Lecture-free high school biology using an audience response system

American Biology Teacher

Volumn 70, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 531-536

  Barnes, Larry J ^a  

^a Wood River High School

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 58049148115     PISSN: 00027685     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1662/0002-7685-70.9.531     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Burrowes, P. (2003). A student-centered approach to teaching general biology that really works: Lord's constructivist model put to a test. The American Biology Teacher, 65(7), 491-501.
2. Conoley, J. W. (2005). Impacts of an audience response system on high school agriscience applications courses. Ph. D. dissertation, North Carolina State University, 116 pp. Available online at: http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/theses/ available/etd-09022005-121637/.
3. Draper, S. & Brown, M. (2004). Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20(2), 81-94.
4. Dufresne, R. J., Gerace, W. J., Leonard, W. J., Mestre, J. P & Wenk, L. (1996). Classtalk: A classroom communication system for active learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 7, 3-47.
5. Judson, E. & Sawada, D. (2002). Learning from the past and present: Electronic response systems in college lecture halls. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 21(2), 167-181.
6. Kennedy, G. & Cutis, Q. (2005). The association between students' use of an electronic voting system and their learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(4), 260-268.
7. Lord, T. (1998). Cooperative learning that really works in biology teaching. Using constructivist-based activities to challenge student teams The American Biology Teacher, 60(8), 580-588.
8. Lord, T. (2001). 101 reasons for using cooperative learning in biology teaching. The American Biology Teacher, 63(1), 30-38.
9. Lord, T. (2005). A comparison between traditional and constructivist teaching in college biology. Journal of Innovative Higher Education, 21(3), 197-216.
10. Lord, T. & Orkwiszewski, T. (2006). Didactic to inquiry-based instruction in a science laboratory. The American Biology Teacher, 68(6), 342-345.
11. Lowery, R. C. (2005). Teaching and learning with interactive student response systems: A comparison of commercial products in the higher-education market. Annual Meeting of the Southwestern Social Science Association, New Orleans, LA. Available online at: http://people.uncw.edu/lowery/SWSSA%20ms.pdf.
12. Uhari, M., Renko, M. & Soini, H. (2003). Experiences of using an interactive audience response system in lectures. BMC Medical Education, 3, 12. Available online at: doi: 10.1186/1472-692Q-3 -12 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/3/12.
13. Wit, E. (2003). Who wants to be... The use of a personal response system in statistics teaching. MSOR Connections, 3(2), 14-20.
14. Wood, B. (2005). Lecture-free teaching in seven steps. The American Biology Teacher, 67(6), 334-342.