Accuracy of the new ICare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 83, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 102-107

  García ResúA, Carlos ^a   González Meijome, José M ^b   Gilino, Jorge ^a   Yebra Pimentel, Eva ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Accuracy; ICare; Intraocular pressure; Perkins tonometry; Portable tonometers; Rebound tonometry; Tono Pen XL

Indexed keywords

PORTABLE EQUIPMENT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; VISION;

ICARE; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; PERKINS TONOMETRY; REBOUND TONOMETRY;

VISION AIDS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL IMAGING; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PORTABLE EQUIPMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; STUDENT T TEST; TONOMETER;

ADULT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 33644629030     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.opx.0000200673.96758.7b     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Kao SF, Lichter PR, Bergstrom TJ, Rowe S, Musch DC. Clinical comparison of the Oculab Tono-Pen to the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Ophthalmology 1987;94:1541-4.
2. Hessemer V, Rossler R, Jacobi KW. Tono-Pen, a new tonometer. Int Ophthalmol 1989;13:51-6.
3. Jorge J, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Diaz-Rey JA, Almeida JB, Ribeiro P, Parafita MA. Clinical performance of non-contact tonometry by Reichert AT550 in glaucomatous patients. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2003;23:503-6.
4. Jorge J, Diaz-Rey JA, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Almeida JB, Parafita MA. Clinical performance of the Reichert AT550: a new non-contact tonometer. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2002;22:560-4.
5. Garcia Resua C, Giraldez Fernandez MJ, Cervino Exposito A, Gonzalez Perez J, Yebra-Pimentel E. Clinical evaluation of the new TGDc-01 'PRA' palpebral tonometer: comparison with contact and non-contact tonometry. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:143-50.
6. Wingert TA, Bassi CJ, McAlister WH, Galanis JC. Clinical evaluation of five portable tonometers. J Am Optom Assoc 1995;66:670-4.
7. Chiara GF, Semes LP, Potter JW, Cutter GR, Tucker WR. Portable tonometers: a clinical comparison of applanation and indentation devices. J Am Optom Assoc 1989;60:105-10.
8. Wilensky JT, Gieser DK, Dietsche ML, Mori MT, Zeimer R. Individual variability in the diurnal intraocular pressure curve. Ophthalmology 1993;100:940-4.
9. Moses RA, Marg E, Oechsli R. Evaluation of the basic validity and clinical usefulness of the Mackay-Marg tonometer. Invest Ophthalmol 1962;1:78-85.
10. Kooner KS, Cooksey JC, Barron JB, Zimmerman TJ, Gupte RK, Wall JL. Tonometry comparison: Goldmann versus Tono-Pen. Ann Ophthalmol 1992;24:29-36.
11. Geyer O, Mayron Y, Loewenstein A, Neudorfer M, Rothkoff L, Lazar M. Tono-Pen tonometry in normal and in post-keratoplasty eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 1992;76:538-40.
12. Midelfart A, Wigers A. Clinical comparison of the ProTon and TonoPen tonometers with the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Br J Ophthalmol 1994;78:895-8.
13. Lim L, Ng TP, Tan DT. Accurate intraocular pressure measurement in contact lens wearers with normal pressures. CLAO J 1997;23: 130-3.
14. Rootman DS, Insler MS, Thompson HW, Parelman J, Poland D, Unterman SR. Accuracy and precision of the Tono-Pen in measuring intraocular pressure after keratoplasty and epikeratophakia and in scarred corneas. Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:1697-700.
15. Mark LK, Asbell PA, Torres MA, Failla SJ. Accuracy of intraocular pressure measurements with two different tonometers through bandage contact lenses. Cornea 1992;11:277-81.
16. Kontiola AI. A new induction-based impact method for measuring intraocular pressure. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2000;78:142-5.
17. Kontiola AI, Goldblum D, Mittag T, Danias J. The induction/impact tonometer: a new instrument to measure intraocular pressure in the rat. Exp Eye Res 2001;73:781-5.
18. Kontiola A, Puska P. Measuring intraocular pressure with the Pulsair 3000 and Rebound tonometers in elderly patients without an anesthetic. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2004;242:3-7.
19. Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 1993;38:1-30.
20. Krakau CE, Wilke K. On repeated tonometry. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1971;49:611-4.
21. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1: 307-10.
22. Andrada Marquez MT, Fesser Oroz I, Anton Lopez A. [Comparative study of two portable tonometers: Tono-Pen XL and Perkins.] Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2003;78:189-96.
23. Evans K, Wishart PK. Intraocular pressure measurement in children using the Keeler Pulsair tonometer. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1992;12: 287-90.
24. Lagerlof O. Airpuff tonometry versus applanation tonometry. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1990;68:221-4.
25. Bricker SR, McGalliard JN, Mostafa SM. The Keeler Pulsair air impulse tonometer. Comparison with the Perkins hand-held applanation tonometer for peri-operative measurement of intra-ocular pressure. Anaesthesia 1990;45:36-9.
26. Shiose Y. Intraocular pressure: new perspectives. Surv Ophthalmol 1990;34:413-35.
27. Moses RA, Arnzen RJ. Instantaneous tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol 1983;101:249-52.
28. Holladay JT, Allison ME, Prager TC. Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with regular corneal astigmatism. Am J Ophthalmol 1983;96:90-3.