CAD in questions/answers. Review of the literature

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 24-33

  Boyer, Bruno ^a   Balleyguier, Corinne ^b   Granat, Olivier ^a   Pharaboz, Christian ^a  

^a Cabinet de Radiologie   (France)

^b INSTITUT GUSTAVE ROUSSY   (France)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast screening programs; CAD mammography; Double reading

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; BREAST SCREENING PROGRAMS; CAD MAMMOGRAPHY; CAD SYSTEMS; DOUBLE READING; MAMMOGRAPHIC; MICROCALCIFICATIONS; NEGATIVE RATES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC RADIOGRAPHY; MEDICAL IMAGING;

MAMMOGRAPHY;

BREAST CALCIFICATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DEVICE; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MASS SCREENING; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 58149503982     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.07.042     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Beam C.A., Sullivan D.C., and Layde P.M. Effect of human variability on independent double reading in screening mammography. Acad Radiol 3 (1996) 891-897
2. Boyer B., Hauret L., Bellaiche R., Graf C., Bourcier B., and Fichet G. Retrospectively detectable carcinomas: review of the literature. J Radiol 85 (2004) 2071-2078
3. Bird R.E., Wallace T.W., and Yankaskas B.C. Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 184 (1992) 613-617
4. Hall F.M. Opinions about mammographic double reading. Am J Roentgenol 168 (1997) 846
5. Homer M.J. Mammography training in diagnostic radiology residency programs. Radiology 135 (1980) 529-531
6. Jackson V.P., Bresch J.A., Bassett L.W., Dershaw D.D., and Jessop N.W. Status of mammography education and knowledge of radiology residents. Radiology 201 (1996) 773-776
7. Laming D., and Warren R. Improving the detection of cancer in the screening of mammograms. J Med Screen 7 (2000) 24-30
8. Pisano E.D., McLelland R., Clark R.L., Dicke K., and Muller K. A formal curriculum in breast imaging for radiology residents. Invest Radiol 28 (1993) 762-766
9. Ciatto S., Del Turco M.R., Morrone D., et al. Independent double reading of screening mammograms. J Med Screen 2 (1995) 99-101
10. Thurfjell E.L., Lernevall K.A., and Taube A.A. Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. Radiology 191 (1994) 241-244
11. Bassett L.W., Cassady C.I., and Gold R.H. Present status of residency training in mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 156 (1991) 59-62
12. Nodine C.F., Kundel H.L., Mello-Thoms C., et al. How experience and training influence mammography expertise. Acad Radiol 6 (1999) 575-585
13. Doi K., Giger M.L., Nishikawa R.M., and Schmidt R.A. Computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer on mammograms. Breast Cancer 4 (1997) 228-233
14. Giger M.L., Doi K., MacMahon H., et al. An "intelligent" workstation for computer-aided diagnosis. Radiographics 13 (1993) 647-656
15. Doi K., MacMahon H., Katsuragawa S., Nishikawa R.M., and Jiang Y. Computer-aided diagnosis in radiology: potential and pitfalls. Eur J Radiol 31 (1999) 97-109
16. Feig S.A. Breast cancer screening: potential role of computer-aided detection (CAD). Technol Cancer Res Treat 1 (2002) 127-131
17. Malich A., Sauner D., Marx C., et al. Influence of breast lesion size and histologic findings on tumor detection rate of a computer-aided detection system. Radiology 228 (2003) 851-856
18. Taylor C.G., Champness J., Reddy M., Taylor P., Potts H.W., and Given-Wilson R. Reproductibility of prompts in computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer. Clin Radiol 58 (2003) 733-738
19. Helvie M.A., Hadjiiski L., Makariou E., et al. Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial. Radiology (2004) 2311030429
20. Wei J., Hadjiiski L.M., Sahiner B., et al. Computer-aided detection systems for breast masses: comparison of performances on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms. Acad Radiol 14 6 (2007) 659-666
21. Brem R.F., Hoffmeister J.W., Zisman G., DeSimio M.P., and Rogers M.K. A computer-aided detection system for the evaluation of breast cancer by mammographic appearance and lesion size. Am J Roentgenol 184 (2005) 893-896
22. Yang S.K., Moon W.K., Cho N., et al. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms. Radiology 244 (2007) 104-111
23. Gavrielides M.A., Lo J.Y., Vargas-Voracek R., and Floyd Jr. C.E. Segmentation of suspicious clustered microcalcifications in mammograms. Med Phys 27 (2000) 13-22
24. Soo M.S., Rosen E.L., Xia J.Q., Ghate S., and Baker J.A. Computer-aided detection of amorphous calcifications. Am J Roentgenol 184 (2005) 887-892
25. Chan H.P., Lo S.C., Sahiner B., Lam K.L., and Helvie M.A. Computer-aided detection of mammographic calcifications: pattern recognition with an artificial neural network. Med Phys 23 (1996) 1325-1336
26. Brem R.F., and Schoonjans J.M. Radiologist detection of microcalcifications with and without computer-aided detection: a comparative study. Clin Radiol 56 (2001) 150-154
27. Li L., Clark R.A., and Thomas J.A. Computer-aided diagnosis of masses with full-field digital mammography. Acad Radiol 9 (2002) 4-12
28. Paquerault S., Petrick N., Chan H.P., Sahiner B., and Helvie M.A. Improvement of computerized mass detection on mammograms: fusion of two-view information. Med Phys 29 (2002) 238-247
29. Baker J.A., Rosen E.L., Lo J.Y., Gimenez E.I., Walsh R., and Soo M.S. Computer-aided detection (CAD) in screening mammography: sensitivity of commercial CAD systems for detecting architectural distortion. Am J Roentgenol 181 (2003) 1083-1088
30. Birdwell R.L., Ikeda D.M., O'Shaughnessy K.F., and Sickles E.A. Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. Radiology 219 (2001) 192-202
31. Ho W.T., and Lam P.W. Clinical performance of computer-assisted detection (CAD) system in detecting carcinoma in breasts of different densities. Clin Radiol 58 (2003) 133-136
32. Nunes F.L., Schiabel H., and Benatti R.H. Contrast enhancement in dense breast images using the modulation transfer function. Med Phys 29 (2002) 2925-2936
33. Lepori D., De Landtsheer J.P., Piguet J.C., De Geer G., and Schnyder P.Y.M. Utilisation d'un système d'aide à la détection par ordinateur dans un programme de dépistage. Analyse rétrospective des mammographies de 49 cancers. Le Sein 12 (2002) 295-303
34. Seradour B., Heid P., Pagliuchi C., et al. Apport d'un système d'aide à la détection assistée par ordinateur dans le cadre d'un programme de dépistage. Le Sein 11 (2001) 13-16
35. Ikeda D.M., Birdwell R.L., KF O.S., Sickles E.A., and Brenner R.J. Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography. Radiology (2004)
36. Khoo L.A., Taylor P., and Given-Wilson R.M. Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Programme: prospective study. Radiology 237 (2005) 444-449
37. Brenner R.J., Ulissey M.J., and Wilt R.M. Computer-aided detection as evidence in the courtroom: potential implications of an appellate court's ruling. Am J Roentgenol 186 (2006) 48-51
38. Freer T.W., and Ulissey M.J. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12 860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 220 (2001) 781-786
39. Morton M.J., Whaley D.H., Brandt K.R., and Amrami K.K. Screening mammograms: interpretation with computer-aided detection-prospective evaluation. Radiology 239 (2006) 375-383
40. Cupples T.E., Cunningham J.E., and Reynolds J.C. Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program. Am J Roentgenol 185 (2005) 944-950
41. Gur D., Sumkin J.H., Rockette H.E., et al. Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. J Natl Cancer Inst 96 (2004) 185-190
42. Feig S.A., Sickles E.A., Evans W.P., and Linver M.N. Re: changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system [letter]. J Natl Cancer Inst 96 (2004) 1260-1261 author reply 1261
43. Fenton J.J., Taplin S.H., Carney P.A., et al. Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N Engl J Med 356 14 (2007) 1399-1409
44. Karssemeijer N., Otten J.D.M., Verbeek A.L.M., et al. Computer-aided detection versus independent double reading of masses on mammograms. Radiology 227 (2003) 192-200
45. Destounis S.V., DiNitto P., Logan-Young W., Bonaccio E., Zuley M.L., and Willison K.M. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience. Radiology 232 (2004) 578-584