The effect of cochlear implantation on music perception a review

Otorinolaringologia

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 169-190

  Looi, V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Cochlear implants; Hearing loss, therapy; Music

Indexed keywords

EID: 59649090696     PISSN: 00264938     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (100)

1. Krumhansl CL, Iverson P. Perceptual interactions between musical pitch and timbre. J Exp Psychol 1992;18:739-51.
2. Gfeller K, Woodworth G, Robin DA, Witt S, Knutson JF. Perception of rhythmic and sequential pitch patterns by normally hearing adults and adult cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 1997;18:252-60.
3. th International Conference on music perception and cognition; 2002 Jul 17-21; Sydney, Australia. Sydney: Casual Productions; 2002. p. 10-3.
4. Chasin M, Russo FA. Hearing aids and music. Trends Amplif 2004;8:35-47.
5. rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
6. th ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 2003.
7. Morgan CT, Garner WR, Galambos R. Pitch and intensity. J Acoust Soc Am 1951;23:658-63.
8. Rasch RA, Plomp R. The perception of musical tones. In: Deutsch D, editor. The psychology of music. New York: Academic Press; 1982. p. 1-22.
9. Arehart KH. Effects of harmonic content on complex-tone fundamental-frequency discrimination in hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1994;95:3574-85.
10. Carlyon RP, van Wieringen A, Long CJ, Deeks JM, Wouters J. Temporal pitch mechanisms in acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 2002;112:621-33.
11. Goldstein JL. An optimum processor theory for the central formation of the pitch of complex tones. J Acoust Soc Am 1973;54:1496-516.
12. Meddis R, O'Mard L. A unitary model of pitch perception. J Acoust Soc Am 1997;102:1811-20.
13. Moore BCJ, Carlyon RP. Perception of pitch by people with cochlear hearing loss and by cochlear implant users. In: Plack CJ, Oxenham AJ, Fay RR, Popper AN, editors. Pitch: neural coding and perception. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2005. p. 234-77.
14. Moore BCJ, Moore GA. Discrimination of the fundamental frequency of complex tones with fixed and shifting spectral envelopes by normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Hear Res 2003;182:153-63.
15. Moore BCJ. Coding of sounds in the auditory system and its relevance to signal processing and coding in cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol 2003;24:243-54.
16. Plomp R. Pitch of complex tones. J Acoust Soc Am 1967;41:1526-33.
17. Ritsma RJ. Frequencies dominant in the perception of the pitch of complex sounds. J Acoust Soc Am 1967;42:191-8.
18. Moore BCJ, Rosen SM. Tune recognition with reduced pitch and interval information. Q J Exp Psychol 1979;31:229-40.
19. Clark GM. Cochlear implants: fundamentals and applications. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2003.
20. Gfeller K, Witt S, Adamek M, Mehr M, Rogers J, Stordahl J, et al. Effects of training on timbre recognition and appraisal by postlingually deafened cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol 2002;13:132-45.
21. Grey JM. Multidimensional scaling of musical timbres. J Acoust Soc Am 1977;61:1270-7.
22. Gfeller K, Christ A, Knutson J, Witt S, Mehr M. The effects of familiarity and complexity on appraisal of complex songs by cochlear implant recipients and normal hearing adults. J Music Ther 2003;40:78-112.
23. Gfeller K, Knutson JF, Woodworth G, Witt S, DeBus B. Timbral recognition and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users and normal-hearing adults. J Am Acad Audiol 1998;9:1-19.
24. Beal AL. The skill of recognizing musical structures. M&C 1985;13:405-12.
25. Pitt MA, Crowder RG. The role of spectral and dynamic cues in imagery for musical timbre. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1992;18:728-38.
26. Pitt MA. Perception of pitch and timbre by musically trained and untrained listeners. J. Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1994;20:976-86.
27. Moore BCJ, Skrodzka E. Detection of frequency modulation by hearing-impaired listeners: Effects of carrier frequency, modulation rate, and added amplitude modulation. J Acoust Soc Am 2002;111(Part 1):327-35.
28. Moore BCJ. Perceptual consequences of cochlear damage. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995.
29. th International Symposium on Hearing; 1988 April 5-9, Groningen, Netherlands. Paterswolde, NL: Academic Press; 1988. p. 421-30.
30. Moore BCJ, Peters RW. Pitch discrimination and phase sensitivity in young and elderly subjects and its relationship to frequency selectivity. J Acoust Soc Am 1992;91:2881-93.
31. Moore BCJ. Perceptual consequences of cochlear hearing loss and their implications for the design of hearing aids. Ear Hear 1996;17:133-61.
32. Loizou PC. Mimicking the human ear. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 1998;Sept: 101-30.
33. McKay CM. Psychophysics and electrical stimulation. In: Zeng FG, Popper AN, Fay RR, editors. Cochlear implants: auditory prostheses and electric hearing. New York: Springer; 2004. p. 286-333.
34. Wilson BS, Sun X, Schatzer R, Wolford RD. Representation of fine structure or fine frequency information with cochlear implants. In: Miyamoto RT, editor. The VIII International Cochlear Implant Conference; 2004 May 10-13; Indianapolis, Indiana. Indianapolis, Amsterdam Elsevier; 2004. p. 3-6.
35. Zeng FG. Temporal pitch in electric hearing. Hear Res 2002;174:101-6.
36. Kessler DK. The CLARION multi-strategy cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999;108:8-16.
37. Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Wolford RD, Zerbi M. Design and evaluation of a continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) processing strategy for multichannel cochlear implants. J Rehabil Res Dev 1993;30:110-6.
38. Seligman P, McDermott H. Architecture of the Spectra 22 speech processor. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995;166:139-41.
39. Vandali AE, Whitford LA, Plant KL, Clark GM. Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Ear Hear 2000;21:608-24.
40. Dorman MF, Loizou PC, Rainey D. Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs. J Acoust Soc Am 1997;102:2403-11.
41. Loizou PC, Dorman M, Tu Z. On the number of channels needed to understand speech. J Acoust Soc Am 1999;106(Pt 1):2097-103.
42. Wilson BS. Strategies for representing speech information with cochlear implants. In: Niparko JK, Kirk KI, Mellon NK, Robbins AM, Tucci DL, Wilson BS, editors. Cochlear implants: principles and practices. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000. p. 129-70.
43. Frijns JH, Klop WM, Bonnet RM, Briaire JJ. Optimizing the number of electrodes with high-rate stimulation of the clarion CII cochlear implant. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 2003;123:138-42.
44. Hochmair I, Nopp P, Jolly C, Schmidt M, Schosser H, Garnham C, et al. MED-EL Cochlear implants: state of the art and a glimpse into the future. Trends Amplif 2006;10:201-19.
45. Skinner MW, Clark GM, Whitford LA, Seligman P, Staller SJ, Shipp DB, et al. Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy (SPEAK) for the Nucleus 22 channel cochlear implant system. Am J Otol 1994;15(Suppl 2):15-27.
46. Arnoldner C, Riss D, Brunner M, Durisin M, Baumgartner WD, Hamzavi JS. Speech and music perception with the new fine structure speech coding strategy: preliminary results. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 2007;127:1298-303.
47. Moore BCJ, Glasberg BR. Gap detection with sinusoids and noise in normal, impaired, and electrically stimulated ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1988;83:1093-101.
48. Moore BCJ, Glasberg BR. Temporal modulation transfer functions obtained using sinusoidal carriers with normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 2001;110:1067-73.
49. Shannon RV. Detection of gaps in sinusoids and pulse trains by patients with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 1989;85:2587-92.
50. Shannon RV. Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 1992;91:2156-64.
51. Busby PA, Whitford LA, Blarney PJ, Richardson LM, Clark GM. Pitch perception for different modes of stimulation using the cochlear multiple-electrode prosthesis. J Acoust Soc Am 1994;95(Pt 1):2658-69.
52. McDermott HJ, McKay CM. Pitch ranking with nonsimultaneous dual-electrode electrical stimulation of the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 1994;96:155-62.
53. McKay CM, McDermott HJ, Clark GM. The perceptual dimensions of single-electrode and nonsimultaneous dual-electrode stimuli in cochlear implantees. J Acoust Soc Am 1996;99:1079-90.
54. Townshend B, Cotter N, Van Compernolle D, White RL. Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1987;82:106-15.
55. Tsang DJ. Musical pitch perception with cochlear implants: a comparison of strategies. (Honours dissertation) Melbourne: The University of Melbourne; 2003.
56. Shannon RV, Fu QJ, Galvin JJ, Friesen L. Speech perception with cochlear implants. In: Zeng FG, Popper AN, Fay RR, editors. Cochlear implants: auditory prostheses and electric hearing. New York: Springer; 2004. p. 334-76.
57. McKay CM, McDermott HJ, Clark GM. Pitch percepts associated with amplitude-modulated current pulse trains in cochlear implantees. J Acoust Soc Am 1994;96(Pt 1):2664-73.
58. McKay CM, McDermott HJ, Clark GM. Pitch matching of amplitude-modulated current pulse trains by cochlear implantees: the effect of modulation depth. J Acoust Soc Am 1995;97:1777-85.
59. McDermott HJ. Music perception with cochlear implants: a review. Trends Amplif 2004;8:49-82.
60. Geurts L, Wouters J. Coding of the fundamental frequency in Continuous Interleaved Sampling processors for cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 2001;109:713-26.
61. McKay CM, McDermott HJ. The perception of temporal patterns for electrical stimulation presented at one or two intracochlear sites. J Acoust Soc Am 1996;100(Pt 1):1081-92.
62. Pijl S, Schwarz DW. Melody recognition and musical interval perception by deaf subjects stimulated with electrical pulse trains through single cochlear implant electrodes. J Acoust Soc Am 1995;98(Pt 1):886-95.
63. Smith Z, Delgutte B, Oxenham AJ. Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception. Nature 2002;416:87-90.
64. McDermott HJ, McKay CM. Musical pitch perception with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 1997;101:1622-31.
65. Stordahl J. Song recognition and appraisal: a comparison of children who use cochlear implants and normally hearing children. J Music Ther 2002;39:2-19.
66. Vongpaisal T, Trehub SE, Schellenberg EG, Papsin B. Music recognition by children with cochlear implants. In: Miyamoto RT, editor. The VIII International Cochlear Implant Conference; 2004 May 10-13; Indianapolis, Indiana. Indianapolis, Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2004. p. 193-6.
67. Gfeller K, Christ A, Knutson JF, Witt S, Murray KT, Tyler RS. Musical backgrounds, listening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol 2000;11:390-406.
68. Leal MC, Shin YJ, Laborde ML, Calmels MN, Verges S, Lugardon S, et al. Music perception in adult cochlear implant recipients. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 2003;123:826-35.
69. Mirza S, Douglas SA, Lindsey P, Hildreth T, Hawthorne M. Appreciation of music in adult patients with cochlear implants: a patient questionnaire. Cochlear Implants Int 2003;4:85-95.
70. Lassaletta L, Castro A, Bastarrica M, Perez-Mora R, Madero R, De Sarria J, et al. Does music perception have an impace on quality of life following cochlear implantation? Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 2007;127:682-6.
71. Gfeller K, Lansing C. Musical perception of cochlear implant users as measured by the Primary Measures of Music Audiation: an item analysis. J Music Ther 1992;29:18-39.
72. Gfeller K, Lansing CR. Melodic, rhythmic, and timbral perception of adult cochlear implant users. J Speech Hear Res 1991;34:916-20.
73. Schulz E, Kerber M. Music perception with the MED-EL implants. In: Hochmair-Desoyer IJ, Hochmair ES, editors. Advances in cochlear implants. Vienna: Datenkonvertierung, Reproduktion und Druck; 1994. p. 326-32.
74. Gordon EE. Primary Measures of Music Audiation. Chicago: GIA Publications; 1979.
75. Cooper WB, Tobey E, Loizou PC. Music perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal Battery for Evaluation of Amusia. Ear Hear 2008;29:618-26.
76. Looi V, McDermott H, McKay C, Hickson L. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users. Ear Hear 2008;29:421-34.
77. Gfeller K, Turner C, Mehr M, Woodworth G, Fearn R, Knutson J, et al. Recognition of familiar melodies by adult cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults. Cochlear Implants Int 2002;3:29-53.
78. Sucher CM, McDermott HJ. Pitch ranking of complex tones by normally hearing subjects and cochlear implant users. Hear Res 2007;230:80-7.
79. Galvin JJ, Fu QJ, Nogaki G. Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners. Ear Hear 2007;28:302-19.
80. Galvin JJ, Fu QJ, Oba S. Effect of instrument timbre on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am (in press).
81. Looi V, McDermott H, McKay C, Hickson L. The effect of cochlear implantation on music perception by adults with usable pre-operative acoustic hearing. Int J Audiol 2008;47:257-68.
82. Gfeller K, Witt S, Woodworth G, Mehr MA, Knutson J. Effects of frequency, instrumental family, and cochlear implant type on timbre recognition and appraisal. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002;111:349-56.
83. Kong YY, Stickney GS, Zeng FG. Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 2005;117(Pt 1):1351-61.
84. Looi V, McDermott H, McKay C, Hickson L. Comparisons of quality ratings for music by cochlear implant and hearing aid users. Ear Hear 2007;28(2 Suppl):59S-61S.
85. Stainsby TH. The Perception of Musical Sounds with Cochlear Implants. (Doctoral dissertation). Melbourne: The University of Melbourne; 2001.
86. Fujita S, Ito J. Ability of Nucleus cochlear implantees to recognize music. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999;108:634-40.
87. Gfeller K, Olszewski C, Rychener M, Sena K, Knutson JF, Witt S, et al. Recognition of "real-world" musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults. Ear Hear 2005;26:237-50.
88. Gfeller K, Witt S, Stordahl J, Mehr M, Woodworth G. The effects of training on melody recognition and appraisal by adult cochlear implant recipients. J Acad Rehabil Audiol 2000;33:115-38.
89. Kong YY, Cruz R, Jones JA, Zeng FG. Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing. Ear Hear 2004;25:173-85.
90. Swanson BA. Pitch perception with cochlear implants. (Doctoral dissertation). Melbourne: The University of Melbourne; 2008.
91. Jerger J, Jerger S, Oliver T, Pirozzolo F. Speech understanding in the elderly. Ear Hear 1989;10:79-89.
92. Gfeller K, Oleson J, Knutson JF, Breheny P, Driscoll V, Olszewski C. Multivariate predictors of music perception and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users. J Am Acad Audiol 2008;19:120-34.
93. Gfeller K. Aural rehabilitation of music listening for adult cochlear implant recipients: Addressing learner characteristics. Music Ther Perspect 2001;19:88-95.
94. Tyler RS, Parkinson AJ, Wilson BS, Witt S, Preece JP, Noble W. Patients utilizing a hearing aid and a cochlear implant: Speech perception and localization. Ear Hear 2002;23:98-105.
95. Kiefer J, von Ilberg C, Reimer B, Knecht R, Gall V, Diller G, et al. Results of cochlear implantation in patients with severe to profound hearing loss - implications for patient selection. Audiology 1998;37:382-95.
96. Gantz BJ, Turner C. Combining acoustic and electrical speech processing: Iowa/Nucleus hybrid implant. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 2004;124:344-7.
97. Gantz BJ, Turner C, Gfeller KE, Lowder MW. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: Advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. Laryngoscope 2005;115:796-802.
98. Gfeller K, Turner C, Oleson J, Zhang X, Gantz B, Froman R, et al. Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise. Ear Hear 2007;28:412-23.
99. Gfeller KE, Olszewski C, Turner C, Gantz B, Oleson J. Music perception with cochlear implants and residual hearing. Audiol Neurootol 2006;11(Suppl 1):12-5.
100. Reiss LA, Gantz BJ, Turner CW. Cochlear implant speech processor frequency allocations may influence pitch perception. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:160-7.