The social and neuropsychological underpinnings of communication disorders after severe traumatic brain injury

Clinical Aphasiology: Future Directions

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 42-71

  McDonald, Skye ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 58149394859     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203962558     Document Type: Chapter

References (151)

1. Adams, J. H., Doyle, D., Ford, I., Gennarelli, T. A., Graham, D. I., & McLellan, D. R. (1989). Diffuse axonal injury in head injury: Definition, diagnosis and grading. Histopathology, 15(1), 49-59.
2. Adams, J. H., Doyle, D., Graham, D. I., Lawrence, A. E., McLellan, D. R., Gennarelli, T., et al. (1985). The contusion index: A reappraisal in human and experimental non-missile head injury. Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology, 11(4), 299-308.
3. Adolphs, R. (2001). The neurobiology of social cognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 231-239.
4. Adolphs, R. (2003). Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviour. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(3), 165-178.
5. Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1998). The human amygdala in social judgement. Nature, 393, 470-474.
6. Bara, B. G., Cutica, I., & Tirassa, M. (2001). Neuropragmatics: Extralinguistic communication after closed head injury. Brain and Language, 77(1), 72-94.
7. Bara, B. G., Tirassa, M., & Zettin, M. (1997). Neuropsychological constraints on formal theories of dialogue. Brain and Language, 59, 7-49.
8. Barnes, M. A., & Dennis, M. (2001). Knowledge-based inferencing after childhood head injury. Brain and Language, 76(3), 253-265.
9. Bechara, A. (2002). The neurology of social cognition. Brain, 125(8), 1673-1675.
10. Bibby, H., & McDonald, S. (2004). Theory of Mind after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia, 43, 99-104.
11. Biddle, K. R., McCabe, A., & Bliss, L. S. (1996). Narrative skills following traumatic brain injury in children and adults. Journal of Communication Disorders, 29(6), 446-469.
12. Body, R., & Parker, M. (2005). Topic repetitiveness after traumatic brain injury: An emergent, jointly managed behaviour. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 19(5), 379-392.
13. Body, R., & Perkins, M. R. (1998). Ecological validity in assessment of discourse in traumatic brain injury: Ratings by clinicians and non-clinicians. Brain Injury, 12(11), 963-976.
14. Body, R., & Perkins, M. R. (2004). Validation of linguistic analyses in narrative discourse after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 18(7), 707-724.
15. Bond, F., & Godfrey, H. P. (1997). Conversation with traumatically brain-injured individuals: A controlled study of behavioural changes and their impact. Brain Injury, 11, 319-329.
16. Bowler, D. M. (1992). "Theory of mind" in Asperger's syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33, 877-893.
17. Brookshire, B. L., Chapman, S. B., Song, J., & Levin, H. S. (2000). Cognitive and linguistic correlates of children's discourse after closed head injury: A three-year follow-up. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 6(7), 741-751.
18. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. N. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
19. Channon, S., Pellijeff, A., & Rule, A. (2005). Social cognition after head injury:Sarcasm and theory of mind. Brain and Language, 93, 123-134.
20. Channon, S., & Watts, M. (2003). Pragmatic language interpretation after closed head injury: Relationship to executive functioning. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 8(4), 243-260.
21. Chapman, S. B., Culhane, K. A., Levin, H. S., Harward, H., Mendelsohn, D., Ewing-Cobbs, L., et al. (1992). Narrative discourse after closed head injury in children and adolescents. Brain and Language, 43, 42-65.
22. Chapman, S. B., Levin, H. S., Matejka, J., Harward, H., & Kufera, J. A. (1995). Discourse ability in children with brain injury: Correlations with psychosocial, linguistic and cognitive factors. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 10 (5), 36-54.
23. Chapman, S. B., Sparks, G., Levin, H. S., Dennis, M., Roncadin, C., Zhang, L., et al. (2004). Discourse macrolevel processing after severe pediatric traumatic brain injury. Developmental Neuropsychology, 25 (1-2), 37-60.
24. Cicerone, K. D., & Tanenbaum, L. N. (1997). Disturbance of social cognition after traumatic orbitofrontal brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 12, 173-188.
25. Clark, H. H., & Schunk, D. H. (1980). Polite responses to polite requests. Cognition, 8(2), 111-143.
26. Coelho, C. A. (1999). Discourse analysis in traumatic brain injury. In S. McDonald, L. Togher, & C. Code (Eds.), Communication disorders after traumatic brain injury. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
27. Coelho, C. A. (2002). Story narratives of adults with closed head injury and non-brain-injured adults: Influence of socioeconomic status, elicitation task, and executive functioning. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45(6), 1232-1248.
28. Coelho, C. A., Grela, B., Corso, M., Gamble, A., & Feinn, R. (2005). Microlinguistic deficits in the narrative discourse of adults with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 19(13), 1139-1145.
29. Coelho, C. A., Liles, B. Z., & Duffy, R. J. (1991a). Analysis of conversational discourse in head-injured adults. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 6(2), 92-98.
30. Coelho, C. A., Liles, B. Z., & Duffy, R. J. (1991b). The use of discourse analysis for the evaluation of higher level traumatically brain injured adults. Brain Injury, 5, 381-392.
31. Coelho, C. A., Liles, B. Z., & Duffy, R. J. (1995). Impairments of discourse abilities and executive functions in traumatically injured adults. Brain Injury, 9, 471-477.
32. Corrigan, P. W., & Toomey, R. (1995). Interpersonal problem solving and information processing in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 21(3), 395-403.
33. Croker, V., & McDonald, S. (2005). Recognition of emotion from facial expression following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 19, 787-789.
34. Crosson, B. (1987). Treatment of interpersonal deficits for head-trauma patients in inpatient rehabilitation settings. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 1 (4), 335-352, 366.
35. Darby, D., & Walsh, K. W. (2005). Walsh's neuropsychology: A clinical approach (5th ed.). Edinburgh, UK: Elsevier.
36. Davis, G. A., & Coelho, C. A. (2004). Referential cohesion and logical coherence of narration after closed head injury. Brain and Language, 89(3), 508-523.
37. Davis, H. L., & Pratt, C. (1995). The development of children's Theory of Mind:The working memory explanation. Australian Journal of Psychology, 47, 25-31.
38. Dennis, M., & Barnes, M. A. (1990). Knowing the meaning, getting the point, bridging the gap, and carrying the message: Aspects of discourse following closed head injury in childhood and adolescence. Brain and Language, 39, 428-446.
39. Dennis, M., & Barnes, M. A. (2000). Speech acts after mild or severe childhood head injury. Aphasiology, 14(4), 391-405.
40. Dennis, M., Guger, S., Roncadin, C., Barnes, M., & Schachar, R. (2001a). Attentionalinhibitory control and social-behavioral regulation after childhood closed head injury: Do biological, developmental, and recovery variables predict outcome? Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 7(6), 683-692.
41. Dennis, M., Purvis, K., Barnes, M. A., Wilkinson, M., & Winner, E. (2001b). Understanding of literal truth, ironic criticism, and deceptive praise following childhood head injury. Brain and Language, 78, 1-16.
42. Douglas, J. M., Bracy, C. A., & Snow, P. C. (in press). Exploring the factor structure of the La Trobe communication questionnaire: Insights into the nature of communication deficits following traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology.
43. Douglas, J. M., O'Flaherty, C. A., & Snow, P. C. (2000). Measuring perception of communicative ability: The development and evaluation of the La Trobe communication questionnaire. Aphasiology, 14(3), 251-268.
44. Drummond, S. S., & Boss, M. R. (2004). Functional communication screening in individuals with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 18(1), 41-56.
45. Ehrlich, J., & Barry, P. (1989). Rating communication behaviours in the head injured. Brain Injury, 3, 193-198.
46. Erlich, J. S. (1988). Selective characteristics of narrative discourse in head-injured and normal adults. Journal of Communication Disorders, 21, 1-9.
47. Ferstl, E. C., Guthke, T., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2002). Text comprehension after brain injury: Left prefrontal lesions affect inference processes. Neuropsychology, 16(3), 292-308.
48. Flanagan, S., McDonald, S., & Togher, L. (1995). Evaluation of the BRISS as a measure of social skills in the traumatically brain injured. Brain Injury, 9, 321-338.
49. Galski, T., Tompkins, C., & Johnston, M. V. (1998). Competence in discourse as a measure of social integration and quality of life in persons with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 12(9), 769-782.
50. Gibbs, R. W., & O'Brien, J. (1991). Psychological aspects of irony understanding. Journal of Pragmatics, 16, 523-530.
51. Glosser, G., & Deser, T. (1991). Patterns of discourse production among neurological patients with fluent language disorders. Brain and Language, 40(1), 67-88.
52. Godfrey, H. D. P., Knight, R. G., Marsh, N. V., Monory, B., & Bishara, S. M. (1989). Social interaction and speed of information processing following severe head injury. Psychological Medicine, 19, 175-182.
53. Godfrey, H. P., Knight, R. G., & Bishara, S. M. (1991). The relationship between social skill and family problem solving following very severe closed head injury. Brain Injury, 5, 207-211.
54. Gordon, A. C. L., & Olson, D. R. (1998). The relation between theory of mind and capacity to hold in mind. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 68, 70-83.
55. Gordon, D., & Lakoff, G. (1975). Conversational postulates. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (Vol. 3). New York: Academic Press.
56. Green, R. E. A., Turner, G. R., & Thompson, W. F. (2004). Deficits in facial emotion perception in adults with recent traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia, 42, 133-141.
57. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (Vol. 3). New York: Academic Press.
58. Grice, H. P. (1978). Further notes on logic and conversation. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and semantics: Pragmatics (Vol. 9). New York: Academic Press.
59. Hagan, C. (1984). Language disorders in head trauma. In A. Holland (Ed.), Language disorders in adults. San Diego, CA: College Hill Press.
60. Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. Australia: Edward Arnold.
61. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1985). Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Melbourne: Deakin University Press.
62. Happé, F., & Frith, U. (1996). The neuropsychology of autism. Brain, 119(4), 1377-1400.
63. Happé, F. G. E. (1993). Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory. Cognition, 48, 101-119.
64. Hartley, L. L., & Jensen, P. J. (1991). Narrative and procedural discourse after closed head injury. Brain Injury, 5, 267-285.
65. Hartley, L. L., & Jensen, P. J. (1992). Three discourse profiles of closed-head-injury speakers: Theoretical and clinical implications. Brain Injury, 6(3), 271-281.
66. Hasan, R. (1984). Coherence and cohesive harmony. In J. Flood (Ed.), Understanding reading comprehension. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
67. Hasan, R. (1985). The texture of a text. In M. A. K. Halliday & R. Hasan (Eds.), Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Victoria: Deakin University Press.
68. Haverkate, H. (1990). A speech act analysis of irony Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 77-109.
69. Heberlein, A. S., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. (2004). Cortical regions for judgments of emotions and personality traits from point-light walkers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1143-1158.
70. Heilman, K. M., Safran, A., & Geschwind, N. (1971). Closed head trauma and aphasia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 34, 265-269.
71. Hough, M. S. (1990). Narrative comprehension in adults with right and left hemisphere brain damage: Theme organisation. Brain and Language, 38, 253-227.
72. Hough, M. S., & Barrow, I. (2003). Descriptive discourse abilities of traumatic brain-injured adults. Aphasiology, 17(2), 183-191.
73. Hughes, C. (1998). Executive function in preschoolers: Links with theory of mind and verbal ability. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 233-253.
74. Jackson, H. F., & Moffat, N. J. (1987). Impaired emotional recognition following severe head injury. Cortex, 23, 293-300.
75. Jordan, F. M., Murdoch, B. E., & Buttsworth, D. L. (1991). Closed-head-injured children's performance on narrative tasks. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34(3), 572-582.
76. Kampe, K. K. W., Frith, C. D., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, U. (2001). Reward value of attractiveness and gaze. Nature, 413, 589.
77. Karafin, M. S., Tranel, D., & Adolphs, R. (2004). Dominance attributions following damage to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1796-1804.
78. Keenan, T. (1998). Memory span as a predictor for false belief understanding. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 27, 36-43.
79. Kendall, E., Shum, D., Halson, D., Bunning, S., & Teh, M. (1997). The assessment of social problem solving ability following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 12, 68-78.
80. Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
81. Leer, E. V., & Turkstra, L. (1999). The effect of elicitation task on discourse coherence and cohesion in adolescents with brain injury. Journal of Communication Disorders, 32(5), 327-349.
82. Levin, H. S., Amparo, E., Eisenberg, H. M., Williams, D. H., High, W. M. Jr., McArdle, C. B., et al. (1987). Magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography in relation to the neurobehavioral sequelae of mild and moderate head injuries. Journal of Neurosurgery, 66(5), 706-713.
83. Levin, H. S., Grossman, R. G., Rose, J. E., & Teasdale, G. (1979). Long term neuropsychological outcome of closed head injury. Journal of Neurosurgery, 50, 412-422.
84. Liles, B. Z., Coelho, C. A., Duffy, R. J., & Zalagens, M. R. (1989). Effects of elicitation procedures on the narratives of normal and closed head injured adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 356-366.
85. MacDonald, S., & Johnson, C. J. (2005). Assessment of subtle cognitivecommunication deficits following acquired brain injury: A normative study of the functional assessment of verbal reasoning and executive strategies (FAVRES). Brain Injury, 19(11), 895-902.
86. Marquardt, T. P., Rios-Brown, M., Richburg, T., Seibert, L. K., & Cannito, M. P. (2001). Comprehension and expression of affective sentences in traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology, 15 (10-11), 1091-1101.
87. Marsh, N. V., & Knight, R. G. (1991). Behavioural assessment of social competence following severe head injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 13(5), 729-740.
88. Martin, I., & McDonald, S. (2005). Exploring the causes of pragmatic language deficits following traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology, 19, 712-730.
89. McDonald, S. (1992). Differential pragmatic language loss following closed head injury: Ability to comprehend conversational implicature. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 295-312.
90. McDonald, S. (1993a). Major review. Viewing the brain sideways? Right hemisphere versus anterior models of non-aphasic language disorders. Aphasiology, 7, 535-549.
91. McDonald, S. (1993b). Pragmatic language loss following closed head injury:Inability to meet the informational needs of the listener. Brain and Language, 44, 28-46.
92. McDonald, S. (1998). Communication and language disturbances following traumatic brain injury. In B. Stemmer & H. A. Whitaker (Eds.), Handbook of neurolinguistics. (pp. 487-495). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
93. McDonald, S., Bornhofen, C., Shum, D., Long, E., Saunders, C., & Neulinger, K. (2006). Reliability and validity of "The Awareness of Social Inference Test" (TASIT): A clinical test of social perception. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28, 1529-1542.
94. McDonald, S., & Flanagan, S. (2004). Social perception deficits after traumatic brain injury: The interaction between emotion recognition, mentalising ability and social communication. Neuropsychology, 18, 572-579.
95. McDonald, S., Flanagan, S., Martin, I., & Saunders, C. (2004). The ecological validity of TASIT: A test of social perception. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 14, 285-302.
96. McDonald, S., Flanagan, S., Rollins, J., & Kinch, J. (2003). TASIT: A new clinical tool for assessing social perception after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 18, 219-238.
97. McDonald, S., & Pearce, S. (1995). The Dice game: A new test of organisational skills in language. Brain Injury, 9, 255-271.
98. McDonald, S., & Pearce, S. (1996). Clinical insights into pragmatic language theory:The case of sarcasm. Brain and Language, 53, 81-104.
99. McDonald, S., & Pearce, S. (1998). Requests that overcome listener reluctance:Impairment associated with executive dysfunction in brain injury. Brain and Language, 61, 88-104.
100. McDonald, S., Togher, L. & Code, C. (Eds.) (1999). Communication disorders following traumatic brain injury. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
101. McDonald, S., & van Sommers, P. (1992). Differential pragmatic language loss following closed head injury: Ability to negotiate requests. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 297-315.
102. McFall, R. M. (1982). A review and formulation of the concept of social skills. Behaviour Assessment, 4, 1-33.
103. Mentis, M., & Prutting, C. A. (1987). Cohesion in the discourse of normal and head-injured adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30, 583-595.
104. Milders, M., Fuchs, S., & Crawford, J. R. (2003). Neuropsychological impairments and changes in emotional and social behaviour following severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology, 25(2), 157-172.
105. Milne, E., & Grafman, J. (2001). Ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions in humans eliminate implicit gender stereotyping. Journal of Neuroscience, 21(12), 1-6.
106. Milton, S. B., Prutting, C. A., & Binder, G. M. (1984). Appraisal of communication competence in head injured adults. In R. W. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology (Vol. 14, pp. 114-123). Minneapolis: BRK Publishers.
107. Milton, S. B., & Wertz, R. T. (1986). Management of persisting communication deficits in patients with traumatic brain injury. In B. P. Uzzell & Y. Gross (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology of intervention. Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff Publishing.
108. Mortensen, L. (2005). Written discourse and acquired brain impairment: Evaluation of structural and semantic features of personal letters from a systemic functional linguistic perspective. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 19(3), 227-247.
109. Newton, A., & Johnson, D. A. (1985). Social adjustment and interaction after severe head injury. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24, 225-234.
110. O'Doherty, J., Winston, J., Critchley, H., Perrett, D., Burt, D. M., & Dolan, R. J. (2003). Beauty in a smile: The role of medial orbitofrontal cortex in facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia, 41, 147-155.
111. Ozonoff, S., & Miller, G. A. (1996). An explanation of right hemisphere contributions to the pragmatic impairments of autism. Brain and Language, 52, 411-434.
112. Patry, R., & Nespoulous, J.-L. (1990). Discourse analysis in linguistics: Historical and theoretical background. In Y. Joanette & H. H. Brownell (Eds.), Discourse ability and brain damage: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. New York:Springer-Verlag.
113. Prigatano, G. P. (1986). Personality and psychosocial consequences of brain injury. In G. P. Prigatano, D. J. Fordyce, H. K. Zeiner, J. R. Roueche, M. Pepping, & B. Casewood (Eds.), Neuropsychological rehabilitation after brain injury. (pp. 29-50). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
114. Prigatano, G. P., & Pribram, K. H. (1982). Perception and memory of facial affect following brain injury. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 54, 859-869.
115. Prigatano, G. P., Roueche, J. R., & Fordyce, D. J. (1986). Neuropsychological rehabilitation after brain injury. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
116. Prince, S., Haynes, W. O., & Haak, N. J. (2002). Occurrence of contingent queries and discourse errors in referential communication and conversational tasks: A study of college students with closed head injury. Journal of Medical Speech Language Pathology, 10(1), 19-39.
117. Prutting, C. A., & Kirchner, D. M. (1987). A clinical appraisal of the pragmatic aspects of language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 105-119.
118. Santoro, J., & Spiers, M. (1994). Social cognitive factors in brain injury associated with personality change. Brain Injury, 8(3), 265-276.
119. Sarno, M. T. (1980). The nature of verbal impairment after closed head injury. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 168, 685-692.
120. Sarno, M. T., & Levita, E. (1986). Characteristics of verbal impairment in closed head injured patients. Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 67, 400-405.
121. Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts. (Vol. 3). New York: Seminar Press.
122. Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Tomer, R., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2005). The neuroanatomical basis of understanding sarcasm and its relationship to social cognition. Neuropsychology, 19, 288-300.
123. Silver, C. H. (2000). Ecological validity of neuropsychological assessment in childhood traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 15(4), 973-988.
124. Snow, P. C., Douglas, J., & Ponsford, J. (1995). Discourse assessment following traumatic brain injury: A pilot study examining some demographic and methodological issues. Aphasiology, 9(4), 365-380.
125. Snow, P. C., Douglas, J., & Ponsford, J. (1997a). Conversational assessment following traumatic brain injury: A comparison across two control groups. Brain Injury, 11(6), 409-429.
126. Snow, P. C., Douglas, J., & Ponsford, J. (1997b). Procedural discourse following traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology, 11(10), 947-967.
127. Snow, P. C., Douglas, J., & Ponsford, J. (1998). Conversational discourse abilities following severe traumatic brain injury: A follow-up study. Brain Injury, 12(11), 911-935.
128. Snow, P. C., & Douglas, J. M. (2000). Conceptual and methodological challenges in discourse assessment with TBI speakers: Towards an understanding. Brain Injury, 14(5), 397-415.
129. Snow, P. C., Douglas, J. M., & Ponsford, J. L. (1999). Narrative discourse following severe traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal follow-up. Aphasiology, 13(7), 529-551.
130. Spell, L. A., & Frank, E. (2000). Recognition of nonverbal communication of affect following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24(4), 285-300.
131. Spence, S. E., Godfrey, H. P., Knight, R. T., & Bishara, S. (1993). First impressions count: A controlled investigation of social skill following closed head injury. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32, 309-318.
132. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
133. Spiers, M. V., Pouk, J. A., & Santoro, J. M. (1994). Examining perspective-taking in the severely head injured. Brain Injury, 8, 463-473.
134. Stone, V. E., Baron-Cohen, S., & Knight, R. T. (1998). Frontal lobe contributions to theory of mind. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(5), 640-656.
135. Stout, C. E., Yorkston, K. M., & Pimentel, J. I. (2000). Discourse production following mild, moderate, and severe traumatic brain injury: A comparison of two tasks. Journal of Medical Speech Language Pathology, 8(1), 15-25.
136. Surian, L., Baron-Cohen, S., & Van der Lely, H. (1996). Are children with autism deaf to Gricean maxims? Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 1(1), 55-71.
137. Tager-Flusberg, H., Sullivan, K., & Boshart, J. (1997). Executive functions and performance on false belief tasks. Developmental Neuropsychology, 13, 487-493.
138. Tate, R. L., Fenelon, B., Manning, M. L., & Hunter, M. (1991). Patterns of neuropsychological impairment after severe blunt head injury. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 179, 117-126.
139. Thomsen, I. V. (1975). Evaluation and outcome of aphasia in patients with severe closed head trauma. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 38, 713-718.
140. Togher, L. (2000). Giving information: The importance of context on communicative opportunity for people with traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology, 14(4), 365-390.
141. Togher, L., & Hand, L. (1998). Use of politeness markers with different communication partners: An investigation of five subjects with traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology, 12 (7-8), 755-770.
142. Togher, L., & Hand, L. (1999). The macrostructure of the interview: Are traumatic brain injury interactions structured differently to control interactions? Aphasiology, 13 (9-11), 709-723.
143. Togher, L., Hand, L., & Code, C. (1997a). Analysing discourse in the traumatic brain injury population: Telephone interactions with different communication partners. Brain Injury, 11(3), 169-189.
144. Togher, L., Hand, L., & Code, C. (1997b). Measuring service encounters with the traumatic brain injury population. Aphasiology, 11 (4-5), 491-504.
145. Togher, L., Hand, L., & Code, C. (1999). Exchanges of information in the talk of people with traumatic brain injury. In S. McDonald, L. Togher, & C. Code (Eds.), Communication disorders after traumatic brain injury. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
146. Turkstra, L. S., McDonald, S., & Kaufmann, P. M. (1996). Assessment of pragmatic communication skills in adolescents after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 10(5), 329-345.
147. van Dijk, T., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York:Academic Press.
148. Wilson, B. M., & Proctor, A. (2002). Written discourse of adolescents with closed head injury. Brain Injury, 16(11), 1011-1024.
149. Winston, J. S., Strange, B. A., O'Doherty, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2002). Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces. Nature Neuroscience, 5(3), 277-283.
150. Ylvisaker, M. (2000). Reflections on dobermanns, poodles, and social rehabilitation for difficult to serve individuals with traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology, 14(4), 407-431.
151. Youse, K. M., & Coelho, C. A. (2005). Working memory and discourse production abilities following closed-head injury. Brain Injury, 19(12), 1001-1009.