Obviously sequential, but continuous or staged? Refits and cognition in three late paleolithic assemblages from Japan

Journal of Anthropological Archaeology

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 329-343

  Bleed, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036750542     PISSN: 02784165     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0278-4165(02)00001-6     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Binford, L.R., 1985. Human ancestors: changing views of their behavior. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 4, 292-327.
2. Bleed, P., 1991. Operations research and archaeology. American Archeology 56, 19-35.
3. Bleed, P., 1996. Risk and cost in Japanese microblade technology. Lithic Technology 21, 95-107.
4. Bleed, P., 1997. Content as variability, results as selection: toward a behavioral definition of technology. In: Barton, C.M., Clark, G. (Eds.), Rediscovering Darwin: Evolutionary Theory and Archaeological Explanation. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, vol. 7. American Anthropological Association, Washington, pp. 95-104.
5. Bleed, P., 2001. Trees or branches, links or chain: archaeological models for the consideration of sequential activities. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 8 (1), 101-127.
6. Bleed, P. A Descriptive Catalog of Refitted Lithic Materials from Three Late Paleolithic Sites in Japan: Isoyama, Iwato, and Mosanru. Tohoku University Museum Bulletin. Tohoku University, Sendai (in press).
7. Bradley, B., 1974. Comments on the lithic technology of the Casper site materials. In: Frison, G. (Ed.), The Casper Site: a Hell Gap Bison Kill on the High Plains. Academic Press, New York, pp. 191-198.
8. Buzan, T., 1985. Make the Most of Your Mind. Simon and Schuster, New York.
9. Byers, H.M., 1999. Intentionality, symbolic pragmatics and material culture: revisiting Binford's view of the Old Copper Culture Complex. American Antiquity 64, 265-287.
10. Callahan, E., 1979. The basics of biface knapping in the eastern fluted point tradition: a manual for flintknappers and lithic analysts. Archaeology of Eastern North America 7, 1-179.
11. Chase, P.G., 1991. Symbols and paleolithic artifact: style standardization and the imposition of arbitrary form. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 10, 193-214.
12. Close, A., 2000. Reconstructing movement in prehistory. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 7, 49-77.
13. Collins, M.B., 1975. Lithic technology as a means of processual inference. In: Earl, Swanson (Ed.), Lithic Technology: Making and Using Stone Tools. Mouton, The Hague, pp. 15-34.
14. Dibble, H.L., 1987. The interpretation of middle paleolithic scraper morphology. American Antiquity 52, 109-117.
15. Dobres, M.A. (Ed.), 2000. Technology and Social Agency: Outlining a Practice Framework for Archaeology. Blackwell, London.
16. Donald, M., 1991. Origins of the Modern Mind: Three Stages in the Evolution of Culture and Cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
17. Flenniken, J.J., 1985. Stone tools reduction techniques as cultural markers. In: Plew, M., Wood, J., Pavesic, M. (Eds.), Stone tool analysis: Essays in Honors of Don E, Crabtree. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, pp. 265-276.
18. Frison, G., Bradley, B., 1980. Folsom Tools and Technology at the Hanson Site, Wyoming. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.
19. Gibson, K., Ingold, T. (Eds.), 1993. Tools, Language, and Cognition in Human Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
20. Hofman, J., 1992. Putting the pieces together: an introduction to refitting. In: Jack Hofman, J.J.G., Enloe, (Eds.), Piecing Together the Past: Applications of Refitting Studies in Archaeology. British Archaeology Report, International Series, Oxford, vol. 578, pp. 1-20.
21. Ingbar, E.E., Marylou, L., Bradley, B.A., 1989. A nontypological approach to debitage analysis. In: Amick, D., Mauldin, R. (Eds.), Experiments in Lithic Technology. British Archaeology Report, International Series, Oxford, vol. 528, pp. 117-135.
22. Kajiwara, H., Akoshima, K., 1981. An experimental study of microwear polish on shale artifacts. Kokogaku Zasshi 67, 1-36 (in Japanese with English summary).
23. Karlin, C., Julien, M., 1994. Prehistoric technology: a cognitive science? In: Renfrew, C., Zubrow, E. (Eds.), The Ancient Mind: Elements of Cognitive Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 152-164.
24. Keller, C.M., Keller, J.D., 1996. Cognition and Tool Use: the Blacksmith at Work. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
25. Kelly, R.L., 1988. Three sides of the biface: tool roles and the organization of technology. American Antiquity 53, 231-244.
26. Koldahoff, B., 1987. The Cahokia flake tool industry: socioeconomic implications for late prehistory in the Central Mississippi valley. In: Johnson, J., Morrow, C. (Eds.), The Organization of Core Technology. Westview Press, Boulder, pp. 151-185.
27. Larson, M.L., Ingbar, E.E., 1992. Perspective of refitting: Critque and a commentary approach. In: Jack, Hofman, Enloe, J.G. (Eds.), Piecing Together the Past: Applications of Refitting Studies in Archaeology. British Archaeological Reports, International Series, Oxford, vol. 578, pp. 151-162.
28. Lemonnier, P., 1986. The study of material culture today: toward an anthropology of technical systems. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 5, 147-186.
29. Lemonnier, P., 1992. Elements for an anthropology of technology. Anthropological Papers, Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, No. 88, Ann Arbor.
30. Machida, H., Arai, F., 1992. Atlas of Tephras in and around Japan. Tokyo University Press. (in Japanese with English title).
31. Mithen, S., 1994. From domain specific to generalized intelligence: a cognitive interpretation of the middle/upper paleolithic transition. In: Renfrew, C., Zubrow, E. (Eds.), The Ancient Mind: Elements of Cognitive Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 29-39.
32. Mithen, S., 1996. The Prehistory of the Mind: The Cognitive Origins of Art, Religion and Science. Thames and Hudson, London.
33. Morrow, J., 1995. Clovis projectile point manufacture: a perspective from the ready/Lincon Hills site, 11JY46, Jersey County, Illinois MCJA. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 20, 167-191.
34. Nelson, M.C., 1991. The study of technological organization. In: Schiffer, M.B. (Ed.), Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 3. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 57-100.
35. Norman, D.A., 1990. The Design of Everyday Things. Doubleday, New York.
36. Odell, G.H., 1994. Prehistoric hafting and mobility in the North American midcontinent: examples from Illinois. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 13, 51-73.
37. Raab, M., Cande, R.F., Stahle, D.W., 1979. Debitage graphs and archaic settlement patterns in the Arkansas Ozarks. Midcontenintal Journal of Archaeology 4, 167-182.
38. Renfrew, C., 1987. Problems in the modeling of sociocultural systems. European Journal of Operational Research 30, 179-192.
39. Renfrew, C., 1994. Toward a cognitive archaeology. In: Renfrew, C., Zubrow, E. (Eds.), The Ancient Mind: Elements of Cognitive Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3-12.
40. Schiffer, M.B., Skibo, J.M., 1997. The explanation of artifact variability. American Antiquity 62, 27-50.
41. Schlanger, N., 1994. Mindful technology: unleasing the chaine operatoire for an archaeology of the mind. In: Renfrew, C., Zubrow, E, (Eds.), The Ancient Mind: Elements of Cognitive Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 143-151.
42. Serizawa, C., 1967a. Kyusekki Jidai no Shomondai. In: Nihon no Rekishi 1. Iwanami Shoten, Tokyo.
43. Serizawa, C., 1967b. Nihon no Kyusekki 4. Kokogaku Jyaanru 5, 7-11.
44. Serizawa, C. (Ed.), 1977. Isoyama: a paleolithic stone industry excavated from the Isoyama site, Tochigi prefecture, Japan. Records of Archaeological Materials No. 1. Department of Archaeology, Faulty of Arts and Letters, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
45. Serizawa, C. (Ed.), 1978. Iwato: a paleolithic stone industry excavated from the Iwato site. Oita prefecture, Japan. Records of Archaeological Materials No. 2. Department of Archaeology, Faulty of Arts and Letters, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
46. Serizawa, C. (Ed.) 1982. Mosanru: a paleolithic stone industry excavated from the Mosanru site, Hokkaido. Records of Archaeological Materials No. 4. Department of Archaeology, Faulty of Arts and Letters, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
47. Shott, M.J., 1994. Size and form in the analysis of flake debris: review and recent approaches. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1, 69-110.
48. Shott, M.J., 1996. Stage versus continuum in the debris assemblage from production of a fluted biface. Lithic Technology 21, 6-22.
49. Stahle, D.W., Dunn, J.E., 1982. An analysis and application of the size distribution of waste flakes from the manufacture of bifacial stone tools. World Archaeology 14, 84-97.
50. Sullivan III, A.P., Rozen, K.C., 1985. Debitage analysis and archaeological interpretation. American Antiquity 50, 755-779.
51. Torrence, R., 1989. Retooling: toward a behavioral theory of stone tools. In: Torrence, R. (Ed.), Time, Energy, and Stone Tools. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 57-66.
52. Wynn, T., 1993a. Two developments in the mind of early Homo. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 12, 299-322.
53. Wynn, T., 1993b. Layers of thinking in tool behavior. In: Gibsin, K., Ingold, T. (Eds.), Tools, Language, and Cognition in Human Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 389-406.
54. Wynn, T., 1995. Hand axe enigmas. World Archaeology 27 (1), 10-24.