Precision and recall estimates for two-hybrid screens

Bioinformatics

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 372-378

  Huang, Hailiang ^a   Bader, Joel S ^a  

^a Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MEMBRANE PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLY; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; HYDROPHOBICITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN INTERACTION; TWO HYBRID SYSTEM; WORM; YEAST;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, GENETIC; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROTEINS; TWO-HYBRID SYSTEM TECHNIQUES;

EID: 59549083190     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn640     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ashburner,M. et al. (2000) Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet., 25, 25-29.
2. Bader,J.S. and Chant,J. (2006) Systems biology. When proteomes collide. Science, 311, 187-188.
3. Bateman,A. et al. (2004) The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res., 32, D138-D141.
4. Cornette,J.L. et al. (1987) Hydrophobicity scales and computational techniques for detecting amphipathic structures in proteins. J. Mol. Biol., 195, 659-685.
5. Deane,C.M. et al. (2002) Protein interactions: Two methods for assessment of the reliability of high throughput observations. Mol. Cell Proteomics, 1, 349-356.
6. Dempster,A.P. et al. (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 39, 1-38.
7. Edwards,A.M. et al. (2002) Bridging structural biology and genomics: Assessing protein interaction data with known complexes. Trends Genet., 18, 529-536.
8. Edwards,A.M. et al. (2007) Revisiting Levy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses, bumblebees and deer. Nature, 449, 1044-1048.
9. Eisenberg,D. et al. (1984) Analysis of membrane and surface protein sequences with the hydrophobic moment plot. J. Mol. Biol., 179, 125-142.
10. Gilchrist,M.A. et al. (2004) A statistical framework for combining and interpreting proteomic datasets. Bioinformatics, 20, 689-700.
11. Giot,L. et al. (2003) A protein interaction map of Drosophila melanogaster. Science, 302, 1727-1736.
12. Hart,G.T. et al. (2006) How complete are current yeast and human protein-interaction networks? Genome Biol., 7, 120.
13. Hillier,L.W. et al. (2008) Whole-genome sequencing and variant discovery in C. elegans. Nat. Methods, 5, 183-188.
14. Huang,H. et al. (2007) Where have all the interactions gone? Estimating the coverage of two-hybrid protein interaction maps. PLoS Comput. Biol., 3, e214.
15. Ito,T. et al. (2001) A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 4569-4574.
16. Johnsson,N. and Varshavsky,A. (1994) Split ubiquitin as a sensor of protein interactions in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 91, 10340-10344.
17. Jolly,G.M. (1965) Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration-stochastic model. Biometrika, 52, 225-247.
18. Krogh,A. et al. (2001) Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: Application to complete genomes. J. Mol. Biol., 305, 567-580.
19. Kyte,J. and Doolittle,R.F. (1982) A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J. Mol. Biol., 157, 105-132.
20. Li,S. et al. (2004)A map of the interactome network of the metazoan C. elegans. Science, 303, 540-543.
21. Margulies,M. et al. (2005) Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature, 437, 376-380.
22. Rose,G.D. et al. (1985) Hydrophobicity of amino acid residues in globular proteins. Science, 229, 834-838.
23. Rual,J.F. et al. (2005) Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein-protein interaction network. Nature, 437, 1173-1178.
24. Salwinski,L. et al. (2004) The Database of Interacting Proteins: 2004 update. Nucleic Acids Res., 32, D449-D451.
25. Scholtens,D. et al. (2008) Estimating node degree in bait-prey graphs. Bioinformatics, 24, 218-224.
26. Seber,G.A. (1965) A note on the multiple-recapture census. Biometrika 52, 249-259.
27. Sprinzak,E. et al. (2003) How reliable are experimental protein-protein interaction data? J. Mol. Biol., 327, 919-923.
28. Stagljar,I. et al. (1998) A genetic system based on split-ubiquitin for the analysis of interactions between membrane proteins in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 95, 5187-5192.
29. Stelzl,U. et al. (2005) A human protein-protein interaction network: A resource for annotating the proteome. Cell, 122, 957-968.
30. Tarassov,K. et al. (2008) An in vivo map of the yeast protein interactome. Science, 320, 1465-1470.
31. Thierry-Mieg,N. and Bailly,G. (2008) Interpool: Interpreting smart-pooling results. Bioinformatics, 24, 696-703.
32. Uetz,P. et al. (2006) Herpesviral protein networks and their interaction with the human proteome. Science, 311, 239-242.
33. Uetz,P. et al. (2000) A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature, 403, 623-627.
34. Valouev,A. et al. (2008) A high-resolution, nucleosome position map of C. elegans reveals a lack of universal sequence-dictated positioning. Genome Res., 18, 1051-1063.
35. Viswanathan,G.M. et al. (1996) Levy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses. Nature, 381, 413-415.
36. von Mering,C. et al. (2002) Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature, 417, 399-403.
37. Yu,H. et al. (2008) High-quality binary protein interaction map of the yeast interactome network. Science, 322, 104-110.