Commonality and the complexity of gweg social attitudes and social change

Personality and Social Psychology Review

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 3-20

  Dovidio, John F ^a   Gaertner, Samuel L ^b   Saguy, Tamar ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Acculturation; Common ingroup identity model; Conflict resolution; Contact hypothesis; Ingroup favoritism; Intergroup relations; Power; Social categorization; Social identity; Status

Indexed keywords

CONFLICT; CULTURAL FACTOR; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; MINORITY GROUP; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REVIEW; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL CHANGE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

ACCULTURATION; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; MINORITY GROUPS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PREJUDICE; SOCIAL CHANGE; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION;

EID: 58449113064     PISSN: 10888683     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1088868308326751     Document Type: Article

References (149)

1. Adorno, T.W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.J., & Sanford, R.N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.
2. Airhihenbuwa, C.O., Kumanyika, S.K., TenHave, T.R., & Morssink, C.B. (2000). Cultural identity and health lifestyles among African Americans: A new direction for health intervention research. Ethnicity and Disease, 10, 148-164.
3. Allport, G.W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4. Antonio, A.L., Chang, M.J., Hakuta, K., Kenny, D.A., Levin, S., & Milem, J.F. (2004). Effects of racial diversity on complex thinking in college students. Psychological Science, 15, 507-510.
5. Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T., Mashek, D., Lewandowski, G., Wright, S.C., & Aron, E.N. (2005). Including others in the self. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 15, pp. 101-132). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
6. Bar-Tal, D. (2004). Nature, rationale, and effectiveness of education for coexistence. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 253-271.
7. Beaton, A.M., Dovidio, J.F., & Léger, N. (2008). All in this together? Group representations and policy support. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 808-817.
8. Berry, J.W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46, 5-34.
9. Bettencourt, B.A., Dorr, N., Charlton, K., & Hume, D.L. (2001). Status differences and in-group bias: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 520-542.
10. Billig, M.G., & Tajfel, H. (1973). Social categorisation and similarity in intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 27-52.
11. Blumer, H. (1958). Race prejudice as a sense of group position. Pacific Sociological Review, 1, 3-7.
12. Bobo, L.D. (1999). Prejudice as group position: Microfoundations of a sociological approach to racism and race relations. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 445-472.
13. Bourhis, R.Y., Mose, L.C., & Perrault, S. (1997). Towards an interactive acculturation model: A social psychological approach. International Journal of Psychology, 32, 369-386.
14. Bowskill, M., Lyons, E., & Coyle, A. (2007). The rhetoric of acculturation: When integration means assimilation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 793-813.
15. Branscombe, N.R., Schmitt, M.T., & Harvey, R.D. (1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 135-149.
16. Brewer, M.B. (1979). Ingroup bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.
17. Brewer, M.B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In T. S. Srull & R. S. Wyer (Eds.), Advances in social cognition: Vol. 1. A dual process model of impression formation (pp. 1-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Brewer, M.B. (1991). On the social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482.
19. Brown, R., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 255-343). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
20. Brown, R.J., & Wade, G. (1987). Superordinate goals and intergroup behavior: The effect of role ambiguity and status on intergroup attitudes and task performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 131-142.
21. Crisp, R.J., Walsh, J., & Hewstone, M. (2006). Crossed categorization in common ingroup contexts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1204-1218.
22. Crocker, J., & Schwartz, I. (1985). Prejudice and ingroup favoritism in a minimal intergroup situation: Effects of self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 379-386.
23. Crocker, J., Thompson, L.L., McGraw, K.M., & Ingerman, C. (1987). Downward comparison, prejudice, and evaluations of others: Effects of self-esteem and threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 907-916.
24. Davies, P.G., Steele, C.M., & Markus, H.R. (2008). A nation challenged: The impact of foreign threat on America's tolerance for diversity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 308-318.
25. Deschamps, J.C., & Brown, R.J. (1983). Superordinate goals and intergroup conflict. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 189-195.
26. Devos, T., & Banaji, M.R. (2005). American = White? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 447-466.
27. Dixon, J.A., Durrheim, K., & Tredoux, C. (2005). Beyond the optimal strategy: A "reality check" for the contact hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 697-711.
28. Dixon, J.A., Durrheim, K., & Tredoux, C. (2007). Intergroup contact and attitudes toward the principle and practice of racial equality. Psychological Science, 18, 867-872.
29. Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1999). Commitment and intergroup behaviour. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment and content (pp. 84-107). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
30. Dovidio, J.F. (2001). On the nature of contemporary prejudice: The third wave. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 829-849.
31. Dovidio, J.F., & Gaertner, S.L. (1993). Stereotypes and evaluative intergroup bias. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in intergroup perception (pp. 167-193). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
32. Dovidio, J.F., & Gaertner, S.L. (1996). Affirmative action, unintentional racial biases, and intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 52 (4). 51-75.
33. Dovidio, J.F., & Gaertner, S.L. (2004). Aversive racism. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 36, pp. 1-51). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
34. Dovidio, J.F., Gaertner, S.L., & Kafati, G. (2000). Group identity and intergroup relations: The common in-group identity model. In S. R. Thye, E. J. Lawler, M. W. Macy, & H. A. Walker (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 17, pp. 1-34). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
35. Dovidio, J.F., Gaertner, S.L., & Loux, S. (2000). Subjective experiences and intergroup relations: The role of positive affect. In H. Bless & J. Forgas (Eds.), The message within: The role of subjective states in social cognition and behavior (pp. 340-371). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
36. Dovidio, J.F., Gaertner, S.L., Pearson, A.R., & Riek, B.M. (2005). Social identities and social context: Attitudes and personal well-being. In S. R. Thye & E. J. Lawler (Eds.), Advances in group processes: Social identification processes in groups (pp. 231-260). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
37. Dovidio, J.F., Gaertner, S.L., & Saguy, T. (2007). Another view of "we": Majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 296-330.
38. Dovidio, J.F., Gaertner, S.L., Saguy, T., & Halabi, S. (2008). From when to why: Understanding how contact reduces bias. In U. Wagner, L. R. Tropp, G. Finchilescu, & C. Tredoux (Eds.), Improving intergroup relations: Building on the legacy of Thomas F. Pettigrew (pp. 75-90). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
39. Dovidio, J.F., Gaertner, S.L., Shnabel, N., Saguy, T., & Johnson, J.D. (in press). Recategorization and prosocial behavior: Common identity and a dual identity. In S. Stürmer & M. Snyder (Eds.), Psychology of helping: New directions in intergroup prosocial behaviour. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
40. Dovidio, J.F., Gaertner, S.L., Validzic, A., Matoka, K., Johnson, B., & Frazier, S. (1997). Extending the benefits of re-categorization: Evaluations, self-disclosure and helping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 401-420.
41. Dovidio, J.F., & Kafati, G. (2003). Majority and minority group support for assimilation and multiculturalism in relation to racial climate. Unpublished data, Colgate University, Hamilton, NY.
42. Dovidio, J.F., ten Vergert, M., Stewart, T.L., Gaertner, S.L., Johnson, J.D., Esses, V.M., et al. (2004). Perspective and prejudice: Antecedents and mediating mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1537-1549.
43. Duckitt, J. (1992). The social psychology of prejudice. Westport, CT: Praeger.
44. Durrheim, K., & Dixon, J.A. (2004). Attitudes in the fiber of everyday life: The discourse of racial evaluation and the lived experience of desegregation. American Psychologist, 59, 626-636
45. Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2001). The impact of relative group status: Affective, behavioral, and perceptual consequences. In R. Brown & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (pp. 324-343). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
46. Fischer, A.R., & Shaw, C.M. (1999). African Americans' mental health and perceptions of racial discrimination. The effects of racial socialization experiences and self-esteem. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 395-407.
47. Fischer, P., Greitemeyer, T., Omay, S.I., & Frey, D. (2007). Mergers and group status: The impact of high, low, and equal group status on identification and satisfaction with a company merger. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 203-217.
48. Fiske, S.T., Lin, M., & Neuberg, S.L. (1999). The continuum model: Ten years later. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 231-254). New York: Guilford.
49. Fiske, S.T., & Taylor, S.E. (1991). Social cognition (2 nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
50. Frederickson, G.M. (1999). Models of American interethnic relations: A historical perspective. In D. Prentice & D. Miller (Eds.), Cultural divides: Understanding and overcoming group conflict (pp. 23-34). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
51. Gaertner, S.L., Bachman, B.A., Dovidio, J.D., & Banker, B.S. (2001). Corporate mergers and stepfamily marriages: Identity, harmony, and commitment. In M. A. Hogg & D. Terry (Eds.), Social identity in organizations (pp. 265-288). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
52. Gaertner, S.L., & Dovidio, J.F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 61-89). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
53. Gaertner, S.L., & Dovidio, J.F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
54. Gaertner, S.L., Dovidio, J.F., Anastasio, P.A., Bachman, B.A., & Rust, M.C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 1-26). New York: John Wiley.
55. Gaertner, S.L., Dovidio, J.F., Guerra, R., Rebelo, M., Monteiro, M.B., Riek, B.M., et al. (2008). The common ingroup identity model: Applications to children and adults. In S. R. Levy & M. Killen (Eds.), Intergroup relations (pp. 204-219). New York: Oxford University Press.
56. Gaertner, S.L., Dovidio, J.F., Mann, J.A., & Anastasio, P.A. (1988). Are there benefits of recategorization when original group boundaries are restored? Unpublished data University of Delaware, Newark, DE.
57. Gaertner, S.L., Mann, J.A., Dovidio, J.F., Murrell, A.J., & Pomare, M. (1990). How does cooperation reduce intergroup bias ? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 692-704.
58. Gaertner, S.L., Mann, J.A., Murrell, A.J., & Dovidio, J.F. (1989). Reduction of intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 239-249.
59. Gaertner, S.L., Rust, M.C., Dovidio, J.F., Bachman, B.A., & Anastasio, P.A. (1996). The contact hypothesis: The role of a common ingroup identity on reducing intergroup bias among majority and minority group members. In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.), What's social about social cognition? (pp. 230-260). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
60. Gómez, A., Dovidio, J.F., Huici, C., Gaertner, S.L., & Cuadrado, I. (2008). The other side of we: When outgroup members express common identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1613-1626.
61. Gonzalez, R., & Brown, R. (2003). Generalization of positive attitude as a function of subgroup and superordinate group identification in intergroup contact. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 195-214.
62. Gonzalez, R., & Brown, R. (2006). Dual identities and intergroup contact: Group status and size moderate the generalization of positive attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 753-767.
63. Guerra, R., Rebelo, M., & Monteiro, M.B. (2005, June). How does a dual identity cognitive representation work? The role of ethnic identity and status legitimacy perceptions on the generalization of positive intergroup attitudes. Paper presented at the 14th general meeting of the European Association of Experimental Social Psychology, Wurzburg, Germany.
64. Hall, N.R., & Crisp, R.J. (2005). Considering multiple criteria for social categorization can reduce intergroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1435-1444.
65. Hewstone, M. (1996). Contact and categorization: Social psychological interventions to change intergroup relations. In C. N. Macrae, C. Stangor, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 323-368). New York: Guilford.
66. Hewstone, M., & Brown, R.J. (1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the "contact hypothesis." In M. Hewstone & R. Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 1-44). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
67. Hewstone, M., Turner, R.N., Kenworthy, J.B., & Crisp, R.J. (2006). Multiple social categorization: Integrative themes and future research priorities In R. J. Crisp & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Multiple social categorization: Processes, models, and applications (pp. 271-310). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
68. Horenczyk, G. (1966). Migrant identities in conflict: Acculturation attitudes and perceived acculturation ideologies. In G. Breakwell & E. Lyons (Eds.), Changing European identities: Social psychological analyses of social change (pp. 241-250). Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
69. Hornsey, M.J., & Hogg, M.A. (2000). Subgroup relations: A comparison of mutual intergroup differentiation and common ingroup identity models of prejudice reduction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 242-256.
70. Houlette, M., Gaertner, S.L., Johnson, K.M., Banker, B.S., Riek, B.M., & Dovidio, J.F. (2004). Developing a more inclusive social identity: An elementary school intervention. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 35-56.
71. Howard, J.M., & Rothbart, M. (1980). Social categorization for ingroup and out-group behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 301-310.
72. Huo, Y.J. (2003). Procedural justice and social regulation across group boundaries: Does subgroup identity undermine relationship-based governance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 336-348.
73. Huo, Y.J., & Molina, L.E. (2006). Is pluralism a viable model of diversity? The benefits and limits of subgroup respect. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9, 359-376.
74. Huo, Y.J., Smith, H.J., Tyler, T.R. (1996). Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns: Is separatism the problem; is assimilation the answer? Psychological Science, 7, 40-45.
75. Insko, C.A., Schopler, J., Gaertner, L., Wildschut, T., Kozar, R., Pinter, B., et al. (2001). Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity reduction through the anticipation of future interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 95-111.
76. Iyer, A., Leach, C.W., & Crosby, F.J. (2003). White guilt and racial compensation: The benefits and limits of self-focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 117-129.
77. Jackman, M.R. (1994). The velvet glove. Berkeley: University of California Press.
78. Jackman, M.R., & Crane, M. (1986). " Some of my best friends are Black... ": Interracial friendship and Whites' racial attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 459-486.
79. Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Manstead, A.S.R. (1997). Strength of identification and intergroup differentiation: The influence of group norms. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 603-609.
80. Jost, J.T., Banaji, M., & Nosek, B.A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881-919.
81. Jost, J.T., Pietrzak, J., Liviatan, I., Mandisodza, A.N., & Napier, J.L. (2008). System justification as conscious and nonconscious goal pursuit. In J. Y. Shah & W. L. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 591-605). New York: Guilford.
82. Kaiser, C., & Pratt-Hyatt, J. (in press). Distributing prejudice unequally: Do Whites distribute their prejudice toward strongly identified minorities? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
83. Kelman, H.C. (1999). The interdependence of Israeli and Palestinian national identities: The role of the other in existential conflicts. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 581-600.
84. Kessler, T., & Mummendey, A. (2001). Is there any scapegoat around? Determinants of intergroup conflicts at different categorization levels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1090-1102.
85. LaFromboise, T., Coleman, H.L.K., & Gerton, J. (1993). Psychological impact of biculturalism: Evidence and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 395-412.
86. Leung, A.K., Maddux, W.M., Galinsky, A.D., & Chiu, C. (2008). Multicultural experience enhances creativity: The when and how. American Psychologist, 63, 169-181.
87. LeVine, R.A., & Campbell, D.T. (1972). Ethnocentrism: Theories of conflict, ethnic attitudes and group behavior. New York: John Wiley.
88. Leyens, J.-P., Demoulin, S., Vaes, J., Gaunt, R., & Paladino, M.P. (2007). Infra-humanization: The wall of group differences. Social Issues and Policy Review, 1, 139-172.
89. McCullough, M.E. (2001). Forgiveness: Who does it and how do they do it ? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 194-197.
90. Miller, N. (2002). Personalization and the promise of contact theory. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 387-410.
91. Mottola, G. (1996). The effects of relative group status on expectations of merger success. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Delaware, Newark.
92. Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103-122.
93. Mummendey, A., Klink, A., & Brown, R. (2001). Nationalism and patriotism: National identification and out-group rejection. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 159-172.
94. Mummendey, A., & Wenzel, M. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 158-174.
95. Nadler, A. (2002). Inter-group helping relations as power relations: Helping relations as affirming or challenging inter-group hierarchy. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 487-502.
96. Nadler, A., & Halabi, S. (2006). Intergroup helping as status relations: Effects of status stability in-group identification and type of help on receptivity to help from high status group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 97-110.
97. Nier, J.A., Gaertner, S.L., Dovidio, J.F., Banker, B.S., & Ward, C.M. (2001). Changing interracial evaluations and behavior: The effects of a common group identity. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 4, 299-316.
98. Opotow, S. (1995). Drawing the line: Social categorization, moral exclusion, and the scope of justice. In B. B. Bunker & J. Z. Rubin (Eds.), Conflict, cooperation, and justice: Essays inspired by the work of Morton Deutsch (pp. 347-369). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
99. Otten, S., & Moskowitz, G.B. (2000). Evidence for implicit evaluative in-group bias: Affect-based spontaneous trait inference in a minimal group paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 77-89.
100. Perdue, C.W., Dovidio, J.F., Gurtman, M.B., & Tyler, R.B. (1990). " Us" and "them": Social categorization and the process of intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 475-486.
101. Pettigrew, T.F. (1958). Personality and sociocultural factors in intergroup attitudes: A cross-national comparison. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 29-42.
102. Pettigrew, T.F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65-85.
103. Piontkowski, U., Rohmann, A., & Florack, A. (2002). Concordance of acculturation attitudes and perceived threat. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 5, 221-232.
104. Putnam, R.D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandanavian Political Studies, 30, 137-174.
105. Rebelo, M., Guerra, R., & Monteiro, M.B. (2004, June). Reducing prejudice: Comparative effects of three theoretical models. Paper presented at the fifth biennial convention of the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues, Washington, DC.
106. Rebelo, M., Guerra, R., & Monteiro, M.B. (2005, July). Generalizing positive intergroup relations in realistic settings: A comparison among recategorization, decategorization and dual identity models. Paper presented at the 14th general meeting of the European Association of Experimental Social Psychology, Wurzburg, Germany.
107. Reicher, S. (2007). Rethinking the paradigm of prejudice. South African Journal of Psychology. 37, 820-834
108. Ripley, J.S., & Worthington, E.L., Jr. (2002). Hope-focused and forgiveness-based group interventions to promote marital enrichment. Journal of Counseling and Development, 80, 452-463.
109. Robbins, J.M., & Krueger, J.I. (2005). Social projection to ingroups and outgroups: A review and meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 32-47.
110. Ruscher, J.B. (2001). Prejudiced communication: A social psychological perspective. New York: Guilford Press.
111. Ryan, C.S., Hunt, J.S., Weible, J.A., Peterson, C.R., & Casas, J.F. (2007). Multicultural and colorblind ideology, stereotypes, and ethnocentrism among Black and White Americans. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 10, 617-637.
112. Ryder, A.G., Alden, L.E., & Paulhus, D.L. (2000). Is acculturation unidimensional or bidimensional? A head-to-head comparison in the prediction of personality, self-construal, and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 49-65.
113. Saguy, T., Dovidio, J., F., & Pratto, F. (2008). Beyond contact: Intergroup contact in the context of power relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 432-445.
114. Saguy, T., Tausch, N., Dovidio, J.F., & Pratto, F. (in press). The irony of harmony: Intergroup contact can produce false expectations for equality. Psychological Science.
115. Sanders Thompson, V.L. (1999). Variables affecting racial identity salience among African Americans. Journal of Social Psychology, 139, 748-761.
116. Scheepers, D., Saguy, T., Dovidio, J.F., & Gaertner, S.L. (2008). [Unpublished data]. University of Leiden, Netherlands.
117. Scheepers, D., Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Manstead, A.S.R. (2006). Diversity in in-group bias: Structural factors, situational features, and social functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 944-960.
118. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
119. Simon, B., & Brown, R. (1987). Perceived intragroup homogeneity in minority-majority contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 703-711.
120. Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social-psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56, 319-331.
121. Simon, B., Kulla, C., & Zobel, M. (1995). On being more than just part of the whole: Regional identity and social distinctiveness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 325-340.
122. Smith, H.J., & Tyler, T.R. (1996). Justice and power: When will justice concerns encourage the advantaged to support policies which redistribute economic resources and the disadvantaged to willingly obey the law ? European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 171-200.
123. Smooha, S. (2003). Jewish ethnicity in Israel as a persistent real phenomenon. Iyunim Bitkumat Israel, 13, 413-425.
124. Sommers, S.R. (2006). On racial diversity and group decision making: Identifying multiple effects of racial composition on jury deliberations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 597-612.
125. Spears, R., Jetten, J., & Doosje, B. (2001). The (il)legitimacy of ingroup bias: From social reality to social resistance. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 332-362). New York: Cambridge University Press.
126. Stuber, J., Galea, S., Ahern, J., Blaney, S., & Fuller, C. (2003). The association between multiple domains of discrimination and self-assessed health: A multilevel analysis of Latinos and Blacks in four low-income New York City neighborhoods. Health Services Research, 38, 1735-1759.
127. Tajfel, H. (1969). Cognitive aspects of prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 25 (4). 79-97.
128. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-48). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
129. Thompson, H.S., Kamarck, T.W., & Manuck, S.B. (2002). The association between racial identity and hypertension in African American adults: Elevated resting and ambulatory blood pressure outcomes. Ethnicity and Disease, 12, 20-28.
130. Thompson, H.S., Valdimarsdottir, H.B., Jandorf, L., & Redd, W. (2004). The Group-Based Medical Mistrust Scale: Psychometric properties and association with breast cancer screening. Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice and Theory, 38, 209-218.
131. Turner, J.C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 2, pp. 77-122). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
132. Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D., & Wetherell, M.S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
133. Tyler, T., & Blader, S.L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349-361.
134. van Dijk, T.A. (1993). Elite discourse and racism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
135. van Oudenhoven, J.P., Prins, K.S., & Buunk, B. (1998). Attitudes of minority and majority members towards adaptation of immigrants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 995-1013.
136. van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504-535.
137. Verkuyten, M. (2006). Multicultural recognition and ethnic minority rights: A social identity perspective. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 17, pp. 148-184). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
138. Voci, A. (2006). The link between identification and in-group favouritism: Effects of threat to social identity and trust-related emotions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 265-284.
139. Waldzus, S., Mummendey, A., Wenzel, M., & Boettcher, F. (2004). Of bikers, teachers, and Germans: Groups' diverging views about their prototypicality. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 385-400.
140. Wenzel, M. (2000). Justice and identity: The significance of inclusion for perceptions of entitlement and the justice motive. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 157-176.
141. Wilder, D.A. (1981). Perceiving persons as a group: Categorization and intergroup relations. In D. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior (pp. 213-257). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
142. Williams, D.R., & Jackson, J.S. (2003). Racial/ethnic discrimination and health: Findings from community studies. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 200-208.
143. Wohl, M.J.A., & Branscombe, N. (2005). Forgiveness and collective guilt assignment to historical perpetrator groups depend on level of social category inclusiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 288-303.
144. Wolsko, C., Park, B., & Judd, C.M. (2006). Considering the Tower of Babel: Correlates of assimilation and multiculturalism among ethnic minority and majority groups in the United States. Social Justice Research, 19, 277-306.
145. Worrell, F.C., & Gardner-Kitt, D.L. (2006). The relationship between racial and ethnic identity in Black adolescents: The Cross Racial Identity Scale and the Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure. Identity, 6, 293-315.
146. Wright, S.C. (2001). Strategic collective action: Social psychology and social change. In R. Brown & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (pp. 223-256). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
147. Wright, S.C., Kiu, L., Semenya, A., & Comeau, J. (2008, June). Prejudice reduction and collective action: When strategies for reducing social inequality collide. Paper presented at the meeting of the European Association for Experimental Social Psychology, Optija, Croatia.
148. Wright, S.C., & Lubensky, M.E. (in press). The struggle for social equality: Collective action versus prejudice reduction. In S. Demoulin, J.-P. Leyens, & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), Intergroup misunderstandings: Impact of divergent social realities. New York: Psychology Press.
149. Zhang, Y., Fishbach, A., & Dhar, R. (2007). When thinking beats doing: The role of optimistic expectations in goal-based choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 567-578.