Disruption by speech of serial short-term memory: The role of changing-state vowels

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 886-890

  Hughes, Robert W ^a,c   Tremblay, Sébastien ^b   Jones, Dylan M ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^c CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644761910     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196781     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. BADDELEY, A. D. (2000). The phonological loop and the irrelevant speech effect: Some comments on Neath (2000). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 544-549.
2. BREGMAN, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization o] sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. BRIDGES, A. M., & JONES, D. M. (1996). Word dose in the disruption of serial recall by irrelevant speech: Phonological similarity or changing state? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 919-939.
4. BUCHNER, A., IRMEN, L., & ERDFELDER, E. (1996). On the irrelevance of semantic information for the "irrelevant speech" effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 765-779.
5. COLE, R. A. (1973). Different memory functions for consonants and vowels. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 39-54.
6. COLLE, H. A. (1980). Auditory encoding in visual short-term recall: Effects of noise intensity and spatial location. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19, 722-735.
7. COLLE, H. A., & WELSH, A. (1976). Acoustic masking in primary memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 15, 17-31.
8. HUGHES, R. W., & JONES, D. M. (2005). The impact of order incongruence between a task-irrelevant auditory sequence and a task-relevant visual sequence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 316-327.
9. JONES, D. M., ALFORD, D., BRIDGES, A., TREMBLAY, S., & MACKEN, W. J. (1999). Organizational factors in selective attention: The interplay of acoustic distinctiveness and auditory streaming in the irrelevant sound effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 464-473.
10. JONES, D. M., FARRAND, P., STUART, G., & MORRIS, N. (1995). Functional equivalence of verbal and spatial information in serial shortterm memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1008-1018.
11. JONES, D. M., & MACKEN, W. J. (1993). Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect: Implications for phonological coding in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 369-381.
12. JONES, D. M., & MACKEN, W. J. (1995a). Organizational factors in the effect of irrelevant speech: The role of spatial location and timing. Memory & Cognition, 23, 192-200.
13. JONES, D. M., & MACKEN, W. J. (1995b). Phonological similarity in the irrelevant speech effect: Within- or between-stream similarity? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 103-115.
14. JONES, D. M., MADDEN, C., & MILES, C. (1992). Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: The role of changing state. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 645-669.
15. JONES, D. M., SAINT-AUBIN, J., & TREMBLAY, S. (1999). Modulation of the irrelevant sound effect by organizational factors: Further evidence from streaming by location. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 545-554.
16. JONES, D. M., & TREMBLAY, S. (2000). Interference by process or context? A reply to Neath (2000). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 550-558.
17. JUSCZYK, P. W., GOODMAN, M. B., & BAUMANN, A. (1999). Nine-month-olds' attention to sound similarities in syllables. Journal of Memory & Language, 40, 62-82.
18. LARSEN, J. D., BADDELEY, A. D., & ANDRADE, J. (2000). Phonological similarity and the irrelevant speech effect: Implications for models of short-term verbal memory. Memory, 8, 145-157.
19. LECOMPTE, D. C. (1995). An irrelevant speech effect with repeated and continuous background speech. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 391-397.
20. LECOMPTE, D. C. (1996). Irrelevant speech, serial rehearsal and temporal distinctiveness: A new approach to the irrelevant speech effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1154-1165.
21. LECOMPTE, D. C., & SHAIBE, D. M. (1997). On the irrelevance of phonological similarity to the irrelevant speech effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 100-118.
22. MACKEN, W. J., PHELPS, F., & JONES, D. M. (2005). What causes auditory distraction? Manuscript in preparation.
23. MILES, C., JONES, D. M., & MADDEN, C. A. (1991). Locus of the irrelevant speech effect in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 578-584.
24. NEATH, I. (2000). Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 403-423.
25. NEUMANN, O. (1996). Theories of attention. In O. Neumann & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of perception and action (Vol. 3, pp. 389-446). London: Academic Press.
26. SALAMÉ, P., & BADDELEY, A. D. (1982). Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech: Implications for the structure of working memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 21, 150-164.
27. SURPRENANT, A. M., & NEATH, I. (1996). The relation between discriminability and memory for vowels, consonants, and silent-center vowels. Memory & Cognition, 24, 356-366.
28. TREMBLAY, S., & JONES, D. M. (1999). Change of intensity fails to produce an irrelevant sound effect: Implications for the representations of unattended sound. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1005-1015.