Fine-tuned: Phonology and semantics affect first- To second-language zooming in

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 180-196

  Elston Güttler, Kerrie E ^a   Gunter, Thomas C ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; CEREBRAL CORTEX; COMPREHENSION; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MULTILINGUALISM; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHONETICS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REFERENCE VALUES; SEMANTICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 58149520595     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21015     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. American Electroencephalographic Society. (1991). Guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 8, 200-202.
2. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
3. Beauvillain, C., & Grainger, J. (1987). Accessing inter-lexical homographs: Some limitations of language-selective access. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 658-672.
4. Bentin, S., Mouchetant-Rostaing, Y., Giard, M. H., Echallier, J. F., & Pernier, J. (1999). ERP manifestations of processing printed words at different psycholinguistic levels: Time course and scalp distribution. Journal ofCognitive Neuroscience, 11, 235-260.
5. Broadbent, F. E. (1982). Task combination and selective intake of information. Acta Psychologica, 50, 253-290.
6. Buchner, A., & Erdfelder, E. (2005). Word frequency of irrelevant speech distractors affects serial recall. Memory & Cognition, 33, 86-97.
7. Chen, H. C., & Ho, C. (1986). Development of Stroop interference in Chinese-English bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 397-401.
8. Colle, H. A., & Welsh, A. (1976). Acoustic masking in primary memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 17-32.
9. Compton, P. E., Grossbacher, P., Posner, M. I., & Tucker, D. M. (1991). A cognitive-anatomical approach to attention in lexical access. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 304-312.
10. Connolly, J. F., & Phillips, N. A. (1994). Event-related potential components reflect phonological and semantic processing of the terminal word of spoken sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 256-266.
11. Connolly, J. F., Phillips, N. A., Stewart, S. H., & Brake, W. G. (1992). Event-related potential sensitivity to acoustic and semantic properties of terminal words in sentences. Brain and Language, 43, 1-18.
12. De Bruijn, E., Dijkstra, T., Chwilla, D., & Schreifers, H. (2001). Language context effects on interlingual homograph recognition: Evidence from event-related potentials and response times in semantic priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 155-168.
13. De Groot, A. M. B., Delmaar, P., & Lupker, S. J. (2000). The processing of interlexical homographs in translation recognition and lexical decision: Support for non-selective access to bilingual memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 53A, 397-428.
14. De Moor, W. (1998). Visual word recognition in bilinguals. Unpublished Master's Thesis, University of Ghent.
15. Deacon, D., Dynowska, A., Ritter, W., & Grose-Fifer, J. (2004). Repetition and semantic priming of nonwords: Implications for theories of N400 and word recognition. Psychophysiology, 41, 60-74.
16. Deacon, D., & Shelley-Tremblay, J. (2000). How automatically is meaning accessed: A review of the effects of attention on semantic processing. Frontiers in Bioscience, 5, 82-94.
17. Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (1999). Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal ofMemory and Language, 41, 496-518.
18. Dijkstra, T., Timmermans, M., & Schreifers, H. (2000). On being blinded by your other language: Effects of task demands on interlingual homograph recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 445-464.
19. Dijkstra, T., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (2002). The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 175-197.
20. Dijkstra, T., Van Jaarsveld, H., & Brinke, S. T. (1998). Interlingual homograph recognition: Effect of task demands and language intermixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 51-66.
21. Elston-Güttler, K. E. (2000). An enquiry into cross-language lexical-conceptual relationships and their effect on L2 lexical processing. PhD Dissertation, University of Cambridge.
22. Elston-Güttler, K. E., & Friederici, A. D. (2005). Native and L2 processing of homonyms in sentential context. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 256-283.
23. Elston-Güittler, K. E., & Friederici, A. D. (2007). Ambiguous words in sentences: Brain indices for native and non-native disambiguation. Neuroscience Letters, 414, 85-89.
24. Elston-Güttler, K. E., Gunter, T. C., & Kotz, S. A. (2005). Zooming into L2: Global language context and adjustment affect processing of interlingual homographs in sentences. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 57-70.
25. Elston-Güttler, K. E., Paulmann, S., & Kotz, S. A. (2005). Who's in control?: Proficiency and L1 influence on L2 processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1593-1610.
26. Farley, L. A., Neath, I., & Allbritton, D. W. (2007). Irrelevant speech effects and sequence learning. Memory & Cognition 35, 156-165.
27. Gerard, L. D., & Scarborough, D. L. (1989). Language-specific access of homographs by bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15, 305-315.
28. Grainger, J., & Dijsktra, T. (1992). On the representation and use of language information in bilinguals. In R. J. Harris (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp. 207-220). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
29. Green, D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 67-81.
30. Greenhouse, S., & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24, 95-112.
31. Grosjean, F. (2001). The bilingual's language modes. In J. Nicol (Ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing (pp. 1-22). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
32. Heinze, H.-J., Münte, T. F., & Mangun, G. R. (1994). Cognitive electrophysiology. Basel: Birkhäuser.
33. Hernandez, A., Dapretto, M., Mazziotta, J., & Bookheimer, S. (2001). Language switching and language representation in Spanish-English bilinguals: An fMRI study. Neuroimage, 14, 510-520.
34. Holender, D. (1986). Semantic activation without conscious indentification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual making: A survey and appraisal. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9, 1-66.
35. Hughes, R. W., Tremblay, S., & Jones, D. M. (2005). Disruption by speech of serial short-term memory: The role of changing-state vowels. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 886-890.
36. Jones, D. (1995). The fate of the unattended stimulus: Irrelevant speech and cognition. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, S23-S38.
37. Jones, D. M., & Macken, W. J. (1995). Phonological similarity in the irrelevant speech effect: Within-or between-stream similarity? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 103-115.
38. Jones, D. M., Miles, C., & Page, J. (1990). Disruption of proofreading by irrelevant speech: Effects of attention, arousal or memory? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 89-108.
39. Kotz, S. A., & Elston-Güttler, K. (2004). The role of proficiency on processing categorical and associative information in the L2 as revealed by reaction times and event-related brain potentials. Journal ofNeurolinguistics, 17, 215-235.
40. LeCompte, D. C., Neely, C. B., & Wilson, J. R. (1997). Irrelevant speech and irrelevant tones: The relative importance of speech to the irrelevant speech effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 472-483.
41. Martin, R. C., Wogalter, M. S., & Forlando, J. G. (1988). Reading comprehension in the presence of unattended speech and music. Journal ofMemory and Language, 27, 382-398.
42. Neely, C. B., & LeCompte, D. C. (1999). The importance of semantic similarity to the irrelevant speech effect. Memory & Cognition, 27, 37-44.
43. Oswald, C.J. P., Tremblay, S., & Jones, D. M. (2000). Disruption of comprehension by the meaning of irrelevant sound. Memory, 8, 345-350.
44. Paulmann, S., Elston-Güttler, K. E., Gunter, T. C., & Kotz, S. A. (2006). Is bilingual lexical access influenced by language context? NeuroReport, 17, 727-731.
45. Price, C. J., Green, D. W., & Von Studnitz, R. (1999). A functional imaging study of translation and language switching. Brain, 122, 2221-2235.
46. Proverbio, A. M., Leoni, G., & Zani, A. (2004). Language switching mechanisms in simultaneous interpreters: An ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1636-1656.
47. Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Schmitt, B. M., Kutas, M., & Müinte, T. (2002). Electrophysiological estimates of the time course of semantic and phonological encoding during listening and naming. Neuropsychologia, 40, 778-787.
48. Salamé, P., & Baddeley, A. D. (1982). Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech: Implications for the structure of working memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 150-164.
49. Salamé, P., & Baddeley, A. D. (1989). Effects of background music on phonological short term memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 41, 107-122.
50. Scarborough, D. L., Gerard, L., & Cortese, C. (1984). Independence of lexical access in bilingual word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 84-99.
51. Smith, M. C., & Kirsner, K. (1982). Language and orthography as irrelevant features in colour-word and picture-word Stroop interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 34A, 153-170.
52. Van den Brink, D., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (2001). Electrophysiological evidence for early contextual influences during spoken-word recognition: N200 versus N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 967-985.
53. Van Hell, J. G., & Dijkstra, T. (2002). Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 780-789.
54. Van Heste, T. (1999). Visual word recognition in bilinguals: Selective and nonselective activation processes as a function of the experimental task. Unpublished Master's Thesis, University of Leuven.
55. Van Heuven, W. J. B., Dijkstra, T., & Grainger, J. (1998). Orthographic neighborhood effects in bilingual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 458-483.
56. Vasey, M. W., & Thayer, J. F. (1987). The continuing problem of false positives in repeated measures ANOVA in psychophysiology: A multivariate solution. Psychophysiology, 4, 479-486.
57. Venetjoki, N., Kaarlela-Tuomaala, A., Keskinen, E., & Hongisto, V. (2006). The effect of speech and speech intelligibility on task performance. Ergonomics, 49, 1068-1091.
58. Von Studnitz, R. E., & Green, D. W. (2002). Interlingual homograph interference in German-English bilinguals: Its modulation and locus of control. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 1-23.
59. Williams, J. N. (1994). The relationship between word meanings in the first and second language: Evidence for a common, but restricted, semantic code. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6, 195-220.