Enhancing nursing students' skills in vital signs assessment by using multimedia computer-assisted learning with integrated content of anatomy and physiology

Nurse Education Today

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 65-72

  Kaveevivitchai, Chularuk ^a,b   Chuengkriankrai, Benchaporn ^b   Luecha, Yuwadee ^b   Thanooruk, Rujires ^b   Panijpan, Bhinyo ^a   Ruenwongsa, Pintip ^a  

^a MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^b MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Computer assisted learning (CAL); Multimedia; Nursing students performance skills; Vital signs assessment

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANATOMY; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIMEDIA; NURSING ASSESSMENT; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING STUDENT; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STANDARD; TEACHING; THAILAND; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ANATOMY; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION, NURSING, BACCALAUREATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MULTIMEDIA; NURSING ASSESSMENT; NURSING EDUCATION RESEARCH; PHYSIOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRES; STUDENTS, NURSING; TEACHING; THAILAND; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 58249092037     PISSN: 02606917     EISSN: 15322793     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2008.06.010     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Baldwin D., Hill P., and Hanson G. Performance of psychomotor skills: a comparison of two teaching strategies. Journal of Nursing Education 30 8 (1991) 367-370
2. Beeson V., and Kring L. The effects of two teaching methods on nursing students' factual knowledge and performance of psychomotor skills. Journal of Nursing Education 38 8 (1999) 357-359
3. Bybee, W., Taylor, A., Gardner, A., Scotter, V., Powell, C., Westbrook, A., et al., 2006. The BSCS 5E instructional model: origins, effectiveness, and applications. (accessed 01.01.08.).
4. Colburn, Clough, 2007. Learning Cycle. (accessed 05.12.07.).
5. Corlett J., Palfreyman J.W., Staines H.J., and Marr H. Factors influencing theoretical knowledge and practical skill acquisition in student nurses: an empirical experiment. Nurse Education Today 23 (2003) 183-190
6. Day R., and Payne L. Comparison of lecture presentation versus computer managed instruction. Computer in Nursing 2 6 (1984) 236-240
7. Dwyer, G., Deloney, A., Cantrell, J., Graham, J., 2007. The first clinical skill: students teach students to take vital signs. (accessed 05.12.07.).
8. Faculty members of Fundamental Nursing Committee, 2007. Performance checklist. Ramathibodi Nursing School, Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand.
9. Freeth D., and Fry H. Nursing students' and tutors' perceptions of learning and teaching in clinical skills center. Nurse Education Today 25 (2005) 72-282
10. Fundamental of Nursing Course Report, 2006. Ramathibodi Nursing School, Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand.
11. Lewis M., Davies R., Jenkins D., and Tait M. A review of evaluative studies of computer-based learning in nursing education. Nurse Education Today 25 (2005) 586-597
12. Prowse A., and Heath V. Working collaboratively in health care contexts: the influence of bioscientific knowledge on patient outcomes. Nurse Educatuon Today 25 (2004) 132-139
13. Rouse D. The effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in teaching nursing students about congenital heart disease. Computer in Nursing 18 (2000) 282-287
14. Russell, A., Jooyce, J., Catherine, C., John, V., William, W., 2006. Effect of interactive multimedia an basic clinical psychomotor skill performance by physical therapist students. .
15. Saksoomboon K., McMillan M., and Cholowski K. An evaluation of the Baccalaureate nursing program within MOPH, Thailand. Nurse Education Today 22 8 (2002) 614-647
16. Schmidt M., Arndt J., Gaston S., and Miller J. The effectiveness of computer managed instruction versus traditional classroom lecture on achievement outcomes. Computer in Nursing 9 4 (1991) 159-163
17. Shadish, R., Cook, D., Campbell, T., 2001. Experiments and Generalized Causal Inference in Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Design for Generalized Causal Inference. Houghion Mifflin, New York, pp. 1-35.
18. Tom E. Nursing ritual, vital observation. Nursing Times 89 51 (1993) 32-34
19. Tuphikron, B.,Tearanabunjong, Y., Kittivit, N., 2001. Knowledge about multimedia for education. Department of Curriculum and Instruction Development, Ministry of Education, Thailand.
20. Vandeveer M., and Norton B. From teaching to learning: theoretical foundation. In: Billings D.M., and Halstead J.A. (Eds). Teaching in Nursing (2005), Elsevier-Saunders, St. Louis 240-241
21. Wharrad J., Kent C., Allcock N., and Wood B. A comparison of CAI with a conventional method of delivery of cell biology to undergraduate nursing students using an experimental design. Nurse Education Today 21 (2001) 579-581