Visual field testing with the new Humphrey Matrix: A comparison between the FDT N-30 and Matrix N-30-F tests

Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica

Volumn 84, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 351-356

  Brusini, Paolo ^a   Salvetat, Maria Letizia ^a   Zeppieri, Marco ^a,b   Tosoni, Claudia ^a   Parisi, Lucia ^a   Felletti, Mirella ^a  

^a SANTA MARIA DELLA MISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UDINE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Chronic open angle glaucoma; Frequency doubling technology (FDT); Humphrey Matrix; Ocular hypertension; Visual field testing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ANALYZER; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED PERIMETRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; DISEASE SEVERITY; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION; PLOTS AND CURVES; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TECHNOLOGY; TIME; VISION TEST; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; VISUAL THRESHOLD;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHRONIC DISEASE; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBERS; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PERIMETRY; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 33646798754     PISSN: 13953907     EISSN: 16000420     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00637.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Anderson AJ & Johnson CA (2002): Mechanisms isolated by frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43: 398-401.
2. Anderson AJ, Johnson CA, Fingeret M et al. (2005): Characteristics of the normative database for the Humphrey Matrix perimeter. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46: 1540-1548.
3. Anderson D & Patella V (1999): Automated Static Perimetry. St Louis, Missouri: Mosby 117.
4. Bayer AU & Erb C (2002): Short-wave automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry and pattern electro-retinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects. Ophthalmology 109: 1009-1017.
5. Bland JM & Altman DG (1986): Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1: 307-310.
6. Bosworth CF, Sample PA, Weinreb RN et al. (1999): Is the frequency-doubling illusion visible down to contrast threshold? (ARVO Abstract # 4436.) Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40: S842.
7. Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Berry CC et al. (2001): Detecting early glaucoma by assessment of retinal nerve fibre layer thickness and visual function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42: 1993-2003.
8. Brusini P & Busatto P (1998): Frequency-doubling perimetry in glaucoma early diagnosis. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 76: 23-24.
9. Burnstein Y, Ellish NJ, Magbalon M et al. (2000): Comparison of frequency-doubling perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 129: 314-322.
10. Casson R, James B, Rubinstein A et al. (2001): Clinical comparison of frequency-doubling technology perimetry and Humphrey perimetry. Br J Ophthalmol 85: 369-372.
11. Cellini M & Torreggiani A (2002): Frequency-doubling perimetry in ocular hypertension and chronic open-angle glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 99: 23-25.
12. Cello KE, Nelson-Quigg JM & Johnson CA (2000): Frequency-doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 129: 314-322.
13. Derrington AM & Lennie P (1984): Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivities of neurons in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque. J Physiol 357: 219-240.
14. Glovinsky Y, Quigley HA & Dunkerlberger GT (1991): Retinal ganglion cell loss is size-dependent in experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33: 484-491.
15. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Lindgren A et al. (1991): Extended empirical statistical package for evaluation of single and multiple fields: Statpac 2. In: Mills RP & Heijl A (eds). Perimetry Update, 1990/ 1991. New York/;Milan: Kugler & Ghedini 303-315.
16. Hollò G, Szabò A & Vargha P (2001): Scanning laser polarimetry versus frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional threshold perimetry: Changes during a 12-month follow-up in preperimetric glaucoma. A pilot study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 79: 403-407.
17. Iester M, Capris P, Pandolfo A et al. (2000b): Learning effect, short-term fluctuation and longterm fluctuation in frequency-doubling technique. Am J Ophthalmol 130: 160-164.
18. Iester M, Mermoud A & Schnider C (2000a): Frequency-doubling technique in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Ophthalmology 107: 288-294.
19. Johnson CA (1994): Selective versus non-selective losses in glaucoma. J Glaucoma 3 (Suppl): 32-44.
20. Johnson CA, Cioffi GA & Van Buskirk EM (1999): Frequency-doubling technology perimetry using a 24-2 stimulus presentation pattern. Optom Vis Sci 76: 571-581.
21. Johnson C & Samuels S (1997): Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38: 413-425.
22. Kaplan E & Shapley RM (1982): X and Y cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque monkeys. J Physiol 330: 125-143.
23. Kelly DH (1996): Frequency-doubling in visual responses. J Opt Soc Am 56: 1628-1633.
24. Maddess T, Goldberg I, Dobinson J et al. (1995): Clinical trials of the frequency-doubling illusion as an indicator of glaucoma. (ARVO abstract.) Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36 (Suppl): 335.
25. Maddess T & Henry GH (1992): Performance of non-linear visual unit in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Clin Vision Sci 7: 371-383.
26. Medeiros FA, Sample PA & Weinreb RN (2004): Frequency-doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 137: 863-871.
27. Merigan WH & Eskin TA (1986): Spatio-temporal vision of macaques with severe loss of P-beta retinal ganglion cells. Vision Res 26: 1751-1761.
28. Paczka JA, Friedman DS, Quigley HA et al. (2001): Diagnostic capabilities of frequency-doubling technology, scanning laser polarimetry and nerve fibre layer photographs to distinguish glaucomatous damage. Am J Ophthalmol 131: 188-197.
29. Polo V, Abecia E, Pablo LE et al. (1998): Short-wavelength automated perimetry and retinal nerve fibre layer evaluation in suspected cases of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 116: 1295-1298.
30. Quigley HA (1998): Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency-doubling technology. Am J Ophthalmol 125: 819-829.
31. Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Bagiski TA et al. (1988): Chronic human glaucoma causes selectively greater loss of large optic nerve fibres. Ophthalmology 95: 357-363.
32. Sample PA, Bosworth CF, Blumenthal EZ et al. (2000): Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41: 783-790.
33. Sample PA, Taylor JD, Martinez GA et al. (1993): Short-wavelength colour visual fields in glaucoma suspects at risk. Am J Ophthalmol 115: 225-233.
34. Soliman MA, Jong LA, Ismael AA et al. (2002): Standard achromatic perimetry, short wavelength automated perimetry and frequency-doubling technology for detection of glaucoma damage. Ophthalmology 109: 444-454.
35. Spry PGD & Johnson CA (2002): Within-test variability of frequency-doubling perimetry using a 24-2 test pattern. J Glaucoma 11: 315-320.
36. Spry PG, Johnson CA, Mansberger SL et al. (2005): Psychophysical investigation of ganglion cell loss in early glaucoma. J Glaucoma 14: 11-19.
37. Trible JR, Schultz RO, Robinson JC et al. (2000): Accuracy of glaucoma detection with frequency-doubling perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 129: 740-745.
38. Turpin A, McKendrick AM, Johnson CA et al. (2002): Development of efficient threshold strategies for frequency-doubling technology perimetry using computer simulation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43: 322-331.
39. Tyrell RA & Owens DA (1988): A rapid technique to assess the resting states of the eye and other threshold phenomena: The modified binary search (MOBS). Behav Res Meth Instr Computers 20: 137-141.
40. Wadood AC, Azuara-Blanco A, Aspinall P et al. (2002): Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry and Humphrey Swedish interactive threshold algorithm-fast perimetry in a glaucoma practice. Am J Ophthalmol 133: 327-332.
41. White AJR, Sun H, Swanson WH et al. (2002): An examination of physiological mechanisms underlying the frequency-doubling illusion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43: 3590-3599.