Pitch ranking of complex tones by normally hearing subjects and cochlear implant users

Hearing Research

Volumn 230, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 80-87

  Sucher, Catherine M ^a   McDermott, Hugh J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cochlear implants; Normal hearing; Pitch perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MALE; MUSIC; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND TRANSMISSION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AGED; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; CUES; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSIC; PITCH PERCEPTION;

EID: 34447327245     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Balkany T., Hodges A.V., and Luntz M. Update on cochlear implantation. Otolaryngol. Clin. North Am. 29 (1996) 277-289
2. Beal A.L. The skill of recognizing musical structures. Mem. Cognit. 13 (1985) 405-412
3. Busby P.A., Whitford L.A., Blamey P.J., Richardson L.M., and Clark G.M. Pitch perception for different modes of stimulation using the Cochlear multiple-electrode prosthesis. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95 (1994) 2658-2669
4. Carlyon R.P., van Wieringen A., Long C.J., Deeks J.M., and Wouters J. Temporal pitch mechanisms in acoustic and electric hearing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112 (2002) 621-633
5. Collins L.M., and Throckmorton C.S. Investigating perceptual features of electrode stimulation via a multidimensional scaling paradigm. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108 (2000) 2353-2365
6. Collins L.M., Zwolan T., and Wakefield G.H. Comparison of electrode discrimination, pitch ranking, and pitch scaling data in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101 (1997) 440-455
7. Fearn R., and Wolfe J. Relative importance of rate and place: experiments using pitch scaling techniques with cochlear implants recipients. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. Suppl. 185 (2000) 51-53
8. Fujita S., and Ito J. Ability of Nucleus cochlear implantees to recognize music. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 108 (1999) 634-640
9. Gfeller K., and Lansing C.R. Melodic, rhythmic, and timbral perception of adult cochlear implant users. J. Speech Hear. Res. 34 (1991) 916-920
10. Gfeller K., Christ A., Knutson J.F., Witt S., Murray K.T., and Tyler R.S. Musical backgrounds, listening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 11 (2000) 390-406
11. Gfeller K., Turner C., Mehr M., Woodworth G., Fearn R., Knutson J., Witt S., and Stordahl J. Recognition of familiar melodies by adult cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults. Coch. Imp. Inter. 3 (2002) 29-53
12. Gfeller K., Christ A., Knutson J., Witt S., and Mehr M. The effects of familiarity and complexity on appraisal of complex songs by cochlear implant recipients and normal hearing adults. J. Music Ther. 40 (2003) 78-112
13. Gfeller K., Olszewski C., Rychener M., Sena K., Knutson J.F., Witt S., and Macpherson B. Recognition of "real-world" musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults. Ear Hear. 26 (2005) 237-250
14. Kong Y.-Y., Cruz R., Jones J.A., and Zeng F.-G. Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing. Ear Hear. 25 (2004) 173-185
15. Leal M.C., Shin Y.J., Laborde M.-L., Calmels M.-N., Verges S., Lugardon S., Andrieu S., Deguine O., and Fraysse B. Music perception in adult cochlear implant recipients. Acta Otolaryngol. 123 (2003) 826-835
16. Ma J.K.-Y., Ciocca V., and Whitehill T.L. Effect of intonation on Cantonese lexical tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120 (2006) 3978-3987
17. McDermott H. Music perception with cochlear implants: a review. Trends Amplif. 8 (2004) 49-82
18. McDermott H.J., and McKay C.M. Musical pitch perception with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101 (1997) 1622-1631
19. McKay C.M., McDermott H.J., and Clark G.M. The perceptual dimensions of single-electrode and nonsimultaneous dual-electrode stimuli in cochlear implantees. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99 (1996) 1079-1090
20. McKay C., McDermott H., and Carlyon R. Place and temporal cues in pitch perception: are they truly independent?. ARLO 1 (2000) 25-30
21. Melara R.D., and Marks L.E. Hard and soft interacting dimensions: differential effects of dual context on classification. Percept. Psychophys. 47 (1990) 307-325
22. Melara R.D., and Marks L.E. Interaction among auditory dimensions: timbre, pitch, and loudness. Percept. Psychophys. 48 (1990) 169-178
23. Nelson D.A., Van Tasell D.J., Schroder A.C., Soli S., and Levine S. Electrode ranking of "place pitch" and speech recognition in electrical hearing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98 (1995) 1987-1999
24. Neuhoff J.G., McBeath M.K., and Wanzie W.C. Dynamic frequency change influences loudness perception: a central, analytic process. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 25 (1999) 1050-1059
25. Pijl S. Musical pitch perception with pulsatile stimulation of single electrodes in patients implanted with the Nucleus cochlear implant. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. Suppl. 166 (1995) 224-227
26. Pijl S. Labeling of musical interval size by cochlear implant patients and normally hearing subjects. Ear Hear. 18 (1997) 364-372
27. Pijl S., and Schwarz D.W. Melody recognition and musical interval perception by deaf subjects stimulated with electrical pulse trains through single cochlear implant electrodes. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98 (1995) 886-895
28. Pitt M.A. Perception of pitch and timbre by musically trained and untrained listeners. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percep. Perform. 20 (1994) 976-986
29. Platt J.R., and Racine R.J. Effect of frequency, timbre, experience, and feedback on musical tuning skills. Percept. Psychophys. 38 (1985) 543-553
30. Robinson K., and Patterson R.D. The stimulus duration required to identify vowels, their octave, and their pitch chroma. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98 (1995) 1858-1865
31. Seligman P., and McDermott H. Architecture of the Spectra 22 speech processor. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. Suppl. 104 (1995) 139-141
32. Singh P.G., and Hirsh I.J. Influence of spectral locus and F0 changes on the pitch and timbre of complex tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92 (1992) 2650-2661
33. Smith J.D., Nelson D.G.K., Grohshkopf L.A., and Appleton T. What child is this - What interval was that - Familiar tunes and music perception in novice listeners. Cognition 52 (1994) 23-54
34. Tong Y.C., and Clark G.M. Absolute identification of electric pulse rates and electrode positions by cochlear implant patients. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 77 (1985) 1881-1888
35. Townshend B., Cotter N., Van Compernolle D., and White R.L. Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82 (1987) 106-115
36. Vandali A.E., Sucher C., Tsang D.J., McKay C.M., Chew J.W., and McDermott H.J. Pitch ranking ability of cochlear implant recipients: a comparison of sound-processing strategies. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117 (2005) 3126-3138
37. Zeng F.-G. Temporal pitch in electric hearing. Hear. Res. 174 (2002) 101-106