A new clinical tool for assessing social perception after traumatic brain injury

Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 219-238

  McDonald, Skye ^a   Flanagan, Sharon ^a   Rollins, Jennifer ^b   Kinch, Julianne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b Australian Government Department of Human Services   (Australia)

Author keywords

Emotional expression; Social perception; Traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BRAIN INJURY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION; EMOTION; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTELLIGENCE; MALE; PERCEPTION; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOCIAL ADAPTATION; SOCIAL INTERACTION; VIDEORECORDING; VOICE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CHRONIC BRAIN DISEASE; COGNITIVE DEFECT; HUMAN RELATION; INJURY SCALE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PILOT STUDY; PROGNOSIS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TASK PERFORMANCE;

BRAIN DAMAGE, CHRONIC; BRAIN INJURIES; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COGNITION DISORDERS; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INJURY SEVERITY SCORE; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; PILOT PROJECTS; PROGNOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 0038779545     PISSN: 08859701     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001199-200305000-00001     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. Crosson B. Treatment of interpersonal deficits for head trauma patients in inpatient rehabilitation settings. Clin Neuropsychol. 1987;1:335-352.
2. Levin HS, Grossman RG, Rose SE, et al. Long-term neuropsychological outcome of closed head injury. J Neurosurg. 1979;50:412-422.
3. McDonald S, van Sommers P. Differential pragmatic language loss following closed head injury: Ability to negotiate requests. Cogn Neuropsychol. 1993;10:97-315.
4. McDonald S, Pearce S. Requests that overcome listener reluctance: Impairment associated with executive dysfunction in brain injury. Brain Lang. 1998;61:88-104.
5. McDonald S, Pearce S. The dice game: A new test of organizational skills in language. Brain Inj. 1995;9:255-271.
6. McDonald S. Pragmatic language loss following closed head injury: Inability to meet the informational needs of the listener. Brain Lang. 1993;44:28-46.
7. Milton SB, Wertz RT. Management of persisting communication deficits in patients with traumatic brain injury. In: Uzzell BP, Gross Y, eds. Clinical Neuropsychology of Intervention. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishing; 1986.
8. Prigatano GP. Personality and psychosocial consequences of brain injury. In: Prigatano GP, Fordyce DJ, Zeiner HK, et al., eds. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation after Brain Injury. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1986.
9. Thomsen IV. Evaluation and outcome of aphasia in patients with severe closed head trauma. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1975;38:713-718.
10. Brooks N, Campsie L, Symington C, et al. The fiveyear outcome of severe blunt head injury: A relative's view. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1986;49:764-770.
11. Kinsella G, Packer S, Olver J. Maternal reporting of behaviour following very severe blunt head injury: 2 year follow-up. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1991;54:422-426.
12. Oddy M, Humphrey M, Uttley D. Subjective impairment and social recovery after closed head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1978;41:611-616.
13. Oddy M, Coughen T, Tyerman A, Jenkins D. Social adjustment after closed head injury: A further follow-up seven years after injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1985;48:564-568.
14. Tate RL. Impairments after severe blunt head injury: Their consequences for rehabilitation and psychosocial reintegration. In: Levick WR, Frost BG, Watson M, et al., eds. Brain impairment: Advances in applied research. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment. Newcastle, UK: University of Newcastle; 1991, pp. 219-227.
15. Tate RL, Lulham JM, Broe GA, et al. Psychosocial outcome for the survivors of severe blunt head injury: The results from a consecutive series of 100 patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1989;52:1128-1134.
16. Thomsen IV. Evaluation and outcome of aphasia in patients with severe closed head trauma. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1975;38:713-718.
17. Bond MR. Assessment of the psychosocial outcome of severe head injury. Acta Neurochir. 1976;34:57-70.
18. Newton A, Johnson DA. Social adjustment and interaction after severe head injury Br J Clin Psychol. 1985;24:225-234.
19. Body R, Perkins M, McDonald S. Communication and cognition. In: McDonald S, Togher L, Code, C, eds. Communication disorders following traumatic brain injury. Hove, UK: Psychology Press; 1999, pp. 81-112.
20. Prigatano GP. Personality and psychosocial consequences of brain injury. In: Prigatano GP, Fordyce DJ, Zeiner HK, et al., eds. Neuropsychological rehabilitation after brain injury. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1986.
21. Boake C. Social skills training following head injury. In: Kreutzer JS, Wehman, PH, eds. Cognitive rehabilitation for persons with traumatic brain injury: A functional approach. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brooks; 1991.
22. Braunling-McMorrow D, Lloyd K, Fralish K. Teaching social skills to head injured adults. J Rehab. 1986;52:39-44.
23. Crosson B. Treatment of interpersonal deficits for head trauma patients in inpatient rehabilitation settings. Clin Neuropsychol. 1987;1:335-352.
24. Flanagan S, McDonald S, Togher L. A review of remediation techniques for social skills deficits following traumatic brain injury. Abstracts presented at the 2nd INS Pacific Rim conference, 1995, Cairns, Australia. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1995;1:319.
25. Bellack AS, Morrison RL. Interpersonal dysfunction. In Bellack AS, Hersen M, Kazdin AE, eds. Interpersonal handbook of behavior modification and therapy. New York: Plenum Press; 1982.
26. Curran JP. Pandora's box reopened? The assessment of social skills. J Behav Assess. 1979;1:55-71.
27. Hersen M, Bellack AS. Social skills training for chronic psychiatric patients: Rationale, research findings, and future directions. Comp Psychiatry. 1976;17:559-580.
28. McFall RM. A review and formulation of the concept of social skills. Behav Assess. 1982;4:1-33.
29. Archer D, Akert RM. Words and everything else: verbal and non-verbal cues in social interpretation. J Personal Social Psychol. 1977;35:443-449.
30. Boice R. Observational skills. Psychol Bull. 1983; 93:3-29.
31. Edinger JA, Patterson ML. Nonverbal involvement and social control. Psychol Bull. 1983;93:30-56.
32. Morrison RL, Bellack AS. The role of social perception in social skill. Behav Ther. 1981;12:69-79.
33. Muehlenhard EL, Koralewski MA, Andrews SL, et al. Verbal and nonverbal cues that convey interest in dating: Two studies. Behav Ther. 1986;17:404-419.
34. Kagan C. Social problem solving and social skills training. Br J Clin Psychol. 1984;23:161-173.
35. Kahn M. Non-verbal communication and marital satisfaction. Family Processes. 1970;9:449-456.
36. Trower P. Situational analysis of the components and processes of behaviour of socially skilled and unskilled patients. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1980;48:327-339.
37. Argyle M. Social skills and the analysis of situations and conversations. In: Hollin CR, Trower P, eds. Handbook of social skills training: Volume 2. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press; 1986, pp. 185-216.
38. Bullmer K. Improving accuracy of interpersonal perception through direct teaching method. J Counsel Psychol. 1972;19:37-41.
39. Meichenbaum D, Cameron R. The clinical potential of modifying what clients say to themselves. In Mahoney MJ, Thoreson CE, eds. Self-control: Power to the person. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole; 1974.
40. Jackson HF, Moffat NJ. Impaired emotional recognition following severe head injury. Cortex. 1987; 23:293-300.
41. McDonald S, Pearce S. Clinical insights into pragmatic language theory: The case of sarcasm. Brain Lang. 1996;53:81-104.
42. Prigatano GP, Pribram KH. Perception and memory of facial affect following brain injury. Percept Motor Skills. 1982;54:859-869.
43. Bara, BG, Tirassa M, Zettin M. Neuropragmatics: Neuropsychological constraints on formal theories of dialogue. Brain Lang. 1997;59:7-14.
44. Levine MJ, Van Horn KR, Curtis AB. Developmental models of social cognition in assessing psychosocial adjustments in head injury. Brain Inj. 1993;7:153167.
45. Santoro J, Spiers M. Social cognitive factors in braininjury, associated with personality change. Brain Inj. 1994;8:265-276.
46. Spiers MV, Pouk JA, Santoro JM. Examining perspective taking in the severely head injured. Brain Inj. 1994;8:463-473.
47. Van Horne KR, Levine MJ, Curtis CL. Developmental levels of social cognition in head injury patients. Brain Inj. 1992;6:15-28.
48. Dennis M, Barnes MA. Knowing the meaning, getting the point, bridging the gap and carrying the message: Aspects of discourse following closed head injury in childhood and adolescence. Brain Lang. 1990;39:428-446.
49. Dennis M, Barnes MA. Speech acts after mild or severe childhood brain injury. Aphasiology. 2000; 14:391-406.
50. Pearce S, McDonald S, Coltheart M. Ability to process ambiguous advertisements after frontal lobe damage. Brain Cognition. 1998;38:150-164.
51. Ekman P, Freisen WV Pictures of facial affect, Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychology Press; 1976.
52. Bassili JN. Facial motion in the perception of faces and of emotional expression. J Exp Psych Human Percept Perf. 1978;4:373-379.
53. Rosenthal R, Hall JA, Archer D, et al. Sensitivity to non-verbal communication: The PONS Test. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1979.
54. Dennis M, Purvis K, Barnes MA, et al. Understanding literal truth, ironic criticism and deceptive praise following childhood head injury. Brain Lang. 2001;78:1-16.
55. McDonald S. Pragmatic language skills after closed head injury: Ability to comprehend conversational implicature. Appl Psycholing. 1992;13:295-312.
56. McDonald S. Neuropsychological studies of sarcasm. Metaphor Symbol. 2000;15:85-98.
57. Corcoran R, Mercer G, Frith CD. Schizophrenia, symptomatology and social inference: Investigating "theory of mind" in people with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 1995;17:5-13.
58. Winner E, Brownell H, Happe F, et al. Distinguishing lies from jokes: Theory of mind deficits and discourse interpretation in right hemisphere brain damaged patients. Brain Lang. 1998;62:89-106.
59. McDonald S, Flanagan S, Rollins J. The awareness of social inference test. Bury St. Edmonds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company; 2002.
60. Ekman P. Cross cultural studies of facial expression. In: Ekman, P, ed. Darwin and facial expression: A century of research in review. New York: Academic Press; 1973, pp. 169-222.
61. Sullivan K, Winner E, Hopfield N. How children tell a lie from a joke: The role of second order mental state attributions. Br J Develop Psychol. 1995;13:191-204.
62. Slugoski BR, Turnbull W. Cruel to be kind and kind to be cruel: Sarcasm, banter and social relations. Lang Soc. 1988;7:101-121.
63. Kaplan JA, Brownell HH, Jacobs JR, et al. The effects of right hemisphere brain damage on the pragmatic interpretation of conversational remarks. Brain Lang. 1990;38:315-333.
64. Flanagan S, McDonald S, Rollins J, et al. Social perception ability following traumatic brain injury. In: Murdoch B, Theodoros D, Ward E, eds. Brain impairment and rehabilitation: A national perspective. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Brain Impairment Conference, Brisbane, 1997. Bowen Hills, Queensland: Australian Academic Press on behalf of the Australian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment; 1999.
65. Baddeley A, Emslie H, Nimmo-Smith I. Speed and capacity of language processing test. Suffolk, UK: Thames Valley Test Company; 1992.
66. Nelson HE. National adult reading test (NAR7): Test manual. Windsor, UK: NFER Nelson; 1982.
67. Wechsler Memory Scale III. San Antonio, TX: Psychology Corporation; 1997.
68. Heaton RK, Chelune GJ, Talley JL, et al. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1993.
69. Kavale KA, Forness SR. Social skill deficits and learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. J Learning Disabil. 1996;29:226-237.
70. Turkstra L, McDonald S, DePompei R. Social information processing in adolescents: Data from normallydeveloping adolescents and preliminary data from their peers with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2001;16:469-483.