The analysis of stone tool procurement, production, and maintenance

Journal of Archaeological Research

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 65-103

  Andrefsky Jr , William ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Artifact curation; Artifact life history; Lithic technology; Reduction sequences

Indexed keywords

ARCHAEOLOGY; ARTIFACT; LIFE HISTORY; LITHIC FRAGMENT; TOOL USE;

EID: 58149337366     PISSN: 10590161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10814-008-9026-2     Document Type: Review

References (291)

1. Ahler, S. A. (1989). Mass analysis of flaking debris: Studying the forest rather than the trees. In Henry, D. O., and Odell, G. H. (eds.), Alternative Approaches to Lithic Analysis, Archeological Papers No. 1, American Anthropological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 85-118.
2. Ahler, S. A., and Christensen, R. C. (1983). A Pilot Study of Knife River Flint Procurement and Reduction as Site 32DU508, A Quarry and Workshop Location in Dunn County, North Dakota, Department of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of North Dakota, Bismarck.
3. Akridge, D. G., and Benoit, P. H. (2001). Luminescence properties of chert and some archaeological applications. Journal of Archaeological Science 28: 143-151.
4. Amick, D. S. (1999). Raw material variation in Folsom stone tool assemblages and the division of labor in hunter-gatherer societies. In Amick, D. S. (ed.), Folsom Lithic Technology, International Monographs in Prehistory, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 169-187.
5. Amick, D. S., and Mauldin, R. P. (eds.) (1989). Experiments in Lithic Technology, BAR International Series No. 528, Archaeopress, Oxford.
6. Amick, D. S., Mauldin, R. P., and Tomka, S. A. (1988). An evaluation of debitage produced by experimental bifacial core reduction of a Georgetown chert nodule. Lithic Technology 17: 26-36.
7. Ammerman, A. J., and Andrefsky Jr., W. (1982). Reduction sequences and the exchange of obsidian in Neolithic Calabria. In Ericson, J., and Earle, T. (eds.), Contexts for Prehistoric Exchange, Academic Press, New York, pp. 149-172.
8. Andrefsky Jr., W. (1986). A consideration of blade and flake curvature. Lithic Technology 15: 48-54.
9. Andrefsky Jr., W. (1991). Inferring trends in prehistoric settlement behavior from lithic production technology in the southern Plains. North American Archaeologist 12: 129-144.
10. Andrefsky Jr., W. (1994a). The geological occurrence of lithic material and stone tool production strategies. Geoarchaeology: An International Journal 9: 345-362.
11. Andrefsky Jr., W. (1994b). Raw material availability and the organization of technology. American Antiquity 59: 21-35.
12. Andrefsky Jr., W. (1995). Cascade phase lithic technology: An example for the lower Snake River. North American Archaeologist 16: 95-115.
13. Andrefsky Jr., W. (1997). Thoughts on stone tool shape and inferred function. Journal of Middle Atlantic Archaeology 13: 125-144.
14. Andrefsky Jr., W. (ed.) (2001a). Lithic Debitage: Context, Form, Meaning, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.
15. Andrefsky Jr., W. (2001b). Emerging directions in debitage analysis. In Andrefsky Jr., W. (ed.), Lithic Debitage: Context, Form, Meaning, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 1-14.
16. Andrefsky Jr., W. (2004). Partitioning the aggregate: Mass analysis and debitage assemblages. In Larson, M. L., and Hall, C. T. (eds.), Aggregate Analysis in Chipped Stone, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 201-210.
17. Andrefsky Jr., W. (2005). Lithics: Macroscopic Approaches to Analysis, 2nd. ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
18. Andrefsky Jr., W. (2006). Experimental and archaeological verification of an index of retouch for hafted bifaces. American Antiquity 71: 743-759.
19. Andrefsky Jr., W. (2007a). The application and misapplication of mass analysis in lithic debitage studies. Journal of Archaeological Science 34: 392-402.
20. Andrefsky Jr., W. (2007b). Cobble tool or cobble core: Exploring alternative typologies. In McPherron, S. P. (ed.), Tools versus Cores: Alternative Approaches to Stone Tool Analysis, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Cambridge, pp. 253-266.
21. Andrefsky Jr., W. (ed.) (2008a). Lithic Technology: Measures of Production, Use and Curation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
22. Andrefsky Jr., W. (2008b). An introduction to lithic technology and stone tool life history. In Andrefsky Jr., W. (ed.), Lithic Technology: Measures of Production, Use and Curation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1-22.
23. Andrefsky Jr., W. (2008c). Projectile point provisioning strategies and human land-use. In Andrefsky Jr., W. (ed.), Lithic Technology: Measures of Production, Use and Curation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 195-216.
24. Ashton, N., and White, M. (2003). Bifaces and raw materials: Flexible flaking in the British Early Paleolithic. In Soressi, M., and Dibble, H. L. (eds.), Multiple Approaches to the Study of Bifacial Technologies, University Museum Monograph 115, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, pp. 109-124.
25. Audouze, F. (1999). New advances in French prehistory. Antiquity 73: 167-175.
26. Baales, M. (2001). From lithics to spatial and social organization: Interpreting the lithic distribution and raw material composition at the final Paleolithic site of Kettig (Central Rhineland, Germany). Journal of Archaeological Science 28: 127-141.
27. Bakewell, E. F. (2003). Evidence for thermal preconditioning in patinated basaltic chipped stone artifacts. Journal of Northwest Anthropology 37: 151-164.
28. Bamforth, D. B. (1986). Technological efficiency and tool curation. American Antiquity 51: 38-50.
29. Bamforth, D. B. (1990). Settlement, raw material, and lithic procurement in the central Mojave Desert. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 9: 70-104.
30. Bamforth, D. B. (1991). Technological organization and hunter-gatherer land use: A California example. American Antiquity 56: 216-234.
31. Bamforth, D. B. (2002). High-tech foragers? Folsom and later Paleoindian technology on the Great Plains. Journal of World Prehistory 16: 55-98.
32. Bamforth, D. B. (2003). Rethinking the role of bifacial technology in Paleoindian adaptations on the Great Plains. In Soressi, M., and Dibble, H. L. (eds.), Multiple Approaches to the Study of Bifacial Technologies, University Museum Monograph 115, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, pp. 209-228.
33. Bamforth, D. B., and Becker, M. S. (2000). Core/biface ratios, mobility, refitting, and artifact use-lives: A Paleoindian example. Plains Anthropologist 45: 273-290.
34. Banks, L. D. (1990). From Mountain Peaks to Alligator Stomachs: A Review of Lithic Sources in theTrans-Mississippi South, the Southern Plains, and Adjacent Southwest, Oklahoma Anthropological Society, Norman.
35. Bar-Yosef, O. (1991). Raw material exploitation in the Levantine Epi-Paleolithic. In Montet-White, A., and Holen, S. (eds.), Raw Material Economies Among Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherers, Publications in Anthropology 19, University of Kansas, Lawrence, pp. 235-250.
36. Barton, C. M. (1988). Lithic Variability and Middle Paleolithic Behavior, BAR International Series No. 408, Archaeopress, Oxford.
37. Baumler, M. F., and Davis, L. B. (2000). Upon closer examination: Paleoindian behavioral inferences from a Folsom feature lithic assemblage at the Indian Creek occupation site, west-central Montana Rockies. Archaeology in Montana 41: 17-62.
38. Baumler, M. F., and Davis, L. B. (2004). The role of small-sized debitage in aggregate lithic analysis. In Larson, M. L., and Hall, C. T. (eds.), Aggregate Analysis in Chipped Stone, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 45-64.
39. Baumler, M. F., and Downum, C. E. (1989). Between micro and macro: A study in the interpretation of small-sized lithic debitage. In Amick, D. S., and Mauldin, R. P. (eds.), Experiments in Lithic Technology, BAR International Series No. 528, Archaeopress, Oxford, pp. 101-116.
40. Bayman, J. M., and Shackley, S. M. (1999). Dynamics of Hohokam obsidian circulation in the North American Southwest. Antiquity 73: 836-845.
41. Beck, C., Taylor, A. K., Jones, G. T., Fadem, C. M., Cook, C. R., and Millward, S. A. (2002). Rocks are heavy: Transport costs and Paleoarchaic quarry behavior in the Great Basin. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 21: 481-507.
42. Bettinger, R. L. (1987). Archaeological approaches to hunter-gatherers. Annual Review of Anthropology 16: 121-142.
43. Bettinger, R. L., Winterhalder, B., and McElreath, R. (2006). A simple model of technological intensification. Journal of Archaeological Science 33: 538-545.
44. Binford, L. R. (1973). Interassemblage variability: The Mousterian and the "functional" argument. In Renfrew, C. (ed.), The Explanation of Culture Change: Models in Prehistory, Duckworth, London, pp. 227-254.
45. Binford, L. R. (1977). Forty-seven trips. In Wright, R. S. (ed.), Stone Tools as Cultural Markers, Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, Canberra, pp. 24-36.
46. Binford, L. R. (1979). Organization and formation processes: Looking at curated technologies. Journal of Anthropological Research 35: 255-273.
47. Binford, L. R. (1980). Willow smoke and dogs' tails: Hunter-gatherer settlement systems and archaeological site formation. American Antiquity 45: 4-20.
48. Binford, L. R. (1985). "Brand X" versus the recommended product. American Antiquity 50: 580-590.
49. Binford, L. R. (1986). An Alyawara day: Making men's knives and beyond. American Antiquity 51: 547-562.
50. Binford, L. R., and Stone, N. M. (1985). "Righteous rocks" and Richard Gould: Some observations on misguided "debate." American Antiquity 50: 151-153.
51. Bisson, M. S. (2000). Nineteenth century tools for twenty-first century archaeology? Why the Middle Paleolithic typology of Francois Bordes must be replaced. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7: 1-48.
52. Blades, B. S. (2003). End scraper reduction and hunter-gatherer mobility. American Antiquity 68: 141-156.
53. Bleed, P. (1986). The optimal design of hunting weapons: Maintainability or reliability. American Antiquity 51: 737-747.
54. Bleed, P. (2001). Trees or chains, links or branches: Conceptual alternatives for consideration of stone tool production and other sequential activities. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 8: 101-127.
55. Bleed, P. (2002a). Obviously sequential, but continuous or staged? Refits and cognition in three Late Paleolithic assemblages from Japan. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 21: 329-343.
56. Bleed, P. (2002b). Cheap, regular, and reliable: Implications of design variation in Late Pleistocene Japanese microblade technology. In Elston, R. G., and Kuhn, S. L. (eds.), Thinking Small: Global Perspectives on Microlithization, Archeological Papers No. 12, American Anthropological Association, Arlington, VA, pp. 95-102.
57. Bleed, P. (2004). Refitting as aggregate analysis. In Larson, M. L., and Hall, C. T. (eds.), Aggregate Analysis in Chipped Stone, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 184-200.
58. Bloomer, W.W., and Ingbar, E. E. (1992). Debitage analysis. In Elston, R. G., and Raven, C. (eds.), Archaeological Investigations at Tosawihi, A Great Basin Quarry, Part I: The Periphery, U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Elko, NV, pp. 229-270.
59. Boeda, E. (1995). Levallois: A volumetric construction, methods, a technique. In Dibble, H. L., and Bar-Yosef, O. (eds.), The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 41-68.
60. Bradbury, A. P., and Carr, P. J. (1999). Examining stage and continuum models of flake debris analysis: An experimental approach. Journal of Archaeological Science 26: 105-116.
61. Bradbury, A. P., and Franklin, J. D. (2000). Material variability, package size and mass analysis. Lithic Technology 25: 42-58.
62. Bradbury, A. P., Carr, P. J., and Cooper, D. R. (2008). Raw material and retouched flakes. In Andrefsky Jr., W. (ed.), Lithic Technology: Measures of Production, Use, and Curation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 233-256.
63. Bradley, B. A. (1975). Lithic reduction sequences: A glossary and discussion. In Swanson, E. (ed.), Lithic Technology: Making and Using Stone Tools, Mouton, The Hague, pp. 5-14.
64. Brantingham, P. J. (2003). A neutral model of stone raw material procurement. American Antiquity 68: 487-509.
65. Brantingham, P. J., and Kuhn, S. L. (2001). Constraints on Levallois core technology: A mathematical model. Journal of Archaeological Science 28: 747-761.
66. Brantingham, P. J., Olsen, J. W., Rech, J. A., and Krivoshapkin, A. I. (2000). Raw material quality and prepared core technologies in northeastern Asia. Journal of Archaeological Science 27: 255-271.
67. Braun, D. R. (2005). Examining flake production strategies: Examples from the Middle Paleolithic of southwest Asia. Lithic Technology 30: 107-125.
68. Callahan, E. (1979). The basics of biface knapping in the eastern fluted point tradition: A manual for flintknappers and lithic analysts. Archaeology of Eastern North America 7 (1): 1-180.
69. Carr, P. J. (ed.) (1994). The Organization of North American Prehistoric Chipped Stone Tool Technologies, International Monographs in Prehistory, Ann Arbor, MI.
70. Carr, P. J., and Bradbury, A. P. (2001). Flake debris analysis, levels of production, and the organization of technology. In Andrefsky Jr., W. (ed.), Lithic Debitage: Context, Form, Meaning, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 126-146.
71. Carr, P. J., and Bradbury, A. P. (2004) Exploring mass analysis, screens, and attributes. In Hall, C. T., and Larson, M. L. (eds.), Aggregate Analysis in Chipped Stone, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 21-44.
72. Chatters, J. C. (1987). Hunter-gatherer adaptations and assemblage structure. Journal of Anthropological Research 6: 336-375.
73. Church, T. (1990). An investigation into prehistoric lithic procurement in the Bearlodge Mountains, Wyoming, unpublished M.A. thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Montana, Missoula.
74. Church, T. (1994). Lithic Resource Studies: A Sourcebook for Archaeologists, Lithic Technology, Special Publication #3, Tulsa, OK.
75. Clark, J. E. (1991). Flintknapping and debitage disposal among the Lacandon Maya of Chiapas, Mexico. In Staski, E., and Sutro, L. D. (eds.), The Ethnoarchaeology of Refuse Disposal, Anthropological Research Papers No. 42, Arizona State University, Tempe, pp. 63-78.
76. Clarkson, C. (2002). An index of invasiveness for the measurement of unifacial and bifacial retouch: A theoretical, experimental and archaeological verification. Journal of Archaeological Science 29: 65-75.
77. Clarkson, C., and Lamb, L. (eds.) (2006). Lithics "Down Under": Australian Approaches to Lithic Reduction, Use, and Classification, BAR International Series No. 1408, Archaeopress, Oxford.
78. Close, A. E. (1991). On the validity of Middle Paleolithic tool types: A test case for the eastern Sahara. Journal of Field Archaeology 18: 256-264.
79. Close, A. E. (1996). Carry that weight: The use and transportation of stone tools. Current Anthropology 37: 545-553.
80. Close, A. E. (2000). Reconstructing movement in prehistory. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7: 49-77.
81. Cochrane, G. W. (2003). On the measurement and analysis of platform angles. Lithic Technology 28: 13-25.
82. Collins, M. B. (1975). Lithic technology as a means of processual inference. In Swanson, E. (ed.), Lithic Technology: Making and Using Stone Tools, Mouton, The Hague, pp. 15-34.
83. Cooper, J., and Qiu, F. (2006). Expediting and standardizing stone artifact refitting using a computerized suitability model. Journal of Archaeological Science 33: 987-998.
84. Crabtree, D. E. (1972). An Introduction to Flintworking, Occasional Papers No. 28, Idaho State Museum, Pocatello.
85. Cziesla, E. (1990). On refitting stone artefacts. In Cziesla, E., Eichoff, S., Arts, N., and Winter, D. (eds.), The Big Puzzle: International Symposium on Refitting Stone Artefacts, Studies in Modern Archaeology 1, Holos, Bonn, pp. 9-44.
86. Davis, Z. J., and Shea, J. J. (1998). Quantifying lithic curation: An experimental test of Dibble and Pelcin's original flake-tool mass predictor. Journal of Archaeological Science 25: 603-610.
87. Dibble, H. L. (1987). The interpretation of Middle Paleolithic scraper morphology. American Antiquity 52: 109-117.
88. Dibble, H. L. (1991). Local raw material exploitation and its effects on Lower and Middle Paleolithic assemblage variability. In Montet-White, A., and Holen, S. (eds.), Raw Material Economies Among Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherers, Publications in Anthropology 19, University of Kansas, Lawrence, pp. 33-48.
89. Dibble, H. L. (1995). Middle Paleolithic scraper reduction: Background, clarification, and review of the evidence to date. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2: 299-368.
90. Dibble, H. L. (1997). Platform variability and flake morphology: A comparison of experimental and archeological data and implications for interpreting prehistoric lithic technological strategies. Lithic Technology 22: 150-170.
91. Dibble, H. L. (1998). Comments on "quantifying lithic curation: An experimental test of Dibble and Pelcin's original flake-tool mass predictor" (Z. J. Davis and J. J. Shea.) Journal of Archaeological Science 25: 611-613.
92. Dibble, H. L., and Pelcin, A. (1995). The effect of hammer mass and velocity on flake mass. Journal of Archaeological Science 22: 429-239.
93. Dietrich, D., and Grant, P. R. (1985). Cathodoluminescence petrography of syntectonic quartz fibres. Journal of Structural Geology 7: 541-553.
94. Eerkens, J. W., and Glascock, M. D. (2000). Northern Fish Lake Valley and the volcanic tablelands of Owens Valley: Description and characterization of two sources of obsidian in the western Great Basin. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 22: 331-342.
95. Eerkens, J. W., and Rosenthal, J. S. (2004). Are obsidian subsources meaningful units of analysis? Temporal and spatial patterning of subsources in the Coso Volcanic Field, southeastern California. Journal of Archaeological Science 31: 21-29.
96. Eerkens, J. W., Ferguson, J. R., Glascock, M. D., Skinner, C. E., and Waechter, S. A. (2007). Reduction strategies and geochemical characterization of lithic assemblages: A comparison of three case studies from western North America. American Antiquity 72: 585-597.
97. Elston, R. G. (1992). The lithic terrane of Tosawihi. In Elston, R. G., and Ravens, C. (eds.), Archaeological Investigations at Tosawihi, A Great Basin Quarry, Part 1: The Periphery, U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Elko, NV, pp. 71-80.
98. Elston, R. G., and Brantingham, P. J. (2002). Microlithic technology in northern Asia: A risk-minimizing strategy of the Late Paleolithic and Early Holocene. In Elston, R. G., and Kuhn, S. L. (eds.), Thinking Small: Global Perspectives on Microlithization, Archeological Papers No.12, American Anthropological Association, Arlington, VA, pp. 103-116.
99. Elston, R. G., and Kuhn, S. L. (eds.), (2002). Thinking Small: Global Perspectives on Microlithization, Archeological Papers No. 12, American Anthropological Association, Arlington, VA.
100. Eren, M., and Prendergast, M. E. (2008). Comparing and synthesizing unifacial stone tool reduction indices. In Andrefsky Jr., W. (ed.), Lithic Technology: Measures of Production, Use, and Curation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 49-85.
101. Eren, M., Dominguez-Rorigo, I. M., Kuhn, S. L., Adler, D. S., Le, I., and Bar-Yosef, O. (2005). Defining and measuring reduction in unifacial stone tools. Journal of Archaeological Science 32: 1190-1206.
102. Ferguson, J. R., and Skinner, C. R. (2005). Bone Cave: A severely disturbed cave site in central Oregon. North American Archaeologist 26: 221-244.
103. Fitzhugh, B. (2001). Risk and invention in human technological evolution. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 20: 125-167.
104. Fladmark, K. R. (1982). Microdebitage analysis: Initial considerations. Journal of Archaeological Science 9: 205-220.
105. Flenniken, J. J. (1985). Stone tool reduction techniques as cultural markers. In Plew, M. G., Woods, J. C., and Pavesic, M. G. (eds.), Stone Tool Analysis: Essays in Honor of Don E. Crabtree, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, pp. 265-276.
106. Flenniken, J. J., and Raymond, A. W. (1986). Morphological projectile point typology: Replication experimentation and technological analysis. American Antiquity 51: 603-614.
107. Flenniken, J. J., and Wilke, P. J. (1989). Typology, technology, and chronology of Great Basin dart points. American Anthropologist 91: 149-158.
108. Foradas, J. G. (2003). Chemical sourcing of Hopewell bladelets: Implications for building a chert database for Ohio. In Kardulias, P. N., and Yerkes, R. W. (eds.), Written in Stone: The Multiple Dimensions of Lithic Analysis, Lexington Books, Lanham, MD, pp. 87-112.
109. Franklin, J. D., and Simek, J. F. (2001). Core refitting and the accuracy of techniques for aggregate lithic analysis. Paper presented at the 66th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, New Orleans, LA.
110. Frison, G. C. (1991). Prehistoric Hunters of the High Plains, 2nd ed., Academic Press, New York.
111. Geneste, J. M. (1991). Systemes techniques de production lithique: variations techno-economiques dans les processus de realisatoni des Outillages Paleolithiques. Techniques et Culture 17-18: 1-35.
112. Gilreath, A. (1984). Stages of bifacial manufacture: Learning from experiments. Paper presented at the 49th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Portland, OR.
113. Glascock, M. D., Neff, H., Stryker, K. S., and Johnson, T. N. (1994). Sourcing of archaeological obsidian by abbreviated NAA procedure. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 180: 29-35.
114. Goodale, N. B., Kuijt, I., MacFarlan, S., Osterhoudt, C., and Finlayson, B. (2008). Lithic core reduction techniques: A model for predicting expected diversity. In Andrefsky Jr., W. (ed.), Lithic Technology: Measures of Production, Use and Curation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 317-336.
115. Goodyear, A. C. (1974). The Brand Site: A Techno-Functional Study of a Dalton Site in Northeast Arkansas, Research Series No. 7, Arkansas Archaeological Survey Publications on Archaeology, Fayetteville.
116. Goodyear, A. C. (1979). A Hypothesis for the Use of Cryptocrystalline Raw Material among Paleo-Indian Groups of North America, Research Manuscript No. 156, Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of South Carolina, Columbia.
117. Goodyear, A. C. (1993). Tool kit entropy and bipolar reduction: A study of interassemblage lithic variability among Paleo-Indian sites in the northeastern United States. North American Archaeologist 14: 1-23.
118. Gould, R. A. (1980). Raw material source areas and "curated" tool assemblages. American Antiquity 45: 823-833.
119. Gould, R. A. (1985). The empiricist strikes back: A reply to Binford. American Antiquity 50: 638-644.
120. Gould, R. A., and Saggers, S. (1985). Lithic procurement in central Australia: A closer look at Binford's idea of embeddedness in archaeology. American Antiquity 50: 117-136.
121. Gramly, R. M. (1980). Raw material source areas and "curated" tool assemblages. American Antiquity 45: 823-833.
122. Greiser, S. T., and Sheets, P. D. (1979). Raw materials as a functional variable in use-wear studies. In Hayen, B. (ed.), Lithic Wear Analysis, Academic Press, New York, pp. 289-296.
123. Grimaldi, S. (1998). Methodological problems in the reconstruction of chaénes opératoire in Lower-Middle Paleolithic industries. In Milliken, S., and Peresani, M. (eds.), Lithic Technology: From Raw Material Procurement to Tool Production, Dipartamento di Scienze Geologiche e Paleontologiche, Universita Degli Studi de Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy, pp. 19-22.
124. Grimes, J. R., and Grimes, B. G. (1985). Flakeshavers: Morphometric, functional and life-cycle analysis of a Paleoindian unifacial tool class. Archaeology of Eastern North America 13: 35-57.
125. Grimm L. T., and Koetje, T. A. (1992). Spatial patterns in the Upper Perigordian at Solvieux: Implications for activity reconstruction. In Hofman, J., and Enloe, J. (eds.), Piecing Together the Past: Applications of Refitting Studies in Archaeology, BAR International Series No. 678, Archaeopress, Oxford, pp. 264-286.
126. Hall, C. T. (2004). Evaluating prehistoric hunter-gatherer mobility, land use, and technological organization strategies. In Hall, C. T., and Larson, M. L. (eds.), Aggregate Analysis in Chipped Stone, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 139-155.
127. Hardy, B. L., Kaye, M., Marks, A. E., and Monigal, K. (2001). Stone tool function at the Palaeolithic sites of Starosele and Buran Kaya III, Crimea: Behavioral implications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98: 10972-10977.
128. Hayden, B. (1993). The cultural capacities of Neanderthals: A review and re-evaluation. Journal of Human Evolution 24: 113-146.
129. Henry, D. O., Haynes, C. V., and Bradley, B. (1976). Quantitative variations in flaked stone debitage. Plains Anthropologist 21: 57-61.
130. Hess, S. C. (1996). Chert provenance analysis at the Mack Canyon Site, Sherman County, Oregon: An evaluative study. Geoarchaeology 11: 51-81.
131. Hiscock, P. (1996). Transformations of Upper Paleolithic implements in the Dabba industry from Haua Fteah (Libya). Antiquity 70: 657-664.
132. Hiscock, P., and Attenbrow, V. (2003). Early Australian implement variation: A reduction model. Journal of Archaeological Science 30: 239-249.
133. Hiscock, P., and Attenbrow, V. (2006). Reduction continuums and tool use. In Clarkson, C., and Lamb, L. (eds.), Lithics "Down Under": Australian Approaches to Lithic Reduction, Use, and Classification, BAR International Series No. 1408, Archaeopress, Oxford, pp. 122-136.
134. Hiscock, P., and Clarkson, C. (2005). Experimental evaluation of Kuhn's geometric index of reduction and the flat-flake problem. Journal of Archaeological Science 32: 1015-1022.
135. Hiscock, P., and Clarkson, C. (2007). Retouched notches at Combe Grenal (France) and the reduction hypothesis. American Antiquity 72: 176-190.
136. Hiscock, P., and Clarkson, C. (2008). The construction of morphological diversity: A study of Mousterian implement retouching at Combe Grenal. In Andrefsky Jr., W. (ed.), Lithic Technology: Measures of Production, Use and Curation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 106-135.
137. Hoard, R. J., Holen, R. A., Glascock, M. D., Neff, H., and Elam, J. M. (1992). Neutron activation analysis of stone from the Chadron Formation and a Clovis site on the Great Plains. Journal of Archaeological Science 19: 655-665.
138. Hoard, R. J., Bozell, J. R., Holen, S. R., Glascock, M. D., Neff, H., and Elam, J. M. (1993). Source determination of White River group silicates from two archaeological sites in the Great Plains. American Antiquity 58: 698-710.
139. Hoffman, C. M. (1985). Projectile point maintenance and typology: Assessment with factor analysis and canonical correlation. In Carr, C. (ed.), For Concordance in Archaeological Analysis: Bridging Data Structure, Quantitative Technique, and Theory, Westport Press, Kansas City, MO, pp. 566-612.
140. Hofman, J. L. (1981). The refitting of chipped-stone artifacts as an analytical and interpretive tool. Current Anthropology 22: 35-50.
141. Hofman, J. L. (1999). Folsom fragments, site types, and assemblage formation. In Amick, D. S. (ed.), Folsom Lithic Technology, International Monographs in Prehistory, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 122-143.
142. Hofman, J. L. (2003). Tethered to stone or freedom to move: Folsom biface technology in regional perspective. In Soressi, M., and Dibble, H. L. (eds.), Multiple Approaches to the Study of Bifacial Technologies, University Museum Monograph 115, University of Pennsylvania Museum, Philadelphia, pp. 229-250.
143. Hofman, J. L., Amick, D. S., and Rose, R. O. (1991). Shifting sands: A Folsom-Midland assemblage from a campsite in western Texas. Plains Anthropologist 35 (129): 221-253.
144. Hofman, J. L., and Enloe, J. G. (eds.) (1992). Piecing Together the Past: Applications of Refitting Studies in Archaeology, BAR International Series No. 578, Archaeopress, Oxford.
145. Hofman, J. L., Todd, L., and Collins, M. B. (1991). Identification of central Texas Edwards chert at the Folsom and Lindenmeier sites. Plains Anthropologist 36: 297-308.
146. Holdaway, S., and Stern, N. (2004). A Record in Stone: The Study of Australia's Flaked Stone Artifacts, Aboriginal Studies Press, Melbourne.
147. Holdaway, S., McPherron, S. P., and Roth, B. (1996). Notched tool reuse and raw material availability in French Middle Paleolithic sites. American Antiquity 61: 377-387.
148. Holmes, W. H. (1894). Natural history of flaked stone implements. In Wake, C. S. (ed.), Memoirs of the International Congress of Anthropology, Schulte, Chicago, pp. 120-139.
149. Hughes, R. E. (1998). On reliability, validity, and scale in obsidian sourcing research. In Ramenofsky, A. F., and Steffen, A. (eds.), Unit Issues in Archaeology, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 103-114.
150. Hull, K. L. (1987). Identification of cultural site formation processes through microdebitage analysis. American Antiquity 52: 772-783.
151. Ingbar, E. E., and Hofman, J. L. (1999). Folsom fluting fallacies. In Amick, D. S. (ed.), Folsom Lithic Technology, International Monographs in Prehistory, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 98-110.
152. Ingbar, E. E., Larson, M. L., and Bradley, B. (1989). A nontypological approach to debitage analysis. In Amick, D. S., and Mauldin, R. P. (eds.), Experiments in Lithic Technology, BAR International Series No. 528, Archaeopress, Oxford, pp. 117-136.
153. Inizan, M. L., Roche, H., and Tixier, J. (1992). Technology of Knapped Stone, Cercle de Recherches et d'Etudes Préhistoriques, Meudon.
154. Jefferies, R. W. (1990). A technological and functional analysis of Middle Archaic hafted endscrapers from the Black Earth site, Saline County, Illinois. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 15: 3-36.
155. Jelinek, A. J. (1991). Observations on reduction patterns and raw materials in some Middle Paleolithic industries in the Perigord. In Montet-White, A., and Holen, S. (eds.), Raw Material Economies Among Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherers, Publications in Anthropology 19, University of Kansas, Lawrence, pp. 7-32.
156. Jeske, R. J. (1989). Economies in raw material use by prehistoric hunter-gatherers. In Torrence, R. (ed.), Time, Energy, and Stone Tools, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 34-45.
157. Johnson, J. K. (1989). The utility of production trajectory modeling as a framework for regional analysis. In Henry, D. O., and Odell, G. H. (eds.), Alternative Approaches to Lithic Analysis, Archeological Papers No. 1, American Anthropological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 119-138.
158. Jodry, M. A. (1992). Fitting together Folsom: Refitting lithics and site formation processes at Stewart's Cattle Guard site. In Hofman, J., and Enloe, J. (eds.), Piecing Together the Past: Applications of Refitting Studies in Archaeology, BAR International Series No. 678, Arhaeopress, Oxford, pp. 179-209.
159. Kalin, J. (1981). Stem point manufacture and debitage recovery. Archaeology of Eastern North America 9: 134-175.
160. Kardulias, N. P., and Yerkes, R. W. (2003). Written in Stone: The Multiple Dimensions of Lithic Analysis, Lexington Books, Lanham, MD.
161. Kelly, R. L. (1983). Hunter-gatherer mobility strategies. Journal of Anthropological Research 39: 277-306.
162. Kelly, R. L. (1985). Hunter-Gatherer Mobility and Sedentism: A Great Basin Study, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
163. Kelly, R. L. (1988). The three sides of a biface. American Antiquity 53: 717-734.
164. Kelly, R. L., and Todd, L. C. (1988). Coming into the country: Early Paleoindian hunting and mobility. American Antiquity 53: 231-244.
165. Knecht, H. (1997). Projectile Technology, Plenum Press, New York.
166. Knell, E. J. (2004). Coarse-scale chipped stone aggregates and technological organization strategies at Hell Gap Locality V Cody complex component, Wyoming. In Hall, C. T., and Larson, M. L. (eds.), Aggregate Analysis in Chipped Stone, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 156-183.
167. Knell, E. J. (2007). The Organization of Late Paleoindian Cody Complex Land-Use on the North American Great Plains, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman.
168. Koldehoff, B. (1987). The Cahokia flake tool industry: Socio-economic implications for late prehistory in the central Mississippi Valley. In Johnson, J. K., and Morrow, C. A. (eds.), The Organization of Core Technology, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp. 151-186.
169. Kooyman, B. P. (2000). Understanding Stone Tools and Archaeological Sites, University of Calgary Press, Calgary, Canada.
170. Kuhn, S. L. (1990). A geometric index of reduction for unifacial stone tools. Journal of Archaeological Science 17: 585-593.
171. Kuhn, S. L. (1991). "Unpacking" reduction: Lithic raw material economy in the Mousterian of west-central Italy. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 10: 76-106.
172. Kuhn, S. L. (1992). Blank form and reduction as determinants of Mousterian scraper morphology. American Antiquity 57: 115-128.
173. Kuhn, S. L. (1995). Mousterian Lithic Technology, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
174. Kuijt, I., Prentiss, W. C., and Pokotylo, D. J. (1995). Bipolar reduction: An experimental study of debitage variability. Lithic Technology 20: 116-127.
175. Larson, M. L. (1990). Early Plains Archaic Technological Organization: The Laddie Creek Example, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara.
176. Larson, M. L. (1994). Toward a holistic analysis of chipped stone assemblages. In Carr, P. J., (ed.), The Organization of North American Stone Tool Technology, International Monographs in Prehistory, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 57-69.
177. Larson, M. L. (2004). Chipped stone aggregate analysis in archaeology. In Hall, C. T., and Larson, M. L. (eds.), Aggregate Analysis in Chipped Stone, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 3-17.
178. Larson, M. L., and Finley, J. B. (2004). Seeing the forest but missing the trees: Production sequences and multiple linear regression. In Hall, C. T., and Larson, M. L. (eds.), Aggregate Analysis in Chipped Stone, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 95-111.
179. Larson, M. L., and Ingbar, E. E. (1992). Perspectives on refitting: Critique and a complementary approach. In Hofman, J. L., and Enloe, J. G. (eds.), Piecing Together the Past: Applications of Refitting Studies in Archaeology, BAR International Series No. 578, Archaeopress, Oxford, pp. 151-162.
180. Larson, M. L., and Kornfeld, M. (1997). Chipped stone nodules: Theory, method, and examples. Lithic Technology 22: 4-18.
181. Lee, K. W, and Lee, Y. J. (2006). Organization of lithic technology and raw material availability: An example with Suyanggae and Changnae sites, Korea. Paper presented at the International Paleoanthropological Symposium on Salawusu, Ordors-Inner Mongolia, China.
182. Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1964). Le geste et la parole I, technique et langage, Albin Michel, Paris.
183. Luedtke, B. E. (1992). An Archaeologist's Guide to Chert and Flint, Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.
184. Lurie, R. (1989). Lithic technology and mobility strategies: The Koster site Middle Archaic. In Torrence, R. (ed.), Time, Energy, and Stone Tools, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 46-56.
185. Lyons, W. H., Glascock, M. D., and Mehringer, P. J. (2003). Silica from sources to sites: Ultraviolet fluorescence and trace elements identify cherts from Lost Dunes, southeastern Oregon, USA. Journal of Archaeological Science 30: 1139-1159.
186. MacDonald, D. H. (2008). The role of lithic raw material availability and quality in determining tool kit size, tool function, and degree of retouch: A case study from Skink Rockshelter (46NI445), West Virginia. In Andrefsky Jr., W. (ed.), Lithic Technology: Measures of Production, Use and Curation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 216-232.
187. Magne, M. P. (1985). Lithics and Livelihood: Stone Tool Technologies of Central and Southern Interior British Columbia, National Museum of Man Mercury Series, Ottawa.
188. Magne, M. P., and Pokotylo, D. (1981). A pilot study in bifacial lithic reduction sequences. Lithic Technology 10: 34-47.
189. Malyk-Selivanova, N., Ashley, G. M., Gal, R., Glascock, M. D., and Neff, H. (1998). Geological-geochemical approach to sourcing of prehistoric chert artifacts, northwestern Alaska. Geoarchaeology 13: 673-708.
190. Marshall, D. J. (1988). Cathodoluminescence of Geological Materials, Unwin Hyman, Boston, MA.
191. McCall, G. S. (2007). Behavioral ecological models of lithic technological change during the later Middle Stone Age of South Africa. Journal of Archaeological Science 34: 1738-1751.
192. McPherron, S. P. (2000). Handaxes as a measure of the mental capabilities of early hominids. Journal of Archaeological Science 27: 655-663.
193. McPherron, S. P. (2003). Technological and typological variability in the bifaces from Tabun Cave, Israel. In Soressi, M., and Dibble, H. L. (eds.), Multiple Approaches to the Study of Bifacial Technologies, University Museum Monograph 115, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, pp. 55-76.
194. McPherron, S. P. (ed.) (2007). Tools versus Cores: Alternative Approaches to Stone Tool Analysis, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Cambridge.
195. Milliken, S., and Peresani, M. (eds.) (1998). Lithic Technology: From Raw Material Procurement to Tool Production, Dipartimento di Scienze Geologiche e Paleontologiche, Universita Degli Studi de Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
196. Moore, M. W. (2002). Australian aboriginal blade production methods on the Georgina River, Camooweal, Queensland. Lithic Technology 28: 35-63.
197. Morrow, C. A., and Jefferies, R. W. (1989). Trade or embedded procurement? A test case from southern Illinois. In Torrence, R. (ed.), Time, Energy and Stone Tools, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 27-33.
198. Morrow, J. (1997). End scraper morphology and use-life: An approach for studying Paleoindian lithic technology and mobility. Lithic Technology 22: 70-85.
199. Morrow, T. M. (1996). Lithic refitting and archaeological site formation processes: A case study from the twin ditch site, Greene County, Illinois. In Odell, G. H. (ed.), Stone Tools: Theoretical Insights into Human Prehistory, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 345-376.
200. Morrow, T. M. (1997). A chip off the old block: Alternative approaches to debitage analysis. Lithic Technology 22: 51-69.
201. Nadel, D. (2001). Indoor/outdoor flint knapping and minute debitage remains: The evidence from the Ohalo II submerged camp (19.5 KY, Jordan Valley). Lithic Technology 26: 118-137.
202. Nash, S. E. (1996). Is curation a useful heuristic? In Odell, G. H. (ed.), Stone Tools: Theoretical Insights into Human Prehistory, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 81-100.
203. Negash, A., Shackley, M. S., and Alene, M. (2006). Source provenance of obsidian artifacts from the Early Stone Age (ESA) site of Melka Konture, Ethiopia. Journal of Archaeological Science 33: 1647-1650.
204. Negash, A., Alene, M., Brown, F. H., Nash, B. P., and Shackley, M. S. (2007). Geochemical sources for the terminal Pleistocene/Early Holocene obsidian artifacts of the site of Beseka, central Ethiopia. Journal of Archaeological Science 34: 1205-1210.
205. Nelson, M. C. (1991). The study of technological organization. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.), Archaeological Method and Theory,Vol. 3, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 57-100.
206. Nowell, A., Park, K., Mutaxas, D., and Park, J. (2003). Deformation modeling: A methodology for the analysis of handaxe morphology and variability. In Soressi, M., and Dibble, H. L. (eds.), Multiple Approaches to the Study of Bifacial Technologies, University Museum Monograph 115, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, pp. 193-208.
207. O'Connell, J. F. (1977). Aspects of variation in central Australian lithic assemblages. In Wright, R. V. (ed.), Stone Tools as Cultural Markers: Change, Evolution and Complexity, Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, Canberra, pp. 269-281.
208. Odell, G. H. (1989). Experiments in lithic reduction. In Amick, D. S., and Mauldin, R. P. (eds.), Experiments in Lithic Technology, BAR International Series No. 528, Archaeopress, pp. 163-198.
209. Odell, G. H. (ed.) (1996a). Stone Tools: Theoretical Insights into Human Prehistory, Plenum Press, New York.
210. Odell, G. H. (1996b). Economizing behavior and the concept of "curation." In Odell, G. H. (ed.), Stone Tools: Theoretical Insights into Human Prehistory, Plenum, New York, pp. 51-80.
211. Odell, G. H. (2004). Lithic Analysis, Springer, New York.
212. Olausson, D. (1998). Different strokes for different folks, possible reasons for variation in quality of knapping. Lithic Technology 23: 90-115.
213. Orr, E. L., Orr, W. N., and Baldwin E. M. (1999). Geology of Oregon, Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque, IA.
214. Parry, W. J., and Kelly, R. L. (1987). Expedient core technology and sedentism. In Johnson, J. K., and Morrow, C. A. (eds.), The Organization of Core Technology, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp. 285-304.
215. Patterson, L. W. (1990). Characteristics of bifacial-reduction flake-size distribution. American Antiquity 55: 550-558.
216. Patterson, L. W., and Sollberger, J. B. (1978). Replication and classification of small size lithic debitage. Plains Anthropologist 23: 103-112.
217. Pecora, A. M. (2001). Chipped stone tool production strategies and lithic debris patterns. In Andrefsky, Jr., W. (ed.), Lithic Debitage: Context, Form, Meaning, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 173-191.
218. Pelcin, A. (1997). The formation of flakes: The role of platform thickness and exterior platform angle in the production of flake initiations and terminations. Journal of Archaeological Science 24: 1107-1113.
219. Pelcin, A. (1998). The threshold effect of platform width: A reply to Davis and Shea. Journal of Archaeological Science 25: 615-620.
220. Petraglia, M. D. (1992). Stone artifact refitting and formation process at the Abri Dufaure, an Upper Paleolithic site in southwestern France. In Hofman, J. L., and Enloe, J. L (eds.), Piecing Together the Past: Applications of Refitting Studies in Archaeology, BAR International Series No. 578, Archaeopress, Oxford, pp. 163-178.
221. Pitblado, B. L. (2003). Late Paleoindian Occupation of the Southern Rocky Mountains: Early Holocene Projectile Points and Land Use in the High Country, University of Colorado Press, Boulder.
222. Prasciunas, M. M. (2007). Bifacial cores and flake production efficiency: An experimental test of technological assumptions. American Antiquity 72: 334-348.
223. Prescott, J. R., and Robertson, G. B. (1997). Sediment dating by luminescence: A review. Radiation Measurements 27: 893-922.
224. Quinn, C. P., Andrefsky Jr., W., Kuijt, I., and Finlayson, B. (2008). Stone tool perforating and retouch intensity: A Neolithic case study. In Andrefsky Jr., W. (ed.), Lithic Technology: Measures of Production, Use and Curation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 150-174.
225. Rasic, J. C., and Andrefsky Jr., W. (2001). Alaskan blade cores as specialized components of mobile toolkits: Assessing design parameters and toolkit organization through debitage analysis. In Andrefsky, Jr., W. (ed.), Lithic Debitage: Context, Form, Meaning, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 61-79.
226. Redman, K. L. (1998). An experiment-based evaluation of the debitage attributes associated with "hard" and "soft" hammer percussion, unpublished M.A. thesis, Department of Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman.
227. Riel-Salvatore, J., and Barton, C. M. (2004). Late Pleistocene technology, economic behavior, and land-use dynamics in southern Italy. American Antiquity 69: 257-274.
228. Riel-Salvatore, J., Bae, M., McCartney, P., and Razdan, A. (2002). Paleolithic archaeology and 3D visualization technology: Recent developments. Antiquity 78: 929-930.
229. Roberts, R. G. (1997). Luminescence data in archaeology: From origins to optical. Radiation Measurements 27: 819-892.
230. Rolland, N., and Dibble, H. L. (1990). A new synthesis of Middle Paleolithic variability. American Antiquity 55: 480-499.
231. Root, M. J. (1992). The Knife River Flint Quarries: The Organization of Stone Tool Production, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman.
232. Root, M. J. (2004). Technological analysis of flake debris and the limitations of size-grade techniques. In Hall, C. T., and Larson, M. L. (eds.), Aggregate Analysis in Chipped Stone, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 65-94.
233. Roth, B. (2000). Obsidian source characterization and hunter-gatherer mobility: An example from the Tucson Basin. Journal of Archaeological Science 27: 305-314.
234. Roth, B., and Dibble, H. L. (1998). The production and transport of blanks and tools at the French Middle Paleolithic site of Combe-Capelle Bas. American Antiquity 63: 47-62.
235. Roux, V., and Bril, B. (2005). Stone Knapping: The Necessary Conditions for a Uniquely Hominid Behavior, McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge.
236. Sassaman, K. E. (1994). Changing strategies of biface production in the South Carolina coastal plain. In Carr, P. J. (ed.), The Organization of North American Prehistoric Chipped Stone Tool Technologies, International Monographs in Prehistory, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 99-117.
237. Schlanger, N. (1994). Mindful technology: Unleashing the chaéne opératoire for an archaeology of mind. In Renfrew, C., and Zubrow, E. (eds.), The Ancient Mind: Elements of Cognitive Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 143-151.
238. Scott, S. A. (1991). Problems with the use of flake size in inferring stages of lithic reduction. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 13: 172-179.
239. Sellet, F. (1993). Chaéne opératoire: The concept and its applications. Lithic Technology 18: 106-112.
240. Sellet, F. (1999). A Dynamic View of Paleoindian Assemblages at the Hell Gap Site, Wyoming: Reconstructing Lithic Technological Systems, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX.
241. Sellet, F. (2004). Beyond the point: Projectile manufacture and behavioral inference. Journal of Archaeological Science 31: 1553-1566.
242. Serizawa, C. (1978). The stone age of Japan. Asian Perspectives 19: 1-14.
243. Shackley, M. S. (ed.) (1998a). Archaeological Obsidian Studies: Method and Theory, Plenum Press, New York.
244. Shackley, M. S. (1998b). Intrasource chemical variability and secondary depositional processes: Lessons from the American Southwest. In Shackley, M. S. (ed.), Archaeological Obsidian Studies: Method and Theory, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 83-102.
245. Shackley M. S. (2005). Obsidian: Geology and Archaeology in the North American Southwest, University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
246. Shafer, H. J. (1991). Late Preclassic formal stone tool production at Colha, Belize. In Hester, T. R., and Shafer, H. J. (eds.), Maya Stone Tools, Prehistory Press, Madison, WI, pp. 31-44.
247. Shafer, H. J., and Hester, T. R. (1983). Ancient Maya chert workshops in northern Belize, Central America. American Antiquity 48: 519-543.
248. Shelley, P. H. (1990). Variation in lithic assemblages: An experiment. Journal of Field Archaeology 17: 187-193.
249. Shott, M. J. (1986). Settlement mobility and technological organization: An ethnographic examination. Journal of Anthropological Research 42: 15-51.
250. Shott, M. J. (1993). The Leavitt Site: A Parkhill Phase Paleo-Indian Occupation in Central Michigan, Memoirs No. 25, Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
251. Shott, M. J. (1996). An exegesis of the curation concept. Journal of Anthropological Research 52: 259-280.
252. Shott, M. J. (2003). Chaéne opératoire and reduction sequence. Lithic Technology 28: 95-105.
253. Shott, M. J., and Ballenger, J. A. (2007). Biface reduction and the measurement of Dalton curation: A southeastern case study. American Antiquity 72: 153-175.
254. Shott, M. J., and Sillitoe, P. (2004). Modeling use-life distributions in archaeology using New Guinea Wola ethnographic data. American Antiquity 69: 339-355.
255. Shott, M. J., and Sillitoe, P. (2005). Use life and curation in New Guinea experimental used flakes. Journal of Archaeological Science 32: 653-663.
256. Shott, M. J., Bradbury, A. P., Carr, P. J., and Odell, G. H. (2000). Flake size from platform attributes: Predictive and empirical approaches. Journal of Archaeological Science 27: 877-894.
257. Sievert, A. K., and Wise, K. (2001). A generalized technology for a specialized economy: Archaic period chipped stone at kilometer 4, Peru. In Andrefsky Jr., W. (ed.), Lithic Debitage: Context, Form, Meaning, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 188-206.
258. Simek, J. F. (1994). The organization of lithic technology and evolution: Notes from the continent. In Carr, P. J. (ed.), The Organization of North American Prehistoric Chipped Stone Tool Technologies, International Monographs in Prehistory, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 118-122.
259. Soressi, M., and Dibble, H. L. (eds.) (2003). Multiple Approaches to the Study of Bifacial Technologies, University Museum Monograph 115,University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
260. Soressi, M., and Hays, M. A. (2003). Manufacture, transport, and use of Mousterian bifaces: A case study from the Perigord (France). In Soressi, M., and Dibble, H. L. (eds.), Multiple Approaches to the Study of Bifacial Technologies, University Museum Monograph 115, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, pp. 125-147.
261. Soriano, S., Villa, P., and Wadley, L. (2007). Blade technology and tool forms in the Middle Stone Age of South Africa: The Howiesons Poort and post-Howiesons Poort at Rose Cottage Cave. Journal of Archaeological Science 34: 681-703.
262. Stoltman, J. B., and Hughes, R. E. (2004). Obsidian in Early Woodland contexts in the upper Mississippi Valley. American Antiquity 69: 751-760.
263. Sullivan III, A. P., and Rozen, K. C. (1985). Debitage analysis and archaeological interpretation. American Antiquity 50: 755-779.
264. Takase, K. (2004). Hide processing of oxen and koryak: An ethnoarchaeological survey in Kamchatka Peninsula, Russia. Material Culture 77: 57-84.
265. Terry, K., Andrefsky Jr., W., and Konstantinov, M. V. (2008). Raw material durability, function, and retouch in the Upper Paleolithic of the Transbikal region. In Adams, B., and Blades, B. (eds.), Lithic Materials and Paleolithic Societies, Blackwell, Oxford, in press.
266. Titmus, G. (1985). Some aspects of stone tool notching. In Plew, M. G., Woods, J. C., and Pavesic, M. G. (eds.), Stone Tool Analysis: Essays in Honor of Don E. Crabtree, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, pp. 243-264.
267. Tomaskova, S. (2005). What is a burin? Typology, technology, and interregional comparison. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 12: 79-115.
268. Tomka, S. A. (1989). Differentiating lithic reduction techniques: An experimental approach. In Amick, D. S., and Mauldin, R. P. (eds.), Experiments in Lithic Technology, BAR International Series No. 528, Archaeopress, Oxford, pp. 137-162.
269. Tomka, S. A. (2001). The effect of processing requirements on reduction strategies and tool form: A new perspective. In Andrefsky Jr., W. (ed.), Lithic Debitage: Context Form Meaning, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 207-225.
270. Torrence, R. (1983). Time budgeting and hunter-gatherer technology. In Bailey, G. (ed.), Hunter-Gatherer Economy in Prehistory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 11-22.
271. Tostevin, G. B. (2007). Levels of theory and social practice in the reduction sequence and chaéne opératoire methods of lithic analysis. Paper presented at the 71st Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
272. Truncer, J. J. (1990). Perkiomen points: A study in variability. In Moeller, R. W. (ed.), Experiments and Observations on the Terminal Archaic of the Middle Atlantic Region, Archaeological Services, Bethlehem, CT, pp. 1-62.
273. Tykot, R. H. (2002). Geochemical analysis of obsidian and the reconstruction of trade mechanisms in the Early Neolithic period of the western Mediterranean. In Jakes, K. (ed.), Archaeological Chemistry: Materials, Methods, and Meaning, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp. 169-184.
274. Tykot, R. H. (2003). Determining the source of lithic artifacts and reconstructing trade in the ancient world. In Kardulias, P. N., and Yerkes, R. W. (eds.), Written in Stone: The Multiple Dimensions of Lithic Analysis, Lexington Books, Lanham, MD, pp. 59-85.
275. Ugan, A., Bright, J., and Rogers, A. (2003). When is technology worth the trouble? Journal of Archaeological Science 30: 1315-1329.
276. Van Peer, P. (1992). The Levallois Reduction Strategy, Prehistory Press, Madison, WI.
277. Veil, S. (1990). A dynamic model of a Magdalenian settlement by spatial analysis of refitted artifacts. In Cziesla, E., Eichoff, S., Arts, N., and Winter, D. (eds.), The Big Puzzle: International Symposium on Refitting Stone Artefacts, Studies in Modern Archaeology 1, Holos, Bonn, pp. 45-60.
278. Villa, P. (1982). Conjoinable pieces and site formation processes. American Antiquity 47: 276-290.
279. Villa, P., and Soressi, M. (2000). Stone tools in carnivore sites: The case of BoisRoche. Journal of Anthropological Research 56: 187-215.
280. Waechter, S. A. (2002). Report on Phase-II Test Excavations at CA-PLU-131 and CA-PLU-421 near Clio, Southern Plumas County, Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Davis, CA.
281. Wallace, I. J., and Shea, J. J. (2006). Mobility patterns and core technologies in the middle Paleolithic of the Levant. Journal of Archaeological Science 33: 1293-1309.
282. Weedman, K. J. (2002). On the spur of the moment: Effects of age and experience on hafted stone scraper morphology. American Antiquity 67: 731-744.
283. Weedman, K. J. (2006). An ethnoarchaeological study of hafting and stone tool diversity among the Gamo of Ethiopia. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 13: 189-238.
284. Wenzel, K. E., and Shelley, P. H. (2001). What put the small in the Arctic small tool tradition: Raw material constraints on lithic technology. In Andrefsky Jr., W. (ed.), Lithic Debitage: Context, Form, Meaning, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 106-125.
285. Whittaker, J. C. (1994). Flintknapping: Making and Understanding Stone Tools, University of Texas Press, Austin.
286. Wiant M., and Hassen, H. (1985). The role of lithic resource availability and accessibility in the organization of technology. In Vehik, S. C. (ed.), Lithic Resource Procurement: Proceedings from the Second Conference on Prehistoric Chert Exploitation, Occasional Paper No. 4, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 101-114.
287. Wilmsen, E. S. (1970). Lithic Analysis and Cultural Inference: A Paleo-Indian Case, Anthropological Papers No. 16, University of Arizona, Tucson.
288. Wilson, J. K., and Andrefsky Jr., W. (2008). Unpacking production, resharpening and hammer type. In Andrefsky Jr., W. (ed.), Lithic Technology: Measures of Production, Use and Curation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 86-105.
289. Wurz, S. (2002). Variability in the Middle Stone Age lithic sequence, 115,000-60,000 years ago at Klasies River, South Africa. Journal of Archaeological Science 29: 1001-1015.
290. Wurz, S., le Roux, N. J., Gardner, S., and Deacon, H. J. (2003). Discriminating between the end products of the earlier Middle Stone Age sub-stages at Klasies River using biplot methodology. Journal of Archaeological Science 30: 1107-1126.
291. Young, D. C. (2002). Secondary obsidian sources of the Madeline Plains: paleolandscapes and archaeological implications. In McGuire, K. R. (ed.), Boundary Lands: Archaeological Investigations Along the California-Great Basin Interface, Anthropological Papers No. 24, Nevada State Museum, Carson City, pp. 75-84.