Reproducibility of prompts in computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer

Clinical Radiology

Volumn 58, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 733-738

  Taylor, C G ^a   Champness, J ^b   Reddy, M ^a   Taylor, P ^b   Potts, H W W ^c   Given Wilson, Rosalind ^a  

^a Duchess of Kent Unit   (United Kingdom)

^b Ctr Hlth Info/Multiprof Educ   (United Kingdom)

^c IMPERIAL CANCER RESEARCH FUND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Computer aided detection; Mammography; Reproducibility

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DEVICE; FEMALE; FILM; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY;

EID: 0041885141     PISSN: 00099260     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0009-9260(03)00231-9     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Freer T, Ulissey M. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology, 2001;220:781-786.
2. Malich A, Azhari T, Bohm T, et al. Reproducibility-an important factor determining the quality of computer aided detection (CAD) systems. Eur J Radiol, 2000;36:170-174.
3. Gilbert F, Kirkpatrick A, Boggis C, et al. Computer aided detection in mammography, Working Party of the Quality Assurance Coordinating Group. NHSBSP Publication No 48, 2001, p. 12.
4. Blanks R, Wallis M, Given-Wilson R. Observer variability in cancer detection during routine repeat (incident) mammographic screening in a study of two versus one view mammography. J Med Screen, 1999;6: 152-158.
5. Blanks R, Wallis M, Moss S. A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography: results from the UK National Health Service breast screening programme. J Med Screen, 1998;5: 195-201.