Nineteenth century tools for twenty-first century archaeology? Why the middle paleolithic typology of François Bordes must be replaced

Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 1-48

  Bisson, Michael S ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Attributes; Bordes; Systematics; Typology

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010055495     PISSN: 10725369     EISSN: 15737764     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1009578011590     Document Type: Article

References (143)

1. Adams, W. Y., and Adams, E. W. (1991). Archaeological Typology and Practical Reality: A Dialectical Approach to Artifact Classification and Sorting, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
2. Anderson-Gerfaud, P. (1990). Aspects of behavior in the Middle Paleolithic: Functional analysis of stone tools from southwest France. In Mellars, P. (ed.), The Emergence of Modern Humans: An Archaeological Perspective, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 389-418.
3. Audouze, F. (1999). New advances in French prehistory. Antiquity 73: 167-175.
4. Audouze, F., and Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1981). France: A continental insularity. World Archaeology 13(2): 170-189.
5. Barton, C. (1988). Lithic Variability and Middle Paleolithic Behavior, British Archaeological Reports International Series No. 408, British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.
6. Barton, C. (1991). Retouched tools, fact or fiction? Paradigms for interpreting paleolithic chipped stone. In Clark, G. (ed.), Perspectives on the Past, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 143-163.
7. Baumler, M. (1988). Core reduction, flake production and the Middle Paleolithic industry of Zobiste (Yugoslavia). In Dibble, H., and Montet-White, A. (eds.), Upper Pleistocene Prehistory of Western Eurasia, University of Pennsylvania Museum Press, Philadelphia, pp. 255-274.
8. Bell, J. (1994). Reconstructing Prehistory: Scientific Method in Archaeology, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
9. Beyries, S. (1987). Variabilité de l'Industrie Lithique au Moustérien: approche fonctionelle sur quelques gisements Française. British Archaeological Reports International Series 328, BAR, Oxford.
10. Bietti, A. (1991). Normal science and paradigmatic biases in Italian hunter-gatherer prehistory. In Clark, G. (ed.), Perspectives on the Past, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 258-281.
11. Bietti, A., and Bietti-Sestieri, A. (1985). Problemi di teoria e di metodo in Archaeologia Preistorica. In Liverani, M., Palmieri, A., and Peroni, R. (eds.), Studi di Paletnologia in Onore di Salvatore M Puglisi, Universitá di Roma, Rome.
12. Binford, L. (1962). Archaeology as anthropology. American Antiquity 28: 217-225.
13. Binford, L. (1972). Models and paradigms in paleolithic archaeology. In Clarke, D. (ed.), Models in Archaeology, Methuen, London, pp. 109-166.
14. Binford, L. (1973). Interassemblage variability - The Mousterian and the "functional" argument. In Renfrew, C. (ed.), The Explanation of Culture Change, Duckworth, London, pp. 227-254.
15. Binford, L. (1989). Isolating the transition to cultural adaptation: An organizational approach. In Trinkhaus, E. (ed.), The Emergence of Modern Humans, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 18-41.
16. Binford, L., and Binford, S. (1966). A preliminary analysis of functional variability in the Mousterian of Levallois facies. American Anthropologist 68(2, Part 2): 238-295.
17. Bisson, M. S. (1997). Interview with a Neanderthal: The role of blank morphology and prehension in determining Middle Paleolithic scraper forms. Paper delivered to the Paleoanthropology Society Annual Meeting.
18. Boëda, E. (1994). Le concept Levallois: variabilité des methodes, CRA Monograph 19, Editions du CNRS, Paris.
19. Boëda, E. (1995). Levallois: A volumetric construction, methods, a technique. In Dibble, H., and Bar-Yosef, O. (eds.), The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology, Prehistory Press, Madison, WI, pp. 41-68.
20. Bordes, F. (1950). Principes d'une méthode d'étude des techniques de débitage et de la typologie du Paléolithique ancien et moyen. L'Anthropologie 54: 19-34.
21. Bordes, F. (1953). Essai de classification des industries moustériennes. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 50: 457-466.
22. Bordes, F. (1961a). Typologie du Paléolithique Ancien et Moyen, Publications de l'Institut de Préhistoire de l'Université de Bordeaux, Mémoire 1, Delmas, Bordeaux.
23. Bordes, F. (1961b). Mousterian cultures in France. Science 134: 803-810.
24. Bordes, F. (1965). A propos de typologie. L'Anthropologie 69: 369-377.
25. Bordes, F. (1968). The Old Stone Age, McGraw Hill, New York.
26. Bordes, F. (1969). Reflections on typology and techniques in the Paleolithic. Arctic Anthropology 6: 1-29.
27. Bordes, F. (1977). Time and space limits in the Mousterian. In Wright, R. V. S. (ed.), Stone Tools as Cultural Markers, Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, Canberra, pp. 37-39.
28. Bordes, F., and Bourgon, M. (1951). Le complexe mousterien: Mousterien, Levalloisian et Tayacien. L'Anthropologie 55: 1-23.
29. Breuil, H., and Lantier, R. (1959). The Men of the Old Stone Age, St. Martins Press, New York.
30. Brézillon, M. (1968). La dénomination des objets de pierre taillée: matériaux pour un vocabulaire des préhistoriens de langue Française, Gallia Préhistoire Supplément 4, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris.
31. Brown, J. (1982). On the structure of artifact typologies. In Whallon, R., and Brown, J. (eds.), Essays on Archaeological Typology, Center for American Archaeology Press, Evanston, IL, pp. 176-189.
32. Callow, P., and Webb, R. (1981). The application multivariate statistical techniques to Middle Paleolithic assemblages from southwestern France. Revue d' Archéometrie 5: 129-138.
33. Chase, P. (1986). Relationships between Mousterian Lithic and Faunal Assemblages at Combe Grenal. Current Anthropology 27: 69-71.
34. Chase, P., and Dibble, H. (1987). Middle Paleolithic symbolism: A review of current evidence and interpretations. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 6: 263-296.
35. Chase, P., and Dibble, H. (1992). Scientific archaeology and the origins of symbolism: A reply to Bednarik. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 2: 43-51.
36. Clark, G. (1987). From the Mousterian to the Metal Ages: Long-term change in the human diet of northern Spain. In Soffer, O. (ed.), The Pleistocene Old World: Regional Perspectives, Plenum, New York, pp. 293-316.
37. Clark, G. (1993). Paradigms in science and archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Research 1: 203-234.
38. Clark, G. (1994). Migration as an explanatory concept in paleolithic archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1: 305-344.
39. Clark, G. (1997). Through a glass darkly: Conceptual issues in modern human origins research. In Clark, G. A., and Willermet, C. M. (eds.), Conceptual Issues in Modern Human Origins Research, Aldine de Gruyter, New York, pp. 60-76.
40. Clark, G. A., and Willermet, C. M. (eds.) (1997). Conceptual Issues in Modern Human Origins Research, Aldine de Gruyter, New York.
41. Clark, J. D. (1974). Kalambo Falls Prehistoric Site, Vol. II, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
42. Clark, J. D. (1982). The cultures of the Middle Paleolithic/Middle Stone Age. In Clark, J. D. (ed.), Cambridge History of Africa, Vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 284-341.
43. Clarke, D. L. (1978). Analytical Archaeology, 2nd ed., Columbia University Press, New York.
44. Combier, J. (1962). Chronologie et systématique du Moustérien occidental: données et conceptions nouvelles. Atti del VI Congresso Internazionale delle Scienze Preistoriche e Protostoriche (Rome) 1: 77-96.
45. Commomt, V. (1914). Les Hommes contemporains du renne dans la vallée de la Somme. Mémoires de la Société des Antiquaires de Picardie (4th ser.) 7: 207-646.
46. Cowgill, G. (1968). Archaeological applications of factor, cluster, and proximity analysis. American Antiquity 33: 367-375.
47. Cowgill, G. (1989). Formal approaches in archaeology. In Lamberg-Karlovsky, C. (ed.), Archaeological Thought in America.
48. Daniel, G. (1975). A Hundred and Fifty Years of Archaeology. 2nd ed., Duckworth, London.
49. Debénath, A., and Dibble, H. (1994). Handbook of Paleolithic Archaeology Volume One: The Lower and Middle Paleolithic of Europe, University of Pennsylvania Museum Press, Philadelphia.
50. Deetz, J. (1967). Invitation to Archaeology, Natural History Press, New York.
51. de Lumley, H. (1971-1972). Le Paléolithique inferieur et moyen du Midi méditerranéen dans son Cadre géologique, GP Supplément 5e (1 and 2), CNRS, Paris.
52. de Mortillet, G. (1883). Le Préhistorique: Antiquité de l'Homme, Reinwald, Paris.
53. Dibble, H. (1984). Interpreting typological variation of Middle Paleolithic scrapers: Function, style, or sequence of reduction. Journal of Field Archaeology 11: 431-436.
54. Dibble, H. (1987). The interpretation of Middle Paleolithic scraper morphology. American Antiquity 52: 109-117.
55. Dibble, H. (1988). Typological aspects of reduction and intensity of utilization of lithic resources in the French Mousterian. In Dibble, H., and Montet-White, A. (eds.), Upper Pleistocene Prehistory of Western Eurasia, University of Pennsylvania Museum Press, Philadelphia, pp. 181-194.
56. Dibble, H. (1989). The implications of stone tool types for the presence of language during the Middle Paleolithic. In Mellars, P., and Stringer, C. (eds.), The Human Revolution: Behavioral and Biological Perspectives on the Origins of Modern Humans, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 415-432.
57. Dibble, H. (1991). Mousterian assemblage variability on an interregional scale. Journal of Anthropological Research 47: 239-257.
58. Dibble, H. (1995a). Middle paleolithic scraper reduction: Background, clarification, and a review of the evidence to date. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2: 299-368.
59. Dibble, H. (1995b). Biache Saint-Vaast, level IIA: A comparison of analytical approaches. In Dibble, H., and Bar-Yosef, O. (eds.), The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology, Prehistory Press, Madison, WI, pp. 93-116.
60. Dibble, H., and Bar-Yosef, O. (1995). The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology, Prehistory Press, Madison, WI.
61. Dibble, H., and Bernard, M. (1980). A comparative study of basic edge angle measurement techniques. American Antiquity 45(4): 857-865.
62. Dibble, H., and Debenath, A. (1991). Paradigmatic differences in a collaborativeresearch project. In Clark, G. (ed.), Perspectives on the Past, Universityof Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 217-226.
63. Dibble, H., and Lenoir, M. (eds.) (1995). The Middle Paleolithic Site of Combe-Capelle Bas (France), University of Pennsylvania Museum Press, Philadelphia.
64. Dibble, H., and Rolland, N. (1992). On assemblage variability in the Middle Paleolithic of western Europe: History, perspectives and a new synthesis. In Dibble, H., and Mellars, P. (eds.), The Middle Paleolithic: Adaptation, Behavior and Variability, University of Pennsylvania Museum Press, Philadelphia, pp. 1-28.
65. Djindjian, F. (1987). Identification, characterization and evolution of material culture. In Djindjian, F., and Ducasse, H. (eds.), Data Processing and Mathematics Applied to Archaeology, European University Center for the Cultural Heritage, Ravello, pp. 393-421.
66. Doran, J., and Hodson, F. (1966). A digital computer analysis of Paleolithic flint assemblages. Nature 210: 688-689.
67. Dunnell, R. C. (1971). Systematics in Prehistory, Free Press, New York.
68. Fish, P. (1978). Consistency in archaeological measurement and classification: A pilot study. American Antiquity 43: 86-88.
69. Fish, P. (1979). The Interpretive Potential of Mousterian Debitage, Arizona State University Anthropological Research Papers 16, Arizona State University, Tempe.
70. Ford, J. (1952). Measurements of some prehistoric design developments in the southeastern states. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History No. 44, American Museum of Natural History, New York.
71. Ford, J. (1954). On the concept of types. American Anthropologist 56: 42-54.
72. Freeman, L. (1966). The nature of Mousterian facies in Cantabrian Spain. American Anthropologist 68(2): 230-237.
73. Freeman, L. (1992). Mousterian facies in space: New data from Morin level 16. In Dibble, H., and Mellars, P. (eds.), The Middle Paleolithic: Adaptation, Behavior, and Variability, University of Pennsylvania Museum Press, Philadelphia, pp. 113-126.
74. Gardin, J. C. (1980). Archaeological Constructs, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
75. Gardin, J. C. (1987). Aid to reasoning in archaeology. In Djindjin, F., and Ducasse, H. (eds.), Data Processing and Mathematics Applied to Archaeology, European University Center for the Cultural Heritage, Ravello, pp. 195-212.
76. Geneste, J.-M. (1989). Economie des ressources lithiques dans le Moustérien du Sud-Ouest de la France. In Otte, M. (ed.), L'Homme de Néanderthal, Vol. 6. La subsistence, Etudes et Recherches Archéologiques de l'Université de Liège, Liège, pp. 75-98.
77. Grace, R. (1989). Interpreting the Function of Stone Tools, BAR International Series 474, Oxford.
78. Gould, R. (1980). Living Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
79. Hammond, M. (1982). The expulsion of the Neanderthals from human ancestry: Marcellin Boule and the social context of scientific research. Social Studies of Science 12: 1-36.
80. Hayden, B. (1977). Stone tool functions in the Western Desert. In Wright, R. (ed.), Stone Tools as Cultural Markers: Change, Evolution and Complexity, Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, Canberra, pp. 178-188.
81. Hayden, B. (1979). Paleolithic Reflections: Lithic Technology and Ethnographic Excavation Among the Australian Aborigines, Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, Canberra.
82. Inizan, M.-L., Roche, H., and Tixier, J. (1992). Technology of Knapped Stone (translation of Préhistoire de la Pierre Taillée), Cercle de Recherches et d'Etudes Préhistoriques CNRS, Meudon.
83. Jelinek, A. (1975). A preliminary report on some Lower and Middle Paleolithic industries from the Tabun Cave, Mount Carmel (Israel). In Wendorf, F., and Marks, A. (eds.), Problems in Prehistory: North Africa and the Levant, SMU Press, Dallas, pp. 279-316.
84. Jelinek, A. (1976). Form, function, and style in lithic analysis. In Cleland, C. (ed.), Cultural Change and Continuity: Essays in Honor of James Bennett Griffin, Academic Press, New York, pp. 19-33.
85. Jelinek, A. (1982). The Tabun Cave and paleolithic man in the Levant. Science 216: 1369-1375.
86. Jelinek, A. (1984). Mousterian variability and reduction intensity: A comparison of Levantine and Perigordian industries. Paper presented at the 49th Annual Meeting of the SAA, Portland, OR.
87. Jelinek, A. (1988a). Technology, typology, and culture in the Middle Paleolithic. In Dibble, H., and Montet-White, A. (eds.), Upper Pleistocene Prehistory of Western Eurasia, University of Pennsylvania Museum Press, Philadelphia, pp. 199-212.
88. Jelinek, A. (1988b). "Discussion" on "Functional Variability of Lithic Sets in the Middle Paleolithic" by S. Beyries. In Dibble, H., and Montet-White, A. (eds.), Upper Pleistocene Prehistory of Western Eurasia, University of Pennsylvania Museum Press, Philadelphia, p. 221.
89. Kuhn, S. (1991). "Unpacking" lithic reduction: Lithic raw material economy in the Mousterian of West-Central Italy. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 10: 76-106.
90. Kuhn, S. (1992). Blank form and reduction as determinants of Mousterian scraper morphology. American Antiquity 57: 115-128.
91. Kuhn, S. (1995). Mousterian Lithic Technology, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
92. Kuhn, S., and Stiner, M. (1998). Middle Paleolithic 'creativity' reflections on an oxymoron? In Mithen, S. (ed.), Creativity in Human Evolution and Prehistory, Routledge, New York, pp. 143-164.
93. Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed., University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
94. Laplace, G. (1964). Essai de typologie systématique. Annali Università di Ferrara n.s. 15: 1-86.
95. Laplace, G. (1968). Récherches de typologie analytique. Origini 2: 7-64.
96. Levi-Sala, I. (1986). Use wear and post-depositional surface modification: A word of caution. Journal of Archaeological Science 13(3): 229-244.
97. Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1964). Le Geste et la Parole, Technique et Langage, Albin Michel, Paris.
98. Marks, A. (1992). Typological variability in the Levantine Middle Paleolithic. In Dibble, H., and Mellars, P. (eds.), The Middle Paleolithic: Adaptation, Behavior and Variability, University of Pennsylvania Museum Press, Philadelphia, pp. 127-142.
99. McPherron, S. P., and Dibble, H. (1999). Stone tool analysis using digitized images: Examples from the Lower and Middle Paleolithic. Lithic Technology 24(1): 38-52.
100. Mellars, P. (1969). The chronology of Mousterian industries in the Périgord region of south-west France. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 35: 134-171.
101. Mellars, P. (1989). Technological changes across the Middle-Upper Paleolithic transition: Technological, social, and cognitive perspectives. In Mellars, P., and Stringer, C. (eds.), The Human Revolution: Behavioral and Biological Perspectives on the Origins of Modern Humans, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 338-365.
102. Mellars, P. (1991). Cognitive changes and the emergence of modern humans in Europe. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 1: 63-76.
103. Mellars, P. (1992). Technological change in the Mousterian of southwest France. In Dibble, H., and Mellars, P. (eds.), The Middle Paleolithic: Adaptation, Behavior, and Variability, University of Pennsylvania Museum Monograph 78, Philadelphia, pp. 29-43.
104. Mellars, P. (1996). The Neanderthal Legacy, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
105. Mithen, S. (1996). The Prehistory of the Mind, Thames and Hudson, London.
106. Moss, E. (1987). A review of "investigating microwear polishes with blind tests." Journal of Archaeological Science 14(3): 473-481.
107. Newcomer, M. R. G., and Unger-Hamilton, R. (1986). Investigating microwear polishes with Blind tests. Journal of Archaeological Science 13(3): 203-218.
108. Nitecki, M. H., and Nitecki, D. V. (eds.) (1994). Origins of Anatomically Modern Humans, Plenum Press, New York.
109. Peyrony, D. (1921). Le Moustérien - Ses faciès. In Association Française pour l'Avancement des Sciences, 44e session, Strassbourg, pp. 496-497.
110. Rolland, N. (1977). New aspects of Middle Paleolithic variability in Western Europe. Nature 266: 251-252.
111. Rolland, N. (1981). The interpretation of Middle Paleolithic variability. Man 16: 15-42.
112. Rolland, N. (1988). Observations on some Middle Paleolithic time series in southern France. In Dibble, H., and Montet-White, A. (eds.), Upper Pleistocene Prehistory in Western Eurasia. University of Pennsylvania Museum Press, Philadelphia, pp. 161-180.
113. Rolland, N., and Dibble, H. (1990). A new synthesis of Middle Paleolithic variability. American Antiquity 55: 480-499.
114. Sackett, J. (1973). Style, function and artifact variability in paleolithic assemblages. In Renfrew, C. (ed.), The Explanation of Culture Change, Duckworth, London, pp. 317-325.
115. Sackett, J. (1981). From de Mortillet to Bordes: A century of French paleolithic research. In Daniel, G. (ed.), Toward a History of Archaeology, Thames and Hudson, London, pp. 85-99.
116. Sackett, J. (1982). Approaches to style in lithic archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1: 59-112.
117. Sackett, J. (1988). The Mousterian and its aftermath: A view from the Upper Paleolithic. In Dibble, H., and Montet-White, A. (eds.), Upper Pleistocene Prehistory of Western Eurasia, University of Pennsylvania Museum Press, Philadelphia, pp. 413-426.
118. Sackett, J. (1991). Straight archaeology french style: The phylogenetic paradigm in historic perspective. In Clark, G. (ed.), Perspectives on the Past: Theoretical Biases in Mediterranean Hunter-Gatherer Research, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 109-140.
119. Salmon, M. (1982). Philosophy and Archaeology, Academic Press, New York.
120. Shea, J. (1989). A functional study of the lithic industries associated with hominid fossils in Kebara and Qafzeh caves, Israel. In Mellars, P., and Stringer, C. (eds.), The Human Revolution: Behavioral and Biological Perspectives on the Origins of Modern Humans, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 611-625.
121. Shea, J., and Klenck, J. (1993). An experimental investigation of the effects of trampling on the results of lithic microwear analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science 20: 175-194.
122. Skinner, J. (1965). The Flake Industries of Southwestern Asia: A Typological Study, Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University, University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.
123. Spaulding, A. (1953). Statistical techniques for the discovery of artifact types. American Antiquity 18: 305-313, 391-393.
124. Spaulding, A. (1982). Structure in archaeological data: Nominal variables. In Whallon, R., and Brown, J. (eds.), Essays in Archaeological Typology, Center for American Archaeology, Evanston, pp. 1-20.
125. Stringer, C. B., and Gamble, C. (1993). In Search of the Neanderthals: Solving the Puzzle of Human Origins, Thames & Hudson, London.
126. Toth, N. (1985). The Oldowan reassessed: A close look at early stone artifacts. Journal of Archaeological Science 12: 101-121.
127. Trigger, B. (1989). A History of Archaeological Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
128. Tringham, R., Cooper, G., Odell, G., Voytek, B., and Whitman, A. (1974). Experimentation in the formation of edge damage: A new approach to lithic analysis. Journal of Field Archaeology 1: 171-196.
129. Trinkaus, E., and Shipman, P. (1993). The Neanderthals: Changing the Image of Mankind, Alfred A Knopf, New York.
130. Tuffreau, A. (1988). L'industrie lithique du niveau IIA. Le gisement paléolithique moyen de Biache-Saint-Vaast (Pas de Calais), Vol. 1. Mémoires de la Société Préhistorique Française 21, SPF, Paris.
131. Turq, A. (1979). L'évolution du Moustérien de type Quina au Roc de Marsal et en Périgord, Thesis, l"Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Bordeaux.
132. Turq, A. (1992). Raw material and technological studies of the Quina Mousterian in Perigord. In Dibble, H., and Mellars, P. (eds.), The Middle Paleolithic: Adaptation, Behavior and Variability, University of Pennsylvania Museum Press, Philadelphia, pp. 75-86.
133. Turq, A. (1995). Raw material sources in the region of Combe-Capelle Bas. In The Middle Paleolithic Site of Combe-Capelle Bas (France), University of Pennsylvania Museum Press, Philadelphia, pp. 321-328.
134. Valdes, V., and de Quiros, F. (1992). Approaches to the Middle Paleolithic in northern Spain. In Dibble, H., and Mellars, P. (eds.), The Middle Paleolithic: Adaptation, Behavior and Variability, University of Pennsylvania Museum Press, Philadelphia, pp. 97-112.
135. Vaughan, P. (1985). Use Wear Analysis of Flaked Stone Tools, University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
136. Villa, P. (1983). Terra Amata and the Middle Pleistocene Archaeological Record of Southern France, University of California Press, Berkeley.
137. Villa, P. (1991). Middle Pleistocene prehistory in southwestern Europe: The state of our knowledge and ignorance. Journal of Anthropological Research 47: 193-217.
138. White, J., and Thomas, D. (1972). What mean these stones: Ethno-taxonomic models and archaeological interpretations in the New Guinea highlands. In Clarke, D. (ed.), Models in Prehistory, Methuen, London, pp. 275-308.
139. Whittaker, J. C., Caulkins, D., and Kamp, K. A. (1998). Evaluating consistency in typology and classification. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 5(2): 129-164.
140. Wilmsen, E. (1968). Functional analysis of flaked stone artifacts. American Antiquity 33: 156-161.
141. Wobst, H. M. (1978). The ethno-archaeology of hunter-gatherers or the tyranny of the ethnographic record in archaeology. American Antiquity 43: 303-309.
142. Wolpoff, M., and Caspari, R. (1997). Race and Human Evolution, Simon and Schuster, New York.
143. Wright, G. (1966). The University of Michigan archaeological collections from et-Tabun, Palestine: Levels F and E. Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts and Letters 51: 407-423.