Environmental education in action: a discursive approach to curriculum design

Environmental Education Research

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 307-327

  Reis, Giuliano ^a   Roth, Wolff Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 59849083684     PISSN: 13504622     EISSN: 14695871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13504620701430356     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Baker, C., and Johnson, G., 1998. Interview talk as professional practice. Language and Education, 12(4): 229–242.
2. Boyer, L., and Roth, W.-M., 2005. Individual/collective dialectic of free-choice learning in a community-based mapping project. Environmental Education Research, 11(3): 335–351.
3. Coulthard, R. M., 1977/1985. An introduction to discourse analysis, London: Longman.
4. Edwards, D., and Potter, J., 1992. Discursive psychology, London: Sage.
5. Fairclough, N., 1995. Media discourse, London: Edward Arnold.
6. Freire, P., 1987. Pedagogy of the oppressed, New York: The Continuum Publishing Corporation.
7. Gilbert, G. N., and Mulkay, M., 1984. Opening Pandora's box: a sociological analysis of scientists' discourse, London: Cambridge University Press.
8. Gough, N., 1997. Weather Incorporated: environmental education, postmodern identities, and technocultural constructions of nature. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 2: 145–162.
9. Guba, E. G., and Lincoln, Y. S., 1989. Fourth generation evaluation, London: Sage.
10. Hammersley, M., 2003. Conversation analysis and discourse: methods or paradigms?. Discourse and Society, 14: 751–781.
11. Ingold, T., 1992. “ Culture and the perception of the environment ”. In Bush base: forest farm, Edited by: Croll, E., and Parkin, D., 39–56. London: Routledge.
12. Jordan, B., and Henderson, A., 1995. Interaction analysis: foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4: 39–103.
13. Lave, J., and Wenger, E., 1990. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Lee, S., and Roth, W.-M., 2003a. Science and the ‘good citizen’: community based scientific literacy. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 28(3): 403–424.
15. Lee, S., and Roth, W.-M., 2003b. Re-mapping the land-scape: science educators within a community action network. Perspectives in Education, 21(2): 15–30.
16. Lee, Y.-J., and Roth, W.-M., 2004. Making a scientist: discursive ‘doing’ of identity and self-presentation during research interviews Available online at: www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/1-04/1-04leeroth-e.htm (accessed 23 April 2004)
17. Lemke, J., 1990. Talking science: language, learning, and values, Norwood: Ablex Publishing.
18. May, T. S., 2000. Elements of success in environmental education through practitioner eyes. Journal of Environmental Education, 31(3): 4–11.
19. Potter, J., 1996a. “ Discourse analysis and constructionist approaches: theoretical background ”. In Handbook of qualitative research methods for psychology and the social sciences, Edited by: Richardson, J. T. E., 125–140. Leicester: BPS Books.
20. Potter, J., 1996b. Representing reality: discourse, rhetoric and social construction, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
21. Potter, J., 2000. Post-cognitive psychology. Theory & Psychology, 10(1): 31–37.
22. Potter, J., 2005. Making psychology relevant. Discourse & Society, 16(5): 739–747.
23. Rickinson, M., 2001. Learners and learning in environmental education: a critical review of the evidence. Environmental Education Research, 7(3): 207–317.
24. Roth, W.-M., 2005. Doing qualitative research: Praxis of methods, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
25. Roth, W.-M., and Alexander, T., 1997. The interaction of students' scientific and religious discourses: two case studies. International Journal of Science Education, 19: 125–146.
26. Roth, W.-M, and Barton, A. C., 2004. Rethinking scientific literacy, New York: Routledge.
27. Roth, W.-M., and Lee, S., 2002. Scientific literacy as collective praxis. Public Understanding of Science, 11(1): 33–56.
28. Roth, W.-M., and Lee, S., 2004. Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88: 263–291.
29. Roth, W.-M., and Lucas, K.B., 1997. From ‘truth’ to ‘invented reality’: a discourse analysis of high school physics students' talk about scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34: 145–179.
30. Roth, W.-M., and Middleton, D., 2006. The making of asymmetries of knowing, identity, and accountability in the sequential organization of graph interpretation. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1: 11–81.
31. Strauss, A. L., 1987. Qualitative analysis for social scientists, New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. Thomas, G., and James, D., 2006. Reinventing grounded theory: some questions about theory, ground and discovery. British Educational Research Journal, 32(6): 767–795.
33. Van Aalsvoort, J., 2004. Activity theory as a tool to address the problem of chemistry's lack of relevance in secondary school chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 26(13): 1635–1651.
34. Veel, R., 1998. “ The greening of school science: ecogenesis in secondary classrooms ”. In Reading science: critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science, Edited by: Martin, J. R., and Veel, R., 114–151. London: Routledge.
35. Wenger, E., 1998. Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Wetherell, M., and Potter, J., 1993. Mapping the language of racism: discourse and the legitimation of exploitation, New York: Columbia University Press.
37. Wong, D., and Pugh, K., 2001. Learning science: a Deweyan perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3): 317–336.