Should you show me the money? Concrete objects both hurt and help performance on mathematics problems

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 171-184

  McNeil, Nicole M ^a   Uttal, David H ^b   Jarvin, Linda ^c   Sternberg, Robert J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Expertise reversal effect; Mathematics; Problem solving; Symbols; Word problems

Indexed keywords

EID: 58649109599     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Ball D.L. Magical hopes: manipulatives and the reform of mathematics education. American Educator 16 (1992) 14-18 46-47
2. Baranes R., Perry M., and Stigler J.W. Activation of real-world knowledge in the solution of word problems. Cognition and Instruction 6 (1989) 287-318
3. Bassok M., and Holyoak K.J. Interdomain transfer between isomorphic topics in algebra and physics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 15 (1989) 153-166
4. Burns M. How to make the most of math manipulatives. Instructor (April 1996) 45-51
5. Cai J. A cognitive analysis of US and Chinese students' mathematical performance on tasks involving computation, simple problem solving, and complex problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph 7 (1995) 1-151
6. Carpenter T.P., Corbitt M.K., Kepner H.S., Lindquist M.M., and Reys R.E. Solving verbal problems: results and implications for national assessment. Arithmetic Teacher 28 (1980) 8-12
7. Carraher T.N., Carraher D.W., and Schliemann A.D. Mathematics in the streets and in schools. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 3 (1985) 21-29
8. Carraher T.N., Carraher D.W., and Schliemann A.D. Written and oral mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 18 (1987) 83-97
9. De Bock D., Verschaffel L., Janssens D., Van Dooren W., and Claes K. Do realistic contexts and graphical representations always have a beneficial impact on students' performance? Negative evidence from a study on modeling non-linear geometry problems. Learning and Instruction 13 (2003) 441-463
10. Defranco T.C., and Curcio F.R. A division problem with a remainder embedded across two contexts: children's solutions in restrictive versus real-world settings. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics 19 (1997) 58-72
11. DeLoache J.S. Early symbol understanding and use. In: Medin D.L. (Ed). The psychology of learning and motivation Vol. 33 (1995), Academic, New York 65-114
12. DeLoache J.S., Uttal D.H., and Pierroutsakos S.L. The development of early symbolization: educational implications. Learning and Instruction 8 (1998) 325-339
13. Ericsson K.A., Chase W.G., and Faloon S. Acquisition of a memory skill. Science 208 (1980) 1181-1182
14. Glenberg A.M., Gutierrez T., Levin J.R., Japuntich S., and Kaschak M.P. Activity and imagined activity can enhance young students' reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology 96 (2004) 424-436
15. van Gog T., Paas F., and van Merrienboer J.J.G. Effects of studying sequences of process-oriented and product-oriented worked examples on troubleshooting transfer efficiency. Learning and Instruction 18 3 (2008) 211-222
16. Goldstone R.L. The complex systems see-change in education. Journal of the Learning Sciences 15 (2006) 35-43
17. Goldstone R.L., and Sakamoto Y. The transfer of abstract principles governing complex adaptive systems. Cognitive Psychology 46 (2003) 414-466
18. Gravemeijer K. Preamble: from models to modeling. In: Gravemijer K., Lehrer R., Oers B., and Verschaffel L. (Eds). Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education (2002), Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands 7-22
19. Greeno J.G. Situations, mental models, and generative knowledge. In: Klahr D., and Kotovsky K. (Eds). Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert Simon (1989), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 285-318
20. Greer B. Modeling reality in mathematics classrooms: the case of word problems. Learning and Instruction 7 (1997) 293-307
21. Grigorenko E.L., Jarvin L., and Sternberg R.J. School-based tests of the triarchic theory of intelligence: three settings, three samples, three syllabi. Contemporary Educational Psychology 27 (2002) 167-208
22. Guberman S.R. The development of everyday mathematics in Brazilian children with limited formal education. Child Development 67 (1996) 1609-1623
23. Hiebert J., and Wearne D. Instruction, understanding, and skill in multidigit addition and subtraction. Cognition and Instruction 14 (1996) 251-283
24. Hiebert J., Wearne D., and Taber S. Fourth graders' gradual construction of decimal fractions during instruction using different physical representations. The Elementary School Journal 91 (1991) 321-341
25. Kalyuga S., Ayres P., Chandler P., and Sweller J. The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist 38 (2003) 23-31
26. Kaminski, J. A., & Sloutsky, V. M. Concreteness and transfer of conceptual knowledge. Talk and poster presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development (SRCD), March 2007, Boston, MA.
27. Koedinger K.R., and Nathan M.J. The real story behind story problems: effects of representations on quantitative reasoning. Journal of the Learning Sciences 13 (2004) 129-164
28. Kotovsky K., Hayes J.R., and Simon H.A. Why are some problems hard? Evidence from Tower of Hanoi. Cognitive Psychology 17 (1985) 248-294
29. Lehrer R., and Schauble L. Symbolic communication in mathematics and science: co-constituting inscription and thought. In: Amsel E.D., and Byrnes J. (Eds). Language, literacy, and cognitive development. The development and consequences of symbolic communication (2002), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 167-192
30. Lillard A.S. Montessori: The science behind the genius (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England
31. Mack N.K. Confounding whole-number and fraction concepts when building on informal knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 26 (1995) 422-441
32. McNeil N.M., and Alibali M.W. Why won't you change your mind? Knowledge of operational patterns hinders learning and performance on equations. Child Development 76 (2005) 1-17
33. McNeil N.M., and Jarvin L. When theories don't add up: disentangling the manipulatives debate. Theory Into Practice 46 (2007) 309-316
34. Meira L. Making sense of instructional devices: the emergence of transparency in mathematical activity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 29 (1998) 121-142
35. Moyer P.S. Are we having fun yet? How teachers use manipulatives to teach mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics 47 (2001) 175-197
36. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Principles and standards for school mathematics (2000), National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA
37. Resnick L.B. The 1987 presidential address: learning in school and out. Educational Researcher 16 (1987) 13-20
38. Reusser K., and Stebler R. Every word problem has a solution: the social rationality of mathematical modeling in schools. Learning and Instruction 7 (1997) 309-327
39. Saxe G.B. The mathematics of child street vendors. Child Development 59 (1988) 1415-1425
40. Schliemann A.D., and Carraher D.W. The evolution of mathematical reasoning: everyday versus idealized understandings. Developmental Review 22 (2002) 242-266
41. Schnotz W., and Bannert M. Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction 13 (2003) 141-156
42. Schoenfeld A.H. When good teaching leads to bad results: the disasters of "well-taught" mathematics courses. Educational Psychologist 23 (1988) 145-166
43. Schoenfeld A.H. Problem solving in context(s). In: Charles R.I., and Silver E.A. (Eds). The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving (1989), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 82-92
44. Skemp R.R. The psychology of learning mathematics (1987), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
45. Sloutsky V.M., Kaminski J.A., and Heckler A.F. The advantage of simple symbols for learning and transfer. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 12 (2005) 508-513
46. Son, J. Y., & Goldstone, R. L. Decontextualized learning and transfer, submitted for publication.
47. Stevenson H.W., and Stigler J.W. The learning gap: Why our schools are failing, and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education (1992), Summit, New York
48. Sweller J. Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction 4 (1994) 295-312
49. Sweller J., van Merriënboer J.J.G., and Paas F.G. Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review 10 (1998) 251-296
50. Taylor, E. V. Store purchasing practices and decimal understanding in an African-American community. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), April 2006, San Francisco, CA.
51. Uttal D.H. On the relation between play and symbolic thought: the case of mathematics manipulatives. In: Saracho O., and Spodek B. (Eds). Contemporary perspectives in early childhood (2003), Information Age Press, Greenwich, CT 97-114
52. Uttal D.H., Liu L.L., and DeLoache J.S. Concreteness and symbolic development. In: Balter L., and Tamis-LeMonda C.S. (Eds). Child psychology: A handbook of contemporary issues. 2nd ed. (2006), Psychology Press, New York 167-184
53. Uttal, D. H., Marulis, L. M., & Lewis, A. R. The relation between concrete and abstract: implications for symbolic development. In D. H. Uttal (Organizer), Concreteness and cognitive development: New perspectives on a classic developmental issue. Symposium presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, 2007, Boston, MA.
54. Uttal D.H., Scudder K.V., and DeLoache J.S. Manipulatives as symbols: a new perspective on the use of concrete objects to teach mathematics. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 18 (1997) 37-54
55. Verschaffel L., and De Corte E. Teaching realistic mathematical modeling and problem solving in the elementary school: a teaching experiment with fifth graders. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 28 (1997) 577-601
56. Verschaffel L., De Corte E., and Lasure S. Realistic considerations in mathematical modeling of school arithmetic word problems. Learning and Instruction 4 (1994) 273-294
57. Verschaffel L., Greer B., and De Corte E. Making sense of word problems (2000), Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, The Netherlands
58. Wyndhamn J., and Säljö R. Word problems and mathematical reasoning: a study of children's mastery of reference and meaning in textual realities. Learning and Instruction 7 (1997) 361-382
59. Yoshida H.L., Verschaffel L., and De Corte E. Realistic considerations in solving problematic word problems: do Japanese and Belgian children have the same difficulties?. Learning and Instruction 7 (1997) 329-338