Critical roles for distance, task and motion in space perception: Initial conceptual framework and practical implications

Human Factors

Volumn 50, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 811-820

  DeLucia, Patricia R ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING; MILITARY OPERATIONS;

BEHAVIORAL STUDIES; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; CRITICAL FACTORS; DESIGN TECHNOLOGIES; HUMAN PERFORMANCES; MOVING OBJECTS; MOVING OBSERVERS; NEAR SPACES; NEUROIMAGING; PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS; SPACE PERCEPTIONS; STATIONARY OBJECTS; UNDERLYING MECHANISMS; VIEWING DISTANCES; VISUAL SPACES; WARNING SYSTEMS;

MACHINE DESIGN;

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; OBJECT RELATION; OBSERVER VARIATION; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

DISTANCE PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; SPACE PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 57749189069     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1518/001872008X312297     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Aglioti, S., DeSouza, J. F. X., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology, 5, 679-685.
2. Anderson, N. H. (1974). Algebraic models in perception. In E. C. Carterette & M. P. Friedman (Eds.), Psychophysical judgment and measurement (pp. 215-298). New York: Academic Press.
3. Berti, A., & Frassinetti, F. (2000). When far becomes near: Remapping of space by tool use. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 415-420.
4. Berti, A., Smania, N., & Allport, A. (2001). Coding of far and near space in neglect patients. NeuroImage, 14, S98-S102.
5. Bridgeman, B., Kirch, M., & Sperling, A. (1981). Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion. Perception and Psychophysics, 29, 336-342.
6. Bridgeman, B., Lewis, S., Heit, G., & Nagle, M. (1979). Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 692-700.
7. Bruno, N., & Cutting, J. E. (1988). Minimodularity and the perception of layout. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 161-170.
8. Craighero, L., Fadiga, L., Rizzolatti, G., & Umilta, C. (1999). Action for perception: A motor-visual attentional effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1673-1692.
9. Cutting, J. E., & Vishton, P. M. (1995). Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In W. Epstein & S. Rogers (Eds.), Perception of space and motion (2nd ed., pp. 69-117). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
10. Dassonville, P., Bridgeman, B., Bala, J. K., Thiem, P., & Sampanes, A. (2004). The induced Roelofs effect: Two visual systems or the shift of a single reference frame? Vision Research, 44, 603-611.
11. DeLucia, P. R. (1991). Pictorial and motion-based information for depth perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 738-748.
12. DeLucia, P. R. (2004). Multiple sources of information influence time-to-contact judgments: Do heuristics accommodate limits in sensory and cognitive processes? In H. Hecht & G. J. P. Savelsburgh (Eds.), Time-to-contact (pp. 243-285). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
13. DeLucia, P. R. (2005). Effective information for TTC judgments varies during an approach event [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 5, 330a.
14. DeLucia, P. R., Kaiser, M. K., Bush, J. M., Meyer, L. E., & Sweet, B. T. (2003). Information integration in judgments of time to contact. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 1165-1189.
15. DeLucia, P. R., & Liddell, G. W. (1998). Cognitive motion extrapolation and cognitive clocking in prediction motion tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 901-914.
16. DeLucia, P. R., Mather, R. D., Griswold, J. A., & Mitra, S. (2006). Toward the improvement of image-guided interventions for minimally invasive surgery: Three factors that affect performance. Human Factors, 48, 23-38.
17. DeLucia, P. R., & Tharanathan, A. (2005). Effects of optic flow and discrete warnings on deceleration detection during car-following. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting (pp. 1673-1676). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
18. DeLucia, P. R., & Warren, R. (1994). Pictorial and motion-based depth information during active control of self motion: Size-arrival effects on collision avoidance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 783-798.
19. Gibson, J. J. (1962). Observations on active touch. Psychological Review, 69, 477-491.
20. Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
21. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
22. Gilinsky,A. S. (1951). Perceived size and distance in visual space. Psychological Review, 58, 460-482.
23. Goodale, M. A. (2004). Perceiving the world and grasping it: Dissociations between conscious and unconscious visual processing. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (3rd ed., pp. 1159-1172). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Goodale, M. A., Jakobson, L. S., & Keillor, J. M. (1994). Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements. Neuropsychologia, 32, 1159-1178.
25. Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience, 15, 20-25.
26. Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (2005). Sight unseen: An exploration of conscious and unconscious vision. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27. Goodale, M. A., Milner, A. D., Jakobson, L. S., & Carey, D. P. (1991). A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature, 349, 154-156.
28. Gordon, I. E. (2004). Theories of visual perception (3rd ed.). New York: Psychology Press.
29. Gray, R. (2004). The use and misuse of visual information for "go/ no-go" decisions in driving. In D. A. Hennessy & D. L. Wiesenthal (Eds.), Contemporary issues in road user behavior (pp. 123-132). Hauppauge, NY Nova Science.
30. Gray, R., & Regan, D. (2000). Simulated self-motion alters perceived time to collision. Current Biology, 10, 587-590.
31. Halligan, P. W., & Marshall, J. C. (1991). Left neglect for near but not far space in man. Nature, 350, 498-500.
32. Harman, K. L., Humphrey, G. K., & Goodale, M. A. (1999). Active manual control of object views facilitates visual recognition. Current Biology, 9, 1315-1318.
33. Helmholtz, H., von. (1962). Treatise on physiological optics: III. The perceptions of vision (J. P. C. Southall, Trans.). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1866)
34. Hesketh, B., & Godley, S. T. (2002). A comparison of time estimations in driving with target-only in motion, self-only in motion, and self-and-target in motion. Ecological Psychology, 14, 111-125.
35. Hochberg, J. (1978). Perception (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
36. Hochberg, J. (1982). How big is a stimulus? In J. Beck (Ed.), Organization and representation in perception (pp. 191-217). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Hochberg, J. (1986). Representation of motion and space in video and cinematic displays. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. I. Sensory processes and perception (pp. 22.1-22.64). New York: Wiley.
38. Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., & Jessell, T. M. (2000). Principles of neural science (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
39. Larish, J. F., & Andersen, G. J. (1995). Active control in interrupted dynamic spatial orientation: The detection of orientation change. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 533-545.
40. Lee, D. N. (1976). A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception, 5, 437-459.
41. Li, Z., & Milgram, P. (2008). An empirical investigation of a dynamic brake light concept for reduction of rear-end collisions through manipulation of optical looming. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66, 158-172.
42. Marshall, J. C., & Fink, G. R. (2001). Spatial cognition: Where we were and where we are. NeuroImage, 14, S2-S7.
43. Miller, R., & Huang, Q. (2002). An adaptive peer-to-peer collision warning system. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, 1, 317-321.
44. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
45. Mork, K. S., & DeLucia, P. R. (2007). Visual information in judgments of head-on collisions. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 51st Annual Meeting (pp. 1555-1559). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
46. Norman, J. (1983). Are the direct and indirect theories of perception incompatible? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6, 729-731.
47. Ott, T. E., & DeLucia, P. R. (2006). The aperture illusion can occur with 3-D displays and active control: Implications for minimally invasive surgery. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting (pp. 1901-1904). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
48. Previc, F. H. (1998). The neuropsychology of 3-D space. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 123-164.
49. Probst, T., Krafczyk, S., & Brandt, T. (1987). Object-motion detection affected by concurrent self-motion perception - Applied aspects for vehicle guidance. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 7, 309-314.
50. Reed, E., & Jones, R. (1982). Reasons for realism: Selected essays of James J. Gibson. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Rossetti, Y., & Pisella, L. (2002). Several "vision for action" systems: A guide to dissociating and integrating dorsal and ventral functions [Tutorial]. In W. Prinz & B. Hommell (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX (pp. 62-119). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
52. Schiff, W. (1988). Accuracy of judging time-to-contact in visual and audiovisual events: Event anisotropy. Unpublished manuscript.
53. Schiff, W., & Detwiler, M. (1979). Information used in judging impending collisions. Perception, 8, 647-658.
54. Sdoia, S., Couyoumdjian, A., & Ferlazzo, F. (2004). Opposite visual field asymmetries for egocentric and allocentric spatial judgments. Neuroreport, 15, 1303-1305.
55. Smith, M. R. H., Flach, J. M., Dittman, S. M., & Stanard, T. (2001). Monocular optical constraints on collision control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 395-410.
56. Stappers, P. J. (1989). Forms can be recognized from dynamic occlusion alone. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 68, 243-251.
57. Tharanathan, A., & DeLucia, P. R. (2006). Time-to-collision judgments of constant and nonconstant velocities: Implications for rear-end collisions. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting (pp. 2463-2467). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
58. Tharanathan, A., & DeLucia, P. R. (2007). Detecting the deceleration of a lead car during active control of self motion. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 51st Annual Meeting (pp. 1522-1525). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
59. Tresilian, J. R. (1995). Perceptual and cognitive processes in time-to-contact estimation: Analysis of prediction-mofion and relative judgment tasks. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 231-245.
60. Trevarthen, C. B. (1968). Two mechanisms of vision in primates. Psychologische Forschung, 31, 299-337.
61. Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549-586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
62. Wallach, H., & O'Connell, D. N. (1953). The kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 205-217.
63. Weiss, P. H., Marshall, J. C., Wunderlich, G., Tellmann, L., Halligan, P. W., Freund, H.-J., et al. (2000). Neural consequences of acting in near versus far space: A physiological basis for clinical dissociations. Brain, 123, 2531-2541.