Crossed categorization in common ingroup contexts

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 32, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1204-1218

  Crisp, Richard J ^a   Walsh, Judi ^b   Hewstone, Miles ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Common ingroup identity; Crossed categorization; Intergroup bias; Reducing prejudice

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RANDOMIZATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STUDENT;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; MALE; PREJUDICE; PROBLEM SOLVING; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; STUDENTS;

EID: 33747112354     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: 15527433     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146167206289409     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage.
2. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
3. Bodenhausen, G. V. (1993). Emotions, arousal, and stereotypic judgments: A heuristic model of affect and stereotyping. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 13-37). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
4. Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self - on being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482.
5. Brewer, M. B., Ho, H., Lee, J., & Miller, N. (1987). Social identity and social distance among Hong Kong school children. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 156-165.
6. Brewer, M. B., & Miller, N. (1984). Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. In N. Miller & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 281-302). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
7. Brown, R. J., & Turner, J. C. (1979). The criss-cross categorization effect in intergroup discrimination. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 371-383.
8. Crisp, R. J., & Beck, S. R. (2005). Reducing intergroup bias: The moderating role of ingroup identification. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8, 173-186.
9. Crisp, R. J., Ensari, N., Hewstone, M., & Miller, N. (2002). A dual-route model of crossed categorization effects. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 35-74). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
10. Crisp, R. J., & Hewstone, M. (1999). Differential evaluation of crossed category groups: Patterns, processes, and reducing intergroup bias. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 2, 1-27.
11. Crisp, R. J., & Hewstone, M. (2000). Crossed categorization and intergroup bias: The moderating roles of intergroup and affective context. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 357-383.
12. Crisp, R. J., & Hewstone, M. (2001). Multiple categorization and implicit intergroup bias: Differential category dominance and the positive-negative asymmetry effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 45-62.
13. Crisp, R. J., Stone, C. H., & Hall, N. R. (2006). Recategorization and subgroup identification: Predicting and preventing threats from common ingroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 230-243.
14. Deschamps, J.-C., & Doise, W. (1978). Crossed category memberships in intergroup relations. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 141-158). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Doise, W. (1978). Groups and individuals: Explanations in social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Isen, A. M., & Lowrance, R. (1995). Group representations and intergroup bias: Positive affect, similarity, and group size. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 856-865.
17. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Isen, A. M., Rust, M., & Guerra, P. (1998). Positive affect, cognition, and the reduction of intergroup bias. In C. Sedikides & C. Insko (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behaviour. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Validzic, A. (1998). Intergroup bias: Status, differentiation and a common ingroup identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 109-120.
19. Ensari, N., & Miller, N. (1998). Effect of affective reactions by the outgroup on preferences for crossed categorization discussion partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1503-1527.
20. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
21. Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 1-26). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
22. Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Rust, M. C., Nier, J., Banker, B. S., Ward, C. M., et al. (1999). Reducing intergroup bias: Elements of intergroup cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 388-402.
23. Gaertner, S. L., Mann, J. A., Dovidio, J. F., Murrell, A. J., & Pomare, M. (1990). How does co-operation reduce intergroup bias? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 692-704.
24. González, R., & Brown, R. J. (2003). Generalization of positive attitude as a function of subgroup and superordinate group identifications in intergroup contact. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 195-214.
25. Hewstone, M. (1996). Contact and categorization: Social psychological interventions to change intergroup relations. In C. N. Macrae, C. Stangor, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 323-368). New York: Guilford.
26. Hewstone, M., & Brown, R. J. (1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the contact hypothesis. In M. Hewstone & R. J. Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 1-44). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
27. Hewstone, M., Islam, M. R., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Models of crossed categorization and intergroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 779-793.
28. Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Subgroup relations: A comparison of mutual intergroup differentiation and common ingroup identity models of prejudice reduction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 242-256.
29. Isen, A. M., & Daubman, K. A. (1984). The influence of affect on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1206-1217.
30. Isen, A. M., Niedenthal, P. M., & Cantor, N. (1992). An influence of positive affect on social categorization. Motivation and Emotion, 16, 65-78.
31. Judd, C. M., & McClelland, G. H. (1989). Data analysis: A modelcomparison approach. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
32. Kenworthy, J. B., Canales, C. J., Weaver, K. D., & Miller, N. (2003). Negative incidental affect and mood congruency in crossed categorization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 195-219.
33. Migdal, M., Hewstone, M., & Mullen, B. (1998). The effects of crossed categorization in intergroup evaluations: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 303-324.
34. Miller, N., Urban, L. M., & Vanman, E. J. (1998). A theoretical analysis of crossed social categorization effects. In C. Sedikides, J. Schopler, & C. Insko (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35. Mullen, B., Migdal, M. J., & Hewstone, M. (2001). Crossed categorization vs. simple categorization and intergroup evaluations: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 721-736.
36. Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R. L., & Rubin, D. B. (2000). Contrasts and effects size in behavioral research: A correlational approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of inter-group conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/ Cole.
38. Taylor, S. E., Fiske, S. T., Etcoff, N. L., & Ruderman, A. J. (1978). Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereo-typing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 778-793.
39. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Re-discovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
40. Urada, D. I., & Miller, N. (2000). The impact of positive mood and category importance on crossed categorization effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 417-433.
41. Urban, L. M., & Miller, N. M. (1998). A meta-analysis of crossed categorization effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 894-908.
42. Vanbeselaere, N. (1991). The different effects of simple and crossed categorizations: A result of the category differentiation process or of differential category salience? In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 247-278). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
43. Wenzel, M., Mummendey, A., Weber, U., & Waldzus, S. (2003). The ingroup as pars pro toto: Projection from the ingroup onto the inclusive category as a precursor to social discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 461-473.