Use of computer aided detection system in mammography breast screening program. Retrospective analysis of previous mammogram of 49 cancers (interval cancer and screen detected cancer);Utilisation d'un système d'aide à la détection par ordinateur dans un programme de dépistage. Analyse rétrospective des mammographies de 49 cancers

Sein

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 295-303

  Lepori, D ^a   De Landtsheer, J P ^c   Piguet, J C ^b   De Geer, G ^b   Schnyder, P ^a   Meuwly, J Y ^a  

^a LAUSANNE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

^b Institut de Radiologie   (Switzerland)

^c Fondation Depistage Cancer du Sein   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Artificial intelligence; False negative; Interval cancers; Screening mammography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCREENING TEST; TUMOR LOCALIZATION;

EID: 0036986914     PISSN: 11631961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON CANCER PREVENTION. Recommandations on cancer screening in the European Union. Position Paper. European Journal of Cancer 2000; 36: 1473-1478.
2. BAINES CJ, McFARLANE DV, MILLER AB. The role of the reference radiologist. Estimates of inter-observer agreement and potential delay in cancer detection in the national breast screening study. Invest Radiol 1990; 25: 971-6.
3. BALLARD-BARBASH R, KLABUNDE C, PACI E et al. Breast cancer screening in 21 countries: delivery of services, notification of results and outcomes ascertainement. European. Journal of Cancer Prevention 1999; 8: 417-426.
4. BIRDWELL RL, IKEDA DM, O'SHAUGHNESSY KF, SICKLES EA. Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. Radiology 2001; 219: 192-202.
5. BLANKS RG, WALLIS MG, GIVEN-WILSON RM. Observer variability in cancer detection during routine repeat (incident) mammographic screening in a study of two versus one view mammography. Journal of Med Sceening 1999; 6: 152-158.
6. BOYD NF, WOLFSON C, MOSKOWITZ M, CARLILE T, PETITCLERC M, FERRI HA, FISHELL E et al. Observer variation in the interpretation of xeromammograms. J Natl Cancer Inst 1982; 68: 357-363.
7. BRAKE GM, KARSSEMEIJER N, HENDRIKS JHCL. Automated detection of breast carcinomas not detected in a screenign program. Radiology 1998; 207: 465-471.
8. BURHENNE LJW, WOOD SA, D'ORSI CJ et al. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 2000; 215: 554-562.
9. CHAN HP, SAHINER B, HELVIE MA et al. Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study. Radiology 1999; 212: 817-827.
10. DE LANDTSHEER JP, HESSLER C, LEVI F, DE GRANDI P, PACCAUD F. Dépistage organisé du cancer du sein et pratique médicale. L'expérience vaudoise: bilan et perspectives. Bulletin des médecins suisses 1998; 34: 1615-1619.
11. DOI K, MACMAHON H, KATSURAGAWA S, NISHIKAWA RM, JIANG Y. Computer-aided diagnosis in radiology: potential and pitfalls. Eur J Radiol 1999; 31: 97-109.
12. ELMORE J, WELLS C, LEE C, HOWARD D, FEINSTEIN A. Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1493-1499.
13. FREER TW, ULISSEY MJ. Screening mammography with compurter-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 2001; 220: 781-786.
14. FRISELL J, EKLUND G, HELLSTROM L. Analysis of interval breast carcinomas in a randomized screening trial in Stockholm. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1987; 9: 219-225.
15. GIGER ML. Computer-aided diagnosis. RSNA Categorical Course in Breast Imaging, 1999; 249-272.
16. IBRAHIM N, FUJITA H, HARA T, ENDO T. Automated detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: CAD system application to MIAS database. Phys Med Biol 1997; 42: 2577-2589.
17. JIANG Y, NISHIKAWA RM, SCHMIDT RA, METZ CE, GIGER ML, DOI K. Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis. Acad Radiol 1999; 6: 22-33.
18. JIANG Y, NISHIKAWA RM, SCHMIDT RA, TOLEDANO AY, DOI K. Potential of computer-aided diagnosis to reduce variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms depicting microcalcifications. Radiology 2001; 220: 787-794.
19. KEGELMEYER WP, PRUNEDA JM, BOURLAND PD, HILLIS A, RIGGS MW, NIPPER ML. Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions. Radiology 1994; 191: 331-337.
20. KERLIKOWSKE K, GRADY D, RUBIN S, SANDROCK C, ERNSTER V. Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis. JAMA 1995; 273: 149-154.
21. KERLIKOWSKE K, GRADY D, BARCLAY J, FRANKEL SD, OMINSKY SH, SICKLES EA, ERNSTER V. Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998; 90: 1801-1809.
22. LEPORI D, HESSLER C, DE LANDTSHEER J-P, BEURRETLEPORI N, BOHNET J. Cancers du sein diagnostiqués aprés la première vague du programme de dépistage de Vaud (Suisse). Le Sein 1999; 9: 39-53.
23. LEVI F, LA VECCHIA C. L'épidémiologie du cancer du sein et ses implications pour le dépistage. Méd Hyg 1990; 48: 2868-2873.
24. LINDFORS K, ROSENQUIST J. The cost-effectiveness of mammographic screening strategies. JAMA 1995; 274: 881-884.
25. NAWANO S, MURAKAMI K, MORIYAMA N, KOBATAKE H, TAKEO H, SHIMURA K. Computer-aided diagnosis in full digital mammography. Invest Radiol 1999; 34: 10-316.
26. PEETERS PMH, VERBEEK ALM, HENDRIKS J, HOLLAND R et al. The occurence of interval cancers in the Nijmegen screening programme. Br J Cancer 1989; 59: 29-932.
27. rd edition, 2001.
28. SÉRADOUR B, HEID P, PAGLIUCHI C, BOUSCARLE D, COLAVOLPE A, GENTON M, JACQUIER M, MAI̊TRE-DEVALLON C, PONCET M, SPERANDEO D. Apport d'un système d'aide à la détection assistée par ordinateur dans le cadre d'un programme de dépistage. Le Sein 2001; 11: 13-16.
29. VYBORNY CJ. Can computers help radiologists read mammograms ? Radiology 1994; 191: 315.
30. VYBORNY CJ, GIGER ML. Computer vision and artificail intelligence in mammography. AJR 1994; 162: 699-708.
31. VYBORNY CJ, DOI T, O'SHAUGHNESSY KF, ROMSDAHL HM, SCHNEIDER AC, STEIN AA. Breast cancer: importance of spiculation in computer-aided detection. Radiology 2000; 215: 703-707.
32. VYBORNY CJ, GIGER ML, NISHIKAWA RM. Computeraided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiologic Clinics of North America 2000; 38: 725-740.
33. WARREN BURHENNE LJ, WOOD SA, D'ORSI CJ et al. Potential Contribution of Computer-aided Detection to the Sensitivity of Screening Mammography. Radiology 2000; 215: 554-562.
34. ZWIGGELAAR R, PARR TC, SCHUMM JE, HUTT IW, TAYLOR CJ, ASTELY SM, BOGGIS CR. Model-based detection of spiculated lesions in mammograms. Med Image Anal 1999; 3: 39-62.