Cheap, regular, and reliable: Implications of design variation in late pleistocene Japanese microblade technology

Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 95-102

  Bleed, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85040391079     PISSN: 1551823X     EISSN: 15518248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/ap3a.2002.12.1.95     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Bleed, P., 1986 The Optimal Design of Hunting Weapons: Maintainability or Reliability. American Antiquity 51(4): 737-747.
2. Bleed, P., 1991 Operations Research and Archaeology. American Antiquity 56(1): 19-35.
3. Bleed, P., 1993 Wedge-Shaped Cores from Fukui Cave and the Organization of Japanese Terminal Paleolithic Technology. InSenshigaku to Kanrenkagaku. S.Chiba, ed. Pp. 25-36. Sapporo.
4. Bleed, P., 1996 Risk and Cost in Japanese Microblade Production. Lithic Technology 21: 95-107.
5. Bleed, P., 2001 Trees or Chains, Links or Branches: Conceptual Alternatives for Consideration of Sequential Activities. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory m): 101-127.
6. Chard, C. S., 1974 Northeast Asia in Prehistory. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
7. Imamura, K., 1996 Prehistoric Japan: Mew Perspectives of Insular East Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
8. Sutoh, T., 1990 The Araya Site: Results of the Second and Third Term Excavations. Department of Archaeology, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
9. Uno, S., and S. Ueno., 1983 Kakuniyama. InNihon no Kyuseki Bunka, vol. 2: Iseki to Ibutsu. Y.Aso, S.Kato, and T.Fujimoto, eds.Pp. 96-112. Tokyo: Oyama.