Dynamics of Hohokam obsidian circulation in the North American Southwest

Antiquity

Volumn 73, Issue 282, 1999, Pages 836-845

  Bayman, James M ^a   Shackley, M Steven ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Archaeology; Exchange; Hohokam; North American; Obsidian

Indexed keywords

ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE; HISTORICAL GEOGRAPHY; OBSIDIAN; TRADE FLOW;

ARIZONA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0033369360     PISSN: 0003598X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0003598X00065571     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. ANDREFSKY, W., JR. 1999. Lithics: macroscopic approaches to analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. BAYMAN, J.M. 1995. Rethinking 'redistribution' in the archaeological record: obsidian exchange at the Marana platform mound, Journal of Anthropological Research 51: 37-63.
3. 1996. Shell ornament consumption in a Classic Hohokam platform mound community center, Journal of Field Archaeology 23(4): 403-20.
4. 1999. Craft economies in the North American Southwest, Journal of Archaeological Research 7(3): 249-99.
5. CROWN, P.L. 1991a. The role of exchange and interaction in Salt-Gila basin Hohokam prehistory, in G.J. Gumerman (ed.), Exploring the Hohokam: prehistoric desert peoples of the American Southwest: 231-78. Albuquerque (NM): University of New Mexico Press.
6. 1991b. The Hohokam: current views of the prehistory and the regional system, in Crown & Judge (ed.): 135-57.
7. CROWN, P.L. & W.J. JUDGE (ed.). 1991. Chaco & Hohokam: prehistoric regional systems in the American Southwest. Santa Fe (NM): School of American Research Press.
8. DOOLITTLE, W.E. 1990. Canal irrigation in prehistoric Mexico: the sequence of technological change. Austin (TX): University of Texas Press.
9. DOYEL, D.R. 1991. Hohokam exchange and interaction, in Crown & Judge (ed.): 225-52.
10. 1996 Production and exchange of obsidian artifacts at the Gatlin site, southwestern Arizona, The Kiva 62(1): 45-60.
11. ERICSON, J.E. 1982. Production for obsidian exchange in California, in J.E. Ericson & T.K. Earle (ed.), Contexts for prehistoric exchange: 129-48. New York (NY): Academic Press.
12. EVANS, J. & H.F. HILLMAN. 1981 Casa Grande, an ancient astronomical observatory, Arizona Highways 57(10): 32.
13. FEWKES, J.W. 1912. Casa Grande, Arizona, in Twenty-Eighth Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology: 25-179. Washington (DC): Government Printing Office.
14. GLADWIN, H.S. 1928. Excavations at Casa Grande, Arizona. Los Angeles (CA): Southwest Museum. Southwest Museum Papers 2.
15. HASTINGS, R. 1934. Report of archaeological excavations at Casa Grande National Monument under C.W.A. Program, monthly report of the Southwestern Monuments Association, March 1934, supplement. Globe (AZ): Gila Pueblo.
16. HUCKELL, B.B. 1981. The Las Colinas flaked stone assemblage, in L.C. Hammack & A.P. Sullivan (ed.), The 1968 excavations at mound 8 Las Colinas ruins group. Phoenix, Arizona: 171-99. Tucson (AZ): University of Arizona. Arizona State Museum Archaeological Series 154.
17. HUGHES, R.E. 1998. On reliability, validity, and scale in obsidian sourcing research, in A.F. Ramenofsky & A. Steffer (ed.), Unit issues in archaeology: measuring time, space, and material: 103-14. Salt Lake City (UT): University of Utah Press.
18. LINDAUER, O. & J.H. BLITZ. 1997. Higher ground: the archaeology of North American platform mounds, Journal of Archaeological Research 5(2): 169-207.
19. MCGUIRE, R.H. & A.V. HOWARD. 1987. The structure and organization of Hohokam shell exchange. The Kiva 52(2): 113-46.
20. MINDELEFF, C. 1896. Casa Grande Ruin, in Thirteenth annual report of the bureau of American Ethnology, 1891-1892. Washington (DC): Government Printing Office.
21. MITCHELL, D.R. & M.S. SHACKLEY. 1995. Classic period Hohokam obsidian studies in southern Arizona, Journal of Field Archaeology 22: 291-304.
22. NELSON, R.S. 1991. Hohokam marine shell exchange and artifacts. Tucson (AZ): University of Arizona. Arizona State Museum Archaeological Series 179.
23. PETERSON, J., D.R. MITCHELL & M.S. SHACKLEY. 1997. The social and economic contexts of lithic procurement: obsidian from Classic-period Hohokam sites, American Antiquity 62(2): 231-59.
24. RENFREW, C. 1977. Alternative models for exchange and spatial distribution, in T.K. Earle & J.E. Ericson (ed.), Exchange systems in prehistory: 71-90. New York (NY): Academic Press.
25. SAHLINS, M. 1972. Stone age economics. Chicago (IL): Aldine Publishing.
26. SHACKLEY, M.S. 1998a. Intrasource chemical variability and secondary depositional processes: lessons from the American Southwest, in M.S. Shackley (ed.), Archaeological obsidian studies method and theory: 83-102. New York (NY): Plenum Press. Advances in Archeological & Museum Science 3.
27. 1998b. An energy-dispersive x-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) analysis of obsidian artifacts from pre-classic contexts at the Grewe Site, central Arizona. Report prepared for Northland Research, Inc., Tempe, Arizona.
28. 1995. Sources of archaeological obsidian in the greater American Southwest: an update and quantitative analysis, American Antiquity 60: 531-51.
29. 1988 Sources of archaeological obsidian in the Southwest: an archaeological, petrological, and geochemical study, American Antiquity 53(4): 752-72.
30. STEEN, C. 1965. Excavations in compound A, Casa Grande National Monument, 1963, The Kiva 31(2): 59-82.
31. WARD, G. 1977. On the ease of 'sourcing' artefacts and the difficulty of knowing prehistory, New Zealand Archaeological Society Newsletter 20: 188-94.
32. WHITE, J.P. & M.N. HARRIS. 1997. Changing sources: early Lapita period obsidian in the Bismark archipelago, Archaeology in Oceania 32: 97-107.
33. WILCOX, D.R. & L.O. SHENK. 1977. The architecture of the Casa Grande and its interpretation. Tucson (AZ): Arizona State Museum. Archaeological Series 115.
34. WILCOX, D.R. & C. STERNBERG. 1983. Hohokam ball courts and their interpretation. Tucson (AZ): Arizona State Museum. Archaeological Series 160.
35. WOODWARD, A. 1931. The Grewe Site. Los Angeles (CA): Los Angeles Museum of History. Science, and Art. Occasional Paper 1.