999 111-122
23. Zamel V. Writing: The process of discovering meaning TESOL Quarterly 16 1982 195-209
24. Zamel V. Responding to student writing TESOL Quarterly 21 1985 697-715