What is a burin? Typology, technology, and interregional comparison

Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 79-115

  Tomáŝková, Silvia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Interregional comparisons; Technology; Tool life history; Typological classification

Indexed keywords

EID: 22144490218     PISSN: 10725369     EISSN: 15737764     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10816-005-5666-4     Document Type: Review

References (214)

1. Adams, W. Y., and Adams, E. W. (1991). Archaeological typology and practical reality, Cambridge University Press.
2. Allsworth-Jones, P. (1986). The Szeletian and the Transition from Middle to Upper Paleolithic in Central Europe, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
3. Allsworth-Jones, P. (1990). The Szeletian and the stratigraphic succession in central Europe and adjacent areas: Main trends, recent results, and problems for resolution. In Mellars, P. (ed.), The Emergence of Modern Humans: An Archaeological Perspective, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, pp. 160-242.
4. Almeida, F. (2001). Cores, tools, or both? Methodological consideration for the study of carinated lithic elements: The Portuguese Case. In Hays, M. A. and Thacker, P. T. (eds.), Questioning the Answers: Re-Solving Fundamental Problems of the Early Upper Paleolithic, British Archaeological Reports International Series 1005, Oxford, pp. 91-97.
5. Andrefsky, W. (1994). Raw-material availability and the organization of technology. American Antiquity 59: 21-35.
6. Aubry, T., Detrain, L., and Kervazo, B. (1995). Les Niveaux intermédiaires entre le Gravettien et le Solutréen de l'abri Casserole (Les Eyzies de Tayac): Mise en évidence d'un mode de production original de microlithes et implications. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 92: 296-302.
7. Bamforth, D. (1986). Technological efficiency and tool curation. American Antiquity 51: 38-50.
8. Bamforth, D. (1990). Settlement, raw material, and lithic procurement in the Central Mojave Desert. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 9: 70-104.
9. Barton, M. C. (1989). Beyond style and function: A view from the Middle Paleolithic. American Anthropologist 92: 57-72
10. Barton, M. C. (1991). Retouched tools, fact or fiction? Paradigms for interpreting Paleolithic chipped stone. In Clark, G. A. (ed.), Perspectives on the Past, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 143-163.
11. Barton, M. C., Olszewski, D. I., and Coinman, N. R. (1996). Beyond the graver: Reconsidering the burin function. Journal of Field Archaeology 23: 111-125.
12. Baumler, M. F., and Downum, C. E. (1989). Between micro and macro: a study in the interpretation of small-sized debitage. In Mauldin, R. P., and Amick, D. S. (eds.), Methodological Contributions to Lithic Analysis, British Archaeological Reports, International Series No. 528. Oxford, England, pp. 101-116.
13. Binford, L. (1965). Archaeological systematics and the study of culture process. American Antiquity 31: 203-210.
14. Binford, L. (1973). Interassemblage variability - The Mousterian and the 'functional' argument. In Renfrew, C. (ed.), The Explanation of Culture Change, Gerald Duckworth, London, pp. 227-254.
15. Binford, L., and Sabloff, J. (1982). Paradigms, systematics, and archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Research. 38: 137-153.
16. Bisson, M. (2000). Nineteenth century tools for twenty-first century archaeology? Why the Middle Paleolithic typology of Francois Bordes must be replaced. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7: 1-48.
17. Bisson, M. (2001). Interview with a Neanderthal: An experimental approach for reconstructing scraper production rules, and their implications for imposed form in Middle Paleolithic tools. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 11: 165-84.
18. Bleed, P. (2001). Trees or chains, links or branches: Conceptual alternatives for consideration of stone tool production and other sequential activities. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 8: 101-127.
19. Boëda, E., Geneste, J.-M., and Meignen, L. (1990). Identification de chaînes opératoires lithiques du Paléolithique ancien et moyen. Paléo 2: 43-80.
20. Bonnichsen, R. (1977). Models for deriving cultural information from stone tools. Archaeological survey of Canada. Paper no. 60. Ottawa.
21. Bordes, F. (1950). Principes d'une méthode d'étude des techniques de débitage et de la typologie du Paléolithique ancien et moyen. L'Anthropologie 54: 1-29.
22. Bordes, F. (1957). La signification du microburin dans le Paléolithique supérieur. L'Anthropologie 41: 578-82.
23. Bordes, F. (1961). Typologie du Paléolithique Supérieur et Moyen. Institut de Préhistoire, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, Autriche.
24. Bordes, F. (1965). A propos de typologie. L'Anthropologie 69: 369-377.
25. Bordes, F. (1969). Reflections on typology and techniques in the Palaeolithic. Arctic Anthropology 6: 1-29.
26. Bordes, F. (1972). On old and new concepts of typology. Reply. Current Anthropology 13: 140-141.
27. Bordes, F., and de Sonneville-Bordes, D. (1970). The significance of variability in Paleolithic assemblages. World Archaeology 2: 61-73.
28. Bousman, C. B. (1993). Hunter-gatherer adaptations, economic risk and tool design. Lithic Technology 18: 59-86.
29. Brew, J. O. (1946). The use and abuse of taxonomy. In Brew, J. O. (ed.), Archaeology of Alkali Ridge, Southeastern Utah, Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology 21, Harvard University, Cambridge, pp. 44-66.
30. Brink, J. (1978). An Experimental Study of Microwear Formation on Endscrapers. Ottawa, Mercury Series, National Museum of Man.
31. Broglio, A., and Laplace, G. (1966). Etudes de typologie analytique des complexes leptolithiques de l'Europe centrale. Les complexes aurignacoides de la Basse Autriche. Rivista di Scienze Preistoriche 21: 61-121.
32. Chang, K. C. (1967). Rethinking Archaeology. Random House, New York.
33. Chazan, M. (2001). Bladelet production in the Aurignacian of La Ferrassie (Dordogne, France). Lithic Technology 26: 16-28.
34. Clark, J. G. D., and Thompson, M. (1953). The groove and splinter technique of working antler in Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic Europe. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 20: 148-160.
35. Clay, R. B. (1976). Typological classification, attribute analysis, and lithic variability. Journal of Field Archaeology 3: 303-311.
36. Coinman, N. R., and Clausen, T. G. (2000). Burins revisited: a re-examination of the burins from Ain al-Buhira (WHS 618). In Coinman, N. R. (ed.), The Archaeology of the Wadi al-Hasa, West-Central Jordan, Volume 2: Excavations at Middle, Upper, and Epipaleolithic Sites, Arizona State University Anthropological Research Papers No. 52, Tempe, pp. 183-194.
37. Conkey, M. W. (1982). Boundedness in art and society. In Hodder, I. (ed.), Symbolic and structural archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 115-128.
38. Conkey, M. W., and Hastorf, C. (eds.), ( 1990). The Uses of Style in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
39. Cotterell, B., and Kamminga, J. ( 1987). The formation of flakes. American Antiquity 52: 675-708.
40. Cross, J. (1983). Twigs, branches, trees and forests: Problems of scale in lithic analysis. In Moore, J. A., and Keene, A. S. (eds.), Archaeological Hammers and Theories, Academic Press, London, pp. 87-106.
41. Cutliffe, R., and Post, S. (eds.) (1989). Context, History and History of Technology. Lehigh University Press, Bethlehem.
42. Debénath, A. (1990). A propos de typologie lithique: Inutilité ou inéluctabilité? Bulletin de la Société d'Anthropologie du Sud-ouest 25: 191-200.
43. Debénath, A., and Dibble, H. (1994). Handbook of Paleolithic Typology. University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
44. Demars, P.-Y., and Laurent, P. (1989). Types d'Outils Lithiques du Paléolithique Supérieur en Europe. Cahiers du Quarternaire No 14, Editions du CNRS, Paris.
45. Dibble, H. (1984). Interpreting typological variation of Middle Paleolithic scrapers: Function, style or sequence of reduction? Journal of Field Archaeology 11: 431-436.
46. Dibble, H. (1987). The interpretation of Middle Paleolithic scraper morphology. American Antiquity 52: 109-117.
47. Dibble, H. (1988). Typological aspects of reduction and intensity of utilization of lithic resources in the French Mousterian. In Dibble, H., and Montet-White, A. (eds.), Upper Pleistocene Prehistory of Western Eurasia, University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, pp. 181-197.
48. Dibble, H. (1990). A new synthesis of Middle Palaeolithic variability. American Antiquity 55: 480-499.
49. Dibble, H. (1991). Local raw material exploitation and its effects on Lower and Middle Paleolithic assemblage variability. In Montet-White, A., and Holen, S. (eds.), Raw Material Economies among Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherers, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, pp. 33-47.
50. Dibble, H. (1995). Scraper reduction: background, clarification, and review of the evidence to date. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2: 299-368.
51. Dibble, H., and Montet-White, A., (eds.) (1988). Upper Pleistocene Prehistory of Western Eurasia. University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
52. Dibble, H., and Rolland, N. (1992). On assemblage variability in the Middle Paleolithic of Western Europe. In Dibble, H., and Mellars, P. (eds.), The Middle Paleolithic: Adaptation, Behavior, and Variability, University Museum Monograph 72, The University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, pp. 1-28.
53. Dobres, M.-A., and Hoffman, R. (eds.) (1999). The Social Dynamics of Technology. Practice, Politics, and World Views, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
54. Dunnell, R. C. (1971). Systematics in Prehistory, Free Press, New York.
55. Dunnell, R. C. (1973). Fire, air, earth, and water: a rational classification. Mankind 9: 127-131.
56. Dunnell, R. C. (1978). Style and function: a fundamental dichotomy. American Antiquity 43: 192-202.
57. Dunnell, R. C. (1982). Science, social science and common sense: The agonizing dilemma of modern archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Research 38: 1-25.
58. Dunnell, R. C. (1986). Methodological issues in Americanist artifact classification. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 9: 149-207.
59. Edmonds, M. (1990). Description, understanding and the chaine operatoire. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 9: 55-70.
60. Féblot-Augustins, J. (1993). Mobility strategies in the Late Middle Paleolithic of central Europe and western Europe: Elements of stability and variability. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 12: 211-265.
61. Felgenhauer, F. (1952). Zur Problematik des späten Palaeolithikums in Österreich. Archaeologia Austriaca 10: 1-15.
62. Felgenhauer, F. (1956-59). Willendorf in der Wachau. Mitteilungen der Prahistorische Kommission der Osterreichische Akademie der Wissenschaft 4.
63. Felgenhauer, F. (1995-96). Aggsbachien - Gravettien - Pavlovien. Zur Frage nomenklatorischer Prioritäten in der Urgeschichtsforschung. Mitteilungen der Anthropologischen Gesellschaft in Wien 75-76: 249-257.
64. Fink, J. (1962). Studien zur absoluten und relativen Chronologie der fossilen Boden in Osterreich. Arche ologia Austriaca 31: 1-18.
65. Fish, P. (1981). Beyond tools: Middle Paleolithic id-cont analysis and cultural inference. Journal of Archaeological Research 38: 374-386.
66. Fladmark, K. R. (1982). Microdébitage analysis: Initial considerations. Journal of Archaeological Science 9: 205-220.
67. Flenniken, J. J. (1984). The past, present and future of flintknapping: An anthropological perspective. Annual Review of Anthropology 13: 187-203.
68. Flenniken, J. J., and Wilke, P. (1989). Typology, technology, and chronology of Great Basin dart points. American Anthropologist 91: 149-158.
69. Ford, J. A. (1954). On the concept of types. American Anthropologist 56: 42-54.
70. Ford, J. A. (1961). In favor of simple typology. American Antiquity 27: 113-114.
71. Gamble, C. S. (1986). The Paleolithic Settlement of Europe, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
72. Gardin, J.-C. (1980). Archaeological Constructs, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
73. Geneste, J. M. (1990). Development des systémes de production lithique au cours du Paléolithique moyen en Aquitaine septentrionale. In Farizy, C. (ed.), Paléolithique supérieur ancien en Europe, Mémoires du Musée de Préhistoire d'Ille de Autriche, Nemours, pp. 203-213.
74. Gero, J. (1991). Genderlithics: Women's roles in stone tool production. In Gero, J. M., and Conkey, M. W. (eds.), Engendering Archaeology, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 163-194.
75. Giddings, J. L. (1956). The burin spall artifact. Arctic 9: 229-237.
76. Gramley, R. (1980). Raw material source areas and curated tool assemblages. American Antiquity 45: 823-33.
77. Green, S. W., and Perlman, S. M. (eds.), (1985). The Archaeology of Frontiers and Boundaries. Academic Press, Orlando.
78. Haesaerts, P. (1990). Nouvelles Recherches au gisement de Willendorf (Basse Autriche). Bulletin van het Koninklijk Belgisch Insitut voor Naturrwetenschappen, Aardwetenschappen 60: 203-218.
79. Hahn, J. (1972). Das aurignacien in Mittel-und Osteuropa. Acta Praehistorica et Archaeologica 3: 77-107.
80. Hahn, J. (1977). Aurignacien: das ältere Jungpaläolithikum in Mittel- und Osteuropa. Köln: Funda-menta Reihe A/9.
81. Hayden, B. (1984). Are emic types relevant to archaeology? Ethnohistory 31: 79-92.
82. Hayden, B. (1987). From chopper to celt: The evolution of resharpening techniques. Lithic Technology 16: 33-43.
83. Hayden, B. (ed.) (1979). Lithic Use-Wear Analysis, Academic Press, New York.
84. Hays, M., and Lucas, G. (2000). A technological and functional analysis of carinates from Le Flageolet I, Dordogne, France. Journal of Field Archaeology 27: 455-465.
85. Hegmon, M. (1992). Archaeological research on style. Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 517-36.
86. Henry, D. O. (1974). The utilization of the microburin technique in the Levant. Paléorient 2: 389-398.
87. Henry, D.O., and Odell, G. H. (eds.) (1989). Alternative Approaches to Lithic Analysis. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, no. 1.
88. Hill, J. N., and Evans, R. K. (1972). A model for classification and typology. In Clarke, D. (ed.), Models in Archaeology, Methuen, London, pp. 231-273.
89. Ingold, T. (1988). Tools, minds and machines: An excursion in the philosophy of technology. Techniques et Culture 12: 151-176.
90. Ingold, T. (1990). Society, nature and the concept of technology. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 9: 5-17.
91. Jelinek, A. J. (1976). Form, function and style in lithic analysis. In Cleland, C. E. (ed.), Cultural Change and Continuity: Essays in Honor of James Bennet Griffin, Academic Press, New York, pp. 19-33.
92. Jelinek, A. J. (1988). Technology, typology, and culture in the Middle Palaeolithic. In Dibble, H. L., and Montet-White, A. (eds.), Upper Pleistocene Western Eurasia, University Museum, Philadelphia, pp. 199-212.
93. Jelinek, A. J. (1991). Observations on reduction patterns and raw materials in some Middle Paleolithic industries in the Perigord. In Montet-White, A., and Holen, S. (eds.), Raw Material Economies among Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherers, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, pp. 7-31.
94. Johnson, J. K., and Morrow, C. A. (eds.) (1987). The Organization of Core Technology, Westview Press, Westview Special Studies in Arch. Research, Boulder, Colorado.
95. Keeley, L. (1974). Technique and methodology in microwear studies: A critical review. World Archaeology 5: 323-336.
96. Keeley, L. (1980). Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses. Chicago University Press, Chicago.
97. Keeley, L. (1987). Hafting and retooling: Effects on the archaeological record. American Antiquity 47: 798-80.
98. Kelley, H. (1954). Burins levalloisiens. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 51: 419-428.
99. Kelley, H. (1955). Burins acheuléens. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 52: 278-283.
100. Klejn, L. S. (1982). Archaeological Typology. BAR International Series 153.
101. Klíma, B. (1954). Pavlov, nové paleoliticke sidliste na jizni Morave. Archeologické rozhledy 6: 137-142.
102. Klíma, B. (1959). Zur Problematik des Aurignacien und Gravettien in Mittel-Europa. Archaeologia Austriaca 26: 35-51.
103. Klíma, B. (1963). Dolní Vestonice. CSAV, Praha.
104. Klíma, B. (1967). Pavlovien a jeho vztahy ve strední Evrope. Archaeologicke rozhledy 19: 558.
105. Klíma, B. (1968). Das Pavlovien in den Weinberghölen von Mauern. Quartär 19: 263.
106. Klíma, B. (1976). Die palaolithische station Pavlov IL Prírodovedné práce ustavu CSAV v Brne X/4. Academia, Praha.
107. Klíma, B. (1994). Dejiny vyzkumu. In Svoboda, J. (ed.), Pavlov 1952-53, ERAUL 66. Monograph Series in Archaeology, University of Liége, Belgium, pp. 2-10.
108. Klíma, B. (ed.) (1976). Périgordien et Gravettien en Europe. Nice, U.I.S.P.P., IX Congrés, Colloque XV.
109. Knecht, H. (1988). Upper Paleolithic Burins: Type, Form and Function. BAR International Series 434.
110. Knutsson, K. (1988a). Patterns of tool use. Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis, AUN 10, Uppsala.
111. Knutsson, K. (1988b). Making and using stone tools. Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis, AUN 11, Uppsala.
112. Kozlowski, J. K. (1986). The Gravettian in Central and Eastern Europe. Advances in World Archaeology 5: 131-200.
113. Kozlowski, J. K. (ed.) (1976). L'Aurignacien en Europe. Nice, U.I.S.P.P., IX Congrés, Colloque XVI.
114. Krieger, A. (1944). The typological concept. American Antiquity 3: 271-288.
115. Kuhn, S. L. (1991). 'Unpacking' reduction: Lithic raw material economy in the Mousterian of west-central Italy. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 10: 76-106.
116. Kuhn, S. L. (1992). Blank form and reduction as determinants of Mousterian scraper morphology. American Antiquity 57: 115-128.
117. Kuhn, S. L. (1994). A formal approach to the design and assembly of mobile toolkits. American Antiquity 59: 426-442.
118. Layton, E. T. (1974). Technology as knowledge. Technology and Culture 15: 31-41.
119. Leakey, M. D. (1971). Olduvai Gorge: Excavations in beds I and II, 1960-1963. Cambridge University Press, London.
120. Lechtman, H. (1977). Style in technology - Some early thoughts. In Lechtman, H., and Merrill, R. S. (eds.), Material Culture, Styles, Organization, and Dynamics of Technology. West Publishing, St. Paul, Minnesota, pp. 3-20.
121. Lechtman, H. (1984). Andean value systems and the development of prehistoric metallurgy. Technology and Culture 15: 1-36.
122. Lemonnier, P. (1986). The study of material culture today: Towards an anthropology of technical systems. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 5: 147-186.
123. Lemonnier, P. (1992). Elements for an Anthropology of Technology. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
124. Lucas, G. (1999). Production expérimental de lamelles torses: Approche préliminaire. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 96: 146-151.
125. Lurie, R. (1990). Lithic technology and mobility strategies: The Koster Site Middle Archaic. In Torrence, R. (ed.), Time, Energy, and Stone Tools, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 46-56.
126. Mansur, M. E. (1982). Microwear analysis of natural and use striations: New clues to the mechanism of striation formation. Studia Praehistorica Belgica 2: 213-233.
127. Marshack, A. (1972). Roots of Civilization, McGraw Hill, New York.
128. Moloney, N., and Shott, M. J. (eds.) (1999). Lithic Analysis at the Millennium. Institute of Archaeology, London.
129. Montet-White, A. (1991). Lithic acquisition, settlements, and territory in the Epigravettian of Central Europe. In Montet-White, A., and Holen, S. (eds.), Raw Material Economies Among Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherers, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, pp. 205-220.
130. Montet-White, A., and Holen, S. (eds.) (1991). Raw Material Economies among Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherers. University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.
131. Moss, E. (1983). The Functional Analysis of Flint Implements - Pincevent and Pont d'Ambon: Two Case Studies from the French Final Palaeolithic. BAR International Series 177.
132. Movius, H. (1968). Note on the history of the discovery and recognition of the function of burins as tools. In Vaufrey, R. (ed.), La Préhistoire, Problémes et Tendences, C.N.R.S., Paris, pp. 311-318.
133. Neeley, M. P., and Barton, M. C. (1994). A new approach to interpreting late Pleistocene id-contin industries in Southwest Asia. Antiquity 68: 275-288.
134. Neugebauer-Maresch, Ch. (ed.), ( 1993). Niederösterreich in Urgeschichte, Wien.
135. Newcomer, M. (1974). Study and replication of bone tools from Ksar Akil (Lebanon). World Archaeology 6: 138-153.
136. Noone, H. V. V. (1934). A classification of flint burins or gravers. Journal of Royal Anthropological Institute 64: 81-92.
137. Noone, H. V. V. (1950). Notes on flint burins of the Vézére (Dordogne) sites. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 16: 186-191.
138. O'Brien, M. J., and Lyman, R. L. (2003). Cladistics and Archaeology, The University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.
139. Odell, G. H. (1979). A new improved system for the retrieval of functional information from microscopic observation of chipped stone tools. In Hayden, B. (ed.), Lithic Use-Wear Analysis, Academic Press, New York, pp. 39-244.
140. Odell, G. H. (1982). Emerging directions in the analysis of prehistoric tool use. Reviews in Anthropology 9: 17-33.
141. Odell, G. H. (1988). Addressing prehistoric hunting practices through stone tool analysis. American Anthropologist 90: 335-356.
142. Odell, G. H. (1994a). The role of stone bladelets in Middle Woodland Society. American Antiquity 59: 102-120.
143. Odell, G. H. (1994b). Prehistoric hafting and mobility in the North American id-continent: Examples from Illinois. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 13: 51-73.
144. Odell, G. H. (2000). Stone tool research at the end of the millennium: Procurement and technology. Journal of Archaeological Research 8: 269-331.
145. Odell, G. H. (2001). Stone tool research at the end of the millennium: Classification, function and behavior. Journal of Archaeological Research 9: 45-100.
146. Otte, M. (1981). Le Gravettien en Europe centrale. Dissertationes Archaeologicae Gandenses 20.
147. Otte, M. (1990). Révision de la séquence du Paléolithique Supérieur de Willendorf (Autriche). Bulletin van het Koninklijk Belgisch Insitut voor Naturrwetenschappen, Aardwetenschappen 60: 219-228.
148. Pelegrin, J. (1990). Prehistoric lithic technology: Some aspects of research. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 9: 116-125.
149. Pelegrin, J., Karlin, C., and Bodu, P. (1988). 'Chaines opératoires': Un outil pour le préhistorien. In Tixier, J. (ed.), Technologie Préhistorique, CNRS, Paris, pp. 55-62.
150. Pfaffenberger, B. (1992). Social anthropology of technology. Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 491-516.
151. Phillipson, D. W. (1985). African Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
152. Plisson, H. (1985). Étude fonctionelle d'outillages lithiques préhistorique par l'analyse des micro-usures: recherche méthodologique et archaeologique. Thése, Science Humaine, Université de Paris 1, Paris.
153. Pradel, L. (1971). A new classification of burins. Current Anthropology 12: 562-563.
154. Prošek, F. (1953). Szeletien na Slovensku. Slovenská archeologia 1: 133-164.
155. Ricklis, R. A. (1993). Examining lithic technological organization as a dynamic cultural subsystem: The advantages of an explicitly spatial approach. American Antiquity 58: 444-461.
156. Riddington, R. (1982). Technology, world view and adaptive strategy in a northern hunting society. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 19: 469-481.
157. Riddington, R. (1988). Knowledge, power, and the individual in subarctic hunting societies. American Anthropologist 90: 98-110.
158. Rigaud, A. (1972). La technologie du burin appliqué au matériel osseux de la Garenne (Indre). Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 69: 104-108.
159. Rolland, N. (1981). The interpretation of Middle Paleolithic variability. Man 16: 15-42.
160. Rolland, N. (1988). Observations on some middle Paleolithic time series in southern France. In Dibble, H., and Montet-White, A. (eds.), Upper Pleistocene Prehistory of Western Eurasia. University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, pp. 161-180.
161. Rolland, N., and Dibble, H. (1990). A new synthesis of Middle Paleolithic variability. American Antiquity 55: 480-499.
162. Rollefson, G. O. (1988). Stratified burin classes at 'Ain Ghazal: Implications for the Deert Neolithic of Jordan. In Garrard, A., and Gebel, H. G. (eds.), The Prehistory of Jordan, British Archaeological Reports International Series, Oxford, 396, pp. 437-449.
163. Roux, V. (2003). A dynamic systems framework for studying technological change: Application to the emergence of the potter's wheel in the Southern Levant. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 10: 1-30.
164. Sackett, J. R. (1977). The meaning of style in archaeology: A general model. American Antiquity 42: 369-380.
165. Sackett, J. R. (1981). From de Mortillet to Bordes: A century of French Paleolithic research. In Daniel, G. (ed.), Towards a History of Archaeology, Thames & Hudson, London, pp. 85-99.
166. Sackett, J. R. (1982). Approaches to style in lithic archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1: 59-112.
167. Sackett, J. R. (1989). Statistics, attributes, and the dynamics of burin typology. In Henry, D. O., and Odell, G. H. (eds.), Alternative Approaches to Lithic Analysis, Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, no. 1, pp. 51-82.
168. Sackett, J. R. (1991). Straight archaeology French style: The phylogenetic paradigm in historic perspective. In Clark, G. (ed.), Perspectives on the Past, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 109-139.
169. Salomon, J.-J. (1990). What is technology? The issue of its origins and definitions. In Bhattacharya, S., and Redondi, P. (eds.), Techniques to Technology: A French Historiography of Technology. Sangam Books, Hyderabad, pp. 242-284.
170. Sassaman, K. (1992). Lithic technology and the hunter-gatherer sexual division of labor. North American Archaeology 13: 249-262.
171. Schiffer, M. B. (ed.) (2001). Anthropological Perspectives on Technology, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.
172. Schiffer, M. B., and Skibo, J. M. (1997). The explanation of artifact variability. American Antiquity 62: 27-50.
173. Shott, M. J. (1986). Settlement mobility and technological organization: An ethnographic examination. Journal of Anthropological Research 42: 15-51.
174. Shott, M. J. (1994). Size and form in the analysis of flake debris: Review and recent approaches. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1: 69-110.
175. Shott, M. J. (1997). Activity and formation as a source of variation in Great Lakes Paleoindian assemblages. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 22: 197-236.
176. Shott, M. J. (2003). Size as a factor in Middle Paleolithic assemblage variation in the Old World: A North American perspective. In Moloney, N., and Shott, M. J. (eds.), Lithic Analysis at the Millennium, Institute of Archaeology, London pp. 137-149
177. Siman, K. (1990). Considerations on the Szeletian unity. Feuilles de pierre: les industries a pointes foliacées de Paléolithique supérieur européen, Etudes et recherches archéologiques de l'Université de Liége; No. 42, pp. 189-198.
178. Sinclair, A. (1995). The technique as symbol in Late Glacial Europe. World Archaeology 27: 50-62.
179. Skibo, J., and Feinman, G. (1999). Pottery and People: A Dynamic Interaction. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.
180. Sliva, R. J., and Keeley, L. H. (1994). Frits and specialized hide preparation in the Belgian Early Neolithic. Journal of Archaeological Science 21: 91-99.
181. Smolíková, L. (1991). Soil micromorphologic investigation of the section at Dolní Vestonice II. In Svoboda, J. (ed.), Dolní Vestonice II - Western Slope, ERAUL 54. Monograph Series in Archaeology, University of Liege, Belgium, pp. 65-74.
182. Spaulding, A. C. (1953). Statistical techniques for the discovery of artifact types. American Antiquity 18: 305-314.
183. Stiner, M. C., and Kuhn, S. L. (1992). Subsistence, technology, and adaptive variation in the Middle Palaeolithic. American Anthropologist 94: 306-339.
184. Sullivan, A., and Rozen, K. (1985). Debitage analysis and archaeological interpretation. American Antiquity 50: 755-779.
185. Svoboda, J. (1983). Raw material sources in Early Upper Paleolithic Moravia. The concept of lithic exploitation areas. Anthropologie 21: 147-158.
186. Svoboda, J. (1989). Middle Pleistocene adaptations in Central Europe. Journal of World Prehistory 3: 33-70.
187. Svoboda, J. (1994). Pavlov site, Czech Republic: Lithic evidence from the Upper Paleolithic. Journal of Field Archaeology 21: 69-81.
188. Svoboda, J., and Simán, K. (1989). Middle-Upper Paleolithic transition in southeastern central Europe. Journal of World Prehistory. 3: 283-322.
189. Svoboda, J. (ed.) (1987). Stránská skála. Bohunicky typ v brnenská kotline. Studie AU CSAV Brno 14(1).
190. Svoboda, J. (ed.) (199 la). Paleolit Moravy a Slezska. CSAV, Archeologicky Ustav Brno.
191. Svoboda, J. (ed.) (1991b). Dolní Vestonice II - Western Slope. ERAUL 54. Monograph Series in Archaeology, University of Liege, Belgium.
192. Svoboda, J. (ed.) (1994). Pavlov 1952-53. ERAUL 66. Monograph Series in Archaeology, University of Liége, Belgium.
193. Svoboda, J., Lozek, V., and Vlcek, E. (1996). Hunters between East and West: The Paleolithic of Moravia. Plenum Press, New York.
194. Svobodová, H. (1991). The pollen analysis of Dolní Vestonice II, section No. 1. In Svoboda, J. (ed.), Dolní Vestonice II - Western Slope, ERAUL 54. Monograph Series in Archaeology, University of Liege, Belgium, pp. 75-88.
195. Svobodová, H., and Svoboda, J. (1988). La chronostratigraphie et paléoécologie du Paléolithique supérieur morave d'après les fouilles récentes. In Tuffreau, A., Cultures et industries lithiques en milieu loessique, Revue archéologique de Picardie, Direction des Antiquités, Amiens, pp. 11-15.
196. Symens, N. (1986). A functional analysis of selected stone artifacts from the Magdalenian site at Verbérie. Journal of Field Archaeology 13: 213-222.
197. Tixier, J. (1963). Typologie de L'Epipaléolithique du Maghreb. Mémoires du Centre de Recherches Anthropologiques Préhistoriques et Ethnographiques 2. Alger, AMG, Paris.
198. Tomášková, S. (1991). Use-wear analysis of the lithic material from Dolní Vstonice, Czechoslovakia. In Svoboda, J. (ed.), Dolní Vstonice II - Western Slope, ERAUL 54. Monograph Series in Archaeology, University of Liege, Belgium, pp. 28-40.
199. Tomášková, S. (2000). The Nature of Difference: History and Lithics at Two Upper Paleolithic Sites in Central Europe. B.A.R. International Series 880, Archaeopress, Oxford.
200. Tomášková, S. (2003). Nationalism, local histories and the making of data in archaeology. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 9: 485-507.
201. Trigger, B. (1989). A History of Archaeological Thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
202. Tringham, R. E., Cooper, G., Odell, G., Voytek, B., and Whitman, A. (1974). Experimentation in the formation of edge damage: A new approach to lithic analysis. Journal of Field Archaeology 1: 171-196.
203. Valoch, K. (1981). Beitrag zur Kenntnis des Pavlovien. Archeologické Rozhledy 33: 279-298.
204. Valoch, K. (1986). Les questions du Pavlovien. Antiquit́s Nationales 18: 55-62.
205. Vaughan, P. C. (1985a). Use-wear Analysis of Flaked Stone Tools. University of Arizona, Tucson.
206. Vaughan, P. C. (1985b). The burin-blow technique: Creator or eliminator? Journal of Field Archaeology 12: 488-496.
207. Watson, P. J., LeBlanc, S. A., and Redman, C. L. (1984). Archeological Explanation: The Scientific Method in Archeology. Columbia University Press, New York.
208. Whallon, R., and Brown, J. (eds). ( 1982). Essays in Archaeological Typology. Center for American Archaeology Press, Evanston.
209. Wiessner, P. (1983). Style and social information in Kalahari San projectile points. American Antiquity 48: 253-276.
210. Wright, R. V. S. (1991). Technological styles: Transferring a natural material into a cultural object. In Kingery, W., and S. Luber (eds.), Learning from Things: Working Papers on Material Culture. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 242-269.
211. Wright, R. V. S. (ed.) (1977) Stone Tools as Cultural Markers. Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, Canberra.
212. Wylie, A. (1985). The reaction against analogy. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.), Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 8, Academic Press, New York, pp. 63-111.
213. Wylie, A. (1992). A hierarchy of purposes: Typological theory and practice. Current Anthropology 33: 486-491.
214. Wynn, T. (1995). Handaxe enigmas. World Archaeology 27: 10-24.