The moderating and mediating role of group identification in observers' reactions to intragroup disrespect

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 69-81

  Okimoto, Tyler G ^a  

^a FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 59349120655     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: 10990992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.474     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Aquino, K., Tripp, T. M., & Bies, R. J. (2001). How employees respond to personal offence: The effects of blame attribution, victim. status, and offender status on revenge and reconciliation in the workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 52-59.
3. Arbuckle, J. L. (1999). Amos 4.0 [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: SmallWaters.
4. Baron, R. A. (1993). Criticism, (informal negative feedback) as a source of perceived unfairness in organizations: Effects, mechanisms, and countermeasures. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace; Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 155-170). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
6. Bies, R. J. (1987). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In L. L. Cummings, & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 289-319). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
7. Bies, R. J. (1993). Privacy and procedural justice in organizations. Social Justice Research, 6, 69-81.
8. Bies, R. J. (2001). Interactional (injustice: The sacred and the profane. In J. Greenberg, & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 89-1.18). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9. Bies, R. J. (2005). Are procedural justice and interactional justice conceptually distinct? In J. Greenberg, & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 85-112). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice. In R. J. Lewicki, B. M. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43-55). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
11. Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1987). Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts. Social Justice Research, 1, 43-55.
12. Bies, R. J., & Tripp, T. M. (1996). Beyond distrust: "Getting even" and the need for revenge. In R. M. Kramer, & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 246-260). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Bobocel, D. R., Agar, S. E., Meyer, J. P., & Irving, P. G. (1998). Managerial accounts and fairness perceptions in conflict resolution: Differentiating the effects of minimizing responsibility and providing justification. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20, 133-143.
14. Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (1.996). An integrative framework, for explaining reactions to decisions: The interactive effects of outcomes and processes. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 189-208.
15. Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386-400.
16. Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z. S., Bobocel, D. R., & Rupp, D. R. (2001). Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 164-201.
17. Cummings, L. L., & Bromiley, P. (1996). The organizational trust inventory (OTI): Development and validation. In R. M. Kramer, & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage.
18. De Cremer, D., & Tyler, T. R. (2005). Managing group behavior: The interplay between, procedural, justice, sense of self, and cooperation. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 151-218). New York: Academic Press.
19. Hogan, R., & Emler, N. P. (1981). Retributive justice. In M. J. Lerner, & S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior (pp. 125-143). New York: Academic Press.
20. Jackson, J. W., & Smith, E. R. (1999). Conceptualizing social identity: A new framework and evidence tor the impact of different dimensions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 120-135.
21. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, 4th ed., pp. 233-265). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
22. Kim., S. H., Smith, R. H., & Brigham, N. L. (1998). Effects of power imbalance and the presence of third parties on reactions to harm: Upward and downward revenge. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 37-43.
23. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
24. Miller, D. T. (2001). Disrespect and the experience of injustice. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 527-553.
25. Mikula, G. (1986). The experience of injustice: Towards a better understanding of its phenomenology. In H. W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in social relations (pp. 103-123). New York: Plenum.
26. Mikula, G., Scherer, K. R., & Athenstaedt, V. (1998). The role of injustice in the elicitation of different emotional reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 769-783.
27. Okimoto, T. G. (2006). Outcomes as affirmation of membership value: Material compensation for procedural injustice (Doctoral dissertation, New York University, 2006). Dissertation Abstracts International, 66, 6337.
28. Okimoto, T. G. (2007). Outcomes as affirmation of membership value: Monetary compensation as an administrative response to procedural injustice. Manuscript submitted for publication.
29. Okimoto, T. G., & Tyler, T. R. (2007). Is compensation enough?: Relational concerns in responding to unintended harm. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 10, 399-420.
30. Platow, M. J., Wenzel, M., & Nolan, M. (2003). The importance of social identity and self-categorization processes for creating and responding to fairness. In S. A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow, & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 261-276). East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
31. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Reb, J., Goldman, B. M., Kray, L. J., & Cropanzano, R. (2006). Different wrongs, different remedies? Reactions to organizational remedies after procedural and interactional injustice. Personnel Psychology, 59, 31-64.
33. Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445.
34. Simon, B., & Stürmer, S. (2003). Respect for group members: Intragroup determinants of collective identification and group-serving behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 183-193.
35. Simon, B., & Stürmer, S. (2005). In search of the active ingredient of respect: A closer look at the role of acceptance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 809-818.
36. Smith, H. J., Olson, G., Agronick, G., & Tyler, T. R. (2007). Everyday interactions with university authorities: Authority treatment quality, outcome favourability and first year students' university adjustment. Manuscript submitted for publication.
37. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982 (pp. 290-312). Washington DC: American Sociological Association.
38. Tajfel, H. (1972). Social categorization. In S. Moscovici (Ed.), Introduction to social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 272-302). Paris: Larousse.
39. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
40. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1978). A theory of procedure. California Law Review, 66, 541-566.
41. Tyler, T. R. (1999). Why people cooperate in organizations: An identity-based perspective. In B. M. Staw, & R. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 201-246). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
42. Tyler, T. R. (2001). Why do people rely on others? Social identity and social aspects of trust. In K. S. Cook (Ed.), Trust in society (pp. 285-306). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
43. Tyler, T. R., & Bies, R. J. (1990). Interpersonal aspects in procedural justice. In J. S. Carroll (Ed.), Applied social psychology in business settings (pp. 77-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44. Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. (2000). Cooperation in groups; Procedural justice, social identity and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
45. Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349-361.
46. Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
47. Tyler, T. R., & Degoey, P. (1995). Collective restraint in social dilemmas: Procedural justice and social identification effects on support for authorities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 482-497.
48. Tyler, T. R., Degoey, P., & Smith, H. J. (1996). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 913-930.
49. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). New York: Academic Press.
50. Tyler, T. R., & Smith, H. J. (1999). Justice, social identity and group processes. In T. R. Tyler, R. Kramer, & O. John (Eds.), The psychology of the social self (pp. 223-264). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51. van Prooijen, J.-W., van den Bos, K., & Wilke, H. A. M. (2002). Procedural justice and status: Status salience as antecedent of procedural. fairness effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1353-1361.
52. van Prooijen, J.-W., van den Bos, K., & Wilke, H. A. M. (2005). Procedural justice and intragroup status: Knowing where we stand in a group enhances reactions to procedures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 664-676.
53. van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2001). The psychology of own versus others' treatment: Self-oriented and other-oriented effects on perceptions of procedural justice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1324-1333.
54. Wenzel, M. (2001). A social categorization approach to distributive justice: Social identity as the link between relevance of inputs and need for justice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 315-335.
55. Wenzel, M., Okimoto, T. G., Feather, N. T., & Platow, M. J. (2008). Retributive and restorative justice. Law and Human Behavior (in press). DOI: 10.1007/s10979-007-9116-6